Course L2DTEC Outcomes (Results/Statistics)

Results by Student, GPAs, Total credits, Avg credits

L2DTEC Standards 91893 91896 91897 91892 91898

Credits 4 6 6 4 3
Interna
Type Internal Internal Internal l External
Student Tutor Total
Title Year Code Teacher Ethnicity DIG 2.4 DIG 2.7 DIG 2.8 DIG 2.3 DIG 2.9 GPA Credits
ABSOLOM, Hugo 12 CCS FRM NZ European E E E E E 100% 23
GALLAGHER,
Marcus 12 OKB FRM NZ European E E E E M 97% 23
GUO, Eric 12 OFR FRM Chinese A A A M A 54% 23
MUIR, William 12 DES FRM Maori/NZ European E A M M N 63% 20
PITCHER, Keaton 11 ONC FRM NZ European E E E E E 100% 23
RANDELL, Tori 12 CMR FRM Maori M A E M A 72% 23
SINGH, Rajwinder 12 DFM FRM Punjabi E A A E N 61% 20
Average 78% 22.14

Grade Spread Overall and by Teacher

Overall
DIG 2.4 DIG 2.7 DIG 2.8 DIG 2.3 DIG 2.9

91893 91896 91897 91892 91898 Total

Not Attempted 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Not Achieved 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% 6%
Achieved 14% 57% 29% 0% 29% 26%
Merit 14% 0% 14% 43% 14% 17%
Excellence 71% 43% 57% 57% 29% 51%
Combined
Merit/Excellence 86% 43% 71% 100% 43% 69%
 Ethnicity Outcomes (Results/Statistics)
DIG
DIG 2.4 DIG 2.7 DIG 2.8 2.3 DIG 2.9
Number of Maori Students: 2
91893 91896 91897 91892 91898 Total

Not Attempted 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Not Achieved 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 10%
Achieved 0% 100% 0% 0% 50% 30%
Merit 50% 0% 50% 100% 0% 40%
Excellence 50% 0% 50% 0% 0% 20%
Combined Merit/Excellence 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 60%

NCEA ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

Please note that you may wish to utilise the following documents in conjunction with your
analysis above and if so enclose these with this Analysis :
1. Subject information provided in the red NCEA folder at beginning of the year.
2. Summary NCEA statistics by standard (available in KAMAR).
3. School wide individual’s GPA analysis with your students highlighted in the ranked listing
(analysis for academic tie/colours awards – provided to HOFs from ROB) and passed onto
you.

TEACHER:
COURSE:

Reflection on this analysis:

1. Please make an overall comment on the quality of your subjects results in your view, that may relate to national %, decile 10 boys, or other
class groups in this subject area and/or your expectation of class performance.

Our boys did quite well in Digital Tech in 2023, there quality of work was of high standard. The year 12 class performance was better than I expected but
certain boys could have done better in some assessment standards.
2. Which Achievement Standard(s) are you most pleased with results wise and why?
AS91893 – Developing an advanced website – The websites the boys developed was of high quality. They incorporated everything that was
learned in class and more.

3. Which Achievement Standard(s) are you most disappointed with, suggest issues here?
AS91898 – Computer Science Concept External. I feel that some boys did not prepare well enough for the external.

4. What programme changes have you, or will you plan to put into place in order to improve opportunities for your students?

I have combined AS91891 and AS91893. Moved it to term one and letting the boys know it is for 7 credits in total.
Programming Moved to term 2 and the external work to the end of term 3 – complete work 4 weeks before they need to sit the DCAT.
I have changed the External for year 12 to writing a summary of an outcome developed.

5. Identify any students you were particularly pleased with and suggest reasons.
Keaton Pitcher and Hugo Absolom - outstanding results for Digital tech. Always putting in their best.

6. Identify any students you feel under-achieved and suggest reasons.

Rajwinder Singh - Time management was biggest let down also handing in wrong and corrupted documents – had to resubmit in various occations

7. Make a comment about the performance versus expectation of:

A High ability band students

Managed their assessments well. Did enough research and asked questions to resolve any confusion on the assessments. They tend to go
beyond what was taught in class.

B Middle ability band students

Managed their assessments good. Did research and asked for clarification on certain aspects.

C Low ability band students

Managed their assessments poorly. Did no or limited research, did not ask for clarification on aspects. Tend to do only minimum.
8. Identify students who identify as Maori in this cohort and comment on how they have performed. Where possible, suggest reasons for
successes or under-achievements, along with any strategies you will put in place to endeavour to make this continue or discontinue, where
appropriate.
Tori Randell – Tori had a difficult year in digital technology. He tried his best but was working with a laptop that was not up to standard. He
was given the opportunity to work on the class computer but only worked on it during lessons. He did not attempt to catch up work outside
lesson time. Tori put in good effort in the internals by completing evidence documents. In the end he received good grades in year 12 although
it was his first year doing digital technology with no prior knowledge.

9. Identify any students who have not gained a minimum 14 credits and suggest approaches and strategies you would use to support boys to get
across this line.
None

10. Are there any other comments you wish to make?

The approach I am taking this year would be to guide the boys more with their time management and give them deadlines for certain topics to be
completed in their assessment.