Key Performance Indicators

Graduate Employment Rate

Survey of 2008-09 graduates six months after graduation Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Employed

Released April 14, 2010

Graduate Satisfaction Rate

87.9 86.5 83.6 86.2 77.3 88.2 88.4 84.7 82.8 86.5 85.0 85.3 87.1 85.2 83.5 87.1 85.0 86.2 81.6 83.4 89.3 85.7 80.4 82.2 84.8

Survey of 2008-09 graduates six months after graduation Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province

Very Satisfied / Satisfied

Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

%
82.1 85.2 80.5 79.5 76.3 84.2 79.4 83.7 74.2 79.8 79.6 78.7 81.0 81.5 80.2 82.4 79.6 79.0 78.0 81.5 83.5 84.1 77.8 78.7 79.8

%
9.1

%
7.8 5.7 8.7 7.5

10.0 10.9 13.0 13.0 9.0 11.5 8.7 15.0 11.7 11.4 11.8 9.9 10.4 10.0 8.9 11.3 12.1 14.9 10.4 10.1 7.1 12.3 12.6 11.4

10.7 6.8 9.1 7.6 10.7 8.5 9.0 9.5 9.1 8.1 9.8 8.7 9.1 8.9 7.1 8.1 6.4 8.8 9.8 8.7 8.8

PLEASE NOTE: College-to-college comparisons (ranking) could produce misleading results, because of college size, local employment conditions, program mix and graduate demographics. The data from each college should be considered on its own.

Key Performance Indicators

Employer Satisfaction Rate
Survey of Employers who have hired 2008-09 College Graduates Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

Released April 14, 2010

Student Satisfaction Rate *

Student Satisfaction Survey, June 2009, November 2009 & February 2010 Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

%
91.6 88.1 93.6 89.0 91.0 92.2 94.6 92.9 93.8 92.3 91.7 92.3 93.4 94.7 89.6 92.7 94.6 93.2 93.3 92.6 94.9 93.8 92.7 93.8 93.0

%
5.2 7.1 5.7 7.3 6.3 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.0 5.2 6.5 6.1 3.8 2.9 7.8 2.8 3.0 5.7 3.3 6.7 4.2 4.7 6.3 4.4 4.9

%
3.2 4.8 0.6 3.7 2.7 4.7 1.8 3.1 2.2 2.5 1.7 1.5 2.8 2.4 2.6 4.6 2.4 1.1 3.3 0.6 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.9 2.1

%
80.7 74.8 74.8 74.8 66.8 82.3 76.5 77.8 71.5 79.8 78.1 70.8 77.9 77.0 76.4 80.5 73.5 83.1 75.2 78.8 78.8 79.5 75.4 75.0 76.3

%
4.8 7.7 7.0 6.2

14.5 17.5 18.2 19.0 21.2 13.6 17.4 17.0 20.7 15.4 16.7 19.3 17.0 17.0 17.5 14.5 19.3 11.0 17.6 16.1 15.8 14.9 15.2 18.8 17.0

12.0 4.1 6.1 5.2 7.7 4.8 5.2 9.9 5.2 6.0 6.0 5.1 7.2 5.9 7.2 5.1 5.3 5.7 9.4 6.2 6.7

*This table represents the average of the four capstone questions (14, 26, 44 & 45), the results for which are provided in the following tables.

PLEASE NOTE: College-to-college comparisons (ranking) could produce misleading results, because of college size, local employment conditions, program mix and graduate demographics. The data from each college should be considered on its own.

Key Performance Indicators

Capstone Question 14
Overall, your program is giving you knowledge and skills that will be useful in your future career Student Satisfaction Survey, June 2009, November 2009 & February 2010 Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

Released April 14, 2010

Capstone Question 26
The overall quality of the learning experiences in this program Student Satisfaction Survey, June 2009, November 2009 & February 2010 Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

%
89.3 86.1 85.5 89.3 82.5 91.9 86.9 89.7 84.2 87.5 87.6 85.3 86.3 88.1 85.2 88.3 85.9 91.3 90.1 89.5 89.4 90.6 86.2 85.8 87.2

%
7.9 9.2

%
2.8 4.7 4.3 3.2 5.3 2.5 3.9 2.9 5.4 3.5 3.5 5.0 3.7 3.2 4.5 4.4 4.0 3.5 2.8 2.7 3.0 3.0 5.4 3.8 3.9

