The document outlines six common logical fallacies to avoid in arguments: ad hominem attacks character instead of the argument; non sequitur conclusions do not logically follow premises; hasty generalizations inaccurately apply claims to all people and situations; oversimplification ignores complexity and misrepresents issues by making them too simple; false analogies inaccurately compare things through flawed analogies; and red herrings distract from the actual argument by raising unrelated issues.
The document outlines six common logical fallacies to avoid in arguments: ad hominem attacks character instead of the argument; non sequitur conclusions do not logically follow premises; hasty generalizations inaccurately apply claims to all people and situations; oversimplification ignores complexity and misrepresents issues by making them too simple; false analogies inaccurately compare things through flawed analogies; and red herrings distract from the actual argument by raising unrelated issues.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document outlines six common logical fallacies to avoid in arguments: ad hominem attacks character instead of the argument; non sequitur conclusions do not logically follow premises; hasty generalizations inaccurately apply claims to all people and situations; oversimplification ignores complexity and misrepresents issues by making them too simple; false analogies inaccurately compare things through flawed analogies; and red herrings distract from the actual argument by raising unrelated issues.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
1. ad hominem—an attack on the character of the person instead of on the argument. 2. Non sequitur—the conclusion does not logically follow the premise (“does not follow”). 3. Hasty Generalization—making a general claim and applying it to all people/situations inaccurately. 4. Oversimplification—taking a complex issue and trying to make it simple, therefore ignoring the complexity and misrepresenting the issue. 5. False analogy—comparing things using an analogy that does not work/the two things do not work as an analogy. The analogy is inaccurate. 6. Red herring—trying to distract the opponent by raising an issue that is unrelated, or very loosely related to the actual argument. Ignoring the argument and avoiding the argument by raising a distraction.