STS 203 Assignment 2

Gift Matsikure R055164Q

Takudzwa Matiringe R081668Q

Michael M Chiwere R094729C

1. model being tested is:

y ij =µ+τ i +ε ij
where
y ij is response variable in the ijth treatment level
µ is the constant term
τ i is ith treatment effect
ε ij is ijth random error term

ANOVA

lifetime

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 9646.333 2 4823.167 4.895 .023

Within Groups 14779.667 15 985.311

Total 24426.000 17

Hypothesis
|H0: µi=µ j
H1: µi ≠ µ j
Rejection criteria:reject h0 if sig<α
Where α=0.05
Sig=0.023
Decision:since sig=0.023<0.05
We reject H0 and conclude that the three oven types are not the same
 Report

lifetime

oventyp
e Mean N Std. Deviation

1 212.83 6 36.406

2 167.50 6 27.574

3 160.67 6 29.500

Total 180.33 18 37.905

Estimated mean is 180.33

Pairwise comparisons

Multiple Comparisons

lifetime
LSD

(I) (J) 95% Confidence Interval

oventyp oventyp Mean Difference
e e (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

1 2 45.333* 18.123 .024 6.71 83.96

3 52.167* 18.123 .011 13.54 90.79

2 1 -45.333* 18.123 .024 -83.96 -6.71

3 6.833 18.123 .711 -31.79 45.46

3 1 -52.167* 18.123 .011 -90.79 -13.54

2 -6.833 18.123 .711 -45.46 31.79

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Hypothesis
H0: there is significant difference between means
H1: there is no significant difference between means
Rejection criteria : we reject H0 if sig< α for each oven type difference
α =0.05
decisions : for
| ý 1− ý 2|; sig=0.025(<0.05), hence we reject H0
| ý 1− ý 3 |; sig=0.011(<0.05), hence we reject H0
| ý 3− ý 2 |; sig=0.711(<0.05), hence we fail to reject H0

2)Correlations (Pearson)
Correlation of tear res and gloss = -0.169, P-Value = 0.477
Comment
There is a weak negative correlation between tear resistance and
gloss

Correlations (Pearson)
Correlation of tear res and opacity = 0.223, P-Value = 0.345
Comment
There is a weak positive correlation between tear resistance and
opacity

Correlations (Pearson)
Correlation of opacity and gloss = 0.180, P-Value = 0.448
Comment
There is a weak positive correlation between opacity and gloss

Scatter plots for each pair of variables

Gloss is represented by (gloss)
Tear resistance is represented by( v1)
Regression Analysis

The regression equation between tear resistance and gloss is

tear res = 8.22 - 0.154 gross

Predictor Coef StDev T P

Constant8.224 1.985 4.14 0.001
gloss -0.1545 0.2128 -0.73 0.477

S = 0.4798 R-Sq = 2.8% R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

Analysis of Variance
Source DF SS MS F P
Regression 1 0.1213 0.1213 0.53 0.477
Residual Error 18 4.1442 0.2302    
Total 19 4.2655      

Unusual Observations
Obs gloss tear res Fit StDev Fit Residual St Resid
3 9.6 5.8 6.741 0.123 -0.941 -2.03R

R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual

Regression Analysis
The regression equation between tear resistance and opacity is
tear res = 6.43 + 0.0755 opacity
Predictor Coef StDev T P
Constant 6.4274 0.384 16.74 0
opacity 0.07551 0.07793 0.97 0.345

S = 0.4746 R-Sq = 5.0% R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

Analysis of Variance
Source DF SS MS F P
Regression 1 0.2115 0.2115 0.94 0.345
Residual Error 18 4.054 0.2252
Total 19 4.2655

Unusual Observations
Residua
Obs opacity tear res Fit StDev Fit l St Resid
16 8.4 7.1 7.062 0.305 0.038 0.11 X

X denotes an observation whose X value gives it large influence.