The document discusses the issue of the digital divide in educational technology. It describes how studies in the 1980s already showed differences in technology availability based on socioeconomic status, with wealthier households having greater access to computers and the internet. While the definition of the digital divide has expanded to include differences in access to information, the gap still exists, with 23% of schools lacking adequate internet connectivity and 40% lacking WiFi. Bridging the digital divide is important so that all teachers and students can benefit equally from educational technology resources.
The document discusses the issue of the digital divide in educational technology. It describes how studies in the 1980s already showed differences in technology availability based on socioeconomic status, with wealthier households having greater access to computers and the internet. While the definition of the digital divide has expanded to include differences in access to information, the gap still exists, with 23% of schools lacking adequate internet connectivity and 40% lacking WiFi. Bridging the digital divide is important so that all teachers and students can benefit equally from educational technology resources.
The document discusses the issue of the digital divide in educational technology. It describes how studies in the 1980s already showed differences in technology availability based on socioeconomic status, with wealthier households having greater access to computers and the internet. While the definition of the digital divide has expanded to include differences in access to information, the gap still exists, with 23% of schools lacking adequate internet connectivity and 40% lacking WiFi. Bridging the digital divide is important so that all teachers and students can benefit equally from educational technology resources.
Edmund J. Ofalt III EDU 352: Foundations of Educational Technology Dr. Elizabeth Forgione-Barkas January 31, 2015
ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
For my issue I chose the digital divide. I feel like in order for any of the other issues, either real or perceived, to be addressed within the use of educational technology we need to first address the issue of students who are simply not on the same playing field. Around 1980 the first Apple IIs were put into schools. Shortly thereafter, 1983 to be exact, there were already studies being released displaying the difference in technology availability based on socioeconomic status (SES) (Compaine, 2001). These differences in the availability of technology can make it extremely difficult for teachers to effectively integrate technology in the classroom. The availability of technology, specifically internet access at home, is directly proportional to the income of the household (Compaine, 2001). In the mid to late 2000s the definition of digital divide expanded to include not only the accessibility to computers but the information disparity between those who have access to computers and those who dont (Eastin, Cicchirllo & Mabry, 2015) Personnel who have access, again usually based on SES, tend to get information faster than those who either have no access, or unreliable access. (Eastin et al, 2015). Expanding the definition and understanding of the term digital divide does not, however, mean that there has been a closing of the gap between low SES areas and those that are more privileged. With 23% of schools lacking internet connectivity capable of providing students with adequate internet access, and 40% lacking wifi, there is still a long way to go before every student is on a level playing field (Braverman, 2016). The digital divide must be bridged in order for teachers and students to be able to fully take advantage of the technology that is available today. There doesnt seem to be any argument that a digital divide doesnt exist. I tried. I couldnt find any.
ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
Please see the below references for extra reading: Van Volkom, M., Stapley, J. C., & Amaturo, V. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide: Generational differences in technology use in everyday life. North American Journal Of Psychology, 16(3), 557-574 Peral-Peral, B., Arenas-Gaitn, J., & Villarejo-Ramos, . (2015). From Digital Divide to Psycho-digital Divide: Elders and Online Social Networks. Comunicar, 23(45), 57-64. doi:10.3916/C45-2015-06 Campos-Castillo, C. (2015). Revisiting the first-level digital divide in the United States: Gender and race/ethnicity patterns, 20072012. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 423-439. doi:10.1177/0894439314547617
References:
ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
Braverman, B. (2016). THE DIGITAL DIVIDE. (cover story). Literacy Today (24117862), 33(4), 16. Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide. [electronic resource] : facing a crisis or creating a myth?. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2001. Eastin, M. S., Cicchirillo, V., & Mabry, A. (2015). Extending the digital divide conversation: Examining the knowledge gap through media expectancies. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 416-437. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1054994