Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Category 4: Resource Development Judging Form - Prelims

    Uploaded by

    shanwei96
    12 views1 page
    This document contains a judging form for the preliminary round of a school projects competition. The form has two main sections that assess potential of the project and presentation skills. For potential, objectives, originality, methodology, coherence, resources, and usefulness are evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5. Reflection is also assessed. Presentation skills related to delivery, engagement, and answering questions are similarly rated. The total score out of 50 determines if a project proceeds to the semi-finals.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    4-Prelim

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a judging form for the preliminary round of a school projects competition. The form has two main sections that assess potential of the project and presentation skills. For potential, objectives, originality, methodology, coherence, resources, and usefulness are evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5. Reflection is also assessed. Presentation skills related to delivery, engagement, and answering questions are similarly rated. The total score out of 50 determines if a project proceeds to the semi-finals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views1 page

    Category 4: Resource Development Judging Form - Prelims

    Uploaded by

    shanwei96
    This document contains a judging form for the preliminary round of a school projects competition. The form has two main sections that assess potential of the project and presentation skills. For potential, objectives, originality, methodology, coherence, resources, and usefulness are evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5. Reflection is also assessed. Presentation skills related to delivery, engagement, and answering questions are similarly rated. The total score out of 50 determines if a project proceeds to the semi-finals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    HWA CHONG INSTITUTION (HIGH SCHOOL)

    PROJECTS’ DAY COMPETITION 2011


    CATEGORY 4 : RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
    JUDGING FORM – PRELIMS
    Project Group No. : __________
    Title of Project : ___________________________________________________________
    Level : Lower Secondary ( ) Upper Secondary ( )

    Skills * Levels of Achievement Remarks


    Potential of Project [35 marks]
    Satis- Very Excel-
    Fair Good
    factory Good lent

    Objectives
    Objectives and target audience 1 2 3 4 5
    are clearly identified

    Originality
    Resource package ideas are 1 2 3 4 5
    original and authentic

    Methodology
    Appropriate research 1 2 3 4 5
    methodology is planned for

    Coherence
    Suggested framework for the 1 2 3 4 5
    resource package is organised

    Resources
    1 2 3 4 5
    Variety of potential resources

    Usefulness
    Resource package is potentially 1 2 3 4 5
    useful

    Reflection
    Evidence of reflection in planning 1 2 3 4 5
    the project
    Presentation Skills [15 marks]
    Delivery
    1 2 3 4 5
    Speech and delivery is clear

    Engagement
    1 2 3 4 5
    Audience attention is engaged

    Q&A
    1 2 3 4 5
    Questions are well-answered TOTAL SCORE
    /50
    Sub-total
    Judge: __________________________ _______________ ___________
    Name Signature Date
    Note: Projects with averaged marks ≥ 25 will proceed to the semi-finals.
    All students must be prepared to do the oral presentation.

    You might also like