Faridabad: Ity Evelopment Lan

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
FARIDABAD
City Development
Plan
2006-2012
October 2006
Technical Assistance by
City Development Plan
Municipal Corporation of Faridabad
CONTENTS
1 PROJECT BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 1 OBJECTIVES OF A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ........................................................................................ 2 THE CDP PROCESS ADOPTED BY FARIDABAD ....................................................................................... 3 ABOUT FARIDABAD ............................................................................................................................... 6 GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 6 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL ....................................................................................................................... 7 LINKAGES AND CONNECTIVITY .............................................................................................................. 7 PLACES OF IMPORTANCE ........................................................................................................................ 8 FARIDABAD IN NCR............................................................................................................................... 9 ECONOMY .............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.7.1 Economic base ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.7.2 NCR proposals for economic development ........................................................................... 11 2.7.3 Major issues pertaining to industrial growth of Faridabad.................................................. 12 INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM ............................................................................................................... 13 2.8.1 Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) ....................................................................... 13 2.8.2 Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) ................................................................ 15 2.8.3 Town & Country Planning Department, Govt. of Haryana .................................................. 16 2.8.4 Major issues pertaining to Institutional Mechanism in Faridabad....................................... 16 APPROACH TO FORMULATING A VISION FOR FARIDABAD UNDER CDP................................................ 18 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME ...................................................... 18 VISION FOR FARIDABAD ....................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Important Aspects that Defined Faridabads Vision............................................................. 23 3.3.2 Vision Statement.................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................. 24 FARIDABAD TOMORROW...................................................................................................................... 25 GROWTH TRENDS................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1.1 Demography.......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Municipal Area and Population Density............................................................................... 26 4.1.3 Sex Ratio and Literacy .......................................................................................................... 27 4.1.4 Population Projection ........................................................................................................... 28 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.1 Urbanisable Land Proposed Land use............................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Implementation of Development Plan ................................................................................... 33 4.2.3 Developed area vis--vis Urbanisable Land......................................................................... 34 4.2.4 Key issues, potential and challenges regarding land use...................................................... 34 URBAN ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................ 35 4.3.1 Air Pollution.......................................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Water Pollution ..................................................................................................................... 37 4.3.3 Key issues regarding urban environment.............................................................................. 38 URBAN POOR AND SLUMS IN FARIDABAD ............................................................................................ 38 4.4.1 Poverty in Faridabad ............................................................................................................ 38 4.4.2 Slums in Faridabad............................................................................................................... 39 4.4.3 Key issues regarding Slums and Urban poor........................................................................ 40 MUNICIPAL SERVICES ROADS, STREET LIGHTING, AND TRANSPORTATION....................................... 41 4.5.1 Road Network........................................................................................................................ 41 4.5.2 Street lighting........................................................................................................................ 42 4.5.3 Urban Transport ................................................................................................................... 43 4.5.4 Issues, Potential and Challenges in roads, street lighting and transport sectors ................. 46
FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY................................................................................................. 6
2.8
FORMULATION OF VISION AND MISSION ........................................................................................ 18 3.1 3.2 3.3
3.4 4 4.1
CITY ASSESSMENT SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 26
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
ii
City Development Plan 4.6
4.7
4.8 4.9
4.10
4.11
MUNICIPAL SERVICES WATER SUPPLY .............................................................................................. 47 4.6.1 Source of Water Supply......................................................................................................... 47 4.6.2 Treatment facilities ............................................................................................................... 48 4.6.3 Storage and Distribution System........................................................................................... 48 4.6.4 House Service Connections, user charges and cost recovery ............................................... 50 4.6.5 Service Levels........................................................................................................................ 52 4.6.6 Issues, Potential and Challenges in water supply sector ...................................................... 52 MUNICIPAL SERVICES SEWERAGE ..................................................................................................... 53 4.7.1 Existing Sewerage System ..................................................................................................... 55 4.7.2 YAP ....................................................................................................................................... 55 4.7.3 Issues related to Sewerage system ........................................................................................ 56 MUNICIPAL SERVICES STORM WATER DRAINAGE ............................................................................ 57 4.8.1 Issues related to Storm water drains..................................................................................... 57 MUNICIPAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 58 4.9.1 Quantum of Solid Waste Generation..................................................................................... 58 4.9.2 Collection of Solid Waste ...................................................................................................... 58 4.9.3 Waste Transportation & Disposal......................................................................................... 58 4.9.4 Issues, potential and challenges in Solid Waste Management .............................................. 59 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................... 60 4.10.1 Fire Services ......................................................................................................................... 60 4.10.2 Recreation, Gardens and Parks ............................................................................................ 61 4.10.3 Health facilities ..................................................................................................................... 62 4.10.4 Educational facilities ............................................................................................................ 62 MUNICIPAL FINANCES .......................................................................................................................... 63 4.11.1 Financial Status at a Glance................................................................................................. 64 4.11.2 Revenue Account ................................................................................................................... 65 4.11.3 Capital Account..................................................................................................................... 71 4.11.4 Key issues regarding financial condition of MCF ................................................................ 72 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP) ............................................................................................................ 75 5.1.1 Institutionalising the CIP Process......................................................................................... 75 5.1.2 Summary of Investments........................................................................................................ 76 SECTOR WISE CIP DETAILS CAPITAL NEEDS/ INVESTMENTS.............................................................. 78 5.2.1 Water Supply (MCF) ............................................................................................................. 78 5.2.2 Sewerage (MCF) ................................................................................................................... 80 5.2.3 Roads, Street lighting, Urban transport and Traffic management (MCF)............................ 82 5.2.4 Storm Water Drainage (MCF) .............................................................................................. 85 5.2.5 Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation (MCF) ............................................................................ 87 5.2.6 Slums and Basic Services for Urban Poor (MCF) ................................................................ 90 5.2.7 Land use/ Development planning (MCF, HUDA)................................................................. 91 5.2.8 River Conservation ............................................................................................................... 92 5.2.9 Fire services.......................................................................................................................... 93 5.2.10 Projects supporting Economic Development and City Beautification .................................. 94 5.2.11 Urban Governance/ System Modernisation .......................................................................... 95 5.2.12 New MCF office, system studies and minor capital works.................................................... 96 SECTOR WISE LISTING OF PRIORITY PROJECTS ..................................................................................... 98 5.3.1 Priority Projects Water Supply .......................................................................................... 98 5.3.2 Priority Projects Sewerage ................................................................................................ 99 5.3.3 Priority Projects Roads.................................................................................................... 101 5.3.4 Priority Projects Storm Water Drains ............................................................................. 104 5.3.5 Priority Projects Parks and Play Grounds ...................................................................... 106 5.3.6 Priority Projects Slums .................................................................................................... 107 FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR THE CIP................................................................................................ 108 FINANCE PROJECTIONS ...................................................................................................................... 109 6.2.1 Municipal Account Growth Projections and Assumptions............................................... 109
CITY INVESTMENT PLAN, STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN................................ 75 5.1
5.2
5.3
INVESTMENT CAPACITY AND SUSTENANCE OF MCF ................................................................ 108 6.1 6.2
iii
City Development Plan 6.3
INVESTMENT CAPACITY/ SUSTENANCE .............................................................................................. 110 6.3.1 Impact of JNNURM Reforms on Investment Capacity ........................................................ 110 6.3.2 Fund Requirement............................................................................................................... 111 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 112 MANDATORY REFORMS BY FARIDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .................................................. 112 7.2.1 Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting .......................... 112 7.2.2 Introduction of a system of e-Governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS for various services provided .............................................................................................. 113 7.2.3 Property tax on GIS platform and proposed achievement of collection efficiency of at least 85%............................................................................................................................. 114 7.2.4 Levy of reasonable user charges by MCF for all services to recover full cost of O&M ..... 114 7.2.5 Internal earmarking within local bodies, budgets for basic services to the urban poor and provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices ................................................................................................................. 114 OPTIONAL REFORMS AT ULB LEVEL ................................................................................................. 115 REFORMS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY GOVT. OF HARYANA .................................................................... 115 7.4.1 Mandatory Reforms............................................................................................................. 115 7.4.2 Optional Reforms ................................................................................................................ 116
REFORM ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 112 7.1 7.2
7.3 7.4
Annexure 1: JNNURM Interactive Workshop ...........................................................................118 Annexure 2: MCF Officials Workshop.......................................................................................120 Annexure 3: City Stakeholder Workshop 16th July 2006 .........................................................122 Annexure 4: Summary of Discussions with Stakeholders..........................................................128 Annexure 5: Municipal Finance Assessment of Past 5 Years .................................................133 Annexure 6: CIP- Demand Gap Analysis, Costing and Investments .......................................141 Annexure 7: Investment Phasing ................................................................................................144 Annexure 8: Financial Projections- Financial Operating Plan ...................................................146 Annexure 9: Reform Check List .................................................................................................148
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Institutional Service Responsibility Matrix ................................................................................. 13 Table 2. MCF, Staffing Pattern (2005-06)................................................................................................. 14 Table 3. Population Growth of Faridabad.................................................................................................. 26 Table 4. Density Pattern in Faridabad and Other Cities in India ............................................................... 27 Table 5. Sex Ratio and Literacy Level....................................................................................................... 27 Table 6. Population projections for Faridabad........................................................................................... 28 Table 7. Proposed Land Use of Faridabad 2011 ..................................................................................... 29 Table 8. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city (NAAQM) ..................................................................... 36 Table 9. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city at other locations............................................................ 36 Table 10. Surface water quality in Faridabad City .................................................................................... 37 Table 11. Ground water quality in Faridabad City .................................................................................... 37 Table 12. Slums in Faridabad .................................................................................................................... 39 Table 13. Road Length in Faridabad.......................................................................................................... 41 Table 14. Street lights in MCF area ........................................................................................................... 42 Table 15. Location and capacity of GLSRs ............................................................................................... 48 Table 16. Location of ESRs in Faridabad .................................................................................................. 50 Table 17. Present Water Tariff Structure ................................................................................................... 51 Table 18. Water Charges Demand Collection Balance Statement.......................................................... 51 Table 19. Service Levels Water Supply.................................................................................................. 52 Table 20. Sewerage Treatment Plants - Faridabad..................................................................................... 55 Table 21. Storm Water Drains (Tertiary Network) Details........................................................................ 57 Table 22. Fleet of Conservancy vehicles with MCF.................................................................................. 59 Table 23. Staff and vehicles with Fire Department, MCF ......................................................................... 60 Table 24. Financial Status at a Glance....................................................................................................... 64 Table 25. Source-wise revenue income ..................................................................................................... 65 Table 26. Nos. of properties in Faridabad.................................................................................................. 66 Table 27. House tax DCB statement....................................................................................................... 67 Table 28. Application of funds by head of Account .................................................................................. 68 Table 29. Section-wise establishment expenditure .................................................................................... 69 Table 30. Outstanding Debt Liability ........................................................................................................ 70 Table 31. Details of Capital Account......................................................................................................... 71 Table 32. Key Financial Indicators ............................................................................................................ 73 Table 33. Municipal service delivery Responsible agencies .................................................................. 75 Table 34. Agency/ Period wise summary of Capital Investments ............................................................. 76 Table 35. Summary of Capital Investments............................................................................................... 77 Table 36. Water supply : Demand-Gap Assessment.................................................................................. 78 Table 37. Sewerage : Demand-Gap Assessment........................................................................................ 80 Table 38. Roads, street lighting, traffic management : Demand-Gap Assessment .................................... 82 Table 39. Storm water drainage : Demand-Gap Assessment..................................................................... 85 Table 40. Conservancy & Sanitation : Demand-Gap Assessment ............................................................. 87 Table 41. Important assumptions made in the projections....................................................................... 109 Table 42. CIP Funding Pattern................................................................................................................. 111
ABBREVIATIONS
ARV BOD BT BT CAA CAGR CC CNCR CDP CIP COD cu.m DCB DTC DCR DHBVN DO DPR ESR EWS FSI GLSR GoI GoH gpcd HHs PT/ HT HMCA HUDA HUIDB HSIDC HUDCO IT IPT JNNURM Kg KL LCS LIG LMV lpcd M mcum ML MCF MoA MoEF MRTS MNC NGO NBCC NCRPB Annual Rateable Value Biological Oxygen Demand Black Topped Bio-technology Constitutional Amendment Act Compound Annual Growth Rate Cement Concrete Central National Capital Region City Development Plan City/ Capital Investment Plan Chemical Oxygen Demand Cubic Meter Demand Collection Balance Delhi Transport Corporation Development Control Regulations Dhakshin Haryana Bijlee Vitharan Nigam Dissolved Oxygen Detail Project Report Elevated Storage Reservoir Economically Weaker Section Floor Space Index (same as FAR) Ground Level Storage Reservoir Government of India Government of Haryana Grams per Capita per Day Households Property Tax/ House Tax Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Housing & Urban Development Corporation Information technology Intermediate Public Transport Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission Kilograms Kilo Litres Low Cost Sanitation Low Income Group Light Motor Vehicle Litres per Capita per Day Meters Million cubic meter Million Litres Municipal Corporation of Faridabad
Memorandum of Agreement
Ministry of Environment and Forest Mass Rapid Transit System Multi National Companies Non-Governmental Organization National Building Construction Company National Capital Region Planning Board
vi
NCT NIUA NH NRCD NIT O&M PCU PWD (PH) PWD (BR) PPP PSP RWA ROB RTO Rs. sq. km. STP SEZ SWOT SWM UFW UGD ULB WBM WFPR YAP
National Capital Territory National Institute of Urban Affairs National Highway National River Conservation Department New Industrial Township Operation & Maintenance Passenger Car Unit Public Works Department (Public Health) Public Works Department (Building and Roads) Public Private Partnership Public Stand Post Resident Welfare Association Road over Bridge Regional Transport Office Rupees (Indian) Square Kilometre Sewerage Treatment Plant Special Economic Zones Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats Solid Waste Management Unaccounted for water Underground Drainage Urban Local Body Water Bound Macadam Work Force Participation Rate Yamuna Action Plan
vii
1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 BACKGROUND
As per the 2001 census, the urban population of India stood at 285.35 million, which is about 27.8 per cent of the countrys total population; by 2021, the urban population is estimated to account for above 40 per cent of Indias population. Thus, cities and towns are expected to play a vital role in Indias socio-economic transformation and change. Apart from their contribution to the countrys gross domestic product (GDP), which is currently placed at about 50-55 per cent, and their growing role in global markets, cities in India will be the engines of economic growth, the centre-points of innovation and the hub of many socio-economic activities. However, the current state of affairs in most of our urban areas is unsatisfactory on all parameters of urban governance like planned growth, share of slum population, reliability of civic infrastructure and financial resources. All these factors will have a significant negative economic consequence if not addressed in a planned manner. Municipal governments and other institutions responsible for providing services are facing an acute shortage of capacity and resources, notwithstanding the Constitution (74th) Amendment Act, 1992, on urban local bodies. Most urban local bodies are starved of resources on account of their inability to effectively use their revenue-raising powers, particularly those relating to property tax and user charges. Given the current state of affairs of our cities, their incompatibility with the countrys socioeconomic objectives and Indias growing role in the world economy, the Government of India launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in FY 2005-06. This mission will be in place for the next seven years; it aims at creating economically productive, efficient, equitable and responsive cities. The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission focuses on: Improving and augmenting the economic and social infrastructure of cities; Ensuring basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure; Initiating wide-ranging urban sector reforms whose primary aim is to eliminate the legal, institutional and financial constraints that have impeded investment in urban infrastructure and service; and Strengthening municipal governments and their functioning with respect to the provisions of the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth) Amendment Act, 1992. It provides for public disclosure of local spending decisions together with the earmarking of budgetary locations for basic services to the poor. The JNNURM assumes that in order to make our cities meaningfully contribute to Indias economic growth and its poverty reduction objectives, it is essential to create incentives and support for urban reforms both at the state and the city level. This can be achieved by: Developing appropriate enabling frameworks; Enhancing the creditworthiness of municipal governments; and Integrating the urban poor with the service delivery systems.
The JNNURM is also designed to encourage the involvement of the private sector in service delivery and management and thus the implementation of the reform agenda. It accordingly provides for the participation of business, industry, civic groups and communities in local decision-making. It is estimated that cities with a million plus population and a few special cities (currently 63 cities) together need about Rs. 1,20,000 crores to cover the gap in their infrastructure-building funds. To meet this gap, the Government of India (GoI) proposes to allocate about Rs. 50,000 crores during the next seven years in the form of grants to urban local bodies (ULBs). But GoI has framed the JNNURM guidelines in such a way that applicant ULBs will be eligible for grant assistance provided the cities undertake certain reforms; the objective is to improve infrastructure as well as to ensure longterm sustenance of the ULBs. Thus, to be eligible for the grant assistance under JNNURM, the Government of India requires cities to: Formulate a medium-term City Development Plan (CDP) to align with citizens interest and priorities;
Application Process to JNNURM funds Application Process to JNNURM funds

City Development Plan City Development Plan
Timeline for Implementation Timeline for Implementation of Reforms of Reforms
Detailed Project Reports Detailed Project Reports
Application for JNNURM funds Application for JNNURM funds Application for JNNURM funds Application for JNNURM funds
Prepare project proposals in accordance with the CDP; and Draw up a timeline for implementing the urban sector reforms. Subject to the fulfillment of the above-stated requirements and their satisfactory appraisal, the Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development/Ministry of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation will sign a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the state government and the city, and release funds in accordance with the payment schedule that will form a part of the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA). The formulation of a City Development Plan is thus a mandatory requirement for accessing JNNURM funds. The Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board, Government of Haryana, has retained the services of CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory to prepare the City Development Plan under the JNNURM guidelines for Faridabad.
1.2
OBJECTIVES OF A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The City Development Plan (CDP) is the municipal corporations corporate strategy that presents both a vision of a desired future for the city and the Corporations organization, as well as mission statements on how the Corporation, together with other stakeholders, intends to work towards achieving this long-term vision in the next five years. The CDP should lead to the translation of missions into actions and actions into outcomes. The objective of involving stakeholders through a consultation process and securing endorsements of the proposed actions by the local body and other implementing agencies is to hold these bodies accountable for their mission statements, actions and expected outcomes.
The CDP clearly defines how a Corporation will serve its customers (businesses and citizens). For example, the CDP talks about how the Corporation intends to guarantee a basic level of urban services to all citizens; make urban planning responsive to emerging needs; and become responsive to the needs of, and improve its services, to local businesses. The CDP also outlines how the Corporation plans to run its business. The CDP further elaborates on how the Corporation intends to manage public finances in a modern and transparent way; execute urban planning and governance in line with an established framework; and become more responsive - cost and time efficient by availing of technology in its governance and service delivery processes. Finally, the CDP reveals the Corporations strategy to manage its resources, i.e. how it intends to increase revenues and expand its tax base to allow for self-sustaining urban service delivery; improve its creditworthiness; and recruit and retain a skilled workforce.
1.3
THE CDP PROCESS ADOPTED BY FARIDABAD
The formulation of the CDP for Faridabad was divided into three phases and involved the following tasks and activities. The process is also presented in the chart below.
Faridabad City Development Plan Approach

Vision and Sector Goals Vision and Sector Goals
Stakeholder Consultations Assessment & Analysis
Vision and Sector Goals ls What Strategies are required? and Sector GoaWhere are we now? Vision
Strategies Strategies
Stakeholder Consultations Action Plans
Action Plans
What Strategies are required? Where are we now? Where do we want to go?
Strategies Strategies Action Plans Action Plans
Wish list Wish list
Investment Assessment & Analysis Investment Needs Needs
Infrastructure Infrastructure Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Infrastructure Infrastructure Gap Analysis Gap Analysis
Investment Investment Needs Needs
Preferences Preferences Where Prioritization to go? Sustainability Sustainability do we want
What are priority needs?

Preferences Preferences CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Prioritization
Sustainability Sustainability
Phase 1-Define vision and mission statements Step 1.1: Reconnaissance Collected data from the Corporation and other agencies to gain a preliminary understanding of the city; Conducted rapid city assessment and identified the underlying issues and emerging opportunities of the city and the Corporation; and
Identified stakeholders from diverse backgrounds like Industries Associations, Business Associations, Resident Welfare Associations, NGOs, citizens groups, line agencies involved with the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) like the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA), Public Works Department (PWD), the Electricity Board, etc. Step 1.2: Workshop with MCF officials Based on the findings of the above tasks, a workshop was conducted for MCF officials and the line agencies to understand their perspective on Faridabad, issues and technical details of the existing infrastructure. During this workshop, the objectives of JNNURM were specified to them and they were asked to identify issues concerning the city and the strategies required to address these issues and their future plans. Step 1.3: Second workshop to define vision/mission statements Based on the findings of Step 1.1, a workshop was conducted to appraise the citizens about the JNNURM process, provide facts and figures about Faridabad, and urge them to identify challenges which Faridabad needs to overcome. The stakeholders hailed from across the spectrum, including citizens, resident welfare association members, chartered accountants, advocates, Vypar Mandal and NGO representatives, and officials from MCF and the State Government Departments. The stakeholders were appraised about the objectives of JNNURM and the CDP process, and the findings of step 1.1. Further, they were asked to identify issues and strategies in the area of urban infrastructure and envision for Faridabad. Phase 2 Assessment of City Infrastructure and Finances of MCF Collected additional information on demography, economy, civic services, physical features, etc. Carried out infrastructure assessment including a detailed analysis of the existing municipal services and also undertaken the operating efficiency of the core municipal services provided by the Corporation. Conducted a credit assessment to provide insight into the Corporations current performance and financial management practices, as well as provide an opinion on the ability of the Corporation to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis. Phase 3 Draft City Development Plan Step 3.1: Identification of Projects for City Investment Plan Norms for each civic service was fixed, based on desired levels of services as stakeholders views or available policy documents.. Gaps in all core municipal services were identified for a horizon period of 30 years, Projects in the area of non-civic services like economic infrastructure, land development, parks and playgrounds were identified, based on stakeholder consultations including those with MCF officials. Step 3.2: Project costing and determination of funding sources Based on the consultants experience and available information from Faridabad, unit cost for each service component was arrived at, and gaps in service investment were located .
4
Based on the priorities of MCF, investment phasing was done. Based on the JNNURM funding pattern and MCFs financial position, investment sustenance was assessed. Step 3.3: Strategic Implementation Plan An implementation plan for all the prioritised projects/actions was prepared in a logical sequence based on the phased investment and availability of resources. A detailed capital investment plan for the identified projects was prepared. Also, a Financial Operating Plan to outline the preliminary budget and clarify financing assumptions and responsibilities for implementation and financing was prepared. Phase 4: Final CDP document The draft CDP was presented to officials of MCF and Council members. Based on their feedback and feedback from the Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board (HUIDB), the draft CDP was modified for final submission to the Government of India.
2 FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY

2.1 ABOUT FARIDABAD
HARYANA State Faridabad is a southeastern town in the state of Haryana. It was founded in 1607 AD by Sheikh Farid, Emperor Jehangir's treasurer. Sheikh Farid built a fort and a mosque and slowly the town grew in size. Later, it became the headquarters of a pargana which was held in jagir by the Ballabgarh ruler. After independence, the town has become a centre for the resettlement of refugees created by Partition. Now Faridabad is the most populated and industrialized city in the whole of Haryana. Faridabad alone generates about 60 percent of the revenues of Haryana with its large number of industrial units. There is also a belief that it was Baba Farid, an eminent Sufi saint, who founded Faridabad.
Faridabad District
On agriculture front, Faridabad is famous for production of Heena. Tractors, motorcycles, switch gears, refrigerators, shoes and tyres are other well-known industrial products of the city. The Badkhal Lake tourist complex, the Suraj Kund Tourist Complex, the Aravali Golf Club, the Raja Nahar Singh Palace and Dabchick are famous tourist spots of the city. For ease of civil administration, Faridabad district is divided into five sub-divisions viz. Faridabad, Ballabgarh, Palwal, Hodal & Hathin. The Faridabad Municipal Corporation consists of Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and NIT (New Industrial Township).
2.2
GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY
Faridabad is situated on the Delhi Mathura National Highway No. 2 at a distance of 32 km. from Delhi, at 28o 25' 16" north latitude and 77o 18' 28" east longitude. The town is bounded on the north by Delhi State, on the east by Agra and the Gurgaon canals and on the west by the Aravali Hills. The Yamuna flows very near to the city at its northern side and moves away as it goes south. The major part of Faridabad city is underlain by Quaternary Alluvium consisting of sand, clay and silt. In the western and northwestern part of the town, the quartzite ridges of the Delhi system can the observed. Along the Yamuna flood plain towards the eastern part of the town, the younger alluvium is mainly sandy with a thickness of about 10-15 m. The main water -bearing horizons (aquifers) consisting of a sandy layer is generally confined to 60m below ground level. Beyond this depth alluvium is more clayey and generally aquifers are not potential water sources even though depth of bedrock is more than 200m.
The limited thickness of aquifers further restricts the development of ground water on a large scale. In the Delhi quartzites, the availability of ground water is also limited and is controlled by secondary permeability imparted by joints and fractures.
2.3
CLIMATE AND RAINFALL
Faridabad town experiences a semi-arid climate which is characterized by wide temperature variations and scanty and irregular rainfall. During summer, temperature may reach upto 450 C in June while in winter it drops to 1.90 C in February. May and June are the hottest and driest months, when dust storms from the west prevail with high speed. The average wind velocity is 2.1 km./hours during June and 1.3 km./hour during November. The relative humidity is maximum during August (upto 84 percent) and minimum during May (upto 16 percent). The average annual rainfall recorded at the Faridabad rain gauge station is 845 mm as computed from the data of 1978 to 1997. Maximum rainfall occurs during July to September on account of the south east monsoon. The number of actual rainy days varies between 7 and 22 in a year.
2.4
LINKAGES AND CONNECTIVITY

