SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

4 Windermere Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Windermere Site 139 Windermere Rd. Burlington St. E & QEW 41.8

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Fair Good Poor Poor Good Good Good 0 Poor Poor Fair Poor 0 Good Good 0 Terrible Fair Poor Good 0 Good Poor Poor Fair 0 Poor Excellent Good 0 Very Good Terrible Terrible 0 Terrible Good 0 Good Good Fair Good Fair 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Good 0 Very Good Excellent Good 0 Good Good Poor

2 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 5 3 4 0 0 0 3 3 3 2 3 2 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 3 3 1

0.05 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.19 0.12 0.19 0.07 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.04

TOTAL SCORE

675

106

2.60 75.96

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

18 Aberdeen Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Aberdeen Site 606 Aberdeen Ave. Aberdeen Ave. & Longwoods Rd. S 14.6

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Fair Excellent Fair Fair Very Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good Good Good 0 Good Good 0 Poor Very Good Fair Fair 0 Good Poor Poor Very Good 0 Poor Excellent Good 0 Fair Fair Poor 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Good Good Good 0 Poor Poor Fair Good 0 Good Good Good 0 Good Good Good

2 5 2 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 4 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 5 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

0.05 0.19 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11

TOTAL SCORE

675

116

2.62 76.16

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

15 Ancaster High School

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Ancaster Site 374 Jerseyville Rd. W Jerseyville Rd. W & Meadowbrook Dr. 42.8

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Fair Good Good Good Fair Fair Good 0 Fair Fair Fair Fair 0 Good Good 0 Excellent Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Poor Poor 0 Poor Fair Good 0 Fair Poor Good 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Poor Fair Poor 0 Very Good Good Very Good Very Good 0 Very Good Excellent Excellent 0 Good Good Excellent

2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 4 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 4 3 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 5

0.05 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.15 0.07 0.15 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.19

TOTAL SCORE

675

121

2.92 79.20

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

1 Chatham Street

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Chatam Site n/a Chatham St. & Dundurn St. S. 16.5

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Excellent Good Poor Fair Good Good Good 0 Fair Fair Good Fair 0 Good Good 0 Poor Very Good Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Poor Very Good 0 Poor Excellent Good 0 Terrible Terrible Terrible 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Good Good Good 0 Good Poor Very Good Good 0 Very Good Excellent Good 0 Good Good Very Good

5 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 4 3 4 3 1 1 4 1 5 3 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 4 3 4 5 3 3 3 4

0.12 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.15 0.07 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15

TOTAL SCORE

675

117

2.71 77.11

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

9 City Hall Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) City Hall Site 71 Main st. W Main St. W & Bay St. S 6

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Excellent Good Very Good Fair Fair Fair Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Excellent Good 0 Poor Excellent Poor Terrible 0 Good Very Good Very Good Excellent 0 Very Good Excellent Fair 0 Very Good Excellent Excellent 0 Excellent Terrible 0 Good Good Fair Fair Fair 0 Terrible Terrible Terrible Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Good 0 Fair Good Good

5 3 4 2 2 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 1 5 1 0 3 4 4 5 4 5 2 4 5 5 5 0 3 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 4 5 5 3 2 3 3

0.12 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.03 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.11

TOTAL SCORE

675

139

3.13 81.35

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

14 Crestwood Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Crestwood 50 Millwood Place Mohawk Rd. E & Upper Wentworth St. 9.85
Priority

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1 2.00

A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Very Good Very Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Good 0 Very Good Very Good Good Very Good 0 Good Good 0 Very Good Excellent Very Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Good Very Good 0 Fair Good Fair 0 Fair Fair Good 0 Fair Good 0 Good Very Good Very Good Excellent Very Good 0 Good Fair Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Excellent Good Excellent

4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 5 4 4 3 1 3 4 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 3 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 5

0.09 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.15 0.12 0.02 0.11 0.05 0.15 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.19

TOTAL SCORE

675

154

3.62 86.16

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

5 Flamborough Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Flamborough Site 1046 Hwy 6 Hwy 6 & Concession Rd. 6 W 5.33

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Terrible Good Terrible Terrible Good Good Fair 0 Terrible Terrible Poor Terrible 0 Good Good 0 Good Poor Fair Very Good 0 Good Poor Poor Poor 0 Very Good Poor Good 0 Fair Terrible Terrible 0 Terrible Good 0 Good Good Poor Terrible Poor 0 Poor Terrible Poor Good 0 Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good Fair

0 3 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 1 0 3 3 3 1 2 4 3 1 1 1 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 3 3 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 3 4 3 3 3 2

0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

78

1.84 68.39

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

2 Highland Rd.

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Highland Site 512 Highland Rd. Highland Rd. & Upper Mt. Albion Rd. 16.6

