บทบาทในการกำกับและดูแลความเสี่ยงของกรรมการรัฐวิสาหกิจและปัจจัยสาเหตุ

Roles in Governing Risks of State Enterprise Directors and Their Antecedents
Thankawin Ratthawatankul

Master of Business Administration, Nation University
E-mail: thankawin_rat@nation.ac.th

Grounded Theory

34

3

5

:
Abstract
This research reports actual roles in governing risks of state enterprise directors and antecedents of their roles. Based
on Grounded Theory, this study is a qualitative research, integrating In-Depth Interview, Focus Group Discussion, and
Observation, through Case Study Method, conducting in a training program for 34 potential directors of state enterprises. The
analysis with Triangulation Method is employed for the study.
The study finds that the directors present standard roles, including identifying acceptable risk scope, understanding
facing risks of their organization and identifying mechanism in managing risks appropriately, and considering risks in every
significant decision. Moreover, they present three additional roles: connecting between management and shareholders or
original affiliation, foreseeing potential risks and warning management to prepare for risk plan, and not acting over
management. For antecedents of these roles, there are five factors: business management knowledge, direct experience,
network, updated information, and risk sensitivity.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Risk, Risk Management, State Enterprises
Paper type: Research
WMS Journal of Management

Walailak University
Vol.4 No.3 (Sep Dec 2015): 52 - 63
53
...
1.

( 2553)
( 2552;
Price Waterhouse Coopers 2004)
(Baldridge Performance
Excellence Program 2015)

(2551)

(2553)

(
2552)

(Self-Assessment Bias)

2.
1)

2)
3)

4)

3.

Walailak University
Vol.4 No.3 (Sep Dec 2015)
54
Roles in Governing Risks of State Enterprise Directors...

3.1
Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the
Treadway Commission (2004) COSO

(2553)

(Risk)

(Enterprise Risk Management)

3.2


50

(
2552)

(Statement of Directions: SOD)

(
2552)

(2552)

Walailak University
55
...
3.2.1

3.2.2

3.2.3

4.1
(Case Study Method)

(Rungwitoo 2012)
3
(Louise et. al 2007) (Individual
Preparation) (Small Group Discussion)
(Large Group Discussion)

(Louise et. al 2007)

(Individual Preparation)

(Discussion) (, 2554)

2

2
(Small Group Discussion)
34 4 8 - 9

15

(Flip Chart)

34 45

4.

Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss 2012)

(In-Depth Interview)
(Focus Group Discussion) (Observation)
(Case Study
Method)

Walailak University
56

4.2

(Berg et al. 2004)

(In-Dept Interview) 2

4.3

(2552)

(Content Analysis)

(Flip Chart)

(In-Dept
Interview) (Focus Group Discussion)
(Observation)
2

Walailak University
57
(Individual Preparation)
(In-Dept Interview)
(Small Group Discussion)
(Focus Group Discussion)
(Observation)
2
4.4

(Content
Analysis)
2
3

(Triangulation Method)

(Triangulation Method) 3 (Denzin 1978)
4.4.1 Data Triangulation

(Accuracy)

34

4.4.2 Investigator Triangulation

2
4.4.3 Methodological Triangulation

(In-Depth Interview)
(Focus Group Discussion)
(Observation)

5.

34
79.41 20.59
60 64 1

2

Walailak University
58
1
( )
40 49
50 54
55 59
60 64
65 69
2
6
7
13
1
5
34
8
7
5
4
3
2
1
1
3
34
5.1

(2553) 3
3
Debt Practice
1 1
EBITDA 2
Down Grade

50

Walailak University
59

(2552)

(1)

(2)

Fayol (1949)
(3)

OECD (2004)

5.2

5

3
5.2.1


Walailak University
60

Margin

5.2.2

Operational Risk

10
.

5.2.3

Walailak University
61

5.2.4

5.2.5

6.

7.
3
7.1

(Operational Definition)

(Antecedents)
7.2

(Triangulation Method)
(InDepth Interview) (Focus Group Discussion)
(Observation)
(Case Study)

Walailak University
62

7.3.

8.
8.1

5

8.2


9.
. 2553.
,
, 6 2553.
. 2554. .
1. .. : .
.
2553, ...,
1. .
, .
2552.
. .
. 2551.
(.. 2551
.. 2555). .
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. 2015. Baldrige
Excellence Framework 2015-2016. Gaithersburg.
MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National
Institute of Standards and Technology.
Berg, B. L., Lune, H., & Lune, H. 2004. Qualitative research
methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston.
MA: Pearson.
Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway
Commission. 2004. Enterprise Risk Management
Framework, September 2004.
Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical
Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed). New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Fayol, H. 1949. General and Industrial Management.
(trans. C Storrs). London: Pitman.
Glaser, B.G.& Strauss A.L. 2012. The Discovery of
Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative
Research. Aldrine Transaction Publishers.
Walailak University
63
Louise, A, James, A & Michiel R. 2007. Learning with
Cases. Ivey, Canada.
OECD (Organization of Economic Co-operation and
Development). 2004. Principles of Corporate
Governance. OECD, Paris.
Price Waterhouse Coopers. 2547.
2547. Price Waterhouse
Coopers: .
Rungwitoo, T. 2012. The Simultaneous Effect of Individual
Entrepreneurial Competencies on SMEs
Competitive Advantage. BAI 2012 Conference.
April, 3-5, 2012. Japan.

Walailak University

บทบาทในการกำกับและดูแลความเสี่ยงของกรรมการรัฐวิสาหกิจและปัจจัยสาเหตุ

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

บทบาทในการกำกับและดูแลความเสี่ยงของกรรมการรัฐวิสาหกิจและปัจจัยสาเหตุ

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Roles in Governing Risks of State Enterprise Directors and Their Antecedents

WMS Journal of Management

WMS Journal of Management

WMS Journal of Management

WMS Journal of Management

(Small Group Discussion)

(Focus Group Discussion)

(Large Group Discussion)

4.4.3 Methodological Triangulation

WMS Journal of Management

WMS Journal of Management

WMS Journal of Management

You might also like