Road linkage Faridabad is identified as one of the Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA)/ Central National Capital Region cities of National Capital Region (NCR) and accordingly it has strong linkages with Delhi. NH 2 from DelhiMathura passes through the length of the city and is the central axis of the city of Faridabad. Further, NH 3 and NH 4 also pass through the city. It is connected with Gurgaon by the Gurgaon-Faridabad road. As part of NCR proposals, connectivity is proposed for improvement through the western peripheral expressway (Kundli-Manesar-PalwalKMP) and eastern peripheral expressway (Kundli-GhaziabadPalwal KGP).
Haryana State Ghaziabad NCT-Delhi Gurgaon FARIDABAD Uttar Pradesh State
NH 2
Rajasthan State
Rail linkage Faridabad is on the broad gauge line from Delhi to Mathura of the Northern Railway and is an important Rail Junction in this sector as most train reaching Delhi pass through Faridabad. Hence Faridabad is well connected with the rest of the country by rail. Apart from the Main Faridabad Station, it also has two minor stations, Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh stations. Air linkage The Indira Gandhi International Airport and the Palam domestic airport, New Delhi, are the nearest airports providing air linkage for the city.
2.5
PLACES OF IMPORTANCE
Badkhal lake: It is located in Badkhal village, 32 km. from Delhi. The lake, fringed by the Aravalli hills, is a man-made embankment. A flower show is held here every spring. Its name is most probably derived from the Persian word bedakhal, which means free from interference. Close to Badhkal lake is the Peacock Lake, another picturesque spot. Baba Farid's Tomb: The city of Faridabad is believed to have been named after Baba Farid, an eminent Sufi saint. There is also a belief that it was he who founded Faridabad. His tomb in the town is a popular pilgrimage spot for the local people. Suraj Kund Tourist Complex and The Crafts Fair: Situated at a distance of around 8 km. from South Delhi, it is an ideal picnic spot. The Suraj Kund Lake is surrounded by rock-cut steps. Built by the Rajput king Surajpal Tomar, Suraj Kund represents the rising sun. Ruins of a Sun temple lie around the lake. The complex includes a beautifully made up done-up Rajhans, a fresh water pool with a beautiful garden, this water pool is known as Siddha Kund; its waters are said to have healing properties. A delightful handloom and handicraft fair is held here annually in February. Skilled artisans from all over the country display the rich crafts tradition of India in the typical setting of a rural Indian marketplace. Cultural programs like folk dances, magic, acrobats and rural cuisines are also a part of this colourful fair. One can also see traditional crafts being made and buy them directly from the craftsmen. Food is served in banana leaves and clay pots. Nahar Singh Cricket Stadium: The Nahar Singh Cricket Stadium in Faridabad was built in 1981. The first match, a Ranji trophy game between Haryana and the Services was played in 1982 and the first one-day international match was played between India and West Indies. The ground has a capacity to hold around 25,000 people. There are six centre pitches and three practice pitches. There is also a modern pavilion with a suite which has 200 seats. It also has a commentator box, a box for the media, a press box, the Presidents box, an umpire room, a health club, a restaurant, a billiards room, a card room, and a coffee shop. There is an outdoor tennis court. To the north, nine stands have been constructed with an office and parking facilities for ministers. The Nahar Singh Stadium stands out as one of the most modern stadiums in North India.
2.6
FARIDABAD IN NCR
Faridabad is an important constituent of NCR and is identified as a Central National Capital Region (CNCR) city earlier refereed to as Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA) city. Also it is the only other Metro city in NCR other than Meerut. NCR Regional 2021 has listed out a large number of projects involving Faridabad with suggested policy changes, strategies and implementation plan. The proposals are in the sectors of: Economy & fiscal policy Transport Power Water Sewerage, Solid waste management & drainage Communications and social infrastructure Environment and disaster management While being part of NCR gives a high priority status to the city, the ground situation with respect to infrastructure reflects poorly upon this emerging metropolis of the capital region. Whereas the quality of infrastructure in NCT and Faridabad are at opposite ends with Faridabad on the poorer side, the governance and financial condition of the Municipal Corporation also reflects the same. The reasons for the current situation are galore; lack of initiatives, strong leadership; and so on. While being part of NCR should convert into a strong opportunity for Faridabad to transform, on the contrary this status appears to have become a bane on the functioning of the city. This has also resulted from the lack of seriousness/ timely implementation with respect to several of NCR projects related CNCR cities like Faridabad. For instance the eastern and western peripheral expressways, public transportations systems in the form of RRTS/ MRTS, Orbital Rail Corridor etc, all are nearing completion of their planned implementation period but are yet to be put into formal actions on ground. Also to be noted is the delayed implementation of the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) and associated programs in the sewerage sector. Accordingly the YAP proposals and each of the NCR proposals under various sectors ranging from growth management to waste management with respect to Faridabad are presented and discussed in tandem with the existing situation in the city in the following chapters.
2.7
ECONOMY
Faridabad, a constituent part of NCR is home to one of the largest industrial estates of Asia which houses a large number of manufacturing industries. Economy of Faridabad is more or less dependent on Industry.
2.7.1
Economic base
The industrial base of Faridabad is not just the economic base of Faridabad, but again a constituent part of the overall economy of the NCR, implying that the economies are interdependent. As on date there are 16 multinational companies (MNC), 809 ISO-based industries, 205 medium and large-scale industries and 399 small-scale units as per the records of the District Industrial Centre, Faridabad. However, there are also a large number of other smaller industrial units, functioning from various locations including residential areas in the city.
9
On the whole, the total number of small, medium and large industries in the FaridabadBallabgarh Complex stands at about 15,000. The Complex provides direct and indirect employment to nearly half a million people and ranks as the 9th largest industrial estate in Asia. Its combined turnover is estimated to be about Rs.1,500 billion. The place is home to many international/ multinational companies like Whirlpool, Goodyear, Larsen & Toubro, Asia Brown Boveri, GKN Invel, Woodward Governor and Castrol besides Escorts, Eicher, Cutler Hammer, Hyderabad Asbestos, and Nuchem which are operating in this belt. This industrial estate in Faridabad is spread over an approximate area of 6,948 hectares and is home to a variety of engineering products from forgings to tractors, clutch assembly to leaf springs. The major industrial production in the district, mainly represented by Faridabad city itself, is of tractors, steel re-rolling, scientific instruments, power looms, agriculture implements, JCB cranes, etc. The district as a whole reported the production of 12,880 tractors, 24,230 metric tonnes of sugar, 4,240 motorcycles, mopeds, scooters, and agriculture implements worth Rs. 5,666 lakhs, during the year 2000-01. Industry, Employment and Economic Structure The industrial estate of Faridabad is understood to be providing direct and indirect employment to nearly half a million people. The work force participation rate (WFPR) of Faridabad city as per Census 2001 is 31 percent that is about 3.3 lakhs implying another equal number of employees of Faridabad industries travel daily from other NCR areas to Faridabad. The employment in the industries of Faridabad is both skilled and unskilled in nature. The majority of the workforce today is in the tertiary/ services sector. This also indicates the quantum of migration that had and has happened within and outside NCR. While migration within NCR is low, migration into NCR from other regions of Northern India is high. This causes a larger impact on Faridabad due to its industrial character. It may also be noted that the WFPR of Faridabad city was 30 percent in 1991 and 34 percent in 1981. Sectors, which indicated maximum diversification and growth over the decades, are industries other than household and services. The decline in WFPR over the decades is due to the change in the economic character of Faridabad- from being predominantly primary/ secondary it is now tertiary/ service oriented. The trend is similar to that in NCR with industries other than household registering the maximum growth. Industry and Environment The industries and the manufacturing process is largely environment friendly. However the estate has a large number of heavy vehicles plying in and out to transport the raw material and finished goods and these have been the major cause for the air pollution in the surroundings of this large estate. As earlier mentioned several small scale industries which act as ancillary units are located within the residential sectors of the city thereby involving the plying of heavy vehicles on most arterial and internal roads of the city too. Another feature to be noted is the absence of any common effluent treatment plant (CETP) for the large quantum of industrial waste waters generated here. The present industrial water demand is about 20 MLD and the same is expected to reach 100 MLD in another 20 years owing to the growth of the industry. For this large quantum of industrial water supply, the generation of waste water would be equally large necessitating the need for common treatment (from economic point of view) of these wastewaters.
10
There are no major hazardous industries located in the estate and the only hazard the estate is prone to is fire. In Faridabad instances of industrial fire accidents are minimal and none reported during the past five years. An Economy in Transition Industrial activity in Faridabad itself is the result of the policy decision taken after independence regarding the nature of development in the surroundings of Delhi. Faridabad emerged as the choice for the creation of a settlement for the refugees of Partition as well the preferred location for setting up the manufacturing base of the capital as well as the country. The estate, once ranked among the top industrial estates of the continent, today is in the 9th position owing to the neglect during the past decade and a half coupled with stiff competition from other NCR cities and cities elsewhere in the country. Clearly, the change in the economic policies of the Government of India regarding foreign direct investment has led to a change in the economic structure of the country as a whole and also of such towns like Faridabad. Within NCR, Gurgaon and Noida have been in the forefront in attracting these investments, which have been primarily in the information technology (IT) and bio-technology (BT) sectors. Faridabad has lagged behind in these sectors and is now gearing up to catch up with Gurgaon and Noida. More and more investments are flowing into the sectors of industry, commerce and real estate. State government too has been proactive in these terms through awarding incentives for investments to come in. In case of Faridabad, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIIDC) is the nodal agency for the purpose of industrial development. There are five major industrial associations in Faridabad which play a big role in terms of the development and regulation of industrial activity in the city. They are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Faridabad Industries Association Faridabad Small Industries Association Laghu Udhyog Bharti Faridabad Manufacturers Association Faridabad Chamber of Commerce & Industries
2.7.2
NCR proposals for economic development
As an overall strategy, the regional Plan, 2021 of NCR identifies the need to have a Common Economic Zone for the entire area of NCR. This is in light of different and multiplicity of policies, frameworks, acts, institutions, agencies etc applicable for different areas of NCR as NCR is spread across states. The Common Economic Zone is proposed to have rationalized tax structure; uniformity of incentives; uniformity of financial/ banking services; removing restrictions on inter-state traffic movements; uniform power supply, telecommunications, infrastructure like water, sewerage, waste management, pollution control, uniform law & order machinery etc. This Common Economic Zone though is yet to take any formal shape, the same as a long tem measure is in the right direction. As area-specific strategies, the Central National Capital Region (CNCR) cities like Faridabad shall have induced industrial development taking advantage of the location within NCR and the thrust will be on promoting model/ integrated industrial townships with adequate provision for residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational facilities.
11
These townships can also be Special Economic Zones (SEZ) with uninterrupted power supply, efficient telecommunication facilities, integrated transport networks and freight corridors, warehousing and effluent treatment facilities, etc. Further, Faridabad has also been identified as the location for the wholesale trade of auto parts. There is also plan for the development of the Alternative Wholesale Market for auto parts by the concerned state level agency as a joint venture project and proposal to declare auto parts as a commodity under the Specified Commodities Act to avail the benefits.
2.7.3
Major issues pertaining to industrial growth of Faridabad
Consultations and interactions with the officials of MCF, and industrial associations as well as citizens have indicated some of the primary causes for the slowing down of industrial activity in Faridabad, which need to be immediately addressed. The causes are: Shortage of power and water This is a common phenomenon across the NCR; it has become a major issue for the existing industrial set-up as well as for those who plan to set shop. The current situation is also against what has been envisaged in the NCR plan proposals of status of SEZs for the industrial locations with uninterrupted power supplies and other infrastructure. Also, the industry is faced with the challenge of water supplies in future in view of the current situation of non-perennial sources and continuous depletion of ground water sources. Alternate sources for augmentation of supplies, coupled with technology up-gradation and a drive towards reduced industrial water consumption/ recycling are of paramount importance. Incompatible land uses Faridabad today is dotted with several industrial units, set up in non-confirming land use categories, primarily residential areas. Also HSIIDC/ HUDA has so far developed only about 3500 industrial plots as against the current number of 15,000 operating industrial units in the city. This is understood to be due to the lack of proposals in the Development Plan for smaller units. Industrial associations have also been vocal in their requirement for organised industrial estates for varied sizes and purposes. Implementation of long-term strategic proposals of NCR For being part of NCR, Faridabad has been identified for a varied number of proposals towards mutually benefiting economic growth like, the Common Economic Zone, Alternate Wholesale Market for auto parts, the KMP and KGP Peripheral expressways, MRTS and so on. However, a time-bound action plan for the implementation of the same is necessary on the part of NCRPB to implement the proposals so that the individual cities dont lose out due to delay in implementation of these proposals.
12
2.8
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM
MCF and HUDA are the primary institutions involved in the physical development or service delivery aspects in Faridabad. All the core municipal services, their design and implementation are within the domain of MCF. HUDA primarily exercises the role of a land developer. To an extent the Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana also has an institutional role to play in the form of preparing and notifying the DP for the MCF as well as FCA areas. Implementation of the DP however is outside the purview of Town & Country Planning Department. Table 1. Institutional Service Responsibility Matrix
Service/ Sector Town Planning Urban poor & Slums Water Supply Sewerage Storm Water Drainage Solid Waste Management Roads, Bridges, Drains Street lights Planning & Design Town & Country Planning Department MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF, HUDA MCF, HUDA Execution MCF, HUDA MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF, HUDA MCF, HUDA O&M MCF MCF/ PPP MCF MCF MCF/ PPP MCF MCF
There is observed to be a clear multiplicity of roles by these institutions due to the fact that each institution operates under different and independent constitutional provisions/ acts and that the administered areas are different from the jurisdictional areas. The same is brought out in the following section. Institutional overlap of service delivery is also elaborated under each respective sector of infrastructure assessment chapter.
2.8.1
Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF)
The Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) came into existence in 1992 and constituted the erstwhile municipalities of Faridabad Township/ New Industrial Township (NIT), Faridabad Old, Ballabgarh and 38 numbers of revenue villages then referred to as the Faridabad Complex Administration. MCF is governed by the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 (HMCA). As per this Act, MCF is obligated to provide basic infrastructure like water supply, drainage, sewerage and roads, and services such as conservancy, fire fighting, streetlights, education and primary health. The elections to the municipal body are held every five years. The last general elections were held in 2003 and the next are to be held in 2007-08. The ward committees are constituted as per the provision of 74th CAA. There is a Ward Committee for each of the administrative ward within the MCF area. The Municipal Commissioner is the key figure in local self-government and is the administrative head of MCF; the Commissioner is assisted by senior officials in discharging his functions. The Commissioner manages the day-to-day affairs of the Corporation, subject to approvals and sanctions from the standing committee and the Corporation. Whenever required, the entire executive powers to carry out the provisions of the HMCA are vested in the Commissioner.
13
The staffing pattern of MCF under broad heads is presented in the table below. 520 posts in the Corporation are still vacant. Most of these posts are in the conservancy sector. To overcome this shortfall, MCF has engaged the services of persons on daily wages; these persons number 1510. That takes the total staff strength at MCF to 5,317 against the sanctioned 4,327. Table 2. MCF, Staffing Pattern (2005-06)
Municipal Corporation of Faridabad i General Admin & Tax Collection ii Water & Sewerage iii Engineering iv Accounts v Health & Sanitation vi Conservancy vii Town planning viii Gardens, Fire, Library, and All others Total Sanctioned 521 944 217 5 139 1,415 32 1,054 4,327 Filled 438 880 178 2 106 1,212 25 966 3,807 Gap Daily Wage 83 12 64 481 39 33 3 33 4 203 750 7 1 88 229 520 1510
MCF at present is largely manual in its functioning with computerisation restricted to a minimal number of senior officers of the Corporation. E-governance systems are yet to be planned and implemented in the Corporation. On the financial management front too, the corporation is lagging behind with introduction of double entry accruals accounting system and computerisation yet to be initiated. Conformity to the provisions of 74th Constitutional Amendment Act (74th CAA) Sections 41-44 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 (HMCA) lays down the powers and functions of the Corporation and the provisions for operationalising these powers and functions are provided in the following chapters. Section 42 of the HMCA lists out the functions that the State Government may entrust to the Corporation through a government order (GO) which essentially comprise the 18 listed items of Schedule XII of the 74th CAA. However, the HMCA doesnt give powers and procedure to operationilise the Schedule XII items. Thus the basic essence of the 74th CAA remains far from achieved. Since its inception, the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) has been the provider and facilitator of all core municipal services, including water supply and sewerage, in its jurisdictional area. However, the jurisdictional area as a term is contiguous as there is more than one service provider and implementing agency within MCFs jurisdictional area. These are HUDA, HSIIDC and Haryana Housing Board etc. HUDA, for example, provides services in the areas being developed by them and transfers these areas/ sectors to MCF for maintenance purposes only after five years of development. This clearly presents the multiplicity of authorities and functions against the very purpose of the 74th CAA. In the case of Faridabad, only 12 of 18 functions listed under the Schedule XII of 74th CAA have been devolved, but even these are not devolved in true sense as they are not backed by operational procedures in the HMCA and also necessary financial support from State government. Other functions like town planning, urban forestry, and urban poverty alleviation are yet to be devolved. A summary of the conformity of the provisions of 74th CAA is presented below.
14
Regularity in holding of elections: The elections are held every five years. The Corporation was established in 1992. The last general elections were held in 2003 and the next are to be held in 2007-08. Constitution of Ward committees: The ward committees are constituted as per the provision of 74th CAA. There is a Ward Committee for each of the administrative ward within the MCF area. However there is no clarity on the administrative and sanctioning powers of these ward committees. Devolution of Planning Functions: No. (Master Plan is prepared by the Town & Country Planning Department and CDP by City Government). Building permissions are given by MCF and HUDA in their respective controlled areas. There is area overlap and functions overlap. Establishment of the DPC/ MPC: MCF/ Faridabad is part of NCR and NCRPB fits the role. Others: The repeal of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act 1976, suitable amendment to Rent Control Act and Stamp Duty Acts are under consideration by Govt. of Haryana. E-governance: E-governance is non-operational in MCF. Organisation needs complete restructuring and strengthening.
2.8.2
Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA)
HUDA, a statutory body of Government of Haryana was constituted under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 (HUDAA). HUDA is carved out of the erstwhile Department of Urban Estates to overcome the difficulties in development and implementation by different agencies/ departments and to achieve the expeditious development of urban estates, so that HUDA can take up all the developmental activities by itself and provide various facilities in the urban estates. The main functions of HUDA are as under: To promote and secure development of urban areas with the power to acquire, sell and dispose off property, both movable and immovable; To acquire, develop and dispose land for residential, industrial and commercial purposes; To make available developed land to Haryana Housing Board and other bodies for providing houses to economically weaker sections of the society; and To undertake building works. HUDA has so far setup 27 urban estates throughout the state of Haryana of which one estate is in Faridabad and extends beyond the MCF limits into the FCA and administered by a zonal Administrator assisted by an estate officer and an assistant estate officer. The main functions of these Estate Officers are to sell developed and undeveloped plots of all categories of land and realise the amount of installments. A good number of developed sectors within Faridabad as presented in the adjacent figure are under the administration and management of HUDA.
15
Some sectors within MCF Area but being maintained by HUDA
These sectors are residential, commercial as well as industrial in nature. At present the Sectors being maintained by HUDA are 3, 12, 20A & B, 21 C Part III, 21D, 30, 31, 44 to 48, 55, 58, 59 and Dhauj Crushing Zone. New sectors being developed by HUDA are 2, 56, 56A, 62, 64 and 65. It may be noted that HUDA apart from providing basic infrastructure like roads, drains and street lights as part of development of a sector, maintains the sector for five years. If such sectors fall under the jurisdiction of MCF they are later transferred to MCF for further maintenance. However water supply, sewerage and waste management functions are looked after by MCF from the day of the development of the sector irrespective of whether it is administered by MCF or not. This situation is understood to be leading to a lot of revenue loss to MCF.
2.8.3
Town & Country Planning Department, Govt. of Haryana
The Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana has prepared/ finalised the Development Plan (DP) for the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Controlled area including the present MCF area. The Town & Country Planning Department prepares the Development Plan taking into consideration the further needs of industrial, residential and commercial sectors so as to ensure proper and planned urban development, exercising the powers inherited by sub-section(4) of section 5 of Punjab Development Act, 1963. However the implementation of the same is not the domain of the department. Respective agency like HUDA, HSIIDC and MCF take up the role of implementation of the DP indirectly. That is as and when such agency intends to develop a particular sector, land is acquired and detailed planning scheme is prepared in line with the proposals of the DP by that agency and implementation of the same is taken up.
2.8.4
Major issues pertaining to Institutional Mechanism in Faridabad
Consultations and interactions with the officials of various agencies like MCF, HUDA, Town & Country Planning Department etc as well as citizens have stressed upon the below mentioned aspects as the prime reasons for the lack of clarity on institutional aspects and governance of the city of Faridabad. Lacking legal and constitutional support for right implementation of 74th CAA Section 42 of the HMCA only lists out 18 items of Schedule XII of the 74th CAA but did not provide for any powers and operationilising procedure. Accordingly only 12 of 18 functions have been devolved to MCF but not backed by operational procedures. Further other functions like town planning, urban forestry, and urban poverty alleviation are yet to be devolved. Thus the basic essence of the 74th CAA remains far from achieved. Multiplicity of authorities and functions The jurisdictional area of MCF as a term is contiguous as at times MCFs services extends into FCA and there is more than one implementing agency within MCFs jurisdictional area like HUDA. The multiplicity is also due to the applicability of different acts to different agencies like the HMCA for MCF, HUDAA for HUDA, and so on. For example, buildings developed in HUDA administered areas follow the HUDA (Erection of Buildings) Regulations, 1979 and such areas after any transfer to MCF administration will have to comply with the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA.
16
No say for MCF in preparation of DP for its jurisdictional area As of the Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana is the sole agency that prepares the DP for all urban areas/ controlled areas in the state. Town planning as a function is yet to be devolved to MCF in line with 74th CAA and as earlier mentioned, the jurisdictional area of MCF as a term itself is contiguous due to multiplicity of service providing and implementing agencies.
17
3 FORMULATION OF VISION AND MISSION

3.1 APPROACH TO FORMULATING A VISION FOR FARIDABAD UNDER CDP
The CDP is the Municipal Corporations strategy that outlines the vision for the growth of the city and details how the Corporation together with stakeholders intends to achieve its long-term vision. The CDP leads to the translation of missions into actions and actions into outcomes. In this context, stakeholder consultations were held before finalizing the CDP. The stakeholder consultations were held at organizational and individual levels, and included workshops. The objective was to bring all stakeholders on one platform and enable them to voice their opinions and come to a consensus on issues, strategies and actions.
MCF Consultations Draft CDP August 16th 2006
1 1
Data Collection, Situation Analysis July 8th - Interaction Workshop July 11th - Officials Workshop
3 3
Project Finance Implementation Options Strategic Planning/ Reforms timelines Consultations and Revisions to draft CDP
Infrastructure Gaps/ Investment Needs
City Stakeholder Consultations/ Workshop July 16th, 2006
Credit Strength Assessment Project Identification & Prioritization
2 2
4 4
Final CDP/ Approval
Vision and Mission statements
The stakeholders comprised Corporation officials; elected representatives; officials from line agencies, NGOs, resident welfare associations, industry associations and vyapar mandals; advocates; chartered accountants; and citizens. The stakeholder consultations also involved representatives of the HUDA, the PWD-PH, and the Town & Country Planning department. In addition, individual discussions were held with Faridabad MLAs and MPs. Three workshops were held during the period of 8th July 2006 to 16th July 2006 as illustrated in the chart above. The outcomes of each discussion and workshop are summarized in the following section: this discussion forms the base for the formulation of a vision for the city, strategies and action plans. The details of the participants and the summary of consultations are presented in Annexures 1 and 4.
3.2
STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME
The various levels of consultations/ discussions organised for formulating the CDP, which followed a structured format with a pre-defined agenda and objectives, are presented below. The process details and the summary of the outcomes of each consultation are discussed in the respective sections.
18
Nature of Consultation 1. JNNURM Interactive Workshop July 8th, 2006 2. MCF Officials Workshop- July 11th, 2006
3. Discussion with Elected Representatives
4. Vision Workshop July 16, 2006
5. Discussion on Draft CDP with HUIDB on September 6th 2006
Participants Under chairmanship of Divisional Commissioner- Officials from GoI, GoH, MCF, NIUA, HUDCo, NBCC. MCF officials including officials from HUDA, PWD-PH, Town & Country Planning department, District Industries Centre, Dhakshin Haryana Bijlee Vitharan Nigam (DHBVN). Shri Avatar Singh Bhadana- MP Faridabad Shri AC Chowdary, MLA, NIT, Faridabad Shri Mahendra Pratap Sing, MLA, Faridabad Smt. Sharada Rathode, MLA Ballabgarh Citizens, Industries Association, Vypar Mandal, Resident Welfare Associations, NGOs, newspaper groups, line agencies and municipal officials. MCF officials, Council members and HUIDB officials
Interactive Workshop As part of the CDP process, MCF organised various workshops. The interactive session was the first in this process, organised on July 8th, 2006 and was chaired by the Divisional Commissioner Gurgaon. The participants were representatives from the GoI and the GoH, MCF officials and officials of all line agencies with offices in Faridabad. The objective of the workshop was to create awareness among the stakeholders of Faridabad regarding the JNNURM objectives, the process and the guidelines for preparation & evaluation criteria for City Development Plan and the Detail Project Report. During the workshop, the consultants presented the CDP process being adopted for Faridabad. Further, there were a series of presentations on the objectives of JNNURM, mandatory and optional reforms, guidelines for the preparation of DPR for citywide and basic urban services for poor projects, evaluation process and expectations from the CDP and DPRs by officials from GoI, Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), National Building Construction Company (NBCC) and National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), etc. Representatives from GoI have appraised the MCF officials on the objective of JNNURM and the commitment from MCF on the reforms and objectives of linking investment with reforms. NIUA representatives have explained the CDP appraisal process. The following aspects should be addressed clearly and in greater detailed in the CDP demography, urban poor, urban finance and city vision.
19
Officials from NBCC and HUDCO have appraised the gathering about various aspects of DPR, areas which need to be detailed out in the DPR like area coverage, rate analysis, and cost analysis of various technologies. In the case of basic services for the urban poor, there should be a separate DPR for each slum. The DPRs should be comprehensive, taking into account housing and infrastructure requirement, beneficiary details, etc. The MCF Workshop Following the interactive workshop, an in-house workshop involving officials from MCF and line agencies was organised on 11th July 2006. It was a kick-off meeting to create awareness regarding JNNURM and the CDP process. The objective of the workshop was to secure the implementing agencys views on issues such as the strengths of Faridabad and the areas, which deserve focus in the interests of the citys development. Over 50 officials, including the Municipal Commissioner, Joint Commissioners and department heads of MCF and representatives from line agencies attended the workshop. The meeting started with a brief introduction of JNNURM, highlighting its features, objectives and desired reforms. The importance of JNNURM and the crucial role of the CDP were explained. Following these initial discussions, a presentation was made before all officials on facts and figures relating to Faridabads demography, economics, MCFs financial profile, civic infrastructure and related issues, and proposed reforms to be implemented under JNNURM. Later, the officials were asked to identify the major issues concerning the city, specific issues concerning municipal services and strategies and actions required to address the issues. In addition, officials were also provided with data formats and were briefed on the purpose and relevance of the detailed data. This is crucial for the CDP preparation and the identification of issues, projects and strategies. The strengths of Faridabad, according to the MCF officials, were its strong industrial base, and its proximity and connectivity to New Delhi. With regard to their vision for Faridabad, participants wished to see Faridabad as the best city of Haryana, clean and beautiful with ideal infrastructure facilities and an efficient public transport system. During the discussion, the Commissioner of MCF indicated that Faridabad needs to have a comprehensive plan for sewerage, storm water disposal, a well-planned road network, multilevel parking facilities, and the improvement and beautification of all traffic junctions. Also, the plan needs to provide for the expediting of ongoing efforts to develop parks and playgrounds in all residential sectors. Additionally, the Commissioner has stressed that MCF should strive to computerise all its departments and implement e-Governance in all areas of its operations. The participants and the outcome of the workshop are presented in Annexures 2 and 4.
20
Discussion with Elected Representatives In order to get the larger picture or vision for Faridabad and the order of priorities, individual discussions were held with the elected representatives -- Shri. Avatar Singhji Bhadana, Member of Parliament; members of the Legislative Assembly representing MCF; Shri. A.C. Chowdary; Shri. Mahendra Pratap Singhji; and Smt. Sharada Rathod. The detailed discussion with the elected representatives is recorded in Annexure 4. All the elected representatives felt that Faridabad would face problems mainly in the areas water supply, sewerage & drainage, and internal/ regional connectivity - if planned interventions are not given importance. The number of slums has been continuously increasing; the slum dwellers do not have access to basic services. The concentration of these locations in industrial and other environmentally sensitive areas is also a major problem that should be immediately tackled. The increasing crime rate in Faridabad is major fallout of the slowdown of industrial growth as well as the failure of various urban poor/ slum development initiatives due to restrictions on the development of slums on government lands. Owing to these shortcomings, Faridabad is not in a position to compete with other cities in attracting new investments, particularly in the service sector. The elected representatives have suggested that to regain lost glory, Faridabad needs to urgently address the development of its city civic infrastructure, power supply, availability of higher educational facilities and medical facilities, which are lacking in Faridabad. The City Stakeholder Workshop This workshop was held on 16th July, 2006 with the objective of bringing together municipal decision-makers and stakeholders to arrive at a consensus and define the vision and mission for Faridabads economic growth for improving the quality of life in the city. Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS, Commissioner of MCF, had chaired and coordinated the workshop. Mr. Sunderlal Sharma, Senior Deputy Mayor and Mr. NK Katara, Superintending Engineer, MCF was also on the panel to facilitate the discussion. The workshop commenced with a welcome note by Mr. NK Katara. He unfolded the concept of the City Development Plan (CDP) in the context of the JNNURM and further explained the objective of JNNURM under which the Government plans to provide capital grants to urban local bodies (ULB) for funding various urban infrastructure projects/ initiatives that bring greater transparency, accountability and governance in the functioning of the Corporation. He emphasised that no proposal would be accepted unless a CDP was in place and that the idea of the CDP was to fund projects, which fitted into the overall vision of the city.
21
Later, CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory representatives presented the CDP process being adopted in Faridabad and gave out facts and figures based on a rapid assessment of the city that was carried out by the consultants. In addition, stakeholders were apprised of the potential and challenges which Faridabad needed to overcome to improve its infrastructure and be eligible for JNNURM funding. These talks and presentations created an understanding amongst the stakeholders regarding JNNURM and the importance of the CDP. The stakeholders were then requested to focus their discussion on the following aspects: The major issues related to Faridabad and factors affecting economic growth Issues related to municipal services The future of Faridabad, i.e., Faridabad in the next 15-20 years from the perspective of economic development and municipal services Strategies and actions required Your contribution towards the betterment of Faridabad The stakeholders discussions mainly focused on the poor state of infrastructure and unauthorised construction; unplanned development of industrial estates and location of industries in residential areas; and non -availability of developed industrial plots as per the requirement of different industries. The stakeholders were appreciative of this exercise and suggested that MCF should conduct such meetings frequently to get feedback from citizens. The commissioner readily accepted this suggestion and promised to hold such meetings regularly during the implementation of JNNURM. The details of issues, suggestions and strategies proposed by stakeholders are presented in Annexure 4. Representation of Urban poor & Slums in Stakeholder Consultations Due to the poor quality of data and lack of any socio-economic data on slums in Faridabad, consultations with citizens have been the main recourse to identify issues pertaining to services delivery in slums. Considering the need and importance for representation of the same in the stakeholder consultations, each consultation and discussion also focused on aspects related to urban poor and slums in the city. These consultations were in the form of discussions with the MP/ MLA specifically on the slums; discussions with the elected representatives/ corporators of each ward on the status and problems of slums in their ward; consultations with the NGOs working in these slums; and discussions with slum dwellers during visits to select slums in the city like Bapu Nagar, Dabua Colony, Mirjapur etc. Presentation of Draft CDP Based on the inputs from stakeholder consultations, workshops and an analytical review of existing infrastructure, the Draft CDP was formulated, replete with a city investment plan which showed MCFs investment capacity and its strategies and action plan for implementation of CDP. The same is submitted in the form a report to elicit feedback. The draft CDP was also placed for discussion with HUIDB officials on 6th September 2006 based on which the state level sanctioning committee has proposed for approval of the Draft CDP and finalization for onward submission of final CDP to GoI. The draft CDP was also presented by MCF to its Council. The feedback thus received from all such quarters was used to further refine the Draft CDP for final submission to the GoI for approval.
22
3.3
VISION FOR FARIDABAD
The vision for Faridabad was drafted based on stakeholder consultations, wherein the citizens and various stakeholders vocalised how they envisaged Faridabad to develop in the next 20 years. Also, officials perspectives on how they would like to develop Faridabad were taken into account. Accordingly, the mission statement for MCF was formulated.
3.3.1
Important Aspects that Defined Faridabads Vision
During individual discussions and the workshops, the stakeholders discussed and articulated several factors that should be taken into consideration while formulating the vision. These statements are listed below and have been used in drafting the vision statement. Develop Faridabad as a High-Tech city Green Faridabad Multi-sector economic approach to ensure sustainability Good and planned road network An environment-friendly city with excellent infrastructure Slum-free and pollution-free city A tourist transit hub Better connectivity to Delhi and preferred satellite in NCR Industrial growth to be revived and sustained Able, efficient and self contained Efficient use of energy Good connectivity with the region Best city of Haryana
3.3.2
Vision Statement
Based on the citys strengths, futuristic desires, perspectives and potential of Faridabad, the following Vision Statements have been drafted and placed before the MCF council. The MCF has to accept and adopt a futuristic Vision for Faridabad that encompasses the desires of its citizens. The citizens of Faridabad have expressed their thoughts on the vision for Faridabad in the following statements: Our Vision to Make Faridabad the Best City of Haryana with Top Class Infrastructure Sukh, Sampann aur Samarth Faridabad Faridabad to be the Future Industrial Destination of the Region with Best Infrastructure and Safe Livable Environment A Planned and the Model City to Promote Economic Development, Safe Environment, with Best Infrastructure with Equity The above-mentioned statements, together with MCFs understanding of the potential and challenges of Faridabad, are summarized in the form of the following Vision Statement for Faridabad city.
23
Faridabad shall be the place for safe living in the NCR, with, environment enriched, economy booming and the class of infrastructure unmatched. Faridabad shall be the countrys City of the Decade 2011-21.
3.3.3 Mission Statement
With an ambitious vision in mind, the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad defines its presence through a mission of Commitment to develop the city in a planned manner and be a efficient service provider through commitment to achieve distinction in civic amenities provision and a Municipal Corporation which is well governed with modern, simple, responsible, approachable governance to all its citizens. MCF perceives its role as the principal service provider of all municipal services. MCF also intends to involve the private sector in managing services efficiently in a cost-effective manner; MCF would act as a facilitator for provision of services, which promote socio-economic development, but are not under its umbrella. The mission strategies of MCF for each sector are discussed in the following section: MCF As Service Provider to MCF to be Facilitator for Health services, higher education Prepare a comprehensive infrastructure plan Adequate power supply for for water, sewerage and storm water sustainable economic growth drainage Extension of metro rail to Faridabad Improve road network and beautify all Better connectivity with NOIDA and major junctions Gurgaon Develop community centers in all Recreation and entertainment residential sectors Community participation Provide all core municipal services Ensure efficient and sustainable solid waste management Conserve city environment by developing gardens, conserving and protecting water bodies, etc. Provide basic urban service for all urban poor , construct dwelling units and rehabilitate all families in Juggi- Jopidi colonies Provide a clean, green and pollution-free environment Create places of healthy entertainment and recreation Provide efficient fire service Ensure efficient urban and developmental planning, and strict adherence to byelaws Ensure good and modern urban governance
24
3.4
FARIDABAD TOMORROW
Rapid urbanization, population growth, growing economy and emerging opportunities in the region have placed an enormous demand for quality civic infrastructure. Apart from being plagued by huge gaps in infrastructure to service the current population, Faridabad faces other common challenges like accumulation of garbage, traffic congestion, deteriorating roads, pollution, and a strain on civic supplies like water, drainage and electricity. Faridabad was once the industrial centre of Haryana and the sixth largest industrial centre of Asia. It has now moved down to the ninth position and is also facing challenges from other progressive towns in the region, due to the lack of adequate and good civic infrastructure. Other reasons for the downtrend are the lack of educational facilities, particularly higher education, power supply, etc. In order to meet its future challenges, MCF needs to be more responsive and action-oriented. Faridabad is set to become a modern township. But, if the vision for tomorrow has to be realized, it will need the commitment and support of every participating citizen and institution as well as MCF to the implementation of the CDP proposals. Having formulated the vision for a structured development of the city, it would be mandatory to commit to reforms to attract resources for providing adequate infrastructure. With assistance under JNNURM, the Corporation can create state-of-the-art infrastructure and encourage investments (public and private) in creating quality infrastructure. A new wave of public-private partnerships could also sweep the urban infrastructure sectors. This would boost the citys character as an investment destination. The city desires to showcase itself as the gateway to the countrys economic growth and strengthen its position as a growth engine for Haryana and the NCR. Industry too has a responsibility and a larger role to play in urban governance by adopting a more proactive approach. The anticipated outcome: Sustained economic growth, increase in income levels and improvement in the economic condition of the poor Organised micro-enterprise sector with emphasis on IT Strengthened sectoral networks of services Leveraging of sectoral capabilities for development and facilitating the creation of an information infrastructure network Market-friendly environment for micro entrepreneurs Strong linkage between industry and institutions promoting R&D Realise the role defined for Faridabad in NCR
25
4 CITY ASSESSMENT SITUATION ANALYSIS

4.1 GROWTH TRENDS
Faridabad is the biggest urban agglomeration of the Haryana State consisting of the old municipal town of Faridabad, Ballabgarh, and the New Industrial Town (NIT) along with 38 revenue villages. The Development Plan of Faridabad, prepared in 1991, comprises 91 sectors (maximum number of sectors in any development plan of Haryana) with the highest projected population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011 at an assumed decadal growth rate of 70% for 1991-2001 and 2001-11.
4.1.1
Demography
The growth of Faridabad has been a continuous process since independence. Faridabad city is a result of the decision taken after the Partition of the country to establish an industrial-cumhousing estate at Faridabad to relieve the pressure of population growth in Delhi and also to decentralize the location of industries. Since then, Faridabad has been the hub of industrial activity of the state of Haryana and has more than 600 heavy/ medium and small-scale industries. This industrial inducement coupled with natural growth of Faridabad increased many folds over the past four decades. The demographic transition is presented in Table 3. Table 3. Population Growth of Faridabad
Census Year 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 Population Total 56,000 1,22,000 3,30,864 6,25,085 10,55,938 Decadal Change 66,000 2,08,864 2,94,221 4,30,853 Growth Rate (%) 117.86 171.20 88.93 68.93
Source: Census of India, respective years
As evident, the population growth over the past decade of 1991-2001 has come down in comparison to the earlier decades. However, the city has registered a decadal growth rate of about 69 percent and an average annual CAGR of 5.38 percent, which are still on the higher side. In our discussion so far, we have considered the area under the jurisdiction of MCF only. However, the economic activity in the city is to a very large extent directly dependent on the national capital New Delhi, located close by. Faridabad is also a part of the NCR; hence the growth dynamics of Faridabad will depend and move in direct relation to that in NCR.
4.1.2
Municipal Area and Population Density
Prior to its inception as a Corporation in 1993-94, the present-day MCF was referred to as Faridabad Complex Administration (FCA) comprising the municipalities of Faridabad Township, Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and 38 revenue villages. The present geographical area of Faridabad is 207.88 sq.km. and has remained thus since its inception as a Municipal Corporation. The density of the Corporation in 2001 was 5080 persons per sq.km.; in 1991, the density was 3007 persons per sq.km. As on date, the density of population in Faridabad city is estimated to be about 6129 persons per sq.km.
26
Table 4. Density Pattern in Faridabad and Other Cities in India