%
82.4 77.5 79.2 83.7 72.6 87.2 78.7 84.4 74.5 81.4 82.3 77.5 81.3 81.6 77.6 83.2 77.9 86.1 82.5 83.5 82.7 86.3 78.9 79.1 80.2

%
4.4 6.8 5.9 3.7 8.6 3.0 5.7 2.9 7.6 4.6 4.5 6.9 4.4 4.3 5.7 4.8 6.0 4.9 4.4 3.8 4.1 2.9 7.2 5.1 5.4

13.2 15.7 15.0 12.6 18.8 9.8 15.6 12.8 18.0 14.1 13.2 15.6 14.3 14.0 16.7 12.0 16.2 9.0 13.1 12.7 13.2 10.9 13.9 15.8 14.4

10.2 7.6 12.2 5.5 9.2 7.4 10.5 8.9 8.9 9.8 10.0 8.7 10.3 7.3 10.1 5.3 7.1 7.8 7.7 6.4 8.3 10.4 8.9

PLEASE NOTE: College-to-college comparisons (ranking) could produce misleading results, because of college size, local employment conditions, program mix and graduate demographics. The data from each college should be considered on its own.

Key Performance Indicators

Capstone Question 44
The overall quality of the facilities / resources in the college Student Satisfaction Survey, June 2009, November 2009 & February 2010 Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

Released April 14, 2010

Capstone Question 45
The overall quality of the services in the college Student Satisfaction Survey, June 2009, November 2009 & February 2010 Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province
Very Satisfied / Satisfied Neither Satisfied / Nor Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied / Dissatisfied

%
74.8 67.2 66.1 61.3 56.9 73.3 71.6 69.6 64.0 76.5 72.3 60.1 72.8 69.6 72.7 74.8 65.7 77.5 64.4 71.2 72.0 68.9 68.7 68.7 69.3

%
6.8 9.3 9.9

%
76.5 68.2 68.4 64.9 55.2 76.7 68.9 67.4 63.5 73.8 70.1 60.2 71.2 68.6 70.2 75.6 64.7 77.5 63.9 71.0 71.4 72.1 67.7 66.6 68.6

%
5.2 8.1 7.1

18.5 23.5 24.0 27.8 26.2 21.6 21.0 23.0 26.8 18.2 21.2 24.9 20.6 21.7 19.9 18.8 23.8 14.7 23.9 21.5 20.3 21.7 18.4 23.4 21.5

18.3 21.8 23.6 28.0 27.5 17.5 23.8 24.9 27.6 20.6 23.6 26.9 23.0 23.4 23.3 19.7 27.1 15.1 26.3 22.5 22.1 20.5 20.2 25.5 23.0

10.0

10.9 16.9 5.2 7.4 7.4 9.1 5.3 6.5 14.9 6.7 8.7 7.4 6.4 10.4 7.8 11.7 7.2 7.7 9.4 12.9 7.9 9.2

17.3 5.8 7.3 7.7 8.8 5.6 6.3 12.9 5.9 7.9 6.5 4.7 8.2 7.4 9.9 6.5 6.6 7.4 12.1 8.0 8.4

PLEASE NOTE: College-to-college comparisons (ranking) could produce misleading results, because of college size, local employment conditions, program mix and graduate demographics. The data from each college should be considered on its own.

Key Performance Indicators

Graduation Rate *
2009-10 KPI (2008-09 Graduates)

Released April 14, 2010

Algonquin Boral Cambrian Canadore Centennial La Cit collgiale Conestoga Confederation Durham Fanshawe Fleming George Brown Georgian Humber Lambton Loyalist Mohawk Niagara Northern St. Clair St. Lawrence Sault Seneca Sheridan Province

62.9% 77.3% 65.2% 66.4% 59.3% 64.2% 66.5% 59.9% 67.5% 68.5% 66.6% 73.3% 62.5% 61.1% 68.4% 65.6% 60.4% 65.8% 60.8% 66.4% 69.3% 60.0% 56.6% 71.1% 65.0%

* The 2009-10 KPI Graduation Rate is based on students who started one-year programs in 2007-08, two-year programs in 2005-06, three-year programs in 2003-04, and four-year programs in 2002-03, and who had graduated by 2008-09.

PLEASE NOTE: College-to-college comparisons (ranking) could produce misleading results, because of college size, local employment conditions, program mix and graduate demographics. The data from each college should be considered on its own.