You are on page 1of 2

RESTRICTED - STAFF

;' Defence~~
Intelligence

n-t tuts IT YO FDnaFr:NCt.


Old W .n Ollic.e 13wlcling
w'hiich.tll, London SW IA : I;U
I'elcphouc (Uucu 1)iolhng) 020"72 1 S 2407
(Swuc.hhoaid) 020 7218 9000

l~rom 11,10111 110i1'aid


Ocpui~Cl .iefnjUefencc Intelhsence

CD12n2/5i2

John Scarlett
JlC Chairman
Cabinet Office
70 Whitehall
London B July 2003

ex-~

GILLIGAN ACCUSATIONS : DR DAVID IQ?LLY

You asked for a short note on Dt Kelly's views of the Itaqt WMD programme and the
Government's dosstei, published last September What follows reflects points made by
David Kelly in his letter in which lie admitted to his meeting with Gilltgan on 22 May, and
fiom mtctviews conducted with him by MOD

According to Di Kelly, based on his extensive and authoritative knowledge of lraq's WMD
piogramme, notably it's biological piogramme, lie believes that the Septembei dossier was a
fait tefleclton of open souice mfoimauon and appieciations about Iraq's WNID piogramme
lie claims that he has never attempted to tmdet mme Government policy as lie was petsonally
sympathetic to the wai because he iecogmsed fjom a decade's work the menace of Iraq's
ability to fwthet develop a non-conventional weapons piogiamme lie feels no unease ovci
the dossier because it is completely coincident with his pasonal views on ILaq's
unconventional weapons capability

On (lie 45 mmutc deployment issuc, Kelly says that his standard view is that lie does not
know tile intclligcncc and is ]lot f.imiliai with tin liacli Weapons system that matchcs that soit
ol tiirncsc.tlc

raFSTr,ICTED - STAFF
RESTRICTED-STAFF

The onlYotha point that we have elii.tcd liom Di I<clly is 111,11 lie hclieves dime J, a 30%
chtuu,c that Viq had specific CM pioducunn cnpubilily in the six months bclore the wai and
[flat 11 w,is moic My that dime was ,i small I3W hioducUon piogiammc Thns is not
dissimilai to the views ascnbed by Gilligan to his souice in his evidence to the Foucign
Af(tuis Committee (see answei to Q51 I) It is worth pointing Out dial I-' clly distinguishes
between amduction and hossession where he bclicves that it is ncaiei 100°l0 likely dint thme
was some exrsung CW In 1 ; a(I's possession

I hope this is helpful 1lappy to-discuss furlhci if you wish

A copy goes to Sn Kevin Tebbit's office

Rf=S-1-RICTr_n - STAFF
HoDj6jco/b

You might also like