Year 1991 2001 2006 Municipal Corporation of Faridabad Other cities in India Density Density Area- Sq.km City Persons/ Sqkm. Persons/ Sqkm. (2001) 207.88 3007 Pimpri-Chinchwad 5,902 207.88 5080 Kota 3,137 207.88 6129 Visakhapatnam 8,683
Source: Census of India
Faridabad has a higher gross population density, compared to other peer group cities like Pimpri-Chinchwad and Kota, but the density is lesser than that of Visakhapatnam, which is also an industrial city. Though Faridabads present day population density is in a comfortable range for the quantum of area under the jurisdiction of its Corporation, the comparison mentioned above and the significant increase in density signals the need for planned dispersal of development activities within the Corporation area. It is observed that the areas within FCA towards Gurgaon have been on high demand for fast paced growth where real estate activity has picked up considerably during the past five years. Private colonizers have developed and are in the process of developing large number of apartment and housing complexes in these areas. There are also institutional and recreation related developments in the area. Major commercial developments in the form of shopping malls, multiplexes etc are observed to be still restricted to the NH 2 and its nearby surroundings.
Commercial Growth
Growth Directions
4.1.3
Sex Ratio and Literacy
Both the sex ratio and the literacy levels in the city have improved over the years. The sex ratio of the city has improved consistently from 740 in 1981 to 817 in 2001. The sex ratio on the lower side is a common phenomenon across the region extending to Rajasthan from where there has been a lot of out-migration during the times prior to and immediately after independence. It can also be attributed to the character of the city as a manufacturing base which attracts large numbers of male singles; they become a part of the citys skilled and unskilled workforce. The overall literacy level has also improved considerably over the years and stands at 80 percent as per the Census 2001. The table below highlights the sex ratio and the literacy levels of Faridabad city from 1971 to 2001. Table 5. Sex Ratio and Literacy Level
Parameter/ Year Sex Ratio Literacy
Source: Respective Census
1981 740 -
1991 804 -
2001 817 80%
27
4.1.4
Population Projection
For the last four decades, the decadal growth rate of population has been declining continuously - though it is still on the higher side - indicating stabilisation; this is a common phenomenon in most parts of the country. The current decline can be mainly attributed to the movement towards gradual stabilisation, which in the case of Faridabad can be expected to be achieved during the decade 2021-31. The Development Plan (DP) for Faridabad prepared in 1991 assumed a decadal growth rate of 70 percent for the decades 1991-01 and 2001-11 and estimated a population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011. This was based on past growth rates which were above 100 percent; the same have however declined during the last two decades. Based on similar analysis, the NCR regional plan for 2021 has projected the population of Faridabad as 16 lakhs by 2011 and 25 lakhs by 2021. Further the NCR regional plan for 2021 proposed Faridabad-Ballabgarh as a CNCR city/ Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA) city with controlled and moderate growth in the future. While migration within NCR is low, migration into NCR from other regions of Northern India is high. This causes a larger impact on Faridabad due to its industrial character. Accordingly, the past and current trends of population growth in Faridabad city have been projected using various methods, the results of which are presented below. Table 6. Population projections for Faridabad
Method Polynomial 2nd order method Polynomial 3rd order method Arithmetic increase method Incremental increase method Geometrical progression method Assumed projection
Source: Analysis
2001
1055938
Population projections 2011 2021 15,96,403 22,54,233 15,87,680 22,20,861 13,05,923 15,55,907 14,27,540 19,20,760 21,69,481 44,57,313 15,37,208 21,34,351
2031 30,28,501 29,72,461 18,05,892 25,35,598 91,57,787 28,45,505
It is observed that the variance in the case of polynomial methods and incremental increase methods is low; these largely follow the current growth trends and are in line with what has been envisaged in the Regional Plan 2021 of NCR. While the projections with the arithmetic increase method are on the lower side, those by the geometric progression method are on the higher side. Accordingly, an average of the polynomial 2nd order method, polynomial 3rd order method and incremental increase methods is considered appropriate and present the closest of the current population growth trends. The population projection for Faridabad is thus assumed as 15.37 lakhs by 2011, 21.34 lakhs by 2021 and 28.46 lakhs by 2031.
4.2
LAND USE
The Development Plan (DP) for Faridabad was prepared for the period 1991- 2011, for the erstwhile municipalities of Faridabad Township/ NIT, Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and 38 revenue villages, altogether referred to as the Faridabad Controlled Area. The DP was prepared comprising 91 sectors to accommodate an estimated population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011.
28
4.2.1
Urbanisable Land Proposed Land use
The DP proposals have been prepared in 1991 for a total urbanisable area of 38743 acres/ 156.79 sq.km. in FCA area. The present municipal area of MCF is 207.88 sq.km and it is understood that approximately 75 percent of the MCF area is already developed. Table 7. Proposed Land Use of Faridabad 2011
Head 1 Residential 2 Commercial 3 Industrial 4 Special zone 5 Public utilities 6 Public & semi-public 7 Transportation/ circulation 8 Open spaces/ recreation Total Note: (i) (ii) Proposed Land Use (2011) Area (Sq.Km) % area 77.95 49.7 7.73 4.9 31.36 20.0 4.42 2.8 1.55 1.0 5.30 3.4 15.54 9.9 12.95 8.3 100.0 156.79
Proposed Land use (2011)
8% 10% 3% 1% 3% 0% 50%
Residential areas outside of ring road have not been included in the above areas. The above areas include areas under existing land uses within the towns of old Faridabad, NIT and Ballabgarh.
Residential Commercial Industrial Special zone 20% Public Utilities Public & Semi- public Transportation/ Circulation Open Spaces/ Recreation Water bodies
5%
While 50 percent of the urbanisable area is proposed for residential purposes, a significant 20 percent of the area is proposed for industrial uses. Each of the land use categories is further detailed below. Residential An area of 19,262 acres/77.95 sq.km. has been reserved for residential purposes on the basis of an average residential density of 90 persons per area. However, the proposed residential density for the residential sectors adjoining the industrial areas was fixed at 120 persons per acre to accommodate the population of the Economical Weaker Section (EWS) and Low Income Group (LIG). The sectors adjoining the Central Business District (CBD) have been proposed to be developed on the basis of residential density of 100 persons per acre whereas the sectors on rocky terrains along the Badkhal-Suraj Kund road were expected to have lower residential density.
29
Figure - Development Plan 2011 for Faridabad
30
Figure - Development Plan 2011 for Faridabad
31
Commercial An area of 1910 acres/ 7.73 sq.km. has been proposed for commercial purposes in the Development Plan. Considering the proposed industrial area in the eastern side of the Agra Canal and the inadequacy of commercial areas in the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, about 3.33 sq.km. of the proposed commercial area was planned on the eastern side of the Agra Canal. The proposal mainly aims at locating commercial areas along major roads and sector roads between sector 78 to 83 and sector 70. To the west of the Agra Canal, sector 12, which was previously planned as a City center, was retained as a commercial-cum-business centre and a town park was merged with this sector for a better synthesis of high-rise buildings and open spaces. This would also take care of the need for open spaces to an extent. In addition to the commercial belt between sectors 21-C, 46, 45 and the railway line, seven District Business Centres have also been proposed in sectors 52, NIT No. 1, 45, 4, 16, 18 and 79 in the Development Plan. Industrial Considering the industrial character of the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, the area under industrial uses was proposed at 7,749 acres/ 31.36 sq.km. Of this, an area of 10.65 sq.km.on east of Agra Canal was proposed in the form of six industrial sectors. Special Zone An area of 4.42 sq.km. was proposed to be used as a special zone wherein institutions, offices, recreational facilities and areas with residential, commercial and other uses ancillary to the main uses mentioned above were planned. However, there was a condition - the gross area under each main use would not be less than 10 acres. A special zone was planned to incorporate mixed and inter-dependant land uses. Public Utilities While accommodating the then existing public utility sites, new sites for purposes such as sewerage treatment facilities and waste disposal have been proposed in the Development Plan. The total area proposed under this category is 1.55 sq.km. Public and Semi-Public Uses An area of 5.30 sq.km. was proposed for accommodating regional level, town level and community level institutions and amenities. The regional and town level facilities like hospitals, schools, and colleges etc are proposed in a linear pattern along the major roads on east of Agra Canal. The neighbourhood level community facilities were proposed to be provided at the level of preparation of layout plan of industrial sector. The Development Plan provides for 17 colleges and 17 hospitals following the National Capital Region (NCR) norms. Transport & Communication The circulation system of the city was expected to follow a grid-iron pattern. For the location of transport nagars/ sites, the Bypass and the Delhi-Mathura Road adjoining the industrial area were considered the most appropriate. Accordingly, provision was made in sectors 20-A, 27-D, 59, 61, and 67 and near the village Movai opposite sector 87 for six transport Nagars/ sites, primarily to act as intermediate facilities. The total area proposed, including the area under roads, is 15.54 sq.km. which is about 9.9 percent of the proposed urbanisable area.
32
Major Open Spaces An area of 12.95 sq.km./ 3199 acres was proposed under this use. Of this, a large extent of area was proposed in the form of a 100 m wide green belt along the eastern side of the Agra Canal and along the expressway and the bypass. Additionally, another 500 m wide belt on the eastern side of the proposed alignment of bypass was provided for regional recreational facilities like amusement parks and tourist complexes.
4.2.2
Implementation of Development Plan
There is no mandate or identified single institution for the implementation in the DP. MCF and HUDA are the prime institutions with Haryana Housing Board also contributing at times to the implementation aspect. Detailed plans in line with DP proposals are prepared by respective agency that plans to develop a specific parcel of land. MCF due to its several obligations of service delivery has played little or limited role till date with respect to developing the land and hence implementation of DP. Accordingly HUDA has been the only agency who has been acquiring land in the MCF and FCA areas and developing the same. HUDA transfers such areas falling in the jurisdiction of MCF to MCF after five years of maintenance. Haryana Housing Board along with HUDA has also developed some Housing Board Colonies in Faridabad. In the case of industrial development, the HSIDC has worked with HUDA for future industrial development as per the provisions of the Punjab Scheduled Roads & Controlled Area Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963, Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Area Restriction of unregulated development rules 1965 and the provisions of the Haryana Development and Restriction of Urban Area Act 1975 and its Rules of 1976. Apart from these developments, many private developers (colonizers) have also been developing layouts after obtaining the requisite license; permission/ exemption form the Haryana government as per the prevailing norms of HUDA, Housing Board Haryana, and HSIIDC. The private licensed colonizers maintain their colonies for an initial period of five years; subsequently, these are handed over to MCF for their upkeep, future growth and maintenance under the HMCA, 1994. The salient features and proposals of the Development Plan are discussed in the following sections. Building Permissions As earlier mentioned, building permissions are accorded by multiple agencies in case of Faridabad. For areas administered by MCF the permissions are given by MCF and for those administered by HUDA (even if falling within MCF jurisdictional area) the same are accorded by HUDA/ FCA. Since most of the private developments are outside the MCF area, these private developers apply for building permission in HUDA/ FCA. As earlier pointed out in the section on Institutional Mechanism there is a clear example of multiplicity of role play in this activity. Like, buildings developed in HUDA administered areas follow the HUDA (Erection of Buildings) Regulations, 1979 and such areas after any transfer to MCF administration will have to comply with the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA. It also needs mention that the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA are not comprehensive. So also are the Building Regulations provided in the annexures to the DP prepared for MCF and FCA.
33
4.2.3
Developed area vis--vis Urbanisable Land
The DP proposals have been drawn for only 157 sq.km of then identified urbanisable area of FCA in 1991. Taking the developments post 1991 in the economy of the region/ NCR the entire area within FCA has become urbanisable sans any DP proposals. While the area proposed for urbanisation (157 sq.km; mostly falling under MCF) has been completely developed (approximately 20 percent non-confirming to DP proposals). It may be concluded that while parts of MCF areas are yet to develop (areas on the west to the north of Badhkal Lake) the growth has spilled into areas outside MCF limits. Though within FCA, these areas are outside the purview of the DP and also the reason for many private colonisers developing layouts and high-rise apartments in such areas. It needs mention that the DP prepared in 1991 is completely lacking in any concrete proposals for specific development activities. The same is left to the developer of the land. Accordingly neither the National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB) proposals are reflected in the DP of FCA and conversely NCRPB has no proposals from the DP of FCA to act or detail upon. That is such NCRPB proposals like widening of NH 2, development of peripheral expressways, orbital rail corridor, development of wholesale markets etc, unless finds place in the DP of FCA cannot take a formal shape. This leads to a situation of missing clarity on the proposals to be actually implemented and hence presents an urgent need for the DP to reflect and provide for reserving adequate land for all such proposals. In light of the current DP nearing its plan period, the revision may be initiated at the earliest (irrespective of the period of completion of DP by 2011) and also considering the policy decision of reducing the time frame for revision of DP from 20 years to 10 years.
4.2.4
Key issues, potential and challenges regarding land use
Key Issues Lack of concrete proposals in DP The DP prepared in 1991 for FCA is more in the form of a guideline document and presents only the proposed land use for the estimated urbanisable land. Detailing out the DP and Implementation of the detailed plans are left to the respective developer like HUDA or MCF. This has resulted in a situation where the DP neither has any development proposals nor has incorporated any of the NCRPB proposals that would require major parcels of land to be reserved. Also non-incorporation of such major development proposals of NCR in the DP would lead to legal complications and extended delay in implementation. Non-conformity of land uses In the course of industrial development, the past decade and a half has witnessed a large number of ancillary service units, which are smaller than the small-scale industrial units. For lack of any specific proposals in the DP, these smaller units took refuge in residential areas; as on date, more than 9000 such units are estimated to exist within residential sectors. While these are non-hazardous, consultations with citizens revealed that a large number of these are causing noise pollution. A mix of residential and industrial uses is not acceptable by any planning norm; hence this issue would require attention when the Development Plan is taken up for revision.
34
Institutional duplication of efforts While the Town & Country Planning Department prepares the Development Plan, the implementation of the same involves many agencies like HUDA, HHB, HSIIDC and private developers. However, in this entire process, MCF is left with no role in either the actual preparation of the plan or the implementation of the plan itself. The developed sectors are transferred to MCF by HUDA/ private developers for maintenance purposes, that too after five years. This goes against what has been envisaged in the 74th CAA for town planning as this function is to be completely devolved to MCF. Also, the current situation has deprived MCF of major revenues that can accrue from land development. Potentials Faridabad shows adequate potential to accommodate future population additions, indicating prospects of large-scale real estate activity in the near future. The city also boasts of an extensive green belt, which could induce large sections of population to reside in Faridabad. Challenges The town planning function is yet to be devolved on MCF, against what has been envisaged in the 74th CAA. This presents a major challenge for MCF, implementing the Development Plan proposals in the true sense. Bringing in uniformity in the provisions of building byelaws of all planning-related agencies like HUDA and MCF is a necessity. There is a need to adopt a high-rise, high-density policy for residential areas and a Flatted Factory policy for industrial areas, to better serve and accommodate the future additions. The present DP will complete its tenure in 2011, thereby necessitating a revision of the Plan. The same needs to be taken up through GIS-based systems. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
4.3
URBAN ENVIRONMENT
A citys environment is the most critical determinant of the quality of life of its inhabitants and consequently of urban productivity. Air, water, greenery and noise levels are the constituents of urban environment. The Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) is responsible for monitoring the water and air quality of the city.
4.3.1
Air Pollution
The major cause of air pollution in Faridabad is the discharge from automobiles (carbon monoxide, particulate matter, hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen), industries and thermal power plants (fly ash and sulphur dioxide). In the absence of specific studies/ monitoring of vehicular emissions, no specific conclusions could be arrived at. However, it is clear that the large numbers of industry-related heavy vehicles plying the city roads is the main cause of air pollution. The reasons for this substantial contribution by trucks to pollution are the presence of large industrial estates within the city limits and the passing of regional traffic through the city on the NH.
35
HSPCB/ Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) carried out Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring of the parameters of SPM, SO2 and NOx in Faridabad as part of the National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring program (NAAQM). Monitoring is being carried out year-toyear at two locations near the Escorts Medical Centre, which is an industrial location, and near the regional office in Sector 9, which is a residential location. Table 8. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city (NAAQM)
CPCB/ HSPCB Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring Station
SPM
Annual Average Value (g/ m) 2001 327 338 23 23 15 15 2002 465 474 13 13 26 27 2003 402 408 10 10 29 29 CPCB Standard 360 140 80 60 80 60
1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential) SO2 1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential) NOX 1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential)
Source: HSPCB/ CPCB (National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring program)
The results of NAAQM, as presented in the table above, indicated that suspended particulate matter (SPM) levels are critically high in residential and industrial areas; SO2 and NOx emissions are within comfortable levels. SPM levels are, however, subject to major seasonal variations and locational factors. During the summers for instance, SPM levels are reported to be much higher than normal; during the monsoons, they dip to very low levels. The high level of SPM in residential areas, which is observed to be increasing year after year, is mainly due to the unrestricted movements of heavy vehicles in the residential areas of the city. The above mentioned is also corroborated by the recent survey of ambient air quality at select locations as part of the rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted in 2005 for the proposed solid waste disposal site. As can be observed in the table below, SPM levels have been above the critical mark at all locations except at Pali Village. Table 9. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city at other locations
Ambient Air Quality (2005)
Monitoring Station 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Bhakri village (r) Saran school (i) Badhkal lake (s) Sector 21D (r) MCF office (Old Faridabad) (r) Sector 49, HSEB Electric Sub-station (r) Pali village (i) Municipal Auditorium, NIT (r) SWM proposed disposal site (r) SPM (g/ m) 389 504 302 462 441 427 456 421 385 24 Hrs 98th Percentile Value (g/ m) SO2 NOX CO Norm (g/ Norm Norm (g/ (g/ m) m) m) 200 14 80 78 80 736 500 5 120 51 120 872 100 9 30 54 30 860 200 6 80 80 80 1498 200 16 80 67 80 1961 200 5 80 74 80 1930 500 8 120 62 120 967 200 5 80 66 80 2066 200 6 80 58 80 1139 (s) Sensitive location
Norm 2000 5000 1000 2000 2000 2000 5000 2000 2000
(r) Residential location
(i) Industrial location
Source: Rapid EIA for proposed SWM disposal site
36
It may also be observed from the table above that the carbon monoxide (CO) levels are above permissible limits at one location, i.e., the municipal auditorium in NIT which is also the central business district of NIT.
4.3.2
Water Pollution
In the absence of data with CPCB/ HSPCB on the surface and ground water quality in Faridabad city, the results of the water quality monitoring at select locations, as part of the rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted in 2005 for the proposed solid waste disposal site, have been considered for analysis in this section. Table 10. Surface water quality in Faridabad City
Surface Water Quality Badhkal lake Average of Pre & Post Monsoon DO (mg/L) 4.25 CPCB Standard C/D BOD (mg/L) 2.8 CPCB Standard B/C Total Coliform (MPN/100 mL) 125 CPCB Standard B pH Value 7.3 CPCB Standard A/B/D/E
As per the CPCB norms for inland surface water, COD above 10 is highly polluted, DO less than 4 is critical and BOD must ideally be 3. The figures above presented indicate that the waters of Badhkal Lake can be classified under CPCB class C. It was also observed in the study that the lake waters were not clear and that a significant amount of worship material is being thrown into its waters. . Table 11. Ground water quality in Faridabad City
Ground Water Quality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 1 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 2 Graveyard, Faridabad-Gurgaon road Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 3 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 4 Abandoned mine near SWM proposed site/ Gr. water Badhkal lake complex/ Bore well MCF compound/ Tube well Institute of Finance & Management / Gr. Water Boron (mg/L) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class Average of Pre & Post Monsoon TDS Total Class pH (mg/L) Coliform Value (MPN/100 mL) 3717 2 A 7.55 1640 2 A 7.55 794 2 A 7.55 859.5 2 A 7.46 706 2 A 7.66 160 2 A 7.55 275 863 929 2 2 2 A A A 7.35 7.6 7.36 Class
A A A A A A A A A
A A A A A A A A A
An analysis of the Boron content, TDS and pH value of the ground waters at various locations, mentioned in the table, indicate that the ground water in the region is largely free from pollution and the baseline data is well within the prescribed limits for primary water quality criteria issued by CPCB. Ground water quality hence can be classified as A Accordingly also is the water supply system in the city where ground water is drawn and supplied without any conventional treatment however after disinfection by chlorination.
37
4.3.3
Key issues regarding urban environment
Lack of alternate parallel corridors to NH The lack of alternate corridors to NH2, coupled with the absence of inter-connectivity between the eastern and western sides of the railway line, virtually makes the NH the spine of the city. Any trip generated within the city needs to go through or cross the NH. Neither are there any bypass/ regional corridors for the regional traffic. Thus it inevitably enters the city roads and mixes with the city traffic, contributing to increased vehicular emissions into the citys atmosphere along the stretch of the NH. Lack of a public transport system The lack of an organised public transport system in the city has led to an increase in the number of private transport vehicles like stage carriers and seven-seaters. These contribute significantly to carbon emissions in the city. Faridabad also receives a lot of regional traffic and floating population from Delhi, who travel by private vehicles. This increasing number of private vehicles is consequently causing more vehicular emissions and higher noise levels in the city. Lack of Common Effluent Treatment systems for Faridabad Industrial Complex The present industrial water demand is about 20 MLD and the same is expected to reach 100 MLD in another 20 years owing to the growth of the industry. For this large quantum of industrial water supply, the generation of waste water would be equally large and the absence of common treatment facilities (from economic point of view) of these wastewaters is clearly felt in the wake of the large scale pollution of the river Yamuna. Apart from the above mentioned other aspects leading to degradation of urban environment in the city of Faridabad like, inadequate sanitation and drainage systems; inefficient waste management practices etc are discussed under such respective section.
4.4
URBAN POOR AND SLUMS IN FARIDABAD
This section reviews the status of slums and the urban poor and their access to urban basic services in the city, drawing from secondary information and interactions with stakeholders.
4.4.1
Poverty in Faridabad
Defining and Measuring Poverty The simplest definition of poverty is the lack of specific consumptions (i.e., not enough to eat). A broader definition is the lack of command over commodities exercised by a population. Access to basic services, especially adequate and safe water, health and sanitation, and education are now increasingly being recognized as an important indicator of poverty. Standard and widely accepted representations of poverty are the Head Count Index (HCI), which signifies the percentage of people below poverty line and the Poverty Gap (PG), which measures the depth of poverty (in statistical terms, this stands for the mean distance below the poverty line as percent of the poverty line).
Discussions with stakeholders revealed that the poverty levels are of varying nature and are coexistent in the city. Absolute poverty, as per the general definition, i.e. not enough to eat, is not prevalent in the city, except amongst a small section of people living in the slums; these people lack even housing and other amenities and can be categorized as the urban poor. For the majority of the poor in the city, the only concern is security of land tenure, quality of housing, and access to basic infrastructure.
38
If other parameters of urban poverty like housing, access to better sanitation facilities and capability to function in society are considered, then almost all slum dwellers can be categorized as the urban poor.
4.4.2
Slums in Faridabad
The booming industry in the city during the 70s and the 80s and the growth of its economy has also contributed to the growth of slums. Large numbers of labourers from different parts of the country have migrated in groups to the city in lieu of opportunities and settled on available vacant lands, largely belonging to the Central and State Govts, MCF, HUDA, Wakf board, Rehabilitation Department, and even private lands. Further, the meagre provisions in the Development Plan for EWS/ LIG housing and the non-availability of adequate service levels in several of these remote locations have been leading to a deteriorating environment in the city. In all, there are 67 identified slum clusters in the city. The survey conducted during 2001 identified the total population living in these slums as 132424. It is estimated that as on date, the population living in the slums would be about 1.47 lakhs. That accounts for about 12 percent of the total city population. The majority of the slums are concentrated at critical locations like along the alignment of the Badarpur bypass, the entire area between Old Faridabad and G.T. Road, and several lands acquired by HUDA for residential and industrial purposes. Table 12. Slums in Faridabad
Zone 1 NIT zone 2 Ballabgarh zone 3 Old Faridabad zone Total
Slum Survey, 2001 &Estimates
Huts/ Structures 15802 7032 6874 29708
Population (2001) 71792 31294 29338 132424
Population (2006) 79694 34739 32567 147000
The earlier attempts of MCF, HUDA and the District Administration towards removing the encroachments on important and critical lands like the railway lands, and along major regional roads of the city have not yielded the desired results due to various injunctions and interim relief offered by various civil courts. In view of the above, the Honourable High Court of Haryana has given directions to frame a scheme for proper rehabilitation of the old occupants of those slum locations, which are proposed for encroachment removal. In this context, JNNURM is considered to be providing the right opportunity. Access to basic services and amenities in slums The slum survey earlier conducted has only listed the numbers of slums and the population residing in them; it did not evaluate the availability of services in each slum location. No other specific survey has been conducted on the slums in the city. However, information as available in the form of stakeholder consultations has been analysed to understand the access of slum dwellers to basic services, primarily water supply and sanitation. It also needs mention that Govt. of Haryana has ordered a stop vide Memo No. 439(30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 on providing any civic amenities to unauthorised jhuggi clusters residing on rehabilitation lands. This applies to majority of the slum locations in the city and hence this Government notification applies to all. This is also the reason for absolute lacking of civic amenities in most of the slums.
39
Of the total 765 and odd Public Stand Posts (PSP) and 515 hand pumps in the city, an estimated 425 PSPs and half the number of hand pumps are made available by the authorities in the slums, amounting to about 215 persons per public stand post and hand pump. While this indicator itself suggests an uncomfortable living condition, it is reported that this situation is not uniform. While some slum locations have piped water supply and some have public stand posts, the rest and a majority of them lack any such facility. With respect to sanitation, of the total 734 seats of public conveniences in the city, about 410 are located in the slums as part of 24 complexes. Per person availability of seats of public convenience is 359, which represents a far from comfortable situation. This also indicates the general inadequacy of basic services to slum dwellers in the city.
4.4.3
Key issues regarding Slums and Urban poor
Restriction on providing civic amenities to slum dwellers on rehabilitation lands Govt. of Haryana has ordered a stop vide Memo No. 439(30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 on providing any civic amenities to unauthorised jhuggi clusters residing on rehabilitation lands. This is in view of several slum dwellers raising pucca/ semi pucca structures on such lands meant for rehabilitation purposes thereby leading to 1) non-usage of these lands for the very purpose of rehabilitating the jhuggie dwellers in a planned manner and 2) poor living conditions in many slums of the city. A solution needs to be drawn up at the earliest to arrest the further growth of slums and improve the living conditions of not just the slum dwellers but also the citizens of Faridabad. Concentration of slums along sensitive locations The majority of the slum dwellers in the city have taken refuge on easily available locations close to the railway land and major road corridors apart from vacant lands. This dense concentration of slum dwellers along such environmentally and developmentally sensitive locations has only resulted in the complete lack of access to basic services, causing unhygienic living conditions. Unaffordable housing situation for LIG/ Slum dwellers Today, the land market in Faridabad under the impact of NCR is booming with real estate values reaching levels unaffordable by the LIG/ slum dweller groups. Also, the lack of any specific proposals for these groups in the Development Plan has led to a shortage of housing for these unprivileged groups in an otherwise large housing market. Lack of awareness on slum development programs There is a general paucity of awareness of the various slum development schemes and programs announced from time to time by the central and state governments. This leads to long delays in the implementation of the programmes and overall dissatisfying results, apart from the factor of the benefits of the programs not reaching the intended beneficiaries. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
40
4.5
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION
ROADS,
STREET
LIGHTING,
AND
MCFs role with regard to road infrastructure in the city includes the construction and maintenance of all roads in its jurisdiction, except the roads belonging to the Public Works Department (highways and other district-level roads). The construction of internal roads, in the case of a private colony development is the responsibility of the developer. MCF However verifies the adequacy of proposals in these areas with respect to the DP, at the time of sanction. MCF and other functional agencies are also responsible for implementing the DP proposals with regard to new major roads and road-widening activities.
4.5.1
Road Network
The MCF area is characterised by the old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and the New Industrial Town (NIT). The Delhi-Mathura NH 2 is the spine of all road networks in the city. As presented in the adjacent figure areas to the east of NH 2 mostly follow the grid-iron pattern (except for core village areas which have a geometric road network with narrow lanes and high density concentrations). These are Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh areas. Areas to the west of NH 2 mainly comprising of NIT have a mix of organic and grid-iron pattern of roads. The road network in the MCF area functionally comprises arterial roads, collector roads and local streets. The main arterial roads either start or end on the NH 2. Other highways in the city include NH3 and NH4, which also branch out from NH 2. State highways include the Faridabad-Gurgaon highway and the
Grid and Organic pattern of roads
GridIron pattern of roads
Ballabgarh-Sohna highway. The network of roads in the city runs to a length of 1218 km. This includes the 80 Km of NH, SH and PWD roads. The total length of roads under MCFs maintenance is 1138 km., of which 840 km. is of BT surfacing, 48 km. has cement concrete surface and 250km. are of gravel with brick on edges. Table 13. Road Length in Faridabad
S. No Surface Type Municipal Roads 1 Concrete 2 Black-topped 3 Gravel (brick on edge) Total Road Length Other roads (NH/ SH/ PWD etc) Length in Km 48.00 840.00 250.00 1138.00 80.00 Percentage 4% 69% 21% 93% 7%
41
Road condition 79 percent of the roads in the city are surfaced; the per-capita road length as on date is 0.96 metres, which is relatively better in comparison to other peer cities with similar population and size. However this is against only 80 percent of the developed area within MCF limits and newly developing and peripheral areas towards the west lacking absolutely in terms of proper road connectivity. The average width of roads in the city is 6.66 metres. Due to rapid development in economic, industrial and commercial activities, there has been an enormous increase in traffic plying on the city roads. Also, due to delay in the execution of the bypass road, the NH2 other main arterial roads are privy to local and regional traffic. The high volume of traffic, mainly heavy traffic related to the industries located in and around the city, also causes damage to the road surface.
to Delhi
Neelam Bridge Bata Bridge
From the geographical point of view, the Delhi-Agra rail line passes through the length of the city and divides Faridabad into two vertical sections. NH 2 runs along the rail line. This geographical situation ROB necessitates a greater number of road over NH 2 bridges (ROBs) in the city to cross the Rail railway line and avoid traffic congestion at railways crossings. At present, there are only three ROBs across the rail line, the most widely used being the Neelam ROB, which is constantly congested.
4.5.2
Street lighting
The provision and maintenance of streetlights is an obligatory function of MCF. MCF is responsible for the installation, replacement, repairs, operation and maintenance of streetlights in the city. There are about 22,036 street light poles in Faridabad city with different types of electrical fixtures. 76 percent of the fixtures are tube lights and 24 percent are high power lamps, mainly sodium vapour lamps of various wattages - 70W, 150W and 250W. Table 14. Street lights in MCF area
Number of Lights by Type Tube lights Sodium Vapour Lamps Mercury Lamps High Mast Lamps Others Total
Source: MCF
Numbers of streetlights 16,681 5,354 1 22036
42
Against the available road length of 1218 km. within the MCF limits, the average spacing of streetlight poles works out to about 55 meters, which rates well below the norm of 30 meters indicating the gross inadequacy of the system. However, this condition is not uniform.. The inadequacy is mainly observed in the newly developing areas, unauthorized colonies and slum locations and to an extent in the residential sectors adjoining the industrial estates.
4.5.3
Urban Transport
Road infrastructure has not expanded in tandem with the increase in the number of vehicles in the city. In the last four decades, while the population of the city has increased ten times the vehicle population is understood to have increased 60 times. With the projections indicating that Faridabad would have a population of about 21 lakhs by 2021 and 29 lakhs by 2031, road and transportation infrastructure has to not only meet the existing demand, but also cater to the demand that will be generated by the increasing population. It is observed that neither the data on the registered numbers of vehicles nor any other localised statistics can provide the true picture of travel pattern and traffic movements due to the dynamics of travel/ trips generated within NCR and between Delhi and Faridabad. A systematised study in that direction is necessary to assess the ground situation. By comparison, the movement patterns presented in the Regional Plan, 2021 of NCR indicate that public transport commands majority share at 72 percent of the trips generated in the NCR, while private vehicles constitute 28 percent of the trips. It was also observed that within NCR, trips during the morning peak hours are destined for NCT-Delhi; during evenings, the opposite is observed. This clearly indicates the nature of travel within NCR. People prefer to use Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) bus service as mode of public transport for long-distance movements within NCR and most of these trips are office and work-related. Faridabad is also one such location within NCR from where a large number of work-related trips are generated and which typically end in NCT-Delhi. As per the NCR Regional Plan 2001, only 6.4 percent of the total traffic movements between Delhi-Faridabad were accounted for by buses or public transportation. A staggering 71 percent was accounted for by the passenger vehicles/ private vehicles. In terms of generation of passenger traffic for Faridabad, 52 percent of passenger traffic is accounted by buses followed by private vehicles at 35 percent. That is against significant numbers of passenger traffic generation by buses, the availability in umbers of public transport systems are less and inadequate. This is also signified by the per-capita trip rate generation of bus passengers at 0.046 against 0.031 by vehicle passengers. Travel Characteristics While the preferred mode of travel (motorised) in Faridabad is two-wheelers, the predominant number of trips undertaken in the city are understood to be pedestrian in nature followed by cycling. Further, the estimated numbers stage carriers and contract carriers and limited numbers of seven-seaters that form the public transport system of the city, which ply the roads on a given day not even account for 1 percent, indicating that people travel in congestion within the available modes of transport/ travel. In the absence of organised public transport system, apart from stage carriers, auto rickshaws are the other mode of travel. Alternatively, the numbers of two-wheelers plying on city roads is understood to constitute about 70 percent of the total vehicles and four-wheelers about 20 percent.
43
This situation also clarifies the observed shift in the travel mode in Faridabad from public transport to personal transport and the high growth in the numbers of two-wheelers. This is however against a lot of vehicles registered in Delhi observed to be moving in Faridabad indicating the situation to be much worse. Public Transport/ Mass Transit The NCR Regional Plan 2001 has projected a trip rate of 0.036 for vehicle passengers and 0.034 for public transport for Faridabad that is 25856 vehicle passenger trips per day and 85224 public transport trips to be catered to through an efficient public transport system in the city. The projected passenger trips for public transport at 85224 trips also signify the need for MRTS system of public transport in the city. Also the NCR Regional Plan 2021 has indicated major proposals for public transportation like development of the Regional Rail Transit System (RRTS), extension of the MRTS system to Faridabad and linking with RRTS, development of the Orbital Rail Corridor etc all to be implemented by 2011. These proposals have been discussed in ensuing section on NCR Proposals. However till date, the city continued to be devoid of any organised public transport system. The public transport system in the city at present comprises stage carriers and seven- seaters, which ply the city roads and transport commuters to various required destinations. In the absence of an organised public transport system, urban mobility is made possible through transport and non-transport modes. The transport mode includes tempo passengers (sevenseaters), three-wheelers, auto-rickshaws, mini-buses, and taxis. Private transport modes include two-wheelers, cars, and jeeps. Since public transport is not organized to provide quality and dependable service to all sections of the public and in all directions of the city, increasing acquisition of and dependence on personal transport vehicles meet the gap. This has resulted in on-street parking of the stage carriers and seven-seaters, which contribute to the congestion of the main roads, slow movements of vehicles and increasing air pollution. Traffic Management and Circulation Majority of the road network in the city is grid-iron pattern with sufficient road widths and pose little problems with respect to traffic management. The road network primarily has arterial roads and internal roads. Major issues with respect to traffic management are restricted to the core of the old areas of Faridabad and Ballabgarh where the network is organics and narrow and the NH 2. NH 2 carries maximum traffic plying in the city of Faridabad. This comprises both the city traffic, NCR traffic as well as the regional traffic. Due to lack of alternate parallel corridors to NH 2 it has virtually become the spine of traffic movements of the city. Trips generated in the city have either the origin or destination as NH 2. This is also due to concentration of major commercial and institutional areas along NH 2 and lack of any alternate city business districts CBD). This presents a clear case of lack of integration between land use and transportation. Further the Delhi-Agra broad gauge rail line also runs parallel to the NH 2 and the linkages across the rail line between the eastern and western areas is another major issue from traffic management perspective. The present available connectors are only three numbers of ROBs for a linear city of length about 18 Km. For this length the three ROBs are inadequate and necessitates the need for more connecting ROBs across the rail line. One near the Ballabagrh Railway station close to Bata factory would be of priority.
44
Also to mention is the NCR proposal for widening of the length of NH 2 in Faridabad to expressway standards. Such widening will need to propose adequate service roads so as to segregate the regional traffic and city traffic. Further there is also a proposal for a 4 lane elevated road connecting Delhi-Faridabad near Badarpur which would primarily reduce the load on NH 2 entering Faridabad. The proposals while are in the right direction and will possibly solve majority of traffic problems associated with NH 2 in Faridabad, initiation of the same for planned completion before 2011 is important. Parking Organised on-street parking facilities are provided only in select locations in the city, primarily due to lack of space for MCF to provide such facilities. As earlier mentioned, DP proposals are restricted to overall planning and independent sectors are planned by the respective developer (MCF/ HUDA, private developers etc) provision for parking spaces is lost out in the process. This again spells out the lacking integration between land use and transportation planning. Parking lots at present are provided by MCF at 8 locations in the city for two-wheelers and fourwheelers. Lack of sufficient parking lots and organised on-street parking facilities has resulted in haphazard and unorganised parking on most stretches of commercial roads in the city. NCR Transport proposals As per NCR regional plan the modal split is in favour of public transport system and it estimates that the modal split will increase to 82 percent by 2025 due to the extension of MRTS facility into outside NCT-Delhi areas. The regional plan 2021 of NCR has proposed to develop NCR through four policy zones: 1) NCT-Delhi NCR 2) Central NCR Zone 3) Highway Corridor Zone, and 4) Rest NCR Zone. The regional plan proposes to maximize the opportunities in the CNCR zone of which Faridabad-Ballabgarh is also a part. The plan proposes to assist the CNCR towns in competing with NCTDelhi in terms of employment generation, economic activities, transport systems, housing, social infrastructure, environment, etc. Accordingly, the Faridabad Transport Plan 2021 for NCR has further given the following proposals involving Faridabad-Ballabgarh and to be NH 2 Widening to Expressway implemented in the first phase during 2001-11. Peripheral
Expressways Orbital Rail Corridor Regional Rapid Transit System (RRTS)
Proposal to develop NH 2 from Delhi to Ballabgarh to expressway standards.
All CNCR towns are proposed to be connected through peripheral expressways, of which the Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) western peripheral expressway and the Kundli-Ghaziabad-Palwal (KGP) eastern expressway are located closest to Faridabad-Ballabgarh.
45
Metro rail transit system (MRTS) to be extended to Faridabad, one of the CNCR towns and further to have feeder and connect services with the regional rapid transit system (RRTS) to cater to increasing intra-city urban transport needs.
4.5.4
Issues, Potential and Challenges in roads, street lighting and transport sectors
Key Issues Entry and mix of regional traffic on city roads: For want of a bypass road to Faridabad, the vehicular traffic is compelled to pass through the city. Due to this, there is tremendous traffic congestion on important roads of the city, primarily the NH 2. While this issue has been tackled partially by the formation of the Faridabad-Surajkund-Delhi expressway, the NCR proposals for a western peripheral expressway and an eastern peripheral expressway need to be implemented at the earliest (the same were proposed for implementation in the first phase during 2001-11). Lack of appropriate and efficient road infrastructure: While road connectivity within the developed areas of the city is good, the infrastructure is below standard. Inadequate grade separation and poor surface quality are leading to travel delays, congestion and pollution. Appropriate safety and visibility enhancement parameters like signage, markings, channel islands, street name boards and other street furniture are absent on the majority of roads. Major roads lack footpaths and pedestrian facilities; those available are encroached upon by informal activities and street hawkers. Lack of an integrated traffic and transportation system Except for a few major intersections in the city, the rest lack cohesion with road geometry, necessitating an integrated traffic and transport system. Also, the mixing of traffic owing to the lack of lane separators and unabated parking on the main roads and intersections is predominant. The capacity of many intersections has thus been exhausted. Many areas, and mainly the core areas of the city in NIT and Ballabgarh, are experiencing parking problems, low-speed travel, increased congestion, and worsening air quality. Lack of coordination between land use and transportation systems; Land use planning of the city has been largely restricted to the residential, commercial and industrial areas of the city; the most important function of transportation systems has been ignored. The lack of truck terminals and planned arterial ring roads/ bypasses is precipitating a high degree of unwanted freight movement and parking inside the city. The major fallout is the degradation of the environment by oil and waste discharges from the trucks and heavy vehicles along major roads. Lack of an efficient public transport system: Presently, Faridabad city does not have an organised public transport system, except for the extension of Delhi Transport Services to the Badarpur border of Delhi-Faridabad, which caters to the transport needs of Faridabad only to an extent. The city within is entirely dependent on auto-rickshaws and stage carriers for urban mobility. The fallouts of an ineffective public transport system are visible in the form of traffic snarls, congestion on roads and roadsides, increase in pollution, accidents, etc.
46
Potential presented by urban transport The regional plan proposals of NCR towards improving regional connectivity between the CNCR cities of Faridabad, Gurgaon, Ghaziabad and Sonepat reveal the potential for sustenance of the present and potential industrial/ commercial and residential activities in the CNCR cities. NCR proposals for the extension of metro rail to Faridabad will also enhance the citys potential for attracting large-scale investments. Challenges for the urban transport In line with the proposed improvements in the regional connectivity of Faridabad, the city also needs to improve its internal connectivity, mainly between the eastern and western areas. Early implementation of the proposed KMP western peripheral expressway, up-gradation of NH 2 from Delhi-Ballabgarh to expressway standards, widening of the Gurgaon-Faridabad road, etc. present a clear challenge for the implementation agencies. There is a need for an integrated road, traffic and transportation plan for Faridabad and its surroundings in line with the proposals of NCR. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
4.6
MUNICIPAL SERVICES WATER SUPPLY
Water supply systems in the region are dependent to a large extent on ground water and Faridabad is no exception. In line with the increasing population, more and more ground water is extracted to meet the demand. However, in view of depleting ground water levels, water is also being tapped through the rainy wells located along the Yamuna River.
4.6.1
Source of Water Supply
The source of water supply to the city of Faridabad is ground water, tapped from 420 deep tube wells located in various parts of the city and two rainy wells located along the Yamuna River. The river Yamuna runs along the length of Faridabad-Ballabgarh at a distance of about 10 km. The total installed capacity of the tube wells is 195 MLD and that of the two rainy wells is 45 MLD, leading to a total installed capacity of 240 MLD. Faridabad is utilizing the entire installed capacity to cater to the demands of the residential, commercial and industrial areas. Tube wells are drilled to a depth of 200 ft. to 350 ft. and the discharge from tube wells varies from 2500 gallons per hour to 15,000 gallons per hour. It is observed that the discharge from the tube wells located closer to the canal is more in comparison to the rest. The spring level which was 15 to 20 below ground level during the early seventies is now in the range of 45 to 60 below the ground level and the ground level further falls steeply towards the farther end on western side of the canals towards the Aravali Hills. It is therefore essential to search for an alternative and reliable source of water to augment the present per capita supply and to keep pace with the projected population of 28 lakhs by 2031. MCF has privatized the operation and maintenance of all the tube wells supply water to the city. The private operator has provided for a centralized monitoring system for the same whereby he exercises control over the hours of operation of the tube wells.
47
4.6.2
Treatment facilities
The quality of the ground water being extracted at present needs disinfection only. Hence, only chlorination is being done before the water is distributed for usage. However, considering the present trend of excessive ground water drawl, it is considered that future extracts would require a sand filters-based treatment.
4.6.3
Storage and Distribution System
At present, raw water is transmitted from the tube wells and the rainy wells to various underground reservoirs through raising mains and transmission mains which run to a total length of 40.39 km. before pumping into the elevated reservoirs for further distribution. Table 15. Location and capacity of GLSRs
S. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Location of GLSR Tigaon road Chawla colony Sector-14 Sector 15 Sector 15 A Sector 16 Sector 16 A Sector 17 Sector 29 Sector 21 C Sector 22 Sector 23 A Sector 25 NH-1 NH-2 NH-3 NH-5 Budh Vihar Dabua Colony Jawahar Colony Parvatia Colony Mujesher Total Pump capacity 3x100HP 1x50HP 2x50HP 2x50 HP 2x50 HP 2x50 HP 2x50 HP 2x50 HP 2x60 HP; 2x100 HP 2x60 HP 1x50 HP 1x50 HP 2x200 HP; 2x100 HP 3x60 HP 2x55 HP; 1x90 HP 3x45 HP 2x55HP; 1x90 HP 2x60 HP 2x60 HP; 1x40 HP 2x25 HP 3x50 HP; 1x60 HP Areas served Ballabgarh town Chawla colony Sector- 14 Sector 15 Sector 15 A Sector 16 Sector 16 A Sector 17 Sector 28,29&30 Sector 21 C&21 A Sector 22 & Sanjay colony Sector 23, 23 A & Housing Board Colony Sector 22, 23, 24, 25, 55, Sanjay Colony Mujesher NH-1 NH-2 NH-3 NH-5 Sanjay Colony Dabua Colony & Janta Colony Jawahar Colony Parvatia Colony To be commissioned Capacity (ML) 4.55 0.45 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 4.55 4.55 0.45 0.45 13.64 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 4.55 0.91 0.91 5.91 4.55 54.55
Source: MCF
There are 22 ground level storage reservoirs (GLSR) fitted with boosting stations. The total capacity of the GLSRs is 54.55 ML, which is 23 percent of the installed capacity of the water supply system. These GLSRS are located across the city in line with the location of the tube wells. The distribution system in the city is based on the division of the entire city into primarily three zones - Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and NIT. These zones are sub-divided into various sectors/ colonies (mentioned above) for further distribution. Each such sub-division is catered to by an elevated service reservoir of 1 lakh gallon (4.55 ML) capacity. The water supply system, location of the tube wells, GLSRs and ESRs are also presented in the figure below.
48
Figure Water supply for Faridabad
49
There are in all 25 ESRs. The total capacity of the ESRs is 11.37 ML, which is just about 5 percent of the installed capacity of water supply of 240 MLD. Ideally, it is necessary to have 1/3rd of the installed capacity as elevated storage for intermittent supply systems as in Faridabad. The location of the ESRs zone-wise is presented in the table below. The total length of the distribution system in Faridabad is 910 km. The network includes CI, AC and PVC pipes which range from 90 mm to 300 mm in diameter. Against the available road length of about 1218 km., the distribution network covers only 75 percent of the road length indicating a fair coverage of the city through the service. Table 16. Location of ESRs in Faridabad
S.No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Old Faridabad zone MCF store sector 21-A Sector 21-C Sector 37 Ashoka Enclave I& II Sector-28 Sector-29 Sector-19 Old FBD (Sec-28) Sector-14 Sector-15 Sector-16 Sector-16-A Sector-17 Sector-15-A Pali crusher zone Ballabgarh zone Chawla colony Milk plant road Sector-10 Sector-9 NIT zone Nursery ESI. Boosting Tikona park Kalyan Singh chowk Central Green Sector-25 boosting
Source: MCF
4.6.4
House Service Connections, user charges and cost recovery
The total number of house service connections in the city is 1,06,850; these cover only 57 percent of the total properties assessed in the city indicating a huge gap in cost recovery. Of these 52 percent connections are metered, though the working condition of these meters is doubtful. 93 percent of the total connections are domestic in nature, five percent commercial and the rest two percent industrial. As on date, the total number of public stand posts (PSP) provided by various agencies including MCF, PWD-PH and HUDA is about 765, of which an estimated 425 are located in various slums of the city. The tariff structure is fixed by the Government of Haryana across the state irrespective of the cost of service. The current water tariff as presented in Table 17 was last revised during 200203. Further, if a house service connection is unauthorized and not a part of the regularized colonies and villages, MCF charges Rs. 2000 as penalty for regularization. Water charges are collected from the date of sanction of the building plan for that building.
50
Table 17. Present Water Tariff Structure

