Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description
This course will explore affinities between classical religious eschatology, the
secular idea of historical progress as it developed in the 19th century, and certain,
post-traditional, ideas of radical social transformation that emerged among
European Jewish thinkers in the first third of the 20th century, ideas which inspired
the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, and which still retain their critical power as
springs of secular hope, and as goads to socio-political activism. In the first section
of the course, we will intially explore the contours of classical (Jewish) Messianism
and eschatology in order to establish a foundation for our consideration of the
secularization of this orientation, as it came to be expressed in modern (mostly 19th
century) philosophies of history and social theory. In the second section of the
course, we will consider the tension between the retrospective understanding of
historical progress -- as the product of an ongoing, immanent and inexorable
process -- and the emergence of a radical, activist orientation toward historical
progress, which comes increasingly to be understood as a contingent desideratum
which can be produced only through a heroic leap of human action that might
summon or catalyze the power of the present moment and become that straight
gate through which alone redemption might dawn. With an eye to this tension, or
dialectic, we will consider, in turn, the thought of Hermann Cohen, Martin Buber,
Ernst Bloch, Gustav Landauer, Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Emmanuel
Levinas and Jacques Derrida, attending to the dialectic in their writings between
their own secular commitments and the religious sources and conceptions they
Gottsegen, Spring 2009, Secular Messianism and Utopian Hope
2
Each student will give two oral presentations to the class. Specifically, the
presentation should:
1. Lead off with a ‘pressing question’ that the assigned reading raises for the
student. This question might be pressing for intellectual, but also existential
and political reasons.
2. Identify the particular location(s) in the text where this question emerges.
3. Provide a close reading of that limited portion of text. This close reading
should take the form of a line-by-line analysis of the selected text, and
include a suggested interpretation and explanation of the reasons that
portion of text raises the question it does. This interpretation may in turn
radiate out from that selection and touch on other parts of the assigned text,
but complete coverage is neither required nor requested.
4. Suggest further questions for discussion that may have arisen in the course
of dealing with the initial pressing question.
A sign up sheet will be posted for students to choose the weeks on which they give
presentations. The sign up sheet will be available immediately after the second
class. Some weeks there may be several students presenting.
1 A. All students will write four two-page “reaction” papers on the readings for
a particular week. These papers should be handed in at the beginning of class.
These papers are for weeks when you are not presenting.
2 B. Students are also expected to write a 20-25 page term paper. The term
paper may be on any topic bearing on the questions raised by the class. A short,
Gottsegen, Spring 2009, Secular Messianism and Utopian Hope
3
one-page description of the paper and bibliography will be due April 14th and the
final papers will be due (by email) May 11th. Late papers will be downgraded one
letter grade per day, no exceptions.
http://www.brown.edu/Administration/Dean_of_the_College/academic_code/code.ht
ml
Required Texts:
Syllabus:
Recommended:
H. Cohen, "German Humanism and Jewish Messianism" (from Reason and
Hope)
8. Ernst Bloch (1885-1977), The Spirit of Utopia (1918), pp. 1-34, 165-279
Bloch, “Karl Marx, Death and the Apocalypse,” and “Man’s Increasing Entry
into Religious Mystery,” in Man on His Own (WCT)
Background Reading: Max Weber, (in Gerth and Mills)essays III, XIII re
religion and aesthetics] (WCT)
Recommended:
Max Weber, “XIII.6 The Esthetic Sphere,” in From Max Weber (ed. Gerth and
Mills), pp. 340-343
Herbert Marcuse, “The End of Utopia”
http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/67endutopia/67EndUtopiaProb
Viol.htm
Levinas, “The Time of Redemption and the Time of Justice” in Existence and
Existents
Levinas, Totality and Infinity, pp. 21-30, 194 - 247, 281-285.
“The State of Caesar and the State of David”
Derrida Interview with Indy Media (2004) on Messianicity, Utopia, & Benjamin
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dghgx7gw_45f3f6kfgg
Supplemental:
Jacques Derrida, "Force of Law" (1989) in Drucilla Cornell, ed., Deconstruction
and the Possibility of Justice