Martin Luther King Jr. argues that nonviolent resistance is the right method for black people to use in their fight for freedom. He supports this claim by outlining the flaws of the other two approaches: acquiescence and violence. Acquiescence means accepting an unjust system, making the oppressed as evil as the oppressor. Violence is impractical as it leads to destruction for all involved. In contrast, nonviolent resistance allows one to oppose an unjust system while loving the perpetrators. It also enables remaining in the South to continue struggling for rights while eliminating fears in the white community. King asserts nonviolent resistance reconciles the harshness of the other two approaches by avoiding their extremes and immoralities.
Martin Luther King Jr. argues that nonviolent resistance is the right method for black people to use in their fight for freedom. He supports this claim by outlining the flaws of the other two approaches: acquiescence and violence. Acquiescence means accepting an unjust system, making the oppressed as evil as the oppressor. Violence is impractical as it leads to destruction for all involved. In contrast, nonviolent resistance allows one to oppose an unjust system while loving the perpetrators. It also enables remaining in the South to continue struggling for rights while eliminating fears in the white community. King asserts nonviolent resistance reconciles the harshness of the other two approaches by avoiding their extremes and immoralities.
Martin Luther King Jr. argues that nonviolent resistance is the right method for black people to use in their fight for freedom. He supports this claim by outlining the flaws of the other two approaches: acquiescence and violence. Acquiescence means accepting an unjust system, making the oppressed as evil as the oppressor. Violence is impractical as it leads to destruction for all involved. In contrast, nonviolent resistance allows one to oppose an unjust system while loving the perpetrators. It also enables remaining in the South to continue struggling for rights while eliminating fears in the white community. King asserts nonviolent resistance reconciles the harshness of the other two approaches by avoiding their extremes and immoralities.
991262233 English Composition 1 Section 77 February 8, 2016
SSC
Nonviolent Resistance (1958)
By Martin Luther King, Jr. King may be explaining a process, but he is also arguing. What is his central claim, and what support does he provide for it? His central claim is that among three characteristic ways people handle oppression (acquiescence, violence, nonviolent resistance), the way of nonviolent resistance is the right method for black people to choose as they strive for freedom. He supports his own claim by showing us the flaws of the first two approaches and explaining why the third approach is the only one that is going to work. The biggest issue with the first tactic is to accept passively an unjust system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor (pg. 259). By the same token, the second strategys main flaw is that it is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all (pg. 259) According to King Jr., the last approach is the most rational method for the black to exercise at the time, because it would help the Negro rise to the noble height of opposing the unjust system while loving the perpetrators of the system, remain in the South and struggle for his rights, and eliminate the fears of the white community. Whats more, in his viewpoint, this strategy could reconcile the harshness of the two other strategies and avoid the extremes and immoralities of both.