S. Type of No. Consumer 1 2 Domestic Metered water supply (Rs./ KL) Rs. 1.25 per KL up to consumption of 15 KL; Rs. 2.5 per KL for consumption above 15 KL up to 30 KL; Rs. 4 per KL for consumption above 30 KL Rs. 4.00 per KL Un-metered water supply (Rs./ month) Rs. 50 to Rs. 5000 per month according to the area of the site/ building and the no. of floors
Commercial & Industrial New connection fee 1 2 3 Domestic Commercial Industrial
Security fee Rs. 500/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together Rs. 432/-; Total Rs. 932 + road cutting charges as applicable Security fee Rs. 1000/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together Rs. 432/-; Total Rs. 1432 + road cutting charges as applicable Security fee Rs. 2500/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together Rs. 432/-; Total Rs. 2932 + road cutting charges as applicable
Source: Memo No. 14/90/02-3CII dated 05-02-2003 of Urban Development Dept, Government of Haryana
The demand collection balance (DCB) statement presented in Table 18 indicates that the average collection efficiency is 68 percent of the total demand. Arrears account for 29 percent of the total demand. The current demand for the year 2005-06 is Rs. 786 lakhs, which works out to an average of Rs. 61 user charge, per connection per month. The number of persons per house service connection stands at twelve, against an average household size of 4.9, indicating scope for the presence of a large number of unauthorized connections. Table 18. Water Charges Demand Collection Balance Statement
Items Demand Current demand Arrears demand Total demand Collection Current collection Arrears collection Total collection Balance Collection Efficiency No. of HSCs Growth of HSCs
Source: MCF
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04 Rs. Lakhs 658 299 957 475 226 701 256 73% 96302 9%
2004-05
2005-06
285 164 448 187 59 247 202 55% 84761 -
398 210 608 230 81 310 298 51% 88198 4%
722 225 947 611 175 786 161 83% 101952 6%
786 161 948 592 124 716 232 76% 106850 5%
The presence of unauthorized connections is also signified by the poor cost recovery on the service. It is assessed that the average revenue per connection per month is about Rs. 74 against an average expenditure of Rs. 98 indicating a cost recovery of about 76 percent. Ideally, the entire operation & maintenance (O&M) expenses are expected to be recovered in the form of user charges. Further, this is against privatisation of O&M of all the tube wells in the city and very minimal O&M expenses on water supply operations.
51
This clearly points out at very low revenues from the sector that is comparatively low user charges and hence lesser demand and further crippled by collection performance in the range of 70 percent.
4.6.5
Service Levels
The service levels with regard to water supply are comparatively better than those obtaining in many other cities in the country. Faridabad has a gross supply of about 188 lpcd and a net supply of 160 lpcd (accounting for 15% of transmission and distribution losses). Though the per capita supply is fair it could not be considered comfortable considering the large quantum of industrial water demand in the city. The distribution network in the city covers a length of 910 km., which is about 75 percent of the road length. The system, presently, covers almost 100 percent of the developed areas excluding the slums. The newly added areas are currently being catered to by tanker supply. The distribution system in the city is based on both gravity and pumping; the total storage capacity available is 65.92 ML, which is 27.5 percent of the installed capacity (240 MLD) of the system. Elevated storage capacity stands at just 11.36 ML that is 4.7 percent of the installed capacity. The reservoirs are filled up more than two times a day. Table 19. Service Levels Water Supply
Details Unit Drawl at Intake works 240 MLD Treatment capacity Storage Reservoirs (ESR) 11.36 ML (25 Nos.) Storage Reservoirs (UGR) 54.55 ML (22 Nos.) Distribution network 910 Km Individual House Service Connections Nos. Meter-Domestic 50755 Unmetered -Domestic 49225 Commercial & Industrial 6870 Total Connections 106850
Source: MCF
Service level Indicator 188 lpcd 100% 4.7% 22.7% 75% of road length 47.50% 46.07% 6.43%
4.6.6
Issues, Potential and Challenges in water supply sector
Key Issues Policy level issues Short-term policy: Clarity on fixation of norms for water tariff and structure with regard to cost recovery and plugging of illegal connections are the main policy issues to be addressed in the immediate future. Long-term policy: Availability of ground water and reliability of tube wells as a water source to cater to the demand of 2031, in the scenario of high population growth rates and identification of alternate sources including rainy wells, are the long-term policy decisions that need to be taken. Service and O&M Issues Ever-increasing water demand due to rapid urbanization, implementation of township policy and pressures from the floating population of NCR
52
Increasing numbers of tiny industrial service units being set up in the residential sectors leading to inequitable supplies Unaccounted-for water and high transmission and distribution losses. Transmission and distribution losses in the system account for more than 15% of gross supply thereby making the net supply average at 150 lpcd (This includes all uses including industrial, horticultural, and commercial) against an estimated requirement of more than 330 lpcd. Non-comprehensiveness of the system in terms of design - Each individual distribution sector is independent of the overall system and is linked to that sectors specific GLSR and ESR only. Potential The service has the potential to involve the private sector in the current format to bring in efficiency. Challenges The system is highly dependent on ground water. In the absence of alternate sources, it is beset by the challenges of 1) Reduced ground water availability; 2) Increasing demand; and 3) New sources The system lacks a comprehensive design for the entire city as a whole, necessitating a master plan. Service coverage is reported to be very low at about one lakh odd house connections against more than two lakh households, indicating a large quantum of non-revenue water and consequently, poor cost recovery. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
4.7
MUNICIPAL SERVICES SEWERAGE
The city has been divided into four sewerage zones on the basis of the topography of the area and other major barriers. The 91 sectors planned for the city in the Development Plan are covered under these sewerage zones. Sectors falling within each zone are given below: Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV - 27B, 27C, 27D, 32 to 45, 21A, 21B, 21C, 21D, 46 to part of 49 and 84 to 91 - 1 to 20, 27A, 28 to 31 and 60 to 65. - 22 to 25, part of 49 to 59, HIT 1 to III and V and RUA colonies - 66 to 83
The Sewerage master plan was prepared in 1992 to cover the urbanisable area proposed in the Development Plan for Faridabad. The master plan has proposed two sewerage treatment plants, one for zone I and III and the other for zone II & IV. Further sewerage pumping stations (SPS) were proposed in the following manner. Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV 4 6 4 2
53
Figure Sewerage system for Faridabad
4.7.1
54
Existing Sewerage System

The present quantum of sewerage generated in the city is understood to be in the range of 200 MLD which is approximately 80 percent of the water supply. To convey this sewerage to various intermediate and main pumping stations for treatment purposes, there is a sewerage network of about 638 km. covering 52 percent of the total road network of the city. This however, doesnt present the true picture of system coverage, as the road network in the city itself is falling short of requirement. In terms of population coverage, the network is understood to be covering only 50% of the city population implying that a large quantum of sewerage is flowing into the open drains and ultimately into the river Yamuna untreated. Against the 16 proposed SPSs for the four zones, 13 are in place at present. The sewerage transmitted through the system is treated in three sewerage treatment plants (STP) with a combined capacity of 115 ML. S. No
1 2 3
Capacity
20 ML 45 ML 50 ML
Table 20. Sewerage Treatment Plants - Faridabad Treatment Area coverage Population type covered
UASB type UASB UASB Sector 21 to sector 47 2.66 lakhs Sector 1 to 20 old Faridabad, 4.67 lakhs Ballabgarh NIT area Dabua colony, Jawahar 5.00 lakhs colony, sector 23 24, 25 etc
It is further observed that the colonies developed in the recent past and approved by the State Government do not have any sewerage system in place. Sewage from houses are being discharged in septic tanks and the effluent is passed either into soak pits or into surface drains creating hazardous and unhygienic conditions in these approved colonies.
4.7.2
YAP
The Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) is the targeted project to contain the pollution of the river Yamuna and consequently the river Ganga. YAP (Phase-I): The project duration for YAP-I after extension is completed in March 2003. In Haryana, the project initially covered six towns including Faridabad; later, an additional six towns were added to the list. The key concern of the YAP was the pollution arising from the domestic sector and it was accorded the highest priority. All the works proposed under YAP-I have been completed. In continuation to Phase I, works related to sewerage and sanitation were taken up under the YAP extended phase. Under the YAP I program, schemes undertaken were: Sewerage schemes consisting of Interception and diversion sewers and Sewage Treatment Plants Non-sewerage schemes that included Crematoria, Low Cost Sanitation, bathing ghats (or river front development), afforestation and public participation. YAP (Phase II): Works on Phase II of YAP for augmentation of the sewerage system have been approved, but are yet to start. The same are expected to be commissioned by 2007-08. YAP-II has been formulated at an estimated cost of Rs. 624 crore (with financial assistance of Yen 13.33 billion from JBIC). The principal objective of YAP-II is to improve the water quality of Yamuna along the cities located on its banks.
55
In addition to the technical component, YAP-II will also address a program of capacity building of implementing agencies in the states of Haryana, Delhi and U.P. and the executing agency i.e. National River Conservation Department (NRCD) of Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF). Public participation and awareness activities in the project areas, and the water quality management program planned to assess the efficacy of the project will receive special focus. In Haryana, YAP-II under NRCP will be implemented in six towns, viz. Yamuna Nagar-Jagadhari, Karnal, Panipat, Sonepat, Faridabad, and Gurgaon.
4.7.3
Issues related to Sewerage system
Key Issues Policy level issues Short-term policy: Clarity on fixation of norms for sewer tariff and structure with regard to cost recovery is the main policy issue that requires to be addressed in the immediate future. Long-term policy: Reservations in the Development Plan to be provided towards making land available in future for the location of sewerage systems/ treatment plants, etc. Also, coordinated planning between the departments needs to be worked out as a long-term policy measure. Service and O&M Issues Ever-increasing sewerage generation due to rapid urbanization, implementation of township policy and the pressures from NCR- related activities Low system coverage with a large quantum of sewerage being allowed to flow into water bodies untreated Mixing up of sewerage and storm water is a predominant issue in Faridabad. It is understood that at many a location, the rising level of the sewers is above that of storm water drains. This is primarily due to non-comprehensiveness and independent design of each of the systems. Only 50% of the citys area and population is covered. The present system is defunct and inadequate for the present population. It is outdated and has got mixed up with the drainage network in several areas Potential The under ground sewerage service has the potential to involve the private sector as in case of water supply towards part operation and maintenance in specific areas so to bring in efficiency to the service. Challenges A complete sewerage system is one of the high priority needs of the city and taking up the same would present a major implementation capability challenge for MCF. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
56
4.8
MUNICIPAL SERVICES STORM WATER DRAINAGE
The storm water drainage system in Faridabad comprises primary, secondary and tertiary drains. The primary drains comprise the river Yamuna. Secondary drains are the natural channels/ nallahs with a discharge capacity of up to 5 cum/ sec. Tertiary drains are the roadside, built-up open or closed drains and those of the unlined kutcha type. The storm water of the entire catchment area of Faridabad is finding its way mainly through three secondary drains/ outlets Gounchi Drain, Burhia Nalla and Agra Canal; at some points, it is being pumped into the Gurgaon Canal by subsidiary pumping stations/ temporary pumping stations. The general slope of the area is from the northwest to southeast. The western area is mostly hilly; the storm water of this area flows by the force of gravity into Buria Nalla through the Faridabad drain. The Faridabad drain crosses the Agra and Gurgaon Canals through Mawai Siphon. Ultimately, the storm water reaches the Yamuna River through the Buria Nalla and the Gounchi drain. In the case of the NIT area, the storm water is being pumped into the Gounchi Drain, which finally reaches Yamuna River. Keeping in view the general topography of the city, the entire urbanisable area has been divided into seven drainage zones as per suitability of its final disposal; level and existing natural drains available in the area. The storm water from different catchment areas is being collected and pumped mainly into the Gurgaon canal, the Gaunchi drain, the Burhia Nalla and the Agra canal through storm water pumping stations located at different places. The network of tertiary drains in the city runs to length of 800 km. which is 66 percent of the road network in the city. 150 percent of the road network is generally considered to be good network; this system shortage is resulting in the mixing up of sewerage and storm water at several locations in the city. Details of the tertiary drains in the city are presented in 0Table 21. Table 21. Storm Water Drains (Tertiary Network) Details
S.No 1 2 3 4 5 Drain Type Pucca open drains Kutcha open drains Pucca closed drains Total drain length Drain length as % of total road length Length (Kms) 800.00 800.00 Percentage 100 100 65.7%
4.8.1
Issues related to Storm water drains
Flooding of road infrastructure Road infrastructure in the city is badly affected and damaged at several locations during monsoons due to the inadequacy of storm water drainage networks. The monsoons have been witnessing, year after year, overflow of several secondary and primary drains as most stretches of these drains are silted and have not undergone desilting operations for years. Rapid Urbanisation Future population addition is expected to increase the pressure on the drainage system of the city, requiring MCF to stress on the development of road networks along with that of storm water drains. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
57
4.9
MUNICIPAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Rapid urbanisation, increasing commercial and industrial activities and changing life styles in Faridabad are leading to a steady increase in the generation of solid waste. MCF is responsible for the collection, transportation and disposal of all solid waste generated in the city, except the untreated bio-medical waste and hazardous industrial waste, which is taken care of by the respective generators. MCF organizes the collection and transportation of the waste through a team of its own conservancy workers and a fleet of vehicles and dumper-placers. The waste collected is disposed at various dumping yards without any treatment.
4.9.1
Quantum of Solid Waste Generation
The primary sources of solid waste in Faridabad are local households, commercial establishments, industries, markets, hotels, restaurants, and hospitals. The total quantity of waste generated per day is in the order of 480 tonnes per day (TPD) at a per-capita generation of 377 grams per day. No significant seasonal variation in the quantity of waste generated is observed, as Faridabad does not have much tourism-related activity. Of the waste generated, only 450 MT is reported to be collected and transported to temporary dumping places after the partial sorting out recyclable materials. All the municipal solid waste is being dumped in the open without any proper treatment. At present there is no organized door-to-door collection system. Only recently, two NGOs named NAYA SAVERA and PATHEY have been awarded the work of door-to-door collection by MCF. After collecting the waste from the houses, these NGOs transfer it to the nearest collecting points. However, this system has been enforced only in limited areas and in sectors 22, 23, 21A, 21B and 21C. Bio-medical Waste Bio-medical waste is being managed by private contractors who were awarded the contract by the Indian Medical Association, Faridabad. The private agency carries the bio-medical waste to Gurgaon where a centralized incinerator has been installed.
4.9.2
Collection of Solid Waste
There are at present 342 collection points in the city provided with community bins, open bins, dumper bins, etc. In all, 180 dustbins of MCF are located at specific collection points. For the purposes of primary collection, MCF has equipped its staff with 810 wheel barrows and 80 handcarts. The average spacing between the dustbins against the available road length is an uncomfortable 1867 meters and the average area coverage per collection point is 0.40 sq.km. The total staff of the conservancy department of MCF is 1212 against a sanctioned 1415 members. However, MCF has employed 750 conservancy workers on a daily wages basis. Thus on an average each conservancy worker is responsible for seeping 621 meters. of road length.
4.9.3
Waste Transportation & Disposal
Transportation of waste is carried out on all days. Waste collected from various locations in the city is transported either to the transfer station or directly to the dumping yard. MCF uses its own conservancy vehicles. There are two JCBs of 3 Metric Tonnes (MT) capacity each to assist in secondary collection activities. The JCBs are reported to be making at least five trips per vehicle per day.
58
Table 22. Fleet of Conservancy vehicles with MCF

Vehicle Model JCB Tractor Trolleys Tempos Bulk Refuse Carriers Dual loaded dumper placers No.s 2 51 3 4 2 Capacity/ Vehicle (MT) 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 2.0 Trips Per day 5 3 3 2 6 Nature of transfer Secondary Tertiary Tertiary Tertiary Tertiary Daily hrs. of operation 8 Hrs 8 Hrs 7 Hrs 7 Hrs 8 Hrs
For the purposes of secondary collection as well as for transportation to the disposal sites, MCF uses a fleet of 51 tractors with trolleys, three tempos, four BRCs and two DLDPs. The total capacity of the vehicles being put to service is 209 MT which is about 44 percent of the waste generated. These vehicles carry out on an average more than three trips per day. Against a density factor of 0.35 and an average of three trips per vehicle per day, the collection capacity of the conservancy vehicles with MCF is only 86 percent of waste generation, indicating a shortfall. There are at present five numbers of dumping sites which are temporary in nature. These are located at: Kheri Road Basalwa Dairy site, Old Faridabad BLB near Ucchagaon Nagla Enclave, NIT Faridabad Near Badarpur Border behind Samshan Ghat Gurgaon road in the revenue estate of village Bhakari (now also proposed as the landfill site) No scientific method of disposal is followed and the waste is dumped on open ground. About 147 acres of land would be required to cater to the needs of the population of the year 2031. MCF presently has identified 58.6 acres of hilly land on the Faridabad-Gurgaon road for municipal solid waste disposal and treatment and has got a rapid environmental impact assessment (EIA) conducted for the site. The results indicated suitability of the site for sanitary landfill; the design for the same is in progress.
4.9.4
Issues, potential and challenges in Solid Waste Management

