Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2d 23
95 Stat. 357, 843 (1981) [OBRA], it left this highly important matter so
unspecific that there is a division in the circuits: Turner v. Prod, 9 Cir., 1983,
707 F.2d 1109, cert. pending, sub nom. Heckler v. Turner, 52 U.S.L.W. 3552,
having been decided against the Secretary, and James v. O'Bannon, 3 Cir.,
1983, 715 F.2d 794, and Bell v. Massinga, 4 Cir., 1983, 721 F.2d 131, having
held otherwise. Since a certiorari petition has already been filed in Turner, it
may not be of lasting importance which way we decide, but we have concluded
that we, too, do not follow Turner.
2
We do not suggest that a contrary argument cannot be made, but we think it less
persuasive. In part, plaintiffs would say that take-home checks are all the
earned income plaintiffs ever see, and so must be considered as the real income,
or available income, in a different sense from income which is received in gross
and then must be disbursed for necessary work-incurred expenses. But even if
different, Congress is not obliged both to afford a round number disregard and
make separate allowance for taxes, and we do not believe it has done so here. In
any event, the time of payment seems to us but a superficial distinction; all
necessary expenses must be met sometime.
Finally, even if, as plaintiffs claim, it is debatable how much deference in this
case is to be afforded the regulations propounded by the Secretary, see, e.g.,
Batterton v. Francis, 1977, 432 U.S. 416, 424, 97 S.Ct. 2399, 2405, 53 L.Ed.2d
448 ("Ordinarily, administrative interpretations of statutory terms are given
important but not controlling significance."), we note that we are in accord with
these regulations, rather than against them. See 45 C.F.R. Sec. 233.20(a)(6)(iv)
(1982).2
Affirmed.
42 U.S.C. Sec. 602(a) A State plan for aid and services to needy families with
children must ... (7) except as may be otherwise provided in paragraph (8) or
(31) and section 615 of this title, provide that the State agency-(A) shall, in determining need, take into consideration any other income and
resources of any child or relative claiming aid to families with dependent
children, or of any other individual (living in the same home as such child and
relative) whose needs the State determines should be considered in determining
the need of the child or relative claiming such aid; ...
(8)(A) provide that, with respect to any month, in making the determination
under paragraph (7), the State agency ... (ii) shall disregard from the earned
income of any child or relative applying for or receiving aid to families with
dependent children, or of any other individual (living in the same home as such
relative and child) whose needs are taken into account in making such
determination, the first $75 of the total of such earned income for such month;
... (Emphasis suppl.)