On Mar 7, 2016, at 12:18 PM, <Gaurav.jain@agnity.com> <Gaurav.jain@agnity.

com> w
rote:
>
> Dear Sergio,
>
> Please find attached revised AGNITY ACONYX NP solution document in
> same format.
>
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Gaurav Jain
> +919910071789
>
>
>
> Quoting Sergio Blasco <sergio.blasco@agnity.com>:
>
>> Hi Uday,
>> youre right. It looks more like a high level product description,
>> but I think this is most likely what we wanted to send to customers.
>> Another option would be to name it "Agnity NP Solution description"
>> , which can be in the middle between a technology White paper and a
>> product description.
>> I attach the last version.
>> Regards,
>> Sergio
>>
>> From: Uday Choudhury
>> Sent: sbado, 5 de marzo de 2016 1:16
>> To: Sergio Blasco; Gaurav Jain
>> Cc: Martin Cross; Vishal Sharma; hariom.sharma
>> Subject: RE: NP White Paper
>>
>> Sergio,
>>
>> We do need to give some general background info of the industry if
>> we are calling this a 'While paper'.
>> Normally a white paper is written that way. Otherwise we can call it
>> 'ACONYX LNP Product Description' - that a different type of doc
>> which will only describe our product.
>> If the general info is too much we can trim it or re-write.
>>
>> Uday
>>
>> From: Sergio Blasco
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:42 PM
>> To: Gaurav Jain
>> Cc: Martin Cross; Uday Choudhury
>> Subject: RE: NP White Paper
>>
>> Hi,
>> please find my latest version of the NP white paper. I removed
>> general NP info and focused on our product features.
>> Regards,
>> Sergio
>>

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

From: Gaurav Jain [mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com]

Sent: martes, 1 de marzo de 2016 18:58
To: Sergio Blasco
Cc: Martin Cross; Uday Choudhury
Subject: RE: NP White Paper
Hi Sergio,
Please find attached revised version of Number Portability White
paper as per our last call and Martin's comments updated this
document.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Gaurav Jain
+919910071789
From: Sergio Blasco [mailto:sergio.blasco@agnity.com]
Sent: 01 March 2016 17:45
To: Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@agnity.com<mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com>>
Cc: Martin Cross
<martin.cross@agnity.com<mailto:martin.cross@agnity.com>>; Uday
Choudhury
<Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com<mailto:Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com>>
Subject: RE: NP White Paper
Hi Gaurav,
could you please send me the latest version of the LNP paper so that
I can work on it?
Thanks,
Sergio
From: Uday Choudhury
Sent: jueves, 18 de febrero de 2016 23:42
To: Martin Cross
Cc: Sergio Blasco; Gaurav Jain; Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio
A. Trevino; Oscar Rene Reyes-Ruiz
Subject: RE: NP White Paper
No, his email said he received comments from both of you, probably
some other reason/confusion. Let me discuss tonight.
From: Martin Cross
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:33 PM
To: Uday Choudhury
Cc: Sergio Blasco; Gaurav Jain; Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio
A. Trevino; Oscar Rene Reyes-Ruiz
Subject: Re: NP White Paper
Great - thanks.
I am guessing he just did not realize we had two separate sets of comments.
Thx
Martin
On Feb 18, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Uday Choudhury
<Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com<mailto:Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com>> wrote:
Martin,
I will discuss with Gaurav tonight and get it clarified.

>> We will have the meeting also tomorrow 8 AM PST. I will send an invite.
>>
>> Uday
>>
>> From: Martin Cross
>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:20 PM
>> To: Sergio Blasco; Gaurav Jain; Uday Choudhury
>> Cc: Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio A. Trevino; Oscar Rene Reyes-Ruiz
>> Subject: Re: NP White Paper
>>
>> I Guarav
>> Not sure - maybe there was confusion in what we sent over yesterday.
>> Sergio and I both updated the document - unfortunately we did it in
>> parallel - so we did not make our updates in the same document.
>> Attached at the end of this email is my set of comments that I sent
>> out yesterday.
>> It looks like you did not see this - either that or you didn't like
>> my comments and therefore did not include them... I will try not to
>> have my feelings hurt :-)
>> Anyway - please take a look at these comments and see what you think.
>> Also - I am still very confused by that first table of ETSI
>> standards - there are many items in there that are never mentioned
>> in the document. If we are going to include this table we have to
>> include a writeup explaining what it is.
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Sergio Blasco
>> <sergio.blasco@agnity.com<mailto:sergio.blasco@agnity.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guarav,
>> just adding some minor changes.
>> thanks,
>> Sergio
>>
>> From: Gaurav Jain [mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com]
>> Sent: jueves, 18 de febrero de 2016 12:24
>> To: Martin Cross; Sergio Blasco; Uday Choudhury
>> Cc: Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio A. Trevino; Oscar Rene Reyes-Ruiz
>> Subject: RE: NP White Paper
>>
>> Thank you so much Martin and Sergio for reviewing NP white paper :) !!
>>
>> Please find attached revised Aconyx NP White paper.
>>
>> [SB]this picture is not clear for me. Wouldnt it be NGIN vs SRF?
>>>> This pricture is as per this ETSI 123.066 document for NP where 3
>>>> main types of NP solution is described with Direct (ACQ) and
>>>> indirect routing and NP solution could either through NGIN or SRF.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Best Regards,
>> Gaurav Jain
>> +919910071789
>> From: Martin Cross [mailto:martin.cross@agnity.com]
>> Sent: 18 February 2016 02:21
>> To: Sergio Blasco
>> <sergio.blasco@agnity.com<mailto:sergio.blasco@agnity.com>>; Uday