A limited extent of the city area is covered by door-to-door collection, including source segregation. However, even this effort has been rendered unproductive as at the point of collection for transportation; the segregated waste gets mixed up to a large extent. The shortfall in the required capacity of the fleet by about 35 MT is exerting pressure on the present fleet of vehicles through over utilization in terms of the number of trips made. Also the non-availability of intermediate transfer stations is increasing the number of trips and thereby the O&M expenses on the fleet. Only two dumper placers are available with MCF. There is a need to increase the number of dual loaded dumper placers (DLDPs) and to put in place intermediate transfer stations, in order to do away with the bin system of secondary collection and transportation. Crude dumping is resorted to at the disposal sites due to non-availability and nonprovision of infrastructure for scientific disposal.
59
Key Issues
Potential The service has the potential to involve the private sector and increase efficiency. Challenges The system will need major refurbishment and augmentation as all the newly-added areas are lacking completely in MSW infrastructure. The city also needs to acquire a large fleet of vehicles and dumper placers to effectively implement the MSW Rules, 2000 and make the city a clean place. Infrastructure development for sanitary landfill and composting at the proposed site will need to be completed in the next two years. Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
4.10
4.10.1
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Fire Services
As Faridabad City is a hub of manufacturing industries, fire is the major man-made disaster to which the citys industrial base is prone. The fire department of MCF is responsible for responding to this kind of a disaster. Presently, a staff of 55 people is working in the fire department in three shifts with six fire tenders. Four fire stations, located at various places in the city, cater to the needs of the MCF area. In addition to these, certain large industries have their own fire services. The department during interactions has clearly made a point with respect to the inadequacy of the system in the city in terms of available staff or equipment to tackle with any potential for occurrence of large scale fire accident due to large numbers of high rise buildings coming up in the city. Table 23. Staff and vehicles with Fire Department, MCF
S. No 1 2 3 4 Name of Fire Station Sector 15 A NIT Ballabgarh Sarai Khwaja
Total Source: Fire department, MCF
No of staff
15 15 13 12 55
No of Fire tenders
1 2 2 1 6
The city houses a number of slums, markets, high-rise buildings and large industrial estates and small industrial units which dot the entire landscape of the residential sector. Given this, the existing fire stations and staff are inadequate to meet the current demand and to cater to the growing population of the city. The system lacks even the wireless system of communication tools. The number of fire calls/ rescue calls received by the four fire stations of MCF during the past five years is presented in the table below. It is observed that the numbers have been on the rise and constantly increasing. The numbers have increased from 366 during 2001-02 to 470 during 2003-04 and 488 during 2004-05. During 2005-06 a total of 624 calls were registered and responded to.
60
As per the norms laid down by the Standing Fire Advisory Council, the current MCF area will require at least 12 fire stations with minimum technical staff, including a well-equipped central fire station with facilities like a parade ground, a full-fledged workshop, training halls and residential facilities. An area of two acres would be required for the setting up of the central station. The department also needs more specialised equipment like hydraulic platforms, fire trailers, rescue vans, ambulances and mortuary vans. Issues with respect to fire services Inadequate infrastructure to cater to current and future demand Shortfall of equipment and a spacious central fire station Lack of adequate technical manpower Narrow roads in slums and densely populated areas like markets for the movements of fire tenders Increasing number of high-rise buildings and the lack of capacity of the fire brigade to reach upper floors
4.10.2
Recreation, Gardens and Parks
Faridabad has just started to see the mushrooming of a large number of recreational facilities like shopping malls, entertainment centres, and cinema halls, which are being developed by private agencies. There are presently 15 cinema halls, four clubs, two amusement parks, one international stadium, one athletics stadium, and one golf course in the city. Further, MCF has been active in trying to improve the environmental status of the city. Over the past few years, MCF has contributed to the same through the development of traffic islands, a number of parks and other measures. Lands have been reserved for 484 parks/ gardens in the city, of which MCF has already developed 322, either completely or partially. The works included beautification, landscaping, protection of boundaries through compounds etc.
Park in Ballabgarh
Park in sector 16
61
The area to be developed under the remaining 162 lands is 432,542 sq.km. and these are located across the city. 63 such lands are located in Ballabgarh zone and another 25 along the NH 1 and 2. Also, 29 lands are located in sectors 21A, 21B, 21C, 22, 23 and 23A. Rose Garden, NIT Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.
4.10.3
Health facilities
The city has three major hospitals, of which one a government hospital is (BK Hospitaal) located in front of the Municipal Corporation office. The total bed strength of these three hospitals is 250. Also, there are 10 primary health centres, three dispensaries and one blood bank. Apart from these, there are a good number of private health facilities in most of the neighbourhoods, catering to the day-to-day needs of patients in the city.
4.10.4
Educational facilities
With respect to the government-run facilities, Faridabad city has 52 primary schools, 44 middle schools and 32 higher secondary schools, five degree colleges, three vocational training institutes, one management institute, and one polytechnic. Besides, there are private schools which number more than the government facilities; however, information about them is not available. The city is clearly lacking in professional, graduation and post- graduation level educational facilities; students have to depend on NCT-Delhi for these facilities.
62
4.11
MUNICIPAL FINANCES
The first step in analysing the financial position of MCF is to differentiate and categorise the account heads into revenue account and capital account through a budget recasting exercise. For the purpose of financial assessment, financial data pertaining to the last five years (2001-02 to 2005-06) have been recast into a standard format, as presented in Annexure 5. ULB Finance Assessment Analysis Framework
Stage I - Sourcing Municipal Finances Data as obtained from MCF Budget books DCB statements Taxation information Debt/ non-debt liabilities data Stage II - Assessment Stage III - Analysis
*Extra-ordinary account heads comprising cesses, Recast Data: Extra-ordinary account advances, deposits etc is not considered for financial assessment and further projections, as heads these items would not affect the financial health of the ULB.
Recast Data: Revenue Account Capital Account Liabilities: Debt Liabilities Non-debt Liabilities
MCF Financial Assessment/ Credit Standing
MCFs current accounting system is cash-based; income and expenditure heads are maintained on a cash basis. All the expenses towards regular maintenance are treated as revenue expenses, while expenses on new projects are treated as capital expenses. The standing committee exercises strict control over the projects that requires capitalization. Direct expenses are appropriated to the user department. The Corporation accounts can be classified under two major heads, revenue account and capital account. The revenue sources of the Corporation may be broadly classified as internal or operating income and external receipts. Internal income includes receipts from the operations of the Corporation, in the form of taxes, water and sewer charges and fees and charges on other services such as advertisement fee, food and license fee. General heads of internal sources are: General tax and other taxes levied by the Municipal Corporation such as house tax, education, and street and tree tax Income under special acts such as receipts in the form of food and license fee Income from properties rent receipts from lands, buildings, and other properties Income from municipal services such as receipts from water supply charges and fees from other services (health and hospital, public health, etc.) Miscellaneous income heads such as income from investments and sale proceeds External fund sources include revenue grants from State and Central Government, loans and contributions for projects.
63
Expenditure incurred towards establishment, operation and maintenance of services, as well as repayment of loans are treated as revenue expenditure. Expenditure on asset creation and investments in new projects or purchase of equipment are treated as capital expenditure. Advances, deposits and any item of income or expenditure, which is temporary in nature is treated and accounted for under the extraordinary account. This account head is not analysed as the items in it are temporary in nature and have no impact on the overall financial position of MCF.
4.11.1
Financial Status at a Glance

The municipal finances of the Corporation (MCF) have been reviewed for the last five years, commencing from the financial year 2001-02 to 2005-06. The items of both receipts and expenditure are classified under revenue and capital accounts as per their sources and uses.
MCF - Revenue Account

2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03 2 0 0 1- 0 2 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10 0 0 0
The revenue income of MCF has grown to a level of Rs. 9043 lakhs in FY 2005-06 from Rs.6019 lakhs during FY 2001-02, registering a CAGR of 11 percent, while revenue expenditure increased at a similar CAGR of 11 percent. Though this does not project a sound financial condition for the future, MCF has consistently maintained a revenue surplus of an average 37 percent of its revenue income. However, the pressure of capital expenses on the revenue account is increasing year after year. This situation demands expenditure control measures and planned capital investments on the part of MCF.
Revenue Expenditure
R s . la k hs . Revenue Inco me
Table 24. Financial Status at a Glance

Items Revenue Account Income Expenditure Surplus/ Deficit Capital Account Receipts Payments Surplus/ Deficit Overall Status incl. O.B. Source: MCF Annual Accounts 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Actuals in Rs. Lakhs 5974 3868 2106 3427 4692 (1265) 1391 5172 3745 1427 2075 2914 (839) 2039 8159 4955 3204 2099 4781 (2682) 2605 2005-06 CAGR % 11 11
6019 3524 2495 2192 3927 (1735) 1105
9043 5338 3705 2287 6821 (4534) 1804
1 15
The capital income of MCF comprises own sources in the form of sale of lands, loans and internal transfers from revenue to capital account for utilization towards asset creation. During the review period, MCF has not availed of the minimal quantum of loans for its capital expenditure.
64
MCF - Capital Account

2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03 2 0 0 1- 0 2 0 2000 Capital Expenditure 4 00 0 R s . la k hs . Capital Inco me 6000 80 0 0
It is observed that internal sources contributed about 60 percent of the capital income during the review period; the rest is contributed to by external sources, mainly in the form of project- specific grants. It is also observed that capital expenditure has been inconsistent during the review period; this trend can be attributed to the availability of revenue surplus.
The following sections provide an in-depth review of the revenue account, in order to assess the municipal fiscal status and to provide a base for determining the potential of each of the sources and the ability of MCF to sustain the extent of planned investments identified under the City Development Plan.
4.11.2
Revenue Account
The revenue account comprises two components - revenue income and revenue expenditure. Revenue income comprises internal resources in the form of tax and non-tax MCF - Sources of Revenue items. External resources constitute of 0% 1% 67% shared taxes/transfers and revenue grants 32% from the State and Central Government. Revenue expenditure comprises expenditure incurred on salaries; operation & Octroi Compensation maintenance cost; contributions and Tax Revenue donations; and debt servicing. Revenue Income
Non Tax Revenue Assigned Rev, Grants/ Contrib
The revenue sources of MCF can be broadly categorized into own sources, assigned revenues, grants and contributions. The sourcewise income generated during the review period is presented in Table 25. The detailed income and expenditure statement, the sectoral contributions and the growth rates of each item are presented in Annexure 5. Table 25. Source-wise revenue income
Items Own sources Octroi compensation Tax revenue Non tax revenue Assigned rev, grants/ contrib Total Source: MCF Annual Accounts 2001-02 5957 0 2053 3904 62 6019 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Actuals in Rs. Lakhs 5898 5092 8116 0 0 0 2728 1692 3278 3170 3399 4838 76 80 43 5974 5172 8159 2005-06 9043 0 3414 5629 0 9043 Share % 99 0 29 61 1 100 CAGR % 11 7 10 (11) 11
65
Own Sources Own source income includes income from house tax, other taxes and non-tax income in the form of development charges, income from municipal properties, fees & fines and other miscellaneous income. Income from own sources accounts for over 99% of the revenue income, indicating low dependability of MCF on external sources for its operations. The own sources registered an average annual growth rate of about 11 percent. Octroi compensation: In lieu of the abolition of octroi in 1999, the Government of Haryana had compensated during the initial years of the abolition of octroi. However, during the review period, there has been no income in the form of octroi compensation. General Taxes: General taxes consist of various taxes levied as part of house tax; they consist of general tax on properties, fire tax, tree tax and street tax. General tax is charged based as a percentage (2.5 percent for residential and five percent for non-residential) of net Annual Rental Value (ARV). Net ARV is arrived at, based on the capital value of the land and/ or building. The calculation method is presented below. Capital value = Cost of land (as per collector/ revenue guidelines) + cost of bldg (as per PWD (B&R) rates) 1% depreciation per annum on Bldg (subject to a maximum of 50%) = 5% of capital value = ARV 10% of ARV (allowable for maintenance) = 2.5% of net ARV (residential purposes 5% of net ARV (non-residential purposes) Exemptions: Any property with ARV of less than Rs. 1200 is exempted from paying house tax. Any new house/ property are exempted from paying house tax for the initial three years. Table 26. Nos. of properties in Faridabad
No. of PT Assessments 1 2 3 4 5 Residential Commercial Industrial Central/ State Govt. Buildings Exempted Buildings Total Growth in PT Assessments 2001-02 135,824 7,835 3,180 278 130 147,247 2002-03 135,824 7,835 3,180 278 130 147,247 2003-04 Numbers 173,663 8,783 3,459 315 100 186,320 26.54 2004-05 173,663 8,783 3,459 315 100 186,320 2005-06 173,663 8,783 3,459 315 90 186,310 -
Annual rateable Value (ARV) Net ARV House tax
Source: MCF
As can be observed from the table above, the total number of properties in MCFs jurisdiction is 1,86,310. In the state of Haryana, property tax records are updated through a general survey conducted every five years. The last such general survey was conducted during 2003-04 and is again due in 2008-09. During the last revision of records, it was noted that the numbers of properties increased at an annual growth rate of 5.3 percent.
66
In MCF, the house tax accounts for about 29 percent of the revenue income and has registered an average annual growth rate of 7 percent. The overall collection performance for the past five years is an average of 46 percent of the total demand including arrears, indicating a large scope for improving collection efficiency. During 2005-06, arrears accounted for 57 percent of the total demand. Table 27. House tax DCB statement
Item 1 2001-02 Demand - Rs. Lakh Arrears Current Total Demand Collection - Rs. Lakh Arrears Current Total Collection Balance - Rs. Lakh Collection Performance - % Arrears Current Total Tax per Assessment Rs. Persons per assessment Nos. 1989 1986 3975 486 1482 1968 2007 24 75 50 1349 7.4 2002-03 2372 1986 4358 604 1399 2003 2355 25 70 46 1349 7.7 2003-04 2541 1785 4326 264 696 960 3366 10 39 22 958 6.3 2004-05 3140 1785 4925 738 1862 2600 2325 23 104 53 958 6.6 2005-06 2325 1785 4110 622 1847 2469 1641 27 103 60 958 6.8
3 4
5 6
Source: MCF DCB statement
On a comparative note, between various cities in the country,1 the average tax per assessment is relatively low in MCF at Rs. 958. Also, the number of persons per assessment is high at an average of seven indicating scope for identifying un-assessed properties. This however is against the State Governments policy of conducting property roll revision once every five years and not every year as is reflected in the decreasing tax per assessment and increasing persons per assessment after the revision year. It also need mention that in Haryana any new property is exempted from paying tax for the first three years, which need to be re-looked in the context of losing tax revenue. The average household size in MCF being about 4.9 (against the current number of persons per assessment of 6.8) indicates a scope for about 50,000 un-assessed residential properties. The number of current property tax assessments figure includes commercial establishments. Thus, on a conservative estimate, the number of properties to be assessed in Faridabad is likely to be over 2.4 lakhs. Non Tax Revenue: Non-tax sources include all non-tax revenues such as fees and charges levied as per the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 and services provided by MCF. These sources include income from building license fee, development charges, trade licence fee,
1
Comparative Statement of ARV and person per asesment around FY 2002-03 City Tax per Assessment Rs. Pune 5,062 Hyderabad 1,495 Chennai 3,405 Coimbatore 1,819 Ahmedabad 1,605
Persons per Asesmsent-Nos. 9.14 8.14 10.14 5.68 3.75
67
births and death certificate, income from municipal properties and other fees and fines. The nontax income of MCF accounts for about 61 percent of its revenue income and has registered a average growth rate of 10 percent CAGR less than growth rate of the total revenues. The majority of non-tax income is generated by duty on sale/ transfer of properties at 19 percent of total revenues, followed by fees from HUDA at 12 percent (which is received in lieu expenditure incurred for the facilities maintained by MCF in HUDA administered sectors) Income from sale of water in the form of user charges also contributed 12 percent of the revenues during the review period. The demand collection balance (DCB) statement for water charges and cost recovery on the service is discussed in section 4.6. External Sources External sources mainly include grants from local funds and grants from the State and the Central Government. All external sources together account for about only one percent of MCFs revenue income. The growth of these income sources is inconsistent owing to the unrealistic nature of these sources. During the review period, these sources showed a decline of 11 percent. Revenue Expenditure The revenue expenditure of MCF has been analyzed, based on expenditure heads. These have been broadly classified into the following department/sections of MCF - general administration & tax collection, water supply, roads & drains, municipal works, conservancy, street lighting, town planning and the miscellaneous like gardens and libraries. Revenue expenditure is further classified under establishment (mainly comprising salaries and wages); contingencies (O&M) and debt servicing. The application of funds by account head is presented in Table 28, which indicates that the overall revenue expenditure registered an average annual growth of 11 percent against the growth in revenue income by 11 per cent. This trend indicates that MCF needs to take measures to reduce its expenditure or enhance its resources to avoid a deficit situation in future. Table 28. Application of funds by head of Account
Items Salaries, Allowances & Pension Operation & Maintenance Debt Servicing Total Source: MCF Annual Accounts 2001-02 3247 257 20 3524 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Actuals in Rs. Lakhs 3326 3564 3930 525 149 182 18 32 843 3868 3745 4955 2005-06 4639 287 412 5338 Share % 88 7 5 100 CAGR % 9 3 112 11
The establishment expenditure alone accounts for over 88 percent of revenue expenditure. In terms of revenue income spent on salaries, it is 56 percent, which is well above the reasonable range of 40 percent. O&M expenditure accounts for just about seven percent of the total revenue expenses, clearly showing that municipal services do not have any preventive or periodic maintenance plans in place.
MCF - Items of Expenditure

7% 5% 88%
Salaries, Allow ances & Pension Operation & Maintenance Debt Servicing
68
A salient feature of the accounts of MCF is that the Corporation has been regularly servicing its debt commitments. Its expenditure towards debt servicing at present is low at barely five percent of its revenue expenditure, indicating the scope for further leveraging of its resources to implement large-scale projects. Establishment expenditure Establishment expenditure accounts for an average 88 percent of revenue expenditure and registered an annual growth rate of over nine percent during the review period. Conservancy and water supply departments account for the maximum share of establishment cost at 31 and 28 percent respectively, followed by the general administration and tax collection department at 12 percent and engineering department comprising roads, drains and municipal works also at 12 percent (refer to Table 29). Table 29. Section-wise establishment expenditure
Items General Administration & Tax Collection Water supply Roads, Drains & Municipal works Conservancy/ SWM Street Lighting Town planning All others Total Share in Rev. expenditure - % Share in Rev. income - %
Source: MCF Annual Accounts
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Share CAGR Actuals in Rs. Lakhs % % 408 378 424 453 511 12% 6 861 394 1009 28 54 494 3247 92 54 973 376 1054 26 54 466 3326 86 56 980 412 1097 30 65 556 3564 95 69 1129 439 1222 34 63 589 3930 79 48 1356 536 28% 12% 12 8 9 14 10 10 9
1415 31% 47 1% 78 2% 695 15% 4639 100% 87 51
Operation and maintenance expenditure As earlier mentioned the O&M expenses of the corporation doesnt follow any preventive or periodic maintenance plans and are day-to-day in nature and hence reflected by the very low O&M expenses of an average Rs. 3 Crores per annum. This is against handling of all core municipal services like water supply, sewerage, drainage, roads, solid waste management etc by MCF itself. Within the total O&M expenses, more than 66 percent is spent on general administration, followed by 24 percent on conservancy/ solid waste management. Water supply operations accounted for about four percent and roads for about three percent of the expenses. During FY2005-06, the total O&M expenses of the Corporation were Rs. 287 lakhs. During the review period, O&M expenses have increased by just about three percent CAGR.
MCF - O&M Expenditure
0% 24% 1% 2%
4% 3% 66%
General A dministratio n & Tax Co llectio n Water supply Ro ads, Drains & M unicipal wo rks Co nservancy/ SWM Street Lighting To wn planning A ll o thers
69
Debt servicing and outstanding loans The review of annual accounts reveal that debt servicing expenses account for about five percent of the revenue expenditure. In terms of revenue income, only three percent is spent on debt servicing against an accepted comfortble limit of about 25-30 percent. The review of the outstanding loan statement of MCF, as on 31st March 2006, reveals that the net outstanding debt liabilities of MCF stand at Rs. 10.26 crores, which is 57 percent of its property tax demand. The ratio of outstanding debt liabilities to the ARV is about 0.02 against a threshold of two considered by financial institutions. This indicates MCFs potential to leverage its resources to mobilise debt funds for the implementation of large-scale projects. Table 30. Outstanding Debt Liability
Agency 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 GoH GoH GoH LIC GoH LIC LIC GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH GoH Loan Purpose Sewerage Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply Water supply/ Rainy well scheme Loan Amount (Rs. Lakhs) 2.30 2.20 0.90 33.75 3.50 9.00 7.00 4.80 1.20 1.30 1.20 7.20 2.20 3.20 2.60 12.00 6.00 5.50 8.00 8.00 2.00 4.00 10.00 6.00 4.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 10.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1,600.00 1,770.85 Year of Drawl 1981 1983 1983 1983 1984 1984 1985 1987 1987 1987 1987 1988 1988 1988 1988 1992 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1994 1994 1995 1995 2002 Repayment Period (Years) 30 30 30 22 30 22 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 5 Interest Rate (%) 9.0% 10.0% 10.0% 8.5% 12.0% 8.5% 9.8% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 7.0% O/s as on 31-03-2006 (Rs. Lakhs) 0.38 0.49 0.21 3.07 0.94 0.82 0.64 1.76 0.44 0.46 0.44 2.88 0.87 1.28 1.04 6.40 3.20 2.92 4.53 4.53 1.13 2.26 5.66 3.40 2.26 0.85 0.85 1.13 5.99 3.60 0.63 0.63 960.00 1025.66
33 NCRPB Total
Source: MCF
70
Further, of the total outstanding loan of Rs. 10.26 crores, Rs. 9.6 crores is outstanding against the loan of Rs. 16 crores, received from National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB) during 2002-03 towards capital works in water supply. The tenure of repayment of this loan is five years; the repayment is scheduled to be completed by 2007-08. All other outstanding loans of MCF is less than Rs. 0.5 crore against loans received from the Government of Haryana and LIC for various water supply works during 1981 to 1995. It needs mention that these old loans are of high interest rate loans of 12 percent as compared to the current market rates. Hence, MCF needs to swap these loans with low-cost funds. Though the savings might appear comparatively small, this option needs to be explored.
4.11.3
Capital Account
In general, the capital income of MCF comprises own sources in the form of sale of property, loans, grants and contributions and transfers from revenue surplus. During the review period, an average of Rs. 22 crores per annum has been the revenue surplus transfer to capital account. While own sources contributed 60 percent of the capital receipts during the review period, grants and contributions accounted for 39 percent and loans for the rest. Table 31. Details of Capital Account
Items Capital Income Own Sources Loans Grants Total Capital Expenditure General Administration Roads and drains Water supply Sewerage Conservancy/ SWM Street lighting Gardens & Parks Slum development Fire services Library, schools, PHC, etc Town planning Other Grant related works Others Total Funding pattern Capital receipts Revenue/ municipal surpluses
Source: MCF Annual Accounts
2001-02
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Actuals in Rs. Lakhs 3106 0 321 3427 1682 0 394 2075 1872 0 227 2099
2005-06
Share % 60 1 39 100
517 30 1644 2192
359 87 1841 2287
24 819 2730 0 26 175 28 30 0 28 19 49 0 3927
82 1709 1920 57 73 416 83 58 1 43 160 89 0 4692
32 732 1284 0 17 608 37 47 1 11 70 74 0 2914
49 2010 1704 0 48 427 187 59 3 15 81 98 100 4781
112 2073 2351 0 2 651 225 0 5 16 5 1381 0 6821
1 31 45 0 1 11 2 1 0 1 2 6 0 100
2192 1735
3427 1265
2075 839
2099 2682
2287 4534
68% 32%
71
The figure presented in Table 31 indicates that about 68 percent of MCFs capital expenditure during the review period is met from its capital receipts. The rest is contributed to by the revenue/ municipal surpluses.
Capital Expenditure
2% 1% 2% 11% 1% 0% 7% 1%
On an average, over the past five years, the majority of capital expenditure has been directed towards water supply and roads.
3 1%
Water supply system augmentation through the utilisation of the NCRPB loan has been the major capital expenditure item at 45 percent of the total capital investment for the past five years. Construction of new roads and improvement of surface condition of important city roads accounted for a significant 31 percent of the investments. Apart from these, other major investments have been in the street lighting sector which accounted for 11 percent of the total investment. While the results of the improvements in roads and lighting in the city are visible, other sectors like drains and conservancy did not receive any major investments during the review period.
44%
Capital works towards providing amenities to the residents of unauthorised slum dwellers has been stopped since 1997, in the light of Memo No. 439 (30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 of the Government of Haryana, restricting any such provision. Accordingly, it is observed that capital expenditure towards improvement of facilities in slums accounted for just about one percent of the total investments during the review period.
General Administration Roads and drains Water supply Sew erage Conservancy/ SWM Street lighting Gardens & Parks Slum development Tow n planning Others
4.11.4
Key issues regarding financial condition of MCF
The following key issues emerged from the above analysis of the municipal finances of MCF; MCFs financial soundness is revealed by the financial indicators presented in Table 32. Both revenue income and expenditure are growing at a similar rate, indicating no change in the financial condition of MCF from 2001 to 2006. Over 55 percent of the revenues of the Corporation are accounted for by establishment/ salary expenses. This results in extremely low or minimal expenses towards the maintenance of capital assets of MCF, indicating the urgency for improving MCFs revenues. While non-tax revenues are significant at 61 percent of the revenues, the tax base needs to be improved and widened to enhance revenues from this stream. The overall collection efficiency of property taxes is about 46 percent against current collections of near 80 percent. This is because the arrears form 57 percent of the total demand and collections of arrears is extremely low.
72
The cost recovery on water supply service is just about 76 percent, indicating the large quantum of non-revenue water in the form of unauthorised connections, subsidised water, etc. With respect to the sewerage system, the cost recovery is just 13 percent against a very low coverage of the service at just 50 percent of population. Old outstanding loans which have been taken at high interest rates could be swapped or restructured with currently available low-interest and low-cost funds. Capital expenditure per year is of the order of Rs. 46 crores only, as most investments are financed through internal generation and not any external funding, thus causing pressure on available surpluses. Table 32. Key Financial Indicators
S. No INDICATOR Unit Minimum Maximum Value Average OR as on 31/03/2006 710 0.00 32.72 53.06 0.00 0.00 -37.97 -18.81 -100.00 -13.67 -13.44 0.00 45.66 65.73 1.55 0.00 93.72 42.31 22.81 59.40 57.77 0.00 38.08 61.04 0.88 23.20 11.78 -29.48 14.04 13.61
A Resource Mobilisation 1 Per Capita Income 2 Source of Funds i Share of Octroi ii Share of Taxes iii Share of Non Taxes Share of Assigned Revenues, iv Grants & Contributions 3 Growth in Income Sources i Growth in Octroi Income ii Growth in Taxes iii Growth in Non Taxes Growth in Assigned Revenues, iv Grants & Contributions v Growth in Own Sources' Receipts vi Growth in Total Receipts B Expenditure Management 1 Per Capita Expenditure 2 Functional Allocation i Share of Salaries & Wages ii Share of O&M Expenditure iii Share of Debt Servicing Expenditure iv Share of Salaries' Exp. to Revenue Income 3 Growth in Items of Expenses i Growth in Salaries' Expenditure ii Growth in O&M Expenditure iii Growth in Total Expenditure C Performance 1 Operating Ratio 2 Capital Utilisation Ratio 3 Per-capita performance Assessment i Per Capita Own Income Per Capita Assigned Revenues, ii Grants & Contributions
Rupees % % % % % p.a. % p.a. % p.a. % p.a. % p.a. % p.a.
Rupees % % % % % p.a. % p.a. % p.a. 79.31 3.67 0.47 48.17 2.41 -71.69 -3.19 95.18 13.56 17.01 68.92 18.05 104.46 32.32
419 87.90 6.77 5.33 55.60 9.47 28.18 11.65
Ratio Ratio Rs. p.a. Rs. p.a.
0.59 1.37 430.81 0.00
0.72 2.98 709.80 6.77
0.59 2.98 572.70 4.53
73
S. No
INDICATOR iii iv v vi Growth in Per Capita Revenue Income Per Capita Salaries Expenditure Per Capita O&M Expenditure Growth in Per Capita Revenue Expenditure
Unit % p.a. Rs. p.a. Rs. p.a. % p.a.
Minimum
Maximum
292.16 12.57
364.15 46.08
Value Average OR as on 31/03/2006 6.63 314.88 23.87 6.85
D Taxation 1 No. of PT Assessments 2 ARV per Assessment 3 Tax Per Assessment 4 Population per PT Assessment (Bldgs) E Efficiency 1 Property Tax i Growth in Assessments ii Collection Performance-Property Tax iii PT Arrears as % of Total Demand iv PT Demand per Assessment v Cost of Collecting Rs. 1000 of Taxes 2 Water Supply i Growth in Water Connections ii Expenditure per Connection/ month iii Revenue per Connection/ month iv Cost Recovery on Water Supply (%) vi Collection Performance-Water Charges Water Charge Arrears as % of Total vii Demand 3 Sewerage/ UGD i Growth in UGD Connections ii Expenditure per Connection/ month Revenue per Connection/ month (Excl. iii Taxes) iv Cost Recovery on Sewerage system Collection Performance-Sewerage vi Charges Sewerage Charge Arrears as % of Total vii Demand F Debt and Liability Management 1 Outstanding Debt per Capita 2 Liability against Revenues i Outstanding Debt against Own revenues ii Outstanding Debt against revenue income 3 Debt Servicing Ratio 4 Ratio of Outstanding Debt to Tax Demand 5 Ratio of Outstanding Debt to ARV 6 Non-Debt Liability as % of Total Liability
Rs. Rs. p.a. Persons
28386 958
39959 1349
186310 34172 958 7
% p.a. % % Rs. p.a. Rs. % p.a. Rupees Rupees % % % % p.a. Rupees Rupees % % %
22 50 958 90.72 5.67 91.73 51.07 50.98 17.04 6.05 12.42 1.53
60 64 1349 160.73 7.32 111.38 90.10 82.95 36.48 10.98 17.87 2.09
5.31 46 57 1114 116.21 6.53 98.33 74.43 76 67.56 28.62 8.26 13.76 1.80 13.06
67.77 14.44
78.74 37.28
72.97 29.15
Rupees % % Ratio Ratio Ratio %
80.50 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.57 0.02 -
0.00
0.10
74
5 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN, STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

City Investment Plan in line with the identified vision for Faridabad has been prepared through a comprehensive process of assessment of gaps in the physical and social infrastructure sectors. This assessment has also led to the identification of sector-specific strategies, implementation actions and associated reforms with specific inputs from stakeholders. The strategies adopted primarily have three dimensions - improving service delivery by efficiency measures; improving service delivery by creating infrastructure assets; and improving the governance aspects of the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad. This section summarises the capital investments required for creating infrastructure assets and various strategic interventions required in the implementation of such projects; these strategies are both investment-oriented and administration-oriented.
5.1
CITY INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP)
The City Investment Plan is the multi-year scheduling of identified and prioritized investments. The scheduling or phasing of the Plan is based on studies of fiscal resources availability (for new investments and O&M), technical capacity for construction and O&M, and the choice of specific improvements to be carried out for a period of six years. The CIP is needed for: Realisation of city growth and a meeting of infrastructure needs (to be carried out once every five years) Scheduling of investments of ongoing projects due to cost and/ or time overruns Assigning of priorities within the constraints of available financial resources
5.1.1
Institutionalising the CIP Process
The City Investment Plan is an important element of the CDP and is significant in terms of the citys management process and sustainability with regard to the delivery of basic services. The CIP also provides a framework for the annual budget cycle of MCF for the future 6-10 year period. As a part of the Faridabad CDP, the CIP prepared includes the following: Desired norms and standards for infrastructure services; Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in the implementation of identified projects; and Project phasing and strategies for implementation. In Faridabad MCF is the primary agency responsible for delivering municipal services and hence the CDP proposals ought to be implemented by MCF. However HUDA in its role as a developer will assume equal footing with MCF towards acquiring lands for implementation of the DP proposals. The projects, prioritization, investment phasing, strategies and action plan are framed accordingly. Table 33 below indicates the sector wise responsibility of the agencies. Table 33. Municipal service delivery Responsible agencies
S. No 1 2 Sector All sectors Land development, Implementation of DP Proposals Responsible Agency MCF MCF, HUDA
75
The CIP involved the identification of public capital facilities to cater to the demands of the city populace by the year 2011 and 2031 according to their short, medium and long-term infrastructure needs. The project identification has been done through a demand-gap analysis of the services and DPRs available with the MCF. Further, project prioritisation and strategising of the investments/ phasing of investment are based on strategies, listed under each service sector as identified through stakeholder consultations. The projects derived are aimed at ensuring the optimal and efficient utilisation of existing infrastructure systems and enhancing the capacity of the systems/ services to cater to the demands of future population additions. Certain other projects listed as part of the CIP include developmental projects other than those addressing the core service sectors viz. system modernisation, etc. The CIP and the forecasted future needs for provision of capital facilities under each identified sector are presented below. These assets will help Faridabad to universalise services for the current population as well as accommodate the expected increase in population. In sectors where long-term planning is required (for example, source development for water supply and development of landfill site), the planning horizon till the year 2031 is considered. Assets created in such sectors consider the projected population in this horizon. MCF expects that these infrastructure assets would not only guarantee services to its citizens, but also signal a proactive commitment to potential investors considering the Faridabad region.
5.1.2
Summary of Investments
The total estimated capital investment required for providing efficient services to the present population and future population of Faridabad by the year 2031 is Rs. 3053 crores at constant prices. Of this, a total of Rs. 2934 crores is proposed for investment by MCF and the rest of Rs. 119 crores by HUDA. Of the total identified investment need of Rs. 2934 crores by MCF, a total of Rs. 2049 crores is proposed for investment by MCF by 2011-12. Table 34. Agency/ Period wise summary of Capital Investments
S. No 1 2 Investment Head (Agency/ Period) Total investment Need of Faridabad Investment by MCF Investment by HUDA Total investment need of Faridabad by 2011-12 Investment by MCF by 2011-12 Investment by HUDA by 2011-12 Rs. crores Rs. 3053 crores Rs. 2934 crores Rs. 119 crores Rs. 2168 crores Rs. 2049 crores Rs. 119 crores
The planning horizon for the projects identified in the urban poor/ slums sector is 2011-12. Accordingly, the entire identified investment is proposed for funding by 201112 itself. The planning horizon for the core service sectors of water supply, sewerage, drainage, and solid waste management, land use/ development planning and other projects is 2031; hence, only a part of the identified investment is proposed for funding by 2011-12. Faridabad will need to plan for the remaining identified investment to be funded beyond 2011-12, but before 2021.
The phasing of the identified projects and investments is based on the following principles. Priority needs, with developed areas receiving priority over future development area Inter and intra-service linkages, viz. water supply investments shall be complemented by corresponding sewerage/ sanitation improvements Size and duration of the requirements, including preparation and implementation period Project-linked revenue implications, such as installing house connections where supply and distribution capacities have been increased
76
The table below presents the summary of sector-wise total investment needs and investments up to 2011-12. Table 35. Summary of Capital Investments
Sector 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Water Supply Sewerage Roads & Urban Transport Drains Street Lights Conservancy & Sanitation Urban Poor/ Slums Land use/ Dev. Planning Others Total Total Investment Need (Rs. Lakhs) 62,869 70,200 61,358 41,357 3,618 8,264 24,701 23,760 9,136 305,263 Investment by MCF till 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Base Escalated % Sector Cost Cost* wise of Total 43,449 56,049 21% 48,290 62,455 23% 41,193 54,215 20% 25,560 33,754 13% 2,465 3,143 1% 3,910 4,874 2% 24,701 32,971 12% 7,035 9,608 4% 8,294 10,841 4% 204,896 267,911 100% % Investment till 2011-12 against Total 69% 69% 67% 62% 68% 47% 100% 59% 91% 70%
* Escalated cost includes physical contingencies and technical assistance at 10% of total cost and 6% cost escalation due to inflation.
Investment Need in Constant Prices (Rs. Crores)
Others Land use/ Dev. Planning Urban Poor/ Slums Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation 39 Street Lights Drains Roads & Urban Transport Sew erage Water supply 0 100 200 300 434 400 500 600 83 25 36 256 412 483 629 700 800 Rs. Crores 414 614 702 83 70 91 238 247 247
Investment till 2011-12 Investment Need of City
As can be observed from the table above, a total 70 percent of the identified investment need is proposed for funding by 2011-12. Urban poor/ slums sector envisages entire investment phasing by 2011-12 itself. From the perspective of sector priorities, urban poor sector is followed by the water supply and sewerage sectors at 69 percent each, street lighting and roads & transport sectors at 68 percent and 67 percent respectively. Drains sector envisage 62 percent of the identified investment by 2011-12 while conservancy sector envisage 47 percent of the identified investment by 2011-12. Within the total investment proposed by 2011-12 for MCF, maximum share is taken by sewerage sector at 23 percent followed by water supply at 21 percent and roads & transport sector at 20 percent. Drains and urban poor sectors account for 13 and 12 percent respectively. Land use/ dev. planning accounts for 4 percent share against part funding by HUDA.
77
Sector wise details of the CIP, capital facilities identified to be created, supportive actions and implementation aspects/ strategies are discussed in the following sections in detail. Demand-gap assessment leading to various projects identification and costing of the same is presented in Annexure 5 and the summary of capital investment phasing under each sector is presented in Annexure 6.
5.2
5.2.1
SECTOR WISE CIP DETAILS CAPITAL NEEDS/ INVESTMENTS