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Excellent Fair Good Very Good Very Good Good 0 Fair Very Good Fair Very Good 0 Good Good 0 Good Good Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Good Fair 0 Fair Fair Good 0 Very Good Good Good 0 Fair Good 0 Fair Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Very Good Excellent Good 0 Very Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good Fair

3 5 2 3 4 4 3 2 4 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 1 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 2 3 2 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 3 3 3 2

0.07 0.19 0.03 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.15 0.09 0.02 0.19 0.09 0.19 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

139

3.31 83.11

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

8 Innovation Park

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Innovation Park 175 & 270 Longwoods Rd. Longwoods Rd. & Aberdeen Ave. 15.5

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Fair Very Good Good Fair Excellent Excellent Good 0 Good Good Good Good 0 Good Good 0 Poor Very Good Fair Very Good 0 Good Poor Poor Very Good 0 Poor Excellent Good 0 Fair Good Fair 0 Very Good Very Good 0 Very Good Very Good Good Good Good 0 Very Good Fair Excellent Poor 0 Very Good Excellent Good 0 Good Good Very Good

2 4 3 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 4 2 4 3 1 1 4 1 5 3 2 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 2 5 1 4 5 3 3 3 4

0.05 0.15 0.04 0.03 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.15 0.05 0.19 0.02 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15

TOTAL SCORE

675

137

3.20 82.04

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

17 Jackson Square

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Jackson Square 77 James St. N James St. & King St. E 3.5

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Excellent Good Very Good Fair Poor Poor Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Excellent Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Good 0 Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Very Good Good Very Good 0 Excellent Terrible 0 Very Good Very Good Fair Fair Fair 0 Terrible Terrible Terrible Excellent 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Very Good Excellent Excellent

5 3 4 2 1 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 4 5 0 4 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 4 5 5

0.12 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.15 0.07 0.09 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.19

TOTAL SCORE

675

160

3.63 86.33

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

12 Jerome Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Jerome Site 1310 Upper Wellington Upper Wellington St. & L. A. Pkwy 26.9

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Good Good Good Good Good Good 0 Good Fair Good Fair 0 Good Good 0 Good Good Very Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Poor Good 0 Poor Fair Good 0 Poor Terrible Fair 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good 0 Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Good Very Good

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 0 2 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 4

0.07 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.09 0.02 0.19 0.12 0.19 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.15

TOTAL SCORE

675

133

3.12 81.24

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

10 King & Queen

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) King & Queen Site King & Queen King & Queen 3.79

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Excellent Good Very Good Fair Fair Fair Good 0 Very Good Excellent Very Good Very Good 0 Good Good 0 Fair Good Fair Terrible 0 Good Very Good Good Excellent 0 Excellent Very Good Poor 0 Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Very Good Poor 0 Good Good Fair Fair Fair 0 Terrible Terrible Terrible Good 0 Good Good Good 0 Fair Good Fair

5 3 4 2 2 2 3 4 5 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 0 3 4 3 5 5 4 1 4 4 4 4 1 3 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 2 3 2

0.12 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.01 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

124

2.74 77.38

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

6 Pritchard Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Pritchard Site 250 Pritchard Rd. Pritchard Rd. & Rymal Rd. 26

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Poor Good Terrible Terrible Good Good Good 0 Fair Fair Fair Fair 0 Good Good 0 Good Fair Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Fair Fair 0 Poor Fair Fair 0 Terrible Terrible Terrible 0 Terrible Good 0 Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Excellent Excellent Good 0 Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good Fair

1 3 0 0 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 3 3 3 2

0.02 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.09 0.02 0.19 0.12 0.19 0.07 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

109

2.57 75.70

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

13 Sheldon Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Sheldon Site 315 Stone Church Rd. W Stone Church Rd. W & Garth St. 29.1
Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1 2.00

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Terrible

Scoring Points 5 4 3 2 1 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Very Good Good Good Good Good Good 0 Good Fair Fair Fair 0 Good Good 0 Good Fair Fair Excellent 0 Good Poor Poor Fair 0 Poor Fair Fair 0 Poor Terrible Fair 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Very Good Excellent Good 0 Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Good Good

3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 5 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 3 3

0.07 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.09 0.02 0.19 0.09 0.19 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.11 0.11

TOTAL SCORE

675

126

3.01 80.07

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

16 Sir Alan McNab Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Sir Alan McNab Site 145 Magnolia Dr. Magnolia Dr. & Mohawk Rd. W 30

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1 2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Good 0 Good Good Good Good 0 Good Good 0 Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Fair Good 0 Poor Fair Good 0 Poor Terrible Fair 0 Poor Good 0 Good Good Excellent Excellent Excellent 0 Good Good Good Very Good 0 Good Excellent Excellent 0 Excellent Fair Excellent