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Choudhury
<Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com<mailto:Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com>>
Cc: Gaurav Jain
<gaurav.jain@agnity.com<mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com>>; Vishal
Sharma <vishal.sharma@agnity.com<mailto:vishal.sharma@agnity.com>>;
Subhash Verma
<Subhash.Verma@agnity.com<mailto:Subhash.Verma@agnity.com>>; Sergio
A. Trevino
<sergio.trevino@agnity.com<mailto:sergio.trevino@agnity.com>>; Oscar
Rene Reyes-Ruiz
<oscar.reyes@agnity.com<mailto:oscar.reyes@agnity.com>>
Subject: Re: NP White Paper
So the bad news is that Sergio and I both edited the document
separately - sorry about that.
The good news is we had many of the same comments. :-)
Thx
Martin
On Feb 17, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Sergio Blasco
<sergio.blasco@agnity.com<mailto:sergio.blasco@agnity.com>> wrote:
Youre right. Here it goes the word doc.
Sergio
From: Uday Choudhury
Sent: mircoles, 17 de febrero de 2016 21:18
To: Sergio Blasco; Gaurav Jain
Cc: Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio A. Trevino; Oscar Rene
Reyes-Ruiz; Martin Cross
Subject: RE: NP White Paper
Sergio,
You attached the PPT presentation by mistake (not the word doc).
Please resend.
Uday
From: Sergio Blasco
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:46 AM
To: Uday Choudhury; Gaurav Jain
Cc: Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma; Sergio A. Trevino; Oscar Rene
Reyes-Ruiz; Martin Cross
Subject: RE: NP White Paper
Hi Uday and Gaurav,
please find attached my reviewed doc.
thanks,
Sergio
From: Uday Choudhury
Sent: mircoles, 17 de febrero de 2016 0:45
To: Martin Cross; Sergio Blasco; Sergio A. Trevino; Oscar Rene Reyes-Ruiz
Cc: Vishal Sharma; Subhash Verma
Subject: NP White Paper

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Sergio B,
Draft for review and edit.
As discussed in our status call today, I will setup a call on Friday
morning 8 AM PST.
Uday

From: Gaurav Jain [mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 10:12 AM
To: Uday Choudhury
Subject: RE: LNP Presentation -- (NP Product collateral or Marketing
Brochure)
Dear Uday,
Please find attached revised version of Number Portability White
paper . Kindly review the same.
Taken information from the Mexico LNP white paper which is generic
one and not specific to Mexico LNP.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Gaurav Jain
+919910071789
From: Gaurav Jain [mailto:gaurav.jain@agnity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:15 AM
To: Uday Choudhury
Subject: RE: LNP Presentation -- (NP Product collateral or Marketing
Brochure)
Dear Uday,
Please find attached initial draft version of Product collateral or
Marketing Brochure for Wind NP application .
Kindly review the same.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Gaurav Jain
+919910071789
From: Martin Cross
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 11:56 AM
To: Uday Choudhury
Cc: Vishal Sharma; Gaurav Jain
Subject: Re: LNP Presentation
Wow.
So this is much better than what I was thinking - looks like we do a
lot - that is great. There is some really good stuff in here.
Would be really much better if we could put this into a marketing
brochure or white paper - something where it could be explained as
the reader reads it.
The problem with throwing ppt over the wall is they a ppt is really
much better when presented. And this is a long ppt - 25 charts.

>>
>> Also seems like we could improve the flow of this - we seem to go
>> back and forth on "how LNP works" vs "what are our advantages"...
>> and we seem to repeat in places.
>>
>> Also we need to improve the "look" of this - no offense but it looks
>> a bit inconsistent - it does not look like a polished marketing
>> presentation for an existing product (I realize that it is not a
>> polished marketing presentation we are working on the fly here...
>> but...)
>>
>> Regarding Mobile NP - Wind is a mobile operator so I assume they
>> need mobile. They have just been acquired by Shaw (a cable company)
>> so they would likely also need fixed.
>>
>> What we know is that Wind has an LNP platform but it will need to be
>> replaced or upgraded as they move to IMS.
>>
>> What are next steps - if you guys can walk me thru it so that I
>> understand (maybe we bring Sergio B. and Oscar too) then maybe we
>> can help create the marketing documents we need ???
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Uday Choudhury
>> <Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com<mailto:Uday.Choudhury@agnity.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Martin,
>>
>> Here is a draft LNP presentation for your review.
>> From our research it seems Canadian implementation is similar to US.
>> WE have some work to do, but it should not be a whole lot after
>> Telepacific work is done.
>> One questions: Is Wind/Canada looking for just LNP or Mobile NP too?
>>
>> Uday
>>
>>
>> <AG-Aconyx-LNP-NGIN-02082016.pptx>
>>
>> <Agnity_Aconyx-NP_WPv1 1-2016_sergio_review.docx>
>>
>> <Agnity_Aconyx-NP_WPv1 2-2016_sergio_review.docx>
>>
>>
>
> <Agnity_Aconyx-NP_Solutionv1 3-2016.docx>