Water Supply (MCF)
Table 36. Water supply : Demand-Gap Assessment
Existing/ desired level Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap 240 0 910 896 896 1957 672 672 1468 432 672 558
Service head Indicator 1 2 3 Daily Supply
Current Desired level level
Unit
4 5 6
Per-capita supply 188 (lpcd) Treatment capacity Treatment 0 against supply (%) Distribution Distribution Network length 75 Network against road length (%) Elevated Elevated Storage Storage capacity 5 capacity w.r.t Supply (%) Refurbishment of old distribution network Metering System/ Installation of water meters
315 MLD 100 ML
85 Km.
33
ML Km. No.s
11.37
299
224
213 182 32,883
Source: CRISIL Estimates
Sector Strategies & Investment Need

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Augmentation of system for increased extract from rainy wells; in line with long-term planning to reduce dependency on ground water source and strive for equitable distribution of potable water to all through piped supply. Assured ability to meet year 2031 demand Rs. 62,869 lakhs
Long-term needs (2031) Though NCRPB specifies 200 lpcd as the norm, the desired level of per capita supply is proposed at 315 lpcd considering the large industrial demand in Faridabad and estimated industrial demand by 2031. The total quantity of supply required is estimated to be in the range of 896 MLD against the current supply of 240 MLD. Accordingly, treatment capacity and an additional elevated storage of 287 ML capacity is required at 33% of total supply by 2031. The total investment need for water sector by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 62,869 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.
78
Priority needs (2011-12) A sum of Rs. 43,448 lakhs (69% of total investment need in the water supply sector) is the capital cost estimation for the proposed interventions for the augmentation of water supplies through additional rainy wells, improvement of distribution network and provision of additional storage reservoirs by 2011-12. Additional rainy wells, each of 20 MLD capacities, are proposed near Basant Pur, Nasir Pur, Bhaskola and Mohana. While the present ground water extract requires disinfection only, MCF proposes to have a treatment facility for future extracts from rainy wells as well as ground water. This is in view of the increasing reports of ground water contamination. Hence based on authentic analysis to be conducted by ground water resources/ irrigation department on the quality of ground water and reliability, MCF may act upon providing treatment facilities at an appropriate time. In this CDP the treatment facilities are proposed during the current plan period and MCF needs to identify locations for proposed treatment plants. Action Plan for Implementation (2006-07 to 2011-12)
Water Supply Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 43448 lakhs Additional Rainy wells each of 20 MLD capacity Treatment Plant for entire capacity addition Storage capacity addition by 213 ML Distribution network augmentation by about 558 km length System refurbishment & replacements Metering System Regularise unauthorised connections, Check distribution leaks and reduce UFW Improve collections to reach 85% collection efficiency by 2011-12 Revision of tariff every five years starting 2007-08 by 100% Identify potential location for additional rainy wells for further augmentation of water supply and reduce dependency on ground water as drinking water source Conduct water sample and reliability analysis for ground water and assess the appropriate time for providing conventional treatment facilities Prepare an asset inventory and map the water supply systems for effective monitoring Plan tiny industrial units in residential location distribution system in a comprehensive manner to ensure equitable distribution; the comprehensive distribution system should be planned including those sectors being developed by
79 200607 514 200708 10773 200809 11357 200910 6784 201011 7691 201112 6329
Capital Facilities
Support & System Sustenance Measures
Other actions/ Measures
Water Supply
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
HUDA too. The planning should take into account 38 villages falling within the MCF Controlled Area limits, but lacking in basic infrastructure. Conduct a water audit and leak detection study to identify leaks, unaccounted for water (UFW) and worn-out networks for refurbishment Facilitate regular checking of internal plumbing and storage systems at the consumers end by licensing service providers As Faridabad has a large number of industrial connections, ensure that highvolume non-domestic users compulsorily fit ISP metres Promote individual house service connections (HSCs) even in slum locations and discourage public stand posts (PSPs) as a policy measure and to increase accountability Transfer the billing and collection responsibility to the revenue department (house tax) to reduce cost of collections MCF shall be primarily responsible for the implementation of all the suggested actions Capital investments on system refurbishment and replacements shall happen only after conducting a water audit and identification of UFW sources. Improvement of collection efficiency is applicable to both arrears and current demand. Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters Daily per-capita water supply (min of 315 lpcd, including industrial supply, the domestic supply norm being 180 lpcd) Elevated storage capacity w.r.t supply (33%) Distribution network reach as % of road length (100% of road length) System coverage water HSCs as % of PT Assessments (min 75%) Cost recovery through user charges (100% O&M Expenses)
Sector Notes
Performance Monitoring Indicators
5.2.2
Sewerage (MCF)
Table 37. Sewerage : Demand-Gap Assessment
Existing/ desired level Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap 638 115 1842 717 1382 538 744 423
Service head Indicator System coverage/ 1 Collection network 2 Treatment Collection network length against road length (%) Treatment capacity against supply (%)
Current Desired level level 52 60
Unit
80 Km. 100 ML
Source: CRISIL Estimates

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Capacity expansion and upgradation of the existing collection and conveyance system to match additional water supply and provide for environmentally safe disposal Synchronisation with water supply capacity, ability to meet service level targets and disposal norms Rs. 70,200 lakhs
80
Long-term needs (2031) The demand-gap assessment above presented is against an assumed sewerage generation of 80 percent of water supply that is 717 MLD by 2031. Identified investments in the sector are meant to augment the UGD networks in line with the proposed increase in water supply and road network, as well as refurbishments to the existing network and treatment plants. The system plans to cover 70 percent of the population and 85 percent of the road network for efficient service delivery. Construction of public convenience systems in the immediate future to cater to the needs of the urban poor is also envisaged as a part of the sanitation sector. The total investment need for sewerage sector by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 70,200 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the quantum of population addition and augmentation of water supplies to the town. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements. Priority needs (2011-12) A sum of Rs. 48,290 lakhs (69% of total investment need in the sewerage sector) is proposed for sewerage infrastructure by 2011-12 excluding the proposals prepared under YAP-II. Priority capital investments are expected to cater to the current service gap as well the medium-term needs of the estimated population by 2021. Accordingly, additional 744 km. of sewerage network is proposed to be put in place by 2011-12. Capacity addition of sewerage treatment by 423 ML through new sewerage treatment plants (STPs) is proposed by 2011-12. These would also serve the cause of the river conservation/ YAP-II. Maximum investment is expected to come under YAP-II during the initial years and accordingly investment phasing has been planned for the proposed investment by MCF. Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of capacity by another 179 ML of STPs and about 461 km. of UGD network to cater to the long-term needs of 2031. Action Plan for Implementation
Sewerage System/ UGD Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 48290 lakhs Conveyance and rising mains for capacity augmentation Collection network augmentation by about 744 km Sewerage Treatment Plants addition by about 423 ML capacity Pumping Machinery Ensure every house tax assessment & water connection is also connected to the UGD Improve collections to reach 85% collection efficiency by 2011-12
200607 200708 7197 200809 13793 200910 14247 201011 10375 201112 2679
Capital Facilities
81
Sewerage System/ UGD
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Isolate sewerage system storm water lines. Prepare a comprehensive UGD master plan to explore the possibility of the decentralisation of the system of operations for effective service delivery. The planning should take into account 38 villages falling within MCFs limits, and lacking in basic infrastructure. Promote the use of Decentralized Waste Water Treatment Systems (DEWATS) in areas that cannot be served by the centralized system and in appropriate spot locations where the use of DEWATS is beneficial. Plan the UGD system and ensure the location of STPs as anticipated under Yamuna Action Plan II, so that benefits are maximised. Improve and ensure access to sanitary facilities for the urban poor and slum dwellers. Encourage pay & use category of public conveniences with community involvement in the maintenance of the same. The current system of sewerage tariff, based on the number of water closets needs to be reviewed as it is not the correct indicator of the cost of service. Rather, it should be linked with water supply. Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters Collection network reach as % of road length (min 85%) System coverage UGD HSCs as % of water supply connections (min 90%) Cost recovery through user charges (100% O&M expenses)
Sector Notes
5.2.3
Roads, Street lighting, Urban transport and Traffic management (MCF)

Table 38. Roads, street lighting, traffic management : Demand-Gap Assessment
Existing/ desired level Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap
Service head Indicator 1 2 3 Degree of Connectivity
Unit
5 6
Per-capita road 0.96 0.96 length (mt) Average road Road width 6.66 7.00 width (mt) Concrete (%) 4 15 Km Roads BT (%) 74 85 Km Surface type WBM (%) 0 0 Km Earthen (%) 22 0 Km Total municipal road length Km BT to CC Km Up-gradation WBM to BT Km Km Earthen to BT New CC Km formation BT Km Improvements Widening & Strengthening, utility Km to identified shifting, beautification major roads ROBs/ Flyovers No.s Spacing between Street lighting 55 30 Km lamp poles (mt) Tube lights (%) 76 30 No.s
48 920 0 250 1218
345 1957 0 0 2303
259 1468 0 0 1727
211 548 0 -250 509 70 0 250 141 298 122 4
16681
23029
17272
591
82
Existing/ desired level Service head Indicator Current Desired level level Unit
Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap 5354 1 53657 15 40243 12 34889 11 0 591 34889 11 8
High power lamps 24 70 No.s (%) High mast lamps 0 0.1 No.s (%) Replacements Tube lights with high power lamps No.s Tube lights No.s New High power lamps No.s installations High mast lamps No.s 7 Traffic Mgmt Junction improvements No.s Source: CRISIL Estimates

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Increase carrying capacity through widening and improve riding quality through strengthening of existing roads. New roads will cater to missing links and developing areas. Hassle-free travel on the roads, safe driving during nights Rs. 64976 lakhs
Long-term needs (2031) Identified investments based on the demand-gap assessment above presented are meant for the up-gradation of existing un-surfaced roads; new road development; widening and strengthening of major roads; implementation of the public transport system (an appropriate system like bus rapid transits system (BRTS) etc need to be identified), traffic management systems and junction improvements; provision of street lighting, etc. In line with the DP proposal of 9.91 percent of the total city area for transportation and circulation and an average road width of 7 m, a total length of 2303 km. of road network would provide a fair degree of connectivity at an average of 0.96 meters per capita by 2031. Accordingly, an additional 1085 km. of surfaced road networks are proposed to be put in place. Installation of lighting systems on the roads will be in line with new roads development and shall maintain a spacing of not more than 30 metres per light pole. Currently, the intra-city public transport system within Faridabad is of the nature of an intermediate public transport system, supported by privately operated stage carriers and DTC bus service from other locations up to the MCF boundary. In order to improve the public transport system, it is proposed that MCF in conjunction with NCRPB will plan for an appropriate road based public transport system with dedicated bus lanes for intra-city connectivity; regional connectivity will be ensured through the RRTS/ MRTS as proposed for the NCR region. The CDP has allocated about Rs. 2000 lakhs for the public transport system and another Rs. 25,455 lakhs for the improvement of identified major roads and the construction of ROBs at various critical intersections to achieve an efficient traffic management system. The total investment need for roads, street lighting, transportation and traffic management sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 64,976 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the area being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.
83
Priority needs (2011-12) A sum of Rs. 46,735 lakhs (76% of total investment need in the roads and transport sector) and Rs. 2465 lakhs (68% of total investment in the street lighting sector) is proposed by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gaps and medium-term needs of 2021. In addition to CDP investment, it is anticipated that the proposal under the NCR plan will also benefit Faridabad. Also, the proposed KMP western peripheral expressway is expected to improve the circulation pattern of the city and avoid traffic congestion in it. The details of various road improvement proposals are presented in Annexure 6 under service gap assessment. As a long-term strategy, MCF proposes widening/ strengthening and improvement of about 122 km. of important roads of the city along with the construction of four ROBs, of which two would be planned across the railway line. A sum of Rs. 17,587 lakhs is proposed to be invested by 2011-12 on these proposals; this sum includes investment for organizing all utility corridors for better service management. Also, every new road shall be designed to have utility corridors as part of better asset management practice; the cost of this facility is in-built into road improvement cost. Action Plan for Implementation
Roads, Street lighting, Transportation and Traffic Management Investment upto 2011-12 Rs. 49200 lakhs (Rs. lakhs) Roads Up-gradation of 250 km. of earthen & WBM roads to BT and 70 km of BT roads to CC surface New formations- 439 km. Road Widening & Strengthening85 km Public Transport/ (BRTS) Improvement of identified major corridors Land Acquisition, ROB, improvement traffic system and Junction improvements Street lighting (about 35500 poles with fixtures to be installed) KMP bye-pass to be implemented at the earliest to improve regional connectivity The Badarpur elevated road and widening to be constructed at the earliest to improve connectivity with Delhi Improve connectivity in the peripheral areas and villages within MCFs limits and peripheral sectors that are poorly connected Regional traffic passing through NH 1 2, 3 and 4 needs to be bypassed Effective coordination between MCF and various agencies/bodies within NCR Hawker zones to be created as part of land use policy and continuous efforts to be made to avoid encroachments Provide parking lots and introduce parking fee in prime areas Provide for bicycle networks and pedestrian facilities including footpaths It must be ensured that at least 60 percent of the roads have footpaths (i.e. roads measuring 20 feet and more)
84
200607
3161
200708
6021
200809
10428
200910
8918
201011
13709
201112
6962
Capital Facilities
Roads, Street lighting, Transportation and Traffic Management
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Sector Notes
Design of new roads shall necessarily have provision for shoulders, foot paths, utility ducts and storm water drains under the foot paths, landscaped median and concealed cabling for lighting system Construction of new roads shall be integrated with drain construction (i.e., for any new road drainage facility to be planned and constructed first) Coordinated efforts between MCF, PWD-BR, HUDA and traffic police departments need to be put in place for effective traffic management and for ensuring disciplined travel and behaviour. Street lighting systems shall comprise automation of switching, dimming mechanism, etc. Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters Road network degree of connectivity in terms of per-capita road length (min 0.96 meters) Road condition percentage of municipal roads surfaced (100% - CC/ BT surfacing) Street lighting- spacing between two poles not to exceed 30 m.
5.2.4
Storm Water Drainage (MCF)

Table 39. Storm water drainage : Demand-Gap Assessment
Existing/ desired level Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap
Service head Indicator
Unit
Road length 1 Network reach covered with 66 150 drains (%) Kutcha open (%) 0 0 Network Pucca open (%) 100 30 2 type Pucca closed (%) 0 70 Total network length Up-gradation of Pucca open to Pucca closed Augmentation/ New Pucca open drains 3 Improvements New Pucca closed drains Desilting & strengthening of Primary Drains Source: CRISIL Estimates
Km Km Km Km Km Km Km Km
0 800 0.00 800
0 1036 2418 3454
0 777 1814 2591
0 -23 1814 1791 23 0 1791
74
74
74
74

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Network expansion, conversion of kutcha and pucca open drains to closed Pucca drains Universal coverage and disposal capability, restrict sewerage flow into storm water drains Rs. 41357 lakhs
85
Long-term needs (2031) Identified investments based on the demand-gap assessment above presented are meant for the up-gradation of the existing open network to a closed network and the construction of 1791 km. of new drains to cater to current and future service gaps. The system plans to cover 150% of the road network for service efficiency. The total investment need for drains sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 41,357 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the road network being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements. Priority needs (2011-12) A sum of Rs. 25,560 lakhs (62% of total investment need in the drains sector) is proposed to be invested in storm water drainage by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gap as well as to the medium-term needs of the proposed storm water drainage network by 2021. The majority of the investment is dedicated to the formation of new networks in un-serviced and newly developed areas of Faridabad. Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of network by another 864 km. in line with new roads to be developed beyond 2011-12, to cater to the long-term needs of 2031. Action Plan for Implementation
Storm Water Drainage Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs.25560 lakhs Up-gradation of open drains to closed drains Formation of pucca closed drains Desilting and strengthening of about 74 km length of primary drains in city Ensure that every divided road has closed drains on either side and undivided roads have drains on at least one side Isolate storm water drainage from the sewerage system Identify, delineate, sanitize and protect the natural drainage system of the city Develop common washing areas in identified hawking areas with connections to treated water and drainage Improve drainage network on a priority basis in flood-prone areas Ensure that all new roads designed make adequate provision for storm water drains Construction of new roads should be integrated with construction of drains Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters 200607
-
200708
5230
200809
5220
200910
3828
201011
5014
201112
6268
Capital Facilities
Support & System Sustenance Measures Other actions/ Measures
Sector Notes
86
Storm Water Drainage Performance Monitoring Indicators
2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 201107 08 09 10 11 12 Drainage network reach as percentage of road length (min 150%) All divided roads to have drains on either side and undivided roads on at least one side Drains to be cleaned before and after monsoon for better functioning
5.2.5
Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation (MCF)

Table 40. Conservancy & Sanitation : Demand-Gap Assessment
Existing/ desired level Service Levels, Demand and Gaps By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap 480 775 654 -
Service head Indicator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Waste generation Waste Collection Density Factor Vehicle utilisation Primary collection Secondary collection Waste transportation
Unit
Per-capita waste 377 377 MT generation (tpcd) Collection 86 100 performance (%) Moisture content NA 0.35 Trips per Vehicle 3.03 2.50 per day No.s of Hand carts against proposed No.s 80% privatisation Container bins No.s No.s Dual loaded dumper placers Vehicle capacity Landfill site Landfill infrastructure Composting infrastructure MT Acres MT/ day MT/ day
890 180 2 209 NA -
1564 777 32 477 147 276 136
1173 661 27 402 59 138 68
283 481 25 193 59 138 68
8 Disposal
Slums/ Slum popl. per Sanitation/ 9 seat of Public Public convenience conveniences Source: CRISIL Estimates
359
90 Seats
410
1561 (98 Pay & Use units 1971 each with 16 seats)

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Source segregation and door-to-door collection, effective transportation and environmentally safe disposal Reduced waste generation, hygienic conditions and a clean city Rs. 8264 lakhs
Long-term needs (2031) The demand-gap assessment above presented indicates generation of 775 MT of waste in the city by 2031 against the current generation of 480 MT at 377 grams per capita per day; the future generation of solid waste is assumed at 2.2% per annum for the first ten years and at a reduced rate of 1.9% per annum and 1.6% per annum for the next two decades. Accordingly, the requirements are planned for the horizon year 2031.
87
In addition to the proposed land of about 59 acres for disposal, MCF needs to acquire an additional land of about 88 acres after 2011-12 for future landfill and composting purposes. About 193 tons capacity addition by 2011-12 through increasing fleet size would be required for efficient primary and secondary collection of solid waste. Further, public conveniences mainly to cater to the urban poor and slums in the city are planned for 2011-12 only. It is considered that as a long term measure public conveniences should be discouraged; this is also in line with the considered strategy of making Faridabad a no-slum city. The total investment need for conservancy and sanitation sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 8264 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the road network being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements. Priority needs (2011-12) A sum of Rs. 3910 lakhs (47% of total investment need in the sector) is proposed by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gap and the medium-term needs of 2021. The requirements at the disposal site are planned for the horizon year 2031. Accordingly, infrastructure for land fill and composting is proposed on a total land of 58 acres. Infrastructure development for land fill would be a year-to-year capital expense. In line with these developments, augmentation of vehicle capacity by 193 tons would be required by 2011-12 to meet the current gap and immediate needs. About 300 handcarts are proposed to be acquired; 481 dumper placer bins and 25 dual-loaded dumper placers are proposed to meet the gap by 2011-12. Rs. 829 lakhs is proposed for construction of public convenience systems mainly to cater to the urban poor and slum locations. These would be in the form of 16 seat complex (total 98 units) to be operated on pay & use format. This however is to cater to the present slum population only and not a long term measure as earlier suggested. Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of vehicle capacity by 75 tons as well as the construction of more intermediate transfer stations in line with the changing land use pattern and waste generation trends, to cater to the long-term needs of 2031. Action Plan for Implementation
Solid Waste Management Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Capital Facilities Rs. 3910 lakhs Acquisition of new vehicles -three bin handcarts for door to door collection Acquisition of new vehicles for secondary collection Acquiring a new disposal site of approx. 59 acres 200607
83
200708
1970
200809
607
200910
365
201011
547
201112
339
88
Solid Waste Management Land fill infrastructure and composting facility development at disposal site DLDP & Container Bins Construction of pay & use public convenience systems in slums Implementation of complete door to-door collection Part-privatisation of house-to-house collection at 80% households (MCF to cover only 20% households) Awareness campaign on source segregation
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Create a separate multi-disciplinary SWM cell with expertise in engineering, human resources/personnel management, awareness generation/ social behaviour, health Increase the ambit of Solid Waste Management to include recycling and to facilitate and regulate the sector accordingly. Ensure optimum utilization of existing fleet Initiate information-Education-Communication (I-E-C) campaigns to raise awareness among the urban poor and slum dwellers of better SWM practices Initiate steps towards sharing the responsibility of primary collection of segregated garbage with citizens Develop transfer stations in a scientific, eco-friendly manner processing waste at these sites, for different types of material Develop decentralized waste processing sites at each zone and appropriate technologies Improve and ensure access to sanitary facilities for the urban poor and slum dwellers. Encourage pay & use category of public conveniences with community involvement in the maintenance of the same. MCF shall be the prime implementing agency for the sector For establishment of Intermediate Transfer Stations to reduce cost of transportation, identify sites which are cost- effective Identify localised/ decentralised locations for processing/ disposal/ reuse of biodegradable and plastic waste Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters Source segregation reduction of waste to be collected (min 70 % of waste generated) Door-to-door collection as percentage of households covered (min 80%) Optimum fleet utilisation (No. of trips/ vehicle/ day - average minimum of 2.5) Vehicle capacity as percentage of rated capacity to waste generated (minimum 100%)
Sector Notes
89
5.2.6
Slums and Basic Services for Urban Poor (MCF)

Rehabilitation of slum dwellers currently staying in vulnerable areas and in proposed project locations, in-site improvements and access to basic services and amenities Improvement in quality of services for the urban poor, preservation of sensitive geographies, reduced vulnerability of urban poor, removal of slums by year 2011-12 Rs. 24,701 lakhs

Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need
The requirements in this sector are of immediate priority. Hence, the planning horizon for the sector is 2011 and accordingly projects and investments have been identified to be funded by 2011-12. A sum of Rs. 24701 lakhs is the investment identified for various slum rehabilitation and improvement projects and for providing basic services to urban poor. This however is partly against resolution of the prime issue of the encroachments of the proposed rehabilitation lands. Of the identified investment, a sum of Rs. 21,646 has been allocated for improving and rehabilitating housing stock (about 15,000 units). As part of 10% own funding, it is proposed that 10% will be mobilised as beneficiary contribution. Action Plan for Implementation
Slums and Urban Poor Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Capital Facilities Rs. 24701 lakhs In situ rehabilitation of slumshousing Infrastructure development for slum rehabilitation Inventory and geographical mapping of all slums and infrastructure in slums for MCF Socio-Economic Survey of all slums in MCF Training for women in slums and urban poor towards selfemployment and other income generating activities. NGOs and CBOs to play the lead role and MCF shall assume the secondary/ supportive role Providing for reservation of lands for the economically weaker sections (EWS) in each type of commercial/ industrial/ residential land use in the development plan Facilitating access to credit for urban poor. MCF can explore the option of acting as a guarantor. Organising frequent meetings with slum dwellers towards encouraging participation in slum development programmes, creating awareness on beneficiary contribution to project development and also assuming the responsibility of implementing the projects
90
200607
-
200708
6328
200809
6328
200910
4329
201011
3858
201112
3858-
Slums and Urban Poor
2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 201107 08 09 10 11 12 Facilitating and encouraging the neighbourhood concept in slums to carry out recreational activities such as reading, sports and drama Infrastructure and basic services provision in slums shall not be in isolation but in conjunction in line with overall infrastructure development in the city Awareness on health and hygiene shall be created among slum dwellers in line with the long-term goal of moving towards individual toilets and doing away with public convenience systems Water Supply Individual house service connections to all Sewerage - Individual house service connections to all Sanitation Community toilets in the short run and individual toilets in the long run Solid Waste Management -- Coverage of all slum households under door-to-door collection and awareness campaigns on source segregation
Sector Notes
5.2.7
Land use/ Development planning (MCF, HUDA)
The total funding required is estimated at Rs. 23760 lakhs in view of the impending revision of the current Development Plan, which has its planning horizon only till 2011. A sum of Rs. 14,010 lakhs is the identified investment by 2011-12 for the acquisition of lands for future development of sectors in Faridabad and also those reserved lands to be proposed in the Development Plan proposals, including the relocation of wholesale markets. Considering the role of HUDA as the prime agency with respect to development of new sectors, part of the investment amounting to Rs. 6975 lakhs by 2011-12 is proposed to be funded by HUDA. In view of the various NCR proposals in urban transport sector for which major land would be required, MCF in consultation with NCRPB will work towards incorporating all such proposals into the revised DP and accordingly acquire the necessary land. Rs. 7035 lakhs including a GIS-based land use survey for the preparation of the revised DP (to be taken up during 2007-08) is proposed to be funded by MCF. Further, MCF and HUDA will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further acquisition of lands for future urban development proposals. Funding to the tune of Rs. 4875 lakhs each by MCF and HUDA would be required for the purpose. Sector Strategies & Investment Need
Strategy identified Expected Outcome Total Investment Need Facilitate planned development of city as per Development Plan proposals Planned, orderly development of the peripheral areas contributing to overall city development Rs. 23,760 lakhs
Action Plan for Implementation

Land Use / Development Planning Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Capital Facilities Rs. 7,035 lakhs by MCF Rs. 6,975 lakhs by HUDA GIS-based existing land use survey by MCF 200607
-
200708
60 -
200809
1395 1395
200910
1395 1395
201011
2093 2093
201112
2093 2093
91
Land Use / Development Planning Acquisition of lands for NCR proposals and other reserved lands by MCF Acquisition of lands for sector development by HUDA Support & System Sustenance Measures Inventory and geographical mapping of all slums and infrastructure in slums Revitalisation of inner/core areas in old Faridabad
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Consideration of change in policy regarding planning horizon/ revision period of DP from 20 years to 10 years Immediate revision of DP and incorporation of all NCRPB proposals relating to FCA area. Decongesting core areas through selective relocation of commercial, wholesale and trading activities (priority markets are steel, rice and fruits and vegetables) Identifying land in the peripheral areas and providing connectivity and other infrastructure Framing common building regulations for FCA (MCF and HUDA areas) Byelaws to encourage decongestion of the core areas through Revision of FSI norms and incentives; Parking norms; and Specific regulations like accommodation and reservation Discouraging development in critical, ecologically sensitive areas Idenitfying environmentally critical locations Making special DCR applicable to these areas to restrict encroachments and unauthorised developments Developing available open spaces, parks and playgrounds as lungs of the city Using market-friendly mechanisms like densification, accommodation, and reservation to generate more urban land and to further generate open space Reserving more lands for health and institutional purposes and facilitating development of all basic services
5.2.8
River Conservation
Desilting, clearing encroachments, beautification, treatment facilities for preserving rivers and the riverine system around or within the city Conservation of natural river resource; enriched and enhanced lung spaces for the city Rs. 750 lakhs

Under the YAP-II conservation of the river Yamuna is proposed; in this CDP in addition to improvement of sewerage system a sum of Rs. 750 lakhs has been allocated as contribution by MCF towards the components planned under YAP-II for cleaning, strengthening of river banks and providing for permanent treatment facilities and also including awareness programs. These are proposed to follow the YAP-II implementation plan. The investments under the sewerage sector also benefit river conservation since it would clean the sewerage before discharging it into the river.
92
Action Plan for Implementation

River Conservation Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 750 lakhs Clearing of encroachments and desilting operations Strengthening and lining of river banks Development and beautification of surroundings Augmentation/ extension of UGD system in the city for complete coverage and compliance Implementation of SWM practices and complete coverage of city through door-to-door collection Coordinated efforts between MCF, YAP- II, NCR Board, and the Irrigation Department are required for plugging all inlet points into the rivers, before desilting operations are taken up. A Faridabad River Conservation Committee needs to be formed from among the officials of MCF, PWD- PH, and environmental groups of the cities for effective management of the riverine areas. Eradicate conditions for malaria, dengue and other water-borne diseases Ensure location of STPs under the River Conservation Plan in such a way that the benefits are maximised Identify, delineate, sanitize and protect the natural drainage system of the city Ensure functioning of UGD network and compliance by citizens Identify and facilitate conservation of structures of heritage and public importance along riverbanks Rehabilitation/ relocation of slums along the riverbanks needs to be given maximum priority and coordinated efforts are required from the respective departments of MCF. 200607 200708 200809
188
200910
263
201011
300
201112
-
Capital Facilities
Coordination measures
Sector Notes
5.2.9
Fire services
Strengthening disaster management aspects in the city particularly fire hazard management systems. Effective and timely tackling of industrial, commercial and domestic fire calls Rs. 850 lakhs

The present fire brigade of MCF though is effectively handling fire calls from various quarters is seriously strained with lack of infrastructure and personnel. It is proposed to construct one central fire station with all facilities like parade ground, workshop, training areas and residential facilities etc on 2 acres of identified MCF land.
93
Also another 7 new fire stations are proposed to be located at different locations of the city to effectively address the fire rescue calls against the increasing numbers of such calls over the years. The equipment required along with hydraulic platforms, trailers, rescue vans, ambulances, mortuary van etc. A total of Rs. 850 lakhs is proposed for these initiatives to strengthen the fire department of MCF. Action Plan for Implementation
River Conservation Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 850 lakhs Setting up of Central Fire station on identified 2 Acres of land with all facilities Development of 7 new fire stations Acquisition of equipment, hydraulic platforms, trailers, rescue vans, ambulances, mortuary van etc Coordinated efforts between MCF, HUDA and Industries associations for effectively managing the fire hazard are necessary through awareness creation. Resident Welfare Associations to be taken into confidence by MCF towards educating them on tackling minor fire accidents before Fire brigade can answer the situation. MCF need to initiate a study on Fire Hazard Management system to identify the types of fire calls in the past, divide the city area into hazard prone zones and accordingly locate the new fire stations to effectively manage fire calls Town planning department of MCF and HUDA to ensure fire safety for all existing and new constructions in the form of adequate setbacks, fire detector systems, sprinkler systems etc as necessary 200607 200708
340
200809
298
200910
213
201011
-
201112
-
Capital Facilities
Coordination measures
5.2.10
Projects supporting Economic Development and City Beautification

Appropriate siting of economic infrastructure, revitalisation of old cities of Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh and city beautification Boost in the economy of the region, preservation of its culture & heritage and sustenance of growth Rs. 3446 lakhs