3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 2 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 4 3 5 5 5 2 5

0.07 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.19 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.19

TOTAL SCORE

675

134

3.11 81.11

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

3 Stone Church and Pritchard

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Pritchard Site 130 Mud St. & 1565 Stone Church Rd. E Stone Church Rd. E & Pritchard Rd. 16

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Excellent Poor Good Very Good Very Good Good 0 Fair Good Fair Good 0 Good Good 0 Good Fair Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Fair Fair 0 Fair Fair Good 0 Very Good Good Fair 0 Terrible Good 0 Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Excellent Good Excellent Good 0 Very Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good Fair

3 5 1 3 4 4 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 2 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 3 5 3 4 4 3 3 3 2

0.07 0.19 0.01 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.15 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.09 0.02 0.19 0.07 0.19 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

131

3.11 81.05

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

7 Upper James Site

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) Upper James Site Upper James & Alderlea Ave. Upper James & Alderlea Ave. 19.7

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Priority Points A B C D E Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor 5 4 3 2 1

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Good Terrible Terrible Good Good Good 0 Good Good Fair Good 0 Good Good 0 Good Good Good Very Good 0 Good Poor Fair Fair 0 Poor Fair Good 0 Good Fair Fair 0 Terrible Good 0 Good Good Good Good Good 0 Very Good Good Excellent Good 0 Poor Good Poor 0 Good Fair Fair

3 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 1 3 1 3 2 2

0.07 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.15 0.07 0.19 0.07 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.07

TOTAL SCORE

675

111

2.54 75.38

SITE SELECTION CRITERIA MODEL PROPOSED EDUCATION CENTRE HAMILTON WENTWORTH DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

SITE # SITE NAME

11 West Harbour Lands

SITE INFORMATION Name Address Closest Intersection Site Area (acres) West Harbour Lands Barton & Bay Barton & Bay 10

Priority A B C D E

WEIGHTING SYSTEM Assigned Weighting Points 5 4 3 2 1

Priority Weighting Differenciation Factor

2.00

SCORING SYSTEM Scoring Scoring Points Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 Terrible 0

SITE EVALUATION (SCORING MODEL) CRITERIA Category Criteria Rank WEIGHTING % Weighting Evaluation Score Weighted Score

Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Accessibility Amenities Amenities Amenities Amenities Building Operating Costs Building Operating Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Capital Costs Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Economic Impact Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Location Location Location Parking Parking Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Proximity Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Size, Configuration & Topography Site Zoning Site Zoning Site Zoning Timing Timing Timing

Public transit access Highway / major arterial access To pedestrian infrastructure To bike paths To board service vehicles To other delivery vehicles Accessible by all mobilility levels (complies with ODA Act) Business services Restaurants Convention / meeting facilities Other retail services Site Impacts on building operating costs (heating) Site Impacts on building operating costs (hydro) Site Costs, including geotechnical & remediation Infrastructure costs Impacts on building costs Impacts on parking construction costs Hamiltion as "best place to raise a child" Downtown Hamilton revitalization Local economic benefits / impacts (job creation, etc.) Aligns with GRIDS Sized to Minimize Building Footrpint Infill Or brownfield rather than greenfield Re-use of existing buildng infrastructure Visibilility to public Suitability to a "Landmark Building" Connections to / integration with surrounding communities Off site availability Off site parking rates To other key user groups To other key stakeholders To Schools To administrative staff residences To student population Sufficient for building program, allows landmark gesture Sufficient for development of partner facilities (co-location) Sufficient for parking needs Meetings topographical and geotechnical requirements Zoned (or certain to be re-zoned) for ECS land use Zoning allows for sufficient density & building height Approval of other jurisdictions having authority Acquisition timing Approval timing Construction timing

B A C C B D B C B D C B C B B C C D D B C B B C A B B A B C C A B D A B A B A A A A A A

16 25 9 9 16 4 16 9 16 4 9 16 9 16 16 9 9 4 4 16 9 16 16 9 25 16 16 25 16 9 9 25 16 4 25 16 25 16 25 25 25 25 25 25

2.4% 3.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 0.6% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 0.6% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 2.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%

Good Fair Good Good Fair Fair Good 0 Good Good Very Good Good 0 Good Good 0 Poor Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Good Very Good Good Very Good 0 Fair Excellent Good 0 Good Good Very Good 0 Very Good Very Good 0 Good Good Poor Fair Poor 0 Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good 0 Good Good Good 0 Fair Good Good

3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 1 2 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 3 3

0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.15 0.09 0.15 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.11

TOTAL SCORE

675

135

3.04 80.44