Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Level CrossiasdLLLCCCng Name

    Uploaded by

    DavidBelolipeckij
    14 views2 pages
    This document contains information on 15 level crossings that may be affected by a proposal to upgrade the rail network to increase tracks and speeds. For each crossing, it lists the name, location, whether it will be affected by the proposals, and comments on potential replacement options, such as replacing crossings with footbridges or ramps. Replacing level crossings with footbridges is suggested for many to improve safety as tracks and speeds increase. A traffic census is also recommended to evaluate the need for the Open Appleford crossing.

    Original Description:

    asdads

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains information on 15 level crossings that may be affected by a proposal to upgrade the rail network to increase tracks and speeds. For each crossing, it lists the name, location, whether it will be affected by the proposals, and comments on potential replacement options, such as replacing crossings with footbridges or ramps. Replacing level crossings with footbridges is suggested for many to improve safety as tracks and speeds increase. A traffic census is also recommended to evaluate the need for the Open Appleford crossing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Level CrossiasdLLLCCCng Name

    Uploaded by

    DavidBelolipeckij
    This document contains information on 15 level crossings that may be affected by a proposal to upgrade the rail network to increase tracks and speeds. For each crossing, it lists the name, location, whether it will be affected by the proposals, and comments on potential replacement options, such as replacing crossings with footbridges or ramps. Replacing level crossings with footbridges is suggested for many to improve safety as tracks and speeds increase. A traffic census is also recommended to evaluate the need for the Open Appleford crossing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Level Crossing

    Name

    OS Mapping
    Chainage

    Affected by CP6
    Work Yes/No

    Commen Proposal
    ts

    Kilometra DRG
    ge

    Commen
    t

    Sandford Brake
    Farm

    68.0309
    (Miles.Yards)
    109.718 m

    Yes. Increase to 2
    track, 90mph.

    109750

    004

    Is it
    necessary
    to keep it?

    Yarnton

    67.0442
    (Miles.Yards)
    108.230 m

    108320

    05

    Aristotle Lane

    64.35
    (Miles.Chains)
    103.702 m

    103680

    Station LC

    63.31
    (Miles.Chains)
    102.012 m

    Yes. Increase to 2
    track, 90mph. May be
    affected by a proposal
    to site new carriage
    sidings at Yarnton.
    Yes. Potential to
    increase to 6 tracks,
    probably 75mph at this
    point.
    Yes. Potential to
    increase to 6 tracks,
    probably 75mph at this
    point.

    101990

    10

    Tuckwells

    62.64
    (Miles.Chains)
    101.067 m

    101030

    11

    Kennington Jn

    61.04
    (Miles.Chains)
    98.250 m

    98250

    14

    Manor Farm

    60.49
    (Miles.Chains)
    97.546 m

    Yes. Increase to 4
    track, 125mph.

    97530

    15

    Nuneham

    56.72

    Yes. Increase to 4

    UWC XING Replace


    with
    roadbridge
    and a ramp
    FP XING
    Replace
    with f/b
    (ramps
    required?).
    Bridleway
    FPW XING Replace
    with f/b
    (ramps
    required?)
    OCC XING Replace
    with f/b
    (ramps
    required?)
    Appears to
    be used by
    NR only
    UWC XING Replace
    with f/b
    (ramps,
    grooves)?
    UWC XING Replace
    with f/b
    only. Used
    by NR
    UWC XING Replace
    with f/b
    only. Used
    by NR
    FPW XING Replace

    91570

    19-20

    Yes. Some schemes


    have up to 6 tracks,
    probably 90mph at this
    point.
    Yes. Increase to 4
    track, 125mph.

    Is it
    necessary
    to keep it?

    Is it

    Open Appleford

    (Miles.Chains)
    91.571 m
    54.48
    (Miles.Chains)
    87.870 m

    Traffic census to be performed

    track, 125mph.
    Yes. Increase to 4
    track, 125mph.

    CCTV
    XING

    with f/b. No
    ramps
    Talk to
    87950
    Steve

    necessary
    to keep it?
    22

    You might also like