While MCF does not have a direct role to play in the economic development of the city or the region, they propose to play a proactive role in facilitating and supporting the same through identified projects from time to time. Initiatives like revitalisation of the old cities of Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh through decongestion of the core area, relocation of specific economic infrastructure like markets and wholesale centres (rice, steel and fruits and vegetable wholesale markets) are proposed.
94
A sum of Rs. 2000 lakhs is the proposed investment for truck terminals and wholesale markets; Rs. 400 lakhs has been proposed for improvement of gardens, Rs. 64 lakhs for creating night shelters and Rs. 200 lakhs for improvements to the stadium and its surroundings. MCF also proposes to lend a helping hand to heritage/ tourist development by providing linkages to Surajkund and other prominent tourist places around Faridabad. Of the total identified investment of Rs. 3446 lakhs, Rs. 2664 lakhs is proposed for utilisation by 2011-12. Action Plan for Implementation
Economy, Culture and Heritage Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 2664 lakhs Tree plantation, creation of gardens, conservation of heritage structures Relocation of markets/ Construction of truck terminals/ slaughter house etc Provision of night shelters Improvement to of stadium and surroundings Facilitating economic development Parks/ gardens development; Beautification of water bodies by creating parks and carrying out other recreational activities Encouraging citizens contribution towards the maintenance of neighbourhood parks, Decongesting of the core areas by removing high trading activity through selective relocation of commercial, wholesale and trading activities Identifying land in the peripheral areas and providing connectivity and other infrastructure Revision of FSI norms and incentives for factory type layouts Facilitate setting up of exhibition, convention and science centres for dissemination of best practices and development of tourism Listing and documentation of tourist spots around Faridabad 200607 200708
119
200809
600
200910
622
201011
700
201112
622
Capital Facilities
Other actions/ Coordination measures
5.2.11
Urban Governance/ System Modernisation
A sum of Rs. 550 lakhs has been proposed to be spent over the next five years towards system modernisation, e-Governance and GIS projects. These projects would involve administrative reforms implementation, computerisation efforts, GIS-based systems development etc. These capital investments are expected to bring in more accountability and transparency in the administration of MCF and thereby enhance MCF reach to the citizens. Action Plan for Implementation
Other Projects Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 550 lakhs 200607
-
200708
110
200809
110
200910
110
201011
110
201112
110
95
Other Projects Capital Facilities Urban governance, GIS systems, Systems modernisation Implementation of double entry accrual system of accounting Implementing GIS based property tax system and support engineering services Rationalisation of tax admin. process Restructuring of admin. systems
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Urban governance & finance Identifying alternate resources to reduce dependency on octroi compensation Identifying the training needs of the staff (HR, Administration, Financial Management, Urban Governance, Service Delivery, Citizens Communication, IT) Involving city- based institutions in imparting training Publishing property tax records at the ward level and bringing in transparency in the system Carrying out a cost audit of all the expenditure, incurred service-wise and identify and assess sector-wise expenditure to categorise specific expenditure control measures Communicating with the public and within the organisation to build popular support for the reform initiatives Outsourcing Property Tax database management, demand notices generation, arrears collection, non-core functions in the vehicle/ workshop department, etc.
5.2.12
New MCF office, system studies and minor capital works
A sum of Rs. 800 lakhs has been proposed for construction of new office premises for all departments of MCF on the existing site. MCF proposes to take up this activity during 2009-10 and complete the same in two years time. This is proposed towards presenting an ideal and corporate environment for the staff of MCF and thereby improves HR productivity. A sum of Rs. 180 lakhs has been proposed for funding various systems improvement studies, to be taken up by MCF by 2011-12 in line with the various reforms proposed in the CDP (leak detection, preparation of a comprehensive master plan for all infrastructure service, socio-economic survey of slums, preparation of asset inventory, fire hazard management study etc). Another Rs. 60 lakhs has been proposed for studies to be initiated after 2011-12. These apart, MCF proposes to invest a total of Rs. 2500 lakhs through budget allocations for regular minor development works to be identified on a year-to-year basis. These regular capital works have been planned in addition to the proposed investment, but these are not covered under JNNURM funding; they shall be fully funded by MCFs budget. Action Plan for Implementation
Other Projects Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 3480 lakhs 200607
417
200708
417
200809
417
200910
817
201011
817
201112
417
96
Other Projects Capital Facilities Construction of new MCF office Systems Studies Regular capital works (minor)
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
201112
Identify on a year-to-year basis, the detailed list of minor capital works to be taken up at the ward level Identify various studies to be conducted for effective implementation of the various proposed reforms Administrative restructuring Conducting Water audit Mapping and socio-economic survey of Slums Initiate Fire Hazard Management study Preparation of master plan documents for water supply, sewerage, drainage, etc.
97
5.3
5.3.1
SECTOR WISE LISTING OF PRIORITY PROJECTS

Priority Projects Water Supply
Quantity Unit 14.97 780.00 Capacity (ML) 4.5 4.5 4.5 Capacity (HP) 100 100 100 Diameter (mm) 200 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 300 150 300 150 300 150 Diameter (mm) 600 250 250 250 200 250 250 250 250 Diameter (mm) 200 600 150 150 150 150 150 130.50 81.00 180.00 58.00 36.00 80.00 2477.00 671.00 810.00 540.00 482.00 473.00 293.00 244.00 250.00 2 x 268 405.00 230.00 630.00 800.00 2400.00 1000.00 450.00 8700.00 2850.00 6.00 1300.00 760.00 550.00 380.00 1800.00 2100.00 3075.00 1200.00 1550.00 1445.00 3430.00 2000.00 1800.00 2000.00 400.00 3000.00 ML ML ML ML ML Nos Nos Nos mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt Nos mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
S. No Location A Water suply 1 Construction of Ranney wells of 20 MLD capacity each on Yamuna bank 2 Construction of 4 Nos. of under ground storage tanks (Common collection tank). 3 Consturction of water treatment plant including civil and E & M works all complete. 4 Construction of Elevated Storage Reservoirs i Old Faridabad - 29 Nos ii Ballabhgarh - 18 Nos iii NIT - 40 Nos 5 Installing pumps and accessories etc at each ESR i Old Faridabad - 29 x 2 Nos ii Ballabhgarh - 18 x 2 Nos iii NIT - 40 x 2 Nos 6 Augmentation of distribution network - Old Faridabad zone i Bye pass road -18 C1 - 60-55-121-37 A ii 6 - 91 iii 1 - 26 - 115 iv 37 A - 131 v 162 - 158 - 132 vi 92 - 130 vii 25 - 119 E viii 1 - 6 ix 50 - 55 x 2 - 18, 18 C xi 60 - 90 xii 76 - 81 xiii 91 - 132 xiv 27 A xv 27 A xvi 27 B xvii 27 B xviii 27 C xix 27 C xx Green Tubewell 7 Augmentation of distribution network - Ballabgarh zone i Tigaon road boosting to Ambedker chowk ii D.M road to Bohra public school road at 100' iii 100' road to pond chawla colony iv 100' road to mastana chowk, Chawla colony v 60' road and Gurdawara road chawla colony vi D.M road to T.W. No. 1 at milkplan road vii D.M. road to Ambedkar chowk hospital road to Unchagaon Octroi at Mohna road viii Gupta hotel to Unchagaon Neem tree ix Sihi gate Tigaon road to Gupta hotel 8 Augmentation of distribution network - NIT zone and Sector 24 i Bata to Hitkari chowk ii Shona road to Hard ware chowk iii NH - 2-3 chowk to press colony iv Internal road NH - 2 v Internal road NH - 1 vi S.R. road vii Internal road at NH - 3 9 Augmentation of distribution network in approved colonies
98
5.3.2
Priority Projects Sewerage

Quantity Unit 88.00 44.00 128.00 204.00 40.00 277.60 Nos. 4 3 5 Span (mt) 25 40 Diameter (mm) 800 900 1100 Diameter (mm) 1200 1500 1600 1800 1900 2200 2400 Diameter (mm) 600 450 ii Ward 22 P-6 to 91 60 - 90 1-9 50 - 55 1 - 25 40 - 18 C 2 - 18, 18B 158 - 162 76 - 81 1/28 - 1/13 92 - 130 156 - 132 37 A - 116 37 - 115 25 - 119 E 75 - ISC Ashoka Enclave -I and Main 193 to 357 62 - 121 133-144 162 - 198 450 450 250 250 250 300 250 250 300 300 300 300 450 450 450 250 300 300 300 300 156.00 124.00 287.00 ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML
S. No Location B Sewerage 1 Construction of Sewage Treatment plants i Mirzapur ii Badsahpur iii Pratapgarh 2 Construction of Main Pumping station at STP site including E & M works. i Mirzapur ii Badshapur iii Pratapgarh 3 Construction of Intermediate pumping stations in each zone i Faridabad Zone ii Ballabhgarh Zone iii NIT Zone 4 Prividing and laying rising mains i Construction of steel Truss structure bridges for crossing of rising mains. across Gurgaon Canal across Agra Canal ii Providing and laying Rising mains from IPS DI pipe class k - 9 of following sizes
3.00 3.00 2000.00 1000.00 2000.00 1500.00 3000.00 1000.00 4000.00 1000.00 500.00 6000.00
Nos Nos mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
iii
Supply and laying of MS pipe of following sizes
Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - Old Faridabad zone i Sector 19
749.00 1781.00 671.00 406.00 244.00 268.00 268.00 777.00 536.00 137.00 229.00 180.00 473.00 335.00 540.00 495.00 293.00 137.00 280.00 225.00 125.00 250.00
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
iii
Contd..
99
S. No Location B Sewerage iv Ashoka Enclave - II A-59 to A-93 A-37 to A-38 A-18 to A-34 A-7 to A-49 B-2 to B-30 A-7 to A-49 B-2 to B-30 B-45 to B-52 B-13 to B-61 B-63 to B-70 6 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - Ballabgarh zone i Ward No. 31 & 32 Ambedker Chowk to Sihi Gate Road at Tigaon Road Sibi Gate to Tigaon Road disposal D.M Road to Bhohara Public school Road 100' Road to Tigaon Road at Pathawari Road 100' Road to Public High school Chowk Mastana chowk to Echwala colony at 33' Road 100' Road to Tigaon Road at Bhohara Public school Road ii Ward No. 33 & 34 Uncha Gaon Octroi to Gupta Hotal Gupta Hotel to Ambedker Chowk Gupta Hotel to Sihi Gate road at jTigaon road Aalya Vidiya mandir school to Bhagat Singh colony road Bhagat Singh road to Aggresen chowk D.M road to Ambedker chowk Hospital road Sihi Gate road to NagarPark school at Tigaon road 7 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - NIT zone i Bhagat singh school to Mujesor disposal ii Neelam chowk to 4 - 5 chowk iii 4 - 5 chowk to Banke Bihari iv NH 1 - 2 chowk to Phawra singh Kalyan singh chowk, Delite Hotel v Prince Hotel vi NH - 2 police chowki road vii NH - 2 E Block viii 2 - D Block to NH 1 - 2 chowk ix Chimni Bai to 2 - 3 chowk x Masjid chowk to ESI chowk xi NH - 3 outer road to DAV college xii NH - 3 outer road to sports complex xiii Parag Medical store to NH 2 - 3 chowk to 2-3 circle xiv Internal road of NH - 3 Sec. 22, 575 to 740 xv xvi Sec. 22, 575 to 541 xvii Sec. 22, 397 to 363, 483 to 562, 574 to 499, 764 to 883 xviii Sec. 22, Balance all road 8 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network in approved colonies
Quantity
Unit
450 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Diameter (mm) 900 1200 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Diameter (mm) 1200 600 600 600 450 600 600 600 1200 600 600 600 600 450 600 300 250 200
460.00 80.00 180.00 200.00 280.00 200.00 280.00 100.00 125.00 125.00
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
1300.00 900.00 760.00 450.00 450.00 275.00 215.00 1400.00 600.00 1600.00 600.00 700.00 475.00 450.00 5000.00 1750.00 850.00 2000.00 500.00 600.00 1600.00 700.00 2200.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 2100.00 3100.00 320.04 381.00 914.40 3505.20
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
100
5.3.3
S. No
Priority Projects Roads

Location Nature of work Length Width (mt) (mt) Quantity Footpaths (sides) Street lights (SV fixtures) Utility shifting ROB/ Flyover
D Roads & Street lighting 1 Road works in Old faridabad zone i Plot No: 6 - 19, 40 - 18C, DLF Industrial Area W - 22 ii Plot No: 1 - 9, Mkt. Plot (50 - 55), 2 - 18, 2 18 B, 75, 76, - 81, I/29 - I/13, 92 -130, 162 158 iii Plot No. 1 to Tele.Exch , 60-68,37A-116,156132,26-115,85-90 DLF Indstrial Area. iv v vi vii Old Sher shah suri road Dividing sector 30 -31 upto Burhia nalla ward - 22 Sector 28 & 29 dividing road (petrol pump road) ward - 22 H.B. colony & HUDA Sector 29 VIA Market to dry 28 & 29 Sector 21C (old D.c office road) Marble Market road sector 21c, 60' road (Plot No. 450 to 698), 60' road (Plot No. 439 to 250) Dual carriage road of sector 21A & D, 21 B & D, dividing road sector A, D & C dividing road. sector 21 - A, 21 - B, 21 - C Plot No. A - 133 to A - 142, A - 94 to B - 56, A - 104 to A - 113, A - 50 to A - 37 near A - 37 to A - 34, A - 1 to A - 7, B - 61 to B - 71, B 45 to B - 52, B - 63 to B - 70, B - 13 to B - 61 of Ashoka Enclave (II). B - 2 to B - 30 in Ashoka Enclave (II) B - 80 to C - 4, B - 96 to B - 106, A - 59 to A 93 in Ashoka Enclave (II) Palla Chowk to village Basantpur
Widening Widening
1448 2225
6.70 4.60
48 74
Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening
2044 2500 925 1050 3970
5.50 13.70 7.85 10.00 16.00 2 sides
68 84 31 35 132 2 Nos LT/ HT lines 2 Nos LT/ HT lines
viii
Widening Premixing
3600 7800
18.00 6.70
120
ix x
Resurfacing
1370
3.65
xi xii xiii xiv
Widening Widening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Resurfacing
280 960 5000 3250 1800 1520 700
7.00 10.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 6.70
9 32 162 108 60 51
1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines
Old Shershah Suri road from K.G. Khosla to Burhia Nalla xv Main Road of Sector, 37 from D.M road to bye pass road, and Tilput road from old shershah suri road to Palla chowk. xvi House No. 1324 - 826, 643 - 1045, 232 - 375, 11 to D.A.V School in Sector, 37 xvii D.M road to old Shershah Suri road in village Sarai xviii Surya nagar phase I of 12 near plot No. 1 - 20, 29 - 40, 41 - 51, 57 - 67, 78 - 79, 35 - 57, 115 129, 145 - 149, 200 - 203, 107 - 145, 308 - 309, 276 - 279, 216 - 225, 226 - 235, 246 - 255, 266 275 xix Near plot No. 28 to 85, 80 - 137, 130 - 144, 275 to park, near park in surya nagar phase - I
2 Nos LT/ HT lines 2 Nos LT/ HT lines 2 Nos LT/ HT lines
Resurfacing
1260
3.65
Resurfacing
690
6.70
xx
Near plot No. 662 - 682, 657 - 610, 714 - 708, 600 - 607, 603 - 600, 622 - 632, 642 - 650, 651 Resurfacing 662, 689 - 707 in surya nagar phase - II Near plot No. 513 - 401, 497 - 407, 402 - 404, 408 - 409, 411 - 412, 557 - 412, 486 - 417, 339 318, 430 - 340, 569 - 574, 581 - 586, 593 - 598, 291 - 292, 350 - 385, 430 - 441, 400 - 414, 386 - Resurfacing 391, 392 - 399, 550 - 563, 568 - 65, 30 - 81 in surya nagar Near plot No. 216 - 234, 128 - 201, 166 - 187, 92 - 101, 201 - 269, 188 - 193, 155 - 91, 233 258 of surya nagar phaes - (II) Resurfacing
920
3.65
xxi
2470
3.65
xxii
1155
3.65
101
S. No
Location Nature of work Length Width (mt) (mt)
Quantity Footpaths (sides) Street lights (SV fixtures) Utility shifting ROB/ Flyover
D Roads & Street lighting 1 Road works in Old faridabad zone xxiii Near plot No. 568 - 497, 82 - 269, 480 - 497 in surya nagar phase - (II) xxiv Village Sehatpur towards Tillpat upto Surya Nagar phase - I xxv Road sector - 18 HBC colony sector - 16 x 17 xxvi Agra canal bridge to Mata chowk xxvii Various road of sector - 17 xxviii Sector - 19 main road, sector - 16 main road, sector - 16A main road xxix MCF office to Fire station MCF office to sector - 19 & Puran colony chowk on dividing road of Shastri colony xxxi Old MCF office to Lajpat chowk xxxii Sectro - 27A, 27B, 27C & 27D xxxiii Sector - 27A, 27B, 27C, 27D xxxiv Rajiv chowk to bye pass road xxxv D.M road to bye pass of sector - 15A & 16A dividing and 15A and sector - 12 dividing 2 Road works in Ballabgarh zone i Good year road & dividing road of sector 6 & 7 ii Internal road & sector - 10 & 11 iii iv v Sector 7 & 8, 9 & 10 Dividing road of sector - 10 & 11 xxx
Resurfacing Resurfacing Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing
720 610 3225 650 2640 13904 3774 1000 350 3025 1900 2255 4821
6.70 6.70 15.00 9.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 9.00 14.00 6.70 3.65 12.00 12.00 2 sides 126 2 sides 108 22
2 sides 2 sides
YMCA road from D.M road to bey pass road and disposal sector - 9 vi Improvement of roads in sector - 6 plot No. 8 to 40 vii Improvement of roads in sector - 6 Ind. Area near plot No. 47, 61, 111, 120, 84, 90, 24 & plot No. 31 to 56 viii Improvement of roads inscetor - 6 road from plot No. 1 to YMCA ix Improvement of roads in sectro - 4 Ind. Area near C.R.I. (NCB) x Improvement of roads in sectro - 4 Ind. Area near plot No. 6, 28, 38, 41, 46, 16, 20 xi Rest house to tigaon road in front of panchayat bhawan xii Primix corpate from anaj mandi to S.D. publice school in subhash colony xiii Primix corpate from D.M.road to ambedkar hospital road xiv Primix corpate road from samahan ghat to tigaon road disposal xv Primix corpate road from ambedkar chowk to samshan ghat xvi Primix corpate road from D.M.road to ambedkar chowk xvii Primix corpate road from ambedkar chowk to T.W.No. 1 Milk plant road xviii Punjabi dharamshala to MCF. Limit at mohna road
Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing Widening & strengthening Resurfacing Resurfacing Widening & strengthening Resurfacing Widening Widening Widening & strengthening
3000 825 2980 1390 2470 671 5122 1585 412 2190 550 1000 475 1375 800 550 1590 900
14.00 7.00 12.00 7.00 12.00 10.00 7.00 3.67 3.67 7.00 11.00 3.65 5.50 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00
2 sides
100 28
1 Nos LT/ HT lines
2 sides 2 sides 2 sides
100 46 90
1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines
45
Contd..
102
S. No
Location Nature of work Widening & strengthening Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing Length Width (mt) (mt)
Quantity Footpaths (sides) Street lights (SV fixtures) Utility shifting ROB/ Flyover
D Roads & Street lighting 2 Road works in Ballabgarh zone xix Gupta hotel to bhudut colony gali No.1 Bhudut colony gali No.1 to tigaon road to sihi gate road xxi Petrol pump sector - 3 to tigaon road xxii Ambedkar chowk to punjbi dharamshala at mohna road Road works in NIT zone i Chimni bai dharamshala to tikona park, auditorium to maszid chowk, sanik colony, 1 & 2 to dabua FCI godam road ii St. joseph road, bankebihari to 4 & 5 chowk, NH - 1 & 2 chowk to nehru ground, NH - 1, gurudawara to dayanand school, bus stand to delite hotel, NH - 5 gurudawar road iii iv Outer road NH - 2 & 3 from bodhbihar chowk to hitkari chowk Neelam to bhagatsingh, neelam to bata chowk, bhagatsing to B.K.chowk to hardware, neelam to B.K.chowk Nehru ground Main road of sector - 22, sector - 22 to mini restorant & sector - 22 to disposal & sector 22 Bata flyover to hitkari chowk Widening of road hitkari chowk to eicher chowk & jawahar colony Road of Industries area & NIT plot No. - 1 16, 18 & 19, 16 - 34, eicher to jawahar colony Eleson cotton mill / DM road to plot 176 sector - 25 Plot No. 176 & sector - 25 to shona road / water sector - 25 xx
650 950 1100 800
10.00 5.50 7.00 7.00
Widening & strengthening
6000
20.00
2 sides
200
2 Nos LT/ HT lines
Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Strengthening
7400
10.00
2 sides
250
1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines 2 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines
5000 8200 3000 1700 1445 800 4920 750
20.00 10.00 10.00 7.00 16.00 16.00 10.00 8.00
170 280 100
v vi
vii viii ix
2 sides 2 sides 1 side 2 sides
58 28 164 25
1 Nos LT/ HT lines 2 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT line; 1 water supply line 1 Nos LT/ HT lines
x xi
2400
8.00
2 sides
80
1 ROB over canal 1 ROB over canal
xii
xiii xiv
Existing internal road & sector - 25 main road, plot No. 176 to 39, 71 to 75, 76 to hydrabad ltd, 24 to 70, sector - 25 Plot no. 176 / 25 to 8 / 25 service road of sectro - 25 Hardware chowk to shona road
Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening
4730 1900
10.00 4.50
2 sides 1 side
158 64
3430
10.00
2 sides
115
1 Nos LT/ HT line; 1 water supply line 1 Nos LT/ HT lines 1 Nos LT/ HT lines
1 ROB over canal
xv
Sector - 24, plot No. 131 to 260, 99 to 271 136 to 259 & service road 8 to 158 at sector - 24
Widening & strengthening Widening & strengthening Strengthening
4830 1900 2500
10.00 10.00 6.70
161 64 400
xvi
Chowk sector - 22 / 23, plot No. 5 / 24 Mujesher xvii Pali Gurgaon road to Sooraj Kund, Dual carriage way of crushing zone Road works in Approved Colonies i 12 Approved colonies in Old Faridabad ii 33 Approved colonies in ballabgarh iii 14 Approved colonies in NIT
Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lights Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lights Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lights
103
5.3.4
Priority Projects Storm Water Drains

Quantity Unit Diameter (mm) 900 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 900 600 600 600 600 900 600 600 900 1050 Diameter (mm) 1050 600 600 Diameter (mm) 600 600 600 600 600 600 1050 1050 900 900 900 900 Diameter (mm) 900 900 900 900 Diameter (mm) 600 900 900 Nos. 5 3 5 Diameter (mm) 600 900 600 600 600 600 1050 600 900
S. No Location C Storm water drainage 1 Prividing and laying storm water drains - Old Faridabad zone i DLF area, Ward 22 6 - 19 1-6 2 - 18,18 A 18 C - 11 60 - 59 etc 50 - 55 1 - 47 1/33 - 37 A 40 - 47 60 - 90 76 - 81 158 - 162 156 - 132 168 - 131 37 - 115 25 - 119 E 1/28 - 1/13 92 - 114 132 - Nalla Sector 37 ii 578 - 630 and 630 to Bye pass 643 - 1035 17- D.A.V school Ashoka Enclave II iii C - 105 to C- 48 C - 138 to C - 166 C - 12 to Green Belt A - 59 to A-93 B-2 to B-30 Old Sher Shah Suri Road Old S.S.S road to Green belt Tilpat Road iv Sector 27A v Sector 27B vi Sector 27C vii Sector 27D viii Ashoka Enclave I & Main road 173 - 357 1 - 62 193 - 357 29 - 246 2 Prividing and laying storm water drains - Ballabgarh zone i Sec. 6, P.No. 21 to 30, 31-36,106-69,85 to 95, 51 to 106, 1 to 56 Sec. - 6 Sec. - 6 Dividing road of sector 4 & 7 up to disposal Construction of culverts
1342.00 248.00 540.00 290.00 290.00 270.00 270.00 450.00 180.00 814.00 450.00 136.00 315.00 1036.00 956.00 580.00 360.00 630.00 815.00 800.00 370.00 450.00 200.00 300.00 100.00 460.00 280.00 700.00 600.00 700.00 3550.00 4750.00 2550.00 1150.00 600.00 300.00 250.00 650.00
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
4053.00 1585.00 10800.00 0.60 0.91 1.06 1390.00 470.00 1300.00 1590.00 1960.00 1560.00 1100.00 2060.00 1100.00
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x
Div. Road 940 X-ing of sec.7 sec. 60 disposal Div. Road sec. 829 to disposal sec. 8 Div. Road of sec 8 & 7 T.W. No.8 to Mohna road at Bhagat singh road S.D. public school to Malerna road T.W. No. 12 to T. road disposal Subhash colony main road from S.D. public school to Anaj Mandi B.P. school road to T.W. No. 12.LHS
Contd..
104
S. No Location C Storm water drainage xi B.P. school road to Sihi gate road RHS xii Sihi gate at Tigaon roadb to Bhudutt colony gali No.1 xiii Punjab National Bank at D.M. road to B.P. school road xiv At 60' road to post office at 100' road xv Tigaon road Gurgaon canal at B.P. school road xvi Petrol pump road Gurgaon canal to T. road in sec.-3 xvii P.W.D. store to Chandawali disposal xviii D.M. road to Punjabi Dharamshala xix Punjabi Dharamshala to Uncha gaon octroi xx Chhajju Ram school road to Gupta hotel xxi Sec. - 4 Industrial Area xxii Construction of culverts 3 Prividing and laying storm water drains - NIT zone i NIT Industrial area Plot No. 1-16 17-26 16-34 36-49 50-58 32-34 63-66 ii NIT Sector 25 Plot No. 176-83 82-8/25 176-112 121-83 64-8/25 97/25-103/25 9-19 76-Hyderabad iii from Mujesher disposal area to Shona Road iv Sec.23-123A Devinding v Sec.22 H.No. 73-740,605,575 vi at Main road sec.22-23 Chowk/plot No. 105/24 to Autopiri Nalla Mujesher vii AC Nagar Nalla from Neelam to Bata viii Neelam to Bata to hardware ix Chimni Bai Dharamshala x B.K. Chowk to Hardware xi Bhagat singh chowk to B.K. chowk xii Bhagat singh chowk to Neelam chowk xiii Neelam chowk to B.K. xiv Lion club to Neelam Bata road xv Bus stand to Hotel Arya samaj xvi Chimni to 1,2 chowk xvii Sector 24 Plot No. 131-260 Sec-24 Plot No. 131-158 Autopiri Sec-24 to Gaunchi drain 4 Prividing and laying storm water drains in Approved Colonies 5 Prividing and constructing Storm water drainge Pumping Stations
Quantity 900 600 600 600 600 900 600 600 1050 900 600 990.00 1980.00 1100.00 780.00 3300.00 1600.00 950.00 1575.00 900.00 3000.00 2601.00 10.00
Unit mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt Nos
Diameter (mm) 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 Diameter (mm) 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 600 600 900
950.00 900.00 1050.00 760.00 760.00 900.00 700.00 840.00 1130.00 840.00 730.00 850.00 550.00 580.00 900.00 2000.00 1220.00 2180.00 3800.00 1550.00 2350.00 2850.00 1650.00 2150.00 3400.00 700.00 1300.00 1700.00 6500.00 1050.00 1100.00 1800.00
mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt mt
Diameter (mm) 900 900 2100
105
5.3.5
S. No
Priority Projects Parks and Play Grounds

Location No. of parks developed
18 23 8 15 18 23 9 23 7 16 11 3 5 7 27 13 0 12 8 0 0 76
E Parks and gardens 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NH 1 & 2 NH 3 & 5 Sector 21A,B & C Sectors 22, 23 & 23A Sector 14 Sector 15 Sector 15A Sector 16 Sector 16A Sector 17 Sector 19 Sector 18A Sector 18 HBC Old Faridabad Sector 28 Sector 29 Spring Field City Sector 37 Ashoka enclave I, II & Main Surya Nagar Dayal Bagh Ballabgarh
No. of parks to be developed

25 10 15 14 2 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 5 2 3 1 3 1 3 6 1 63
Area to be developed (Sq.mt)

51570 22899 39391 14910 6980 11205 3878 1544
Nature of work
18930
Levelling, landscaping, play areas, equipment, water fountains, electrification, compund wall construction etc
18130
30902
212203
106
5.3.6
S. No F Location Slum location
Priority Projects Slums

Infrastructure Needs (Quantity) Ward Houses Popl Relocation/ Rehabilitation/ Improvement Improvement Relocation Relocation Improvement Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Relocation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Improvement Improvement Rehabilitation Improvement Rehabilitation Relocation Relocation Rehabilitation Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement Relocation Improvement Relocation Improvement Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Improvement Relocation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Improvement Relocation Relocation Relocation Rehabilitation Relocation Relocation Rehabilitation Improvement Rehabilitation Relocation Improvement Relocation Relocation Relocation Relocation Relocation Relocation Improvement Relocation Improvement Improvement Relocation Rehabilitation Improvement Relocation Relocation Relocation Relocation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Relocation Improvement Relocation Relocation Hsg. Units to be relocated Roads (Km) Water supply (Km) UGD (Km) Drains (Km) Street lights (Nos.) 7 10 20 37 59 34 15 3 5 113 8 20 227 50 28 23 51 57 9 17 82 60 9 7 10 2 26 12 307 146 113 34 22 85 9 98 9 12 1,836 Public conveniences (Nos of Seats) 6 9 17 31 50 29 13 3 4 96 7 17 193 43 24 19 43 48 8 15 70 51 8 6 8 2 22 10 261 125 97 29 18 72 7 83 7 10 1,561
Old Faridabad 1 Sector 15A jhuggies near Azad colony 2 Sector 20 jhuggies along Badhkal road 3 Sector 27 Ekta nagar jhuggies near Budia Nallah 4 Sector 37 Anangpur Dairy jhuggies 5 Sector 28 jhuggies 6 Jhuggies behind Frick India 7 Jhuggies near Jarukal crossing 8 Kishan Majdoor colony jhuggies 9 Sector 18 HB colony jhuggies 10 Shastri colony jhuggies (sector 19) 11 Baselwa colony jhuggies 12 Jhuggies near M/s Gopalsons 13 Rajiv Gandhi colony jhuggies behind DLF Industrial area 14 Jhuggies in Sector 28 15 Jhuggies in 14/6, HS behind Sureka Ind. 16 Subash nagar jhuggies 13/3, Budia nala 17 Jhuggies along Anangpur 18 Dayal nagar jhuggies 19 Nahar nagar jhuggies 20 Jhuggies near Ankheer 21 Lakarpur khan majdoor camp jhuggies 22 Khan majdoor camp jhuggies Ballabgarh 23 Jhuggies along Gurgaon canal (sector 4) 24 Azad colony jhuggies near Good Year Factory 25 Jhuggies between Railway line, Sector 24 and Mujeshar cr 26 Jhuggies along Sohna road 27 Sector 25 jhuggies 28 Sector 25 jhuggies behind Hyderabad Asbestos company 29 Shiv sharada colony jhuggies 30 Jhuggies between Railway line besides BBMB 31 Sanjay colony jhuggies opp. Cotton mill 32 Jhuggies opp. Oswal steels 33 Sector 24 jhuggies facing sectors 22 & 23 34 Jhuggies along Gurgaon canal (sector 24) 35 Jhuggies near water park (sector 25) 36 Tigaon road jhuggies (Sector 3) 37 Jhuggies near Tube well No. 7 38 Jhuggies near Old DM Road bridge 39 Bapu nagar jhuggies 40 Jhuggies in south of Anaj mandi 41 Jhuggies in south village rehar kalahan NIT 42 Neelam bata jhuggies 43 Jhuggies along railway line and nalah 44 Krishna nagar 45 IK Park jhuggies 46 Jhuggies behind Railway compound 47 Market 1 jhuggies 48 Sector 2B park jhuggies 49 Sector 2C park jhuggies 50 Sector 2D park jhuggies 51 Millhard colony jhuggies 52 Jhuggies near Bata railway line and power house 53 Rajeev nagar jhuggies behind Hitkari 54 Press colony jhuggies near Saran 55 Indira colony jhuggies along railway line near Escorts hos 56 Auto pin jhuggies 57 Shastri nagar jhuggies (1st and 2nd Block on NH 2) 58 Bhagat singh colony jhuggies along railway line (NH 4) 59 Adarsh nagar jhuggies near NH 4 60 Kalyan puri jhuggies near Samshan ghat (NH 3) 61 Nehru colony jhuggies (NH 3) 62 Sant nagar jhuggies 63 3A park Gujarati colony jhuggies along widow home 64 Jhuggies in central green near BK and Rahul colony 65 Pakistani colony near Metro cinema 66 New Janta colony jhuggies near Samshan ghat 67 3A Ramlila ground jhuggies Total
20 13 14 15 17 14 14 18 18 17 17 14 14 14 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 23 23 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 22 22 22 1 1 3 1 9 9 8 9 8 8 8 8 9 9 4 5 3 4 8 10 12 11 11 9 11 11 8 4 11
71 84 265 86 193 388 384 471 253 118 20 50 1273 171 30 535 150 1200 397 215 158 362 1259 320 2398 98 187 818 895 67 63 87 68 182 157 19 15 79 39 231 50 2076 790 937 23 1092 116 55 398 120 800 355 498 234 2599 801 92 241 943 439 1611 800 63 478 68 120 53 29,708
247 231 871 368 710 1302 1377 2080 1188 545 115 184 3991 284 96 1689 700 8000 1777 990 800 1793 10000 2000 8354 321 615 2903 2115 322 331 260 339 650 1075 84 71 360 165 901 428 10829 5392 5161 230 6000 1000 359 2207 497 4000 1386 1216 764 10802 2998 302 1290 4109 1308 5069 3458 310 1899 410 562 234 132,424
84 265 384 30 535 1,259 2,398 67 182 157 19 79 39 790 23 1,092 116 55 398 120 355 2,599 241 943 439 1,611 478 120 53 14,931
0.21 0.31 0.60 1.11 1.77 1.01 0.46 0.10 0.16 3.39 0.24 0.60 6.80 1.51 0.84 0.68 1.52 1.70 0.27 0.52 2.47 1.80 0.28 0.22 0.29 0.06 0.77 0.36 9.20 4.39 3.40 1.03 0.65 2.55 0.26 2.94 0.26 0.35 55.09
0.18 0.27 0.51 0.94 1.50 0.86 0.39 0.08 0.13 2.88 0.21 0.51 5.78 1.28 0.72 0.58 1.30 1.45 0.23 0.44 2.10 1.53 0.24 0.19 0.24 0.05 0.65 0.31 7.82 3.73 2.89 0.88 0.55 2.17 0.22 2.50 0.22 0.30 46.82
0.13 0.19 0.36 0.66 1.06 0.61 0.28 0.06 0.09 2.04 0.14 0.36 4.08 0.91 0.50 0.41 0.91 1.02 0.16 0.31 1.48 1.08 0.17 0.13 0.17 0.04 0.46 0.22 5.52 2.63 2.04 0.62 0.39 1.53 0.15 1.76 0.16 0.21 33.05
0.31 0.47 0.91 1.66 2.65 1.51 0.69 0.15 0.23 5.09 0.36 0.89 10.20 2.27 1.26 1.02 2.29 2.55 0.41 0.78 3.70 2.70 0.42 0.33 0.43 0.09 1.15 0.55 13.81 6.58 5.10 1.55 0.97 3.82 0.39 4.41 0.40 0.52 82.63
107
6 INVESTMENT CAPACITY AND SUSTENANCE OF MCF

The investment capacity of the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad has been assessed through a Financial Operating Plan (FOP) which gives a multi-year forecast of finances for a medium term. In line with the phasing of identified investment from 2006/07 to 2011/12, the FOP has been generated for the same period for MCF. A salient feature of the FOP is that all outstanding dues, including debt and non-debt liabilities, have been taken into account. The accounts data collected between the years 2000-01 and 2005-06 are used as the basis for determining past trends in revenue and expenditure and arriving at appropriate growth assumptions for each income and expense item. After forecasting the revenue account, the capital investments proposed under the CIP are added to the forecast. The FOP is generated to assess the investment-sustaining capacity of these three agencies. The project funding structure comprises grants under the JNNURM framework (accounting for 70 percent of the funding), internal resources and loans. The level of investment that Faridabad can sustain is determined by studying the overall surpluses/ year-to-year opening balance and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). If the debt service coverage ratio (amount of surplus available to pay interest and to repay principal that is due) falls below 1.25 (i.e. less than 25 % cushion), then the investments are reduced gradually till the DSCR exceeds 1.25 in all the years in the forecast period. The main items of income and expenditure, classified into the revenue account and the capital account, are projected in the FOP under the following categories: Categories of FOP Projections o Revenue Account Receipts: Octroi, Taxes, Non Tax Sources, and Grants, Contribution and Subsidies o Revenue Account Expenditure: Establishment Operation and Maintenance Debt Servicing- Existing and New Loans Phasing of non debt liabilities, and Additional O&M o Capital Income and o Capital Expenditure
6.1
FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR THE CIP

Grants available under the JNNURM Framework (as percentage of investment proposed for funding by 2011-12 in urban governance and the infrastructure sectors -- 50% Central Govt. grants and 20% State Govt. grants) Available internal resources and improving upon the same by: o Revision of the Annual Rateable Value at certain levels o Revision of water and sewerage charges at specific intervals
MCF plans to raise resources and fund the CIP through:
108
o Maintenance of the collection performance of taxes and charges at certain minimum levels for current and for arrears o Borrowings
6.2
FINANCE PROJECTIONS
Current revenue sources are projected under built-in growth assumptions for income and expenditure items, to assess the impact of each such revenue enhancement measure being suggested. The projections also aim at estimating the surplus that will be available for servicing new debt. Part of the surplus, after meeting the additional O&M expenses on newly created assets and infrastructure, is translated into debt size and project size (grant component plus debt component) based on certain assumptions regarding interest rate, repayment method and loangrant mix. A spreadsheet FOP model has been customised to depict the financial position of MCF and the investment-sustaining capacity of MCF has been assessed based on the FOP assumptions. The model was used to calculate future surpluses under various scenarios involving combinations of internal revenue improvement, state support, financing terms, etc.
6.2.1
Municipal Account Growth Projections and Assumptions
The standard assumptions under which the projections are carried out and certain expenditure control and revenue augmentation measures proposed in line with the mandatory and optional reforms under the JNNURM framework are presented below. The detailed assumptions and workings are presented in Annexure 8. Table 41. Important assumptions made in the projections
Head Assumptions Guiding Factor for Assessing the Sustaining Capacity Surplus Positive surplus year-on-year basis DSCR Greater than 1.25 Project Financing for admissible Components under JNNURM Project Costing Unit Cost, with 6 % price contingency and 10% Physical contingency New/Additional O&M and from Water supply : 2% of Capital cost second year of investment 6% growth Sewerage : 5% of Capital cost is considered for the additional O&M Roads : 3% of Capital cost
Drains Street lighting Urban poor/ Slums River Conservation Solid waste management Others
Grant from GoI Grant from GoH If Loan for Balance funding Contribution to revolving fund Old Outstanding loans
: 2% of Capital cost : 8% of Capital cost : 2% of Capital cost : 3% of Capital cost : 12% of Capital cost : 2% of Capital cost
50% of Proposed Projects 20% of Proposed Projects Repayment in 20 years, with 5 year principal moratorium @ 8 % interest rate 25% of Grants starting from third year (in built in the model from 2009-10 onwards) As per existing terms and conditions
109
Head Revenue Expenditure Growth in Expenditure
Assumptions
Actual average growth with a minimum 8% and maximum of 10% (based on last five years trend) Pay Commission Revision 6th Pay Commission revision- additional 10% from 2007-08 every five years Assumption for assessment of MCFs sustainability Income Items Growth in revenue income Actual average growth with a minimum 8% and maximum of 15% (based on last five years trend) Property Tax: Propose to introduce from FY 2007-08 Annual growth in Assessment 5.0% per annum Revision of Tax 25% every 5 years Collection Performance 85% or current average whichever is higher by 2011-12 Assumption for assessment of PHED sustainability Income Items- Water Supply Individual Water Connections 6.53% per annum (current average) Initial Water Tariff revision by 100% in FY 2008-09 Next Revisions by 25% every three years Collection Performance 85% by 2011-12 Income Items- Sewerage Sewerage Connections 100% of Water supply connections by 2011-12 Sewerage Charge Same as water charge to start with (for full cost recovery) Next Revisions by 15% every five years Collection Performance 90% by 2011-12
6.3
INVESTMENT CAPACITY/ SUSTENANCE
Given the existing financial position of MCF, the revenue and capital accounts of MCF are projected against the growth scenario and assumptions presented above. The FOP is generated from the sustainable investment point of view in line with current growth trends against the identified investment of Rs. 2204 crores at constant prices till 2011-12. The results of the FOP are presented in Annexure 8 and the same is summarised below. MCF receipts are expected to be 2.1 times their current levels by 2011-12 under the projection scenario. The revenue improvement and expenditure control measures, coupled with the availability of grants under the JNNURM framework, takes the investment capacity of MCF to Rs. 758 crores (constant prices) over the next six years against an investment need of Rs. 2049 crores by 2011-12. Thus the investment sustenance capacity of MCF is 37 percent of identified need; this is under the assumption that as stipulated under JNNURM, MCF will contribute 25% of grant received to the State Revolving Fund from 3rd year onwards. In case revolving fund contribution is waived off, the sustainability against the investment need will significantly increase to 65 percent (Rs.1332 crores)
6.3.1
Impact of JNNURM Reforms on Investment Capacity
The total investment identified for MCF by 2011-12 is Rs. 2049 crores. It is observed that following the current growth trends (in the absence of any grant funding from JNNURM and associated reforms), MCF can sustain an investment of Rs. 246 crores (constant prices), which is 12 percent of the identified investment till 2011-12. The impact of various revenue improvement and expenditure control measures are assessed in terms of contribution/ addition to this base investment capacity.
110
Only expenditure control measures in the form of energy efficiency measures in all departments of MCF is observed to enhance the investment capacity by Rs. 20 crores which is 8 percent of the base investment capacity. And reforms in property tax like rationalisation of tax structure, identification of unassessed properties, regular revision of property records, improving collection efficiency etc would improve the investment capacity by Rs. 82 crores which is 33 percent of the base investment capacity
Investment Capacity (Rs. Crores) in Constant Prices
Base Investment Capacity Expenditure Controls PT Improvements Water/ Sewerage reforms JNNURM & Reforms
Expenditure Controls 20 Water/ Sewerage reforms 246 PT Improvements 82 JNNURM & Reforms 512
Base Investment Capacity 249
Also reforms in service provision like part privatisation of maintenance functions in water supply, sewerage, roads, street lighting, and conservancy sectors will increase the investment capacity by Rs. 246 crores, i.e. a significant 100 percent of the base investment capacity. Thus it may also be understood that reforms in service delivery and introduction of privatisation are the prime requirements for MCF to position itself as a better governed and financially sound Corporation. And availability of JNNURM grants and associated reforms in various sectors (property tax revenue enhancement, cost recovery on services, energy efficiency measures, improving governance aspects etc) are observed to contribute significantly to the base investment capacity by Rs. 512 crores that is about 208 percent of base investment capacity. The total investment capacity thus is Rs. 758 crores.
6.3.2
Fund Requirement
For the investment identified by 2011-12 of MCF of Rs. 2049 crores at constant prices and Rs. 2679 crores at current prices, the funding pattern as worked out in the FOP model is: Table 42. CIP Funding Pattern
S. No Mode of Funding Source Identified Investment till 2011-12 Sustainable Investment till 2011-12 1 Grants JNNURM GoI Grants JNNURM GoH Grants JNNURM 2 Loan Open Market/FIs 3 Own sources MCF Amount (Rs. Crores) Current Prices 2679.11 991.27 663.34* 473.82 189.53 47.28 280.65 % of Total Investment 100% 37% 67%* 48% 19% 5% 28%
* Of the sustainable investment of Rs. 991.27 crores (current prices), only Rs. 966.28 crores is being proposed under JNNURM and hence the grant figure reflects 67% against the eligible 70%.
In order to improve the sustainability/ investment capacity of MCF to the extent of requirement, it has to execute major revisions in property tax and implement reforms with respect to service delivery aspects as earlier suggested.
111
7 REFORM ACTION PLAN

7.1 BACKGROUND
The aim of JNNURM is to create economically productive, efficient, equitable and responsive cities by focusing on: a) improving and augmenting the civic, social and economic infrastructure, b) ensuring basic services for the poor including security of tenure at affordable prices, c) initiating wide- ranging urban sector reforms, primarily aimed at eliminating legal, institutional and financial constraints that are impeding investments in urban infrastructure and services, and d) strengthening municipal governments and their functioning in accordance with the provisions of the 74th CAA. Though one of the main aims of JNNURM is to finance infrastructure investments identified as part of the CDP, the larger objective of the mission is to initiate the much-needed reforms in ULBs. The mission has identified certain mandatory and optional reforms to be undertaken during the mission period by the ULB to be eligible for funding; the reforms are at the level of the State Government and the ULB. This section deals with the ULB-level reforms. Specific items have been identified under each reform. The timelines for implementation need to be submitted along with the MoA; the checklist of reforms is enclosed in Annexure 9.
7.2
MANDATORY REFORMS BY FARIDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Under JNNURM, there are six mandatory reforms that a ULB or the parastatal agencies delivering municipal services need to implement before 2011-12 to be eligible for funding under JNNURM. The specific reforms that need to be implemented are: Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting Introduction of a system of e-governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS for various services provided by the ULB Reform of property tax with GIS and achievement of collection efficiency of 85 percent of the demand by the end of the mission Levy of reasonable user charges with the objective that the full cost of O&M or the recurring cost is collected within the next seven years Internal earmarking in budgets for basic services to the urban poor, and Provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices
7.2.1
Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting
As part of the adoption of a modern accrual based double entry system of accounting, the MCF needs to implement the following actions and generate balance sheets: Complete audit formalities for all previous years Prepare accounting manual based on the National Municipal Accounting Manual (NMAM) Implement function and accounting codes Develop computer program for the double entry accounting system
112
Record and value all fixed and flexible assets and liabilities Carry out bank reconciliation work of all the bank accounts Train corporation staff for accurate account coding as per NMAM for the preparation of the balance sheet and the budget The MCF needs to fix the timelines for the above actions in the format presented in Annexure 9 and adhere to the timelines for the implementation of each action.
7.2.2
Introduction of a system of e-Governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS for various services provided
E-Governance is an opportunity to transform the Corporations commitment to be citizencentric, provide cost-effective services and enhance governance through improved access to accurate information and transparent and responsive democratic institutions. Thus e-Governance is no longer an experiment in administrative reform, but a permanent part of the governing process. For both government organizations and citizens, its advantages are far-reaching in comparison to investment in establishing e-Governance. The objectives of e-Governance reforms are:
Promote people-centric administration Common citizens should get the benefits of the
system of accurate billing. Corruption should be avoided.

Move from process accountability to productivity accountability and from transactional to transformative governance The process is computerized to increase productivity. Each
department of the Corporation has reports giving the exact statistics of how accountability is achieved through the system.
Reduce delays and ensure promptness in delivery of services -- Computerization would
ensure timely delivery of accurate service.

E-Administration Improve administrative processes by cutting cost, managing performance, making strategic connections within the local bodies and creating empowerment
E-Citizen and EServices Connect citizens to the local government by talking to citizens and supporting accountability; by listening to citizens and supporting democracy; and by improving public services. The Corporation needs to plan for e-Governance and extend this facility to all citizens through citizen facilitations centres (CFC) which could provide the following services: Registration of births and deaths Public grievance redressal as part of an interactive web site and also at CFCs Property tax payments through CFC Works Management System and E-Procurement Fully computerized pay roll and pension system Fully automated building plan permissions Document Management System GIS-based property tax and overall GIS for engineering, water supply and other services
113
7.2.3
Property tax on GIS platform and proposed achievement of collection efficiency of at least 85%
JNNURM requires certain reforms in property taxes with the broad objective of establishing a simple, transparent, non-discretionary and equitable property tax to encourage voluntary compliance; the same is to be brought under the GIS platform. With regard to reforms in the property tax system, the first step is to introduce property tax. In this regard, MCF needs to carry out the following actions: Draft byelaws and rules for the implementation of property tax Council resolution for the implementation of property tax Identify the system of property tax (capital, ARV or area-based unit rate, etc.) Institute house tax assessment system (self- assessment or by ULB) Prepare the inventory of house tax assessments Map all the properties on the GIS platform
7.2.4
Levy of reasonable user charges by MCF for all services to recover full cost of O&M
JNNURM requires the levy of user charges on different municipal services, with the objective of securing effective linkages between asset creation and asset maintenance and ultimately leading to the self-sustaining delivery of urban services. Water Supply: MCF currently levies water tariff, which was last revised in the year 2003-04; the current cost recovery is only about 76% and collection performance is below 70%. Hence, MCF needs to revise the tariff to achieve full cost recovery by 2011-12 and a collection performance of above 85%. Sewerage: The current system is able to service only 50 percent of the area and population; hence, cost recovery of just 13 percent in the service is of no significance. Upon completion of the CDP proposed projects as well as the YAP-II projects, MCF needs to plan to rationalize user charges towards achieving full cost recovery. Solid Waste Management: No charge or tax is levied for solid waste management. As part of the introduction of property tax, MCF needs to implant a SWM cess or sewerage charge. It also needs to implement door-to-door to collection and scientific disposal as part of this reform.
7.2.5
Internal earmarking within local bodies, budgets for basic services to the urban poor and provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices
JNNURM endorses the provision of basic services to the urban poor with the objective of providing security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and sanitation. In addition, delivery of other existing universal services of the government for education, health and social security will be ensured. In this regard, MCF needs to earmark a fixed percentage of funds (25% of ULB budget or in proportion of urban poor); MCF also needs to provide access to basic minimum services to all urban poor citizens.
114
7.3
OPTIONAL REFORMS AT ULB LEVEL
The mission has identified seven optional reforms that a ULB needs to implement to be eligible under JNNURM. Ideally, the ULB should implement at least two reforms each year. The specific items under each reform, which MCF needs to implement, are listed below. The difference between the mandatory and optional reforms exists only in terms of the initiation of the reform. All mandatory reforms need to be started immediately, whereas of the optional reforms, a local body is free to initiate any two reforms every year: 1. Revision of byelaws to streamline the approval process for construction of buildings, development of site, etc. 2. Earmarking of at least 20-25% of developed land in all housing projects (both public and private agencies) for EWS and LIG category with a system of cross subsidization 3. Revision of byelaws to make rain-water harvesting mandatory in all buildings and adoption of water conservation measures 4. Framing of byelaws for reuse of recycled water 5. Administrative reforms, i.e., reduction in establishment costs by adopting the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS), not filling posts falling vacant due to retirement, etc., and achieving specified milestones in this regard 6. Structural reforms like decentralisation of functions at ward level 7. Encouraging PPP -- With regard to private sector participation, the following activities can be considered: door-to- door collection, maintenance of water supply operations, sewerage treatment plant operations, disposal and land fill site operations, citizen facilitation centres
7.4
REFORMS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY GOVT. OF HARYANA
In addition to the mandatory and optional reforms to be carried out by ULBs, JNNURM has prescribed some reforms for implementation by the State Governments. There are seven mandatory and three optional reforms. However, the repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act and the reform of the Rent Control Act can be treated as optional in the case of water supply and sanitation projects.
7.4.1
Mandatory Reforms
1. Implementation of decentralization measures as envisaged in the 74th CAA - The State should ensure meaningful association and engagement of ULBs in planning the function of parastatal agencies as well as the delivery of services to the citizens. 2. Repeal of ULCRA, if applicable in the State 3. Reform of rent control laws, balancing the interests of landlords and tenants, if applicable in the State 4. Rationalization of stamp duty to bring it down to no more than five per cent within the next seven years
115
5. Enactment of the public disclosure law to ensure the preparation of a medium-term fiscal plan of ULBs and parastatal agencies and the release of quarterly performance information to all stakeholders 6. Enactment of the Community Participation Law to institutionalize citizens participation and introduction of the concept of the Area Sabha in urban areas 7. Assigning or associating elected ULBs with city planning function; over a period of seven years, transferring all special agencies that deliver civic services in urban areas to ULBs and creating accountability platforms for all urban civic service providers in transition
7.4.2
Optional Reforms
1. Simplification of legal and procedural frameworks for the conversion of land from agricultural to non-agricultural purposes 2. Introduction of the Property Title Certification System 3. Introduction of a computerised process of registration of land and property
116
ANNEXURES
117
Annexure 1: JNNURM Interactive Workshop

Date: 8th July 2006 1.0
S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
List of Participants
Name Dr. Avthar Singh, IAS Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS Dr. Anupama Sharma, IAS Mr. SC Sharma Mr. Anirood Kumar Mr. DPS Negi Mr. Jayachandran Prof. Usha Raghupathy Mr. Ajay Pal Mr. Anil Gosawmi Mr. Anil Mehta Mr. BS Kaliram Mr. Dharam Singh Mr. DK Soni Mr. DR Bhaskar Mr. DR Mittal Mr. Harichand Mr. IJ Sikka Mr. IJS Sidhu Mr. LR Virmani Mr. ND Vashista Mr. NK Katara Mr. NS Chauhan Mr. Radhya Shyam Sharma Mr. Rajendra Mohan Mr. Rajesh Nanda Mr. Ravi Singla Mr. Rishi Pal Singh Mr. RK Bansal Mr. RK Pachuja Mr. S. Poonia Mr. SC Pundir Mr. SD Saini Mr. SK Bansal Mr. Sudeep Das Mr. Umraw Singh Mr. Vinit Kumar Mr. VK Bathla Ms. Anita Verma Ms. Sunita Verma Mr. Yogesh Chand Mr. SS Arora Mr. Anil Batra Mr. Mahavir Prasad Dr. Neeraja Designation Ld. Commissioner, Gurgaon Division Commissioner, MCF Dy. Commissioner, Gurgaon Division Director, UE & PE, GoI Director, UD, GoI OSD, Mission Directorate, UE & PA, GoI Dy. Director, Ministry of Housing and PA Professor, NIUA, New Delhi Additional GM, NBCC EE, Irrigation Department, Faridabad EE, MCF City Magistrate, Faridabad AE, MCF SE, HUDA EE, MCF EE, MCF NBO SDE, PWD (NH), Faridabad Chief (PM & T), BMTPC Finance Controller, MCF AE, MCF SE, MCF DTP, Faridabad AE, MCF SE, Planning, NBCC Draughtsman, MCF ATP, MCF Accounts Officer, MCF EE, MCF SE, Irrigation Department, Faridabad EE, MCF EE, MCF Chief Town Planner, MCF SE, Public Health, Faridabad HUDCO Research Officer, NBO AE, MCF EE, Public Health, Faridabad Secretary, MCF Joint Commissioner, MCF Dy General Manager, NBCC Administrative Officer, MCF Superintendent, MCF Joint Commissioner, MCF Architect
118
2.0
Newspaper Coverage
Faridabad development plan to be finalised by August-end Bijendra Ahlawat Tribune News Service
Faridabad, July 9 The work of preparing the City Development Plan (CDP) under the ambitious Jawaharlal Lal National Urban Renewal Mission for Faridabad city began here today with an interactive meeting between officials of the Union Government, the state government and the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF), which would be implementing the plan. Infrastructure advisor and consultancy agency, CRISIL, has been asked to prepare and submit the CDP within a months period. The final plan is likely to be submitted and approved by the government by August-end. It was organised by the MCF. More than Rs 2000 crore was likely to be sanctioned under the scheme. The Commissioner, MCF, told the officials that the project would be focusing mainly on the urban infrastructure and governance besides the basic services to the urban poor, especially those living in slum areas. He said while the MoU for the project was likely to be signed very soon a state-level steering committee had already been constituted under the chairmanship of the Chief Minister. He said the CDP would be prepared by M/s CRISIL Ltd, which had agreed to submit the report by August 15. Mr.. Ravi Poddar, Head, Business Development, CRISIL, claimed that the work would be completed within the given timeframe, provided that the relevant details and data were supplied immediately. He said the JNURM project was meant for about 63 cities of the country, which had a population of more than 10 lakh. Faridabad was the only city of Haryana to be included in it. He claimed the authorities concerned would have to implement mandatory as well the optional reforms for effective results and handling the problems relating to the scheme. About 50 per cent of the total budgetary funds would be made available by the Union Government. The state government would have to ensure at least 20 per cent of the financial contribution of the total costs. The remaining 30 per cent would be generated by the MCF from its own resources. According to experts, the implementing agency had to ensure that the process and system of revenue collection for services, including house tax and other user charges, was efficient and hurdle-free. If the project was to be a success, sustainability had to be of primary importance. The JNURM was to be implemented between the period of 2006- 2011 and it was expected to create a broad-based civic infrastructure for the requirement of the year 2035, stated the officials. It was announced that various stakeholders, including representatives of residents and resident welfare associations, would be taken into confidence for getting details for preparing the CDP. It may be recalled that the development plan of Faridabad has 91 urban sectors, 41 revenue villages, with the population projected to be around 17. 5 lakh in the year 2011. With more than 45 per cent of the population residing in unauthorised colonies and slum areas, the city has an area of 208 sq km for cleaning and scavenging, 450 km of sewer lines, 550 km of water supply lines, 420 tube wells, 1118 km of metalled roads, 73 approved colonies, several unapproved colonies, more than 22,000 streetlight points and as many as 24 fully developed sectors.
119
Annexure 2: MCF Officials Workshop

S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
Name Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS Mr. NK Katara Dr. RC Agrawal Mr. Amar Singh Mr. Anil Batra Mr. Anil Mehta Mr. Bhim Singh Mr. BS Dhillon Mr. BS Mareloda Mr. BS Panwar Mr. DC Sharma Mr. Dharam Singh Mr. DK Soni Mr. DR Bhaskar Mr. DR Mittal Mr. Gopi Chand Sharma Mr. Inderjeet Makkar Mr. JP Sharma Mr. JS Malik Mr. Kali Charan Garg Mr. Kulbir S Dhake Mr. Kuldeep Atri Mr. LC Chauhan Mr. LR Virmani Mr. MP Mudgal Mr. ND Vashista Mr. Nirmal Dhama Mr. NS Chauhan Mr. OP Verma Mr. OP Yadav Mr. Prem Pal Sharma Mr. Radhya Shyam Sharma Mr. Raj Pal Verma Mr. Rajesh Nanda Mr. Ram Singh Mr. Ramparakash Mr. Ravi Singla Mr. RK Bansal Mr. RK Goel Mr. RS. Bodhan Mr. S. Poonia Mr. Satish K Agrawal Mr. SC Pundir Mr. SD Saini Mr. Shyam Singh Designation Commissioner, MCF SE, MCF Civil Surgeon, Faridabad AE, MCF Superintendent, MCF EE, MCF Inspector, District Industries Centre Assistant Architect, MCF WRI, MCF ZTO, MCF SSI, MCF AE, MCF SE, HUDA EE, MCF EE, MCF WRI, MCF Sr. Stenographer, MCF ZTO, MCF ADSO WRI, MCF Tehsildar, MCF SDO, DHBVNL SSI, MCF Finance Controller, MCF HTI, NIT Zone, MCF AE, MCF ZTO, MCF DTP, Faridabad AE, MCF District Attorney, MCF AE (H), MCF AE, MCF AE, MCF Draughtsman WRI, MCF AE, MCF ATP, MCF EE, MCF AE, MCF EE, MCF SE, DHBVN EE, MCF Chief Town Planner, MCF AE, MCF
120
S.No. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Name Mr. SK Bansal Mr. SK Sharma Mr. Sohanlal Mr. SR Tanwar Mr. SS Arora Mr. Tek Singh Mr. Umar Farooq Mr. Vinod Kumar Sardhana Mr. VK Bathla Mr. Satish Parasher Ms. Anita Yadav
Designation SE, Public Health, Faridabad ADFO ZTO, MCF CHD Administrative Officer, MCF JE AE, MCF ADA, MCF EE, Public Health, Faridabad DTP, MCF Secretary, Information
121
Annexure 3: City Stakeholder Workshop 16th July 2006

S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
Name Mr. Mr. Mr. Col Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Dr Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Dr Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS NK Katara Sunderlal Sharma S Kapoor HR Gupta BS Dhillon VR Narayanaan Ravi Vaslidev Rajiv Chawla Amrendra Kumar Singh Sagar Arun Bajaj Shuchi Parash JN Batra Lajpat Rai Anand Kumar Nalin Ranjan Jena Rajeev Mahajan Sudharshan Kumar Surendran Dhanesh Gupta SP Verma Lalit Khurana Nitin Srivastav Santosh Kumar Chandan Kaul Kislay Srikamal Vivek OP Goyal Ramnik Prabhakar Kailash Sharma RC Bhatia Satyendra Bhadana Jai Prakash Verma JK Luthra MM Ahuja V. Raj Babul IJ Kalia Kanta Arora Ashok Bhatia Ram Bhatia RK Gupta BK Thakral TD Jatwani Designation Commissioner, MCF SE, MCF Senior Deputy Mayor Faridabad Industries Association Faridabad Industries Association Association of Architects, Faridabad Faridabad Chamb. of Comm & Industry Gen. Secretary, Faridabad Small Ind. Asso. President, Faridabad Small Industries Asso. Centre for Social Action President, Janhit, Society for Social Welfare President, Manav Councillor Association Chairman RWA, Sector 15 Dayal Bhag Dayal Bhag Colony Association Dayal Bhag Colony Association Dayal Bhag Colony Association Dayal Bhag Colony Association Dist. President, Haryana Vyapar Mandal Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony Faridabad Nagar Social Foundation Feedback Ventures Feedback Ventures Feedback Ventures Feedback Ventures Finance Secretary, RWA Sector 16 General Secretary, MAF General Secretary, Manav General Secretary, RWA, 3C General Secretary, RWA, Sector 14 General Secretary, RWA, Sector 15A General Secretary, RWA, Sector 29 General Secretary, Sector 16A HAT MAF MEC Nehru Ground Welfare Association Nehru Ground Welfare Association Nehru Ground Welfare Association President, RWA Sector 16A President, RWA, Sector 15
122
S.No. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
Name Mr. TD Jatwani Col. Rishi Pal Goel Mr. Dinesh Sackar Mr. Balraj Gupta Mr. Balrajgupta Mr. RP Nagpal Maj General (Retd), SK Datt Mr. Anil Mehta Mr. Surendra Dinga Mr. DP Bhadana, Advocate Mr. NK Arora Mr. KG Modi Mr. Jitendra Bhatia Mr. Pankaj Bhatia Mr. Gurmeet Singh Mr. Sitaram Sharma Dr VL Jatwani Mr. MP Nayar Mr. BM Batish, Retd. EE Mr. SR Rawat Mr. PC Masta Mr. HS Malik Mr. DL Kathuria Mr. HS Dingra Mr. Sanjay Wadwa Mr. Yash Pal Mr. Chandilal Mr. Anand Kumar Bhatia Mr. Manoj Bhatia Mr. Pritam Singh Bhali Mr. KC Sharma Mr. JS Narula Mr. ND Dua Mr. SK Arora, Advocate Mr. AK Shegal Mr. Rakesh Ahuja Mr. VK Chkrawarthi Mr. Ajit Mr. SR Tewatis Mr. JK Luthra Mr. ML Gupta Mr. PL Sehgal Mr. PP Gupta Mr. Dharam Singh Mr. Harish Chandra Taneja Mr. Chand Singh Mr. Harjit Singh Mr. Balkar Singh Mr. Jagat Singh Mr. Rajkumar Kaushik Mr. CL Jain Mr. Barten Singh
Designation President, RWA, Sector 15 President, RWA, Sector 15A President, RWA, Sector 18A President, RWA, Sector 29 President, RWA, Sector 29 President, Sector 16 President, WCRA, Sector 21A Resident Resident Resident 1040/14 Resident 673/15 Resident 941/14 Resident Sector, 1D Resident Sector, 1D Resident, 1498/55 Resident, 698/55 Resident, 82/15A Resident, Sector 3 Resident, Sector 7 Resident, Sector 7 Retd. District Attorney RWA Sector 19 RWA Sector 3D RWA Sector 3D RWA Sector 3D RWA Sector 3D RWA Sector 55 RWA, 2E RWA, 2E RWA, 3C RWA, 3D/35 RWA, Nehru ground RWA, Nehru ground RWA, Sector 11 RWA, Sector 14 RWA, Sector 14 RWA, Sector 14 RWA, Sector 16 RWA, Sector 19 RWA, Sector 29 RWA, Sector 3D RWA, Sector 3D RWA, Sector 3D RWA, Sector 4 RWA, Sector 4 RWA, Sector 4A RWA, Sector 4A RWA, Sector 55 RWA, Sector 55 RWA, Sector 55 RWA, Sector 7A RWA, Sector 7B
123
S.No. 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129
Name Mr. Mr. Mr. Capt. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr.
Ranbir Singh HN Sharma KC Agrawal RK Sharma DK Jain OP Wadhwa GPS Chopra VN Sudha Anil Batra AS Bansal BC Majelanda BK Kardan BS Panwar DC Sharma Dharam Singh DK Solonki DR Bhaskar DR Mittal Dr. SS Yadav Indra Jeet Makkar LC Chauhan LR Virmani Mahavir Prasad Nawal Singh ND Vashishta Nirmal Dhama OP Kardan Rajesh Wadva Rakesh Mudgil SK Agrawal Sunita Verma Vinod Kumar
Designation RWA, Sector 7B RWA, Sector 7D RWA, Sector 7D RWA, Sector 8 Secretary, RWA, Sector 14 Secretary, RWA, Sector 18A Tresurer, RWA, Sector 16A Vice President, Sector 16 Superindentent SDO, MCF WRI, MCF AE, MCF ZTO, MCF SSI, MCF AE, MCF JE, MCF EE, MCF MCF MoH, MCF Stenographer SSI, MCF Finance Controller, MCF Joint Commissioner, MCF JE, MCF AE, MCF ZTO, MCF JE, MCF Draughtsman GBWSS AE, MCF Joint Commissioner, MCF MCF
124
2.0
Press Notification for Stakeholder workshop
125
3.0
Invitation Letter to Stakeholders
126
4.0
Newspaper Coverage in Dainik Jagaran, Dainik Baskar & Amar Ujjala- 17 July
127
Annexure 4: Summary of Discussions with Stakeholders

The discussions with Faridabad stakeholders were held at three levels. The agenda for the discussion and its outcome is presented below. Levels of Stakeholder Consultations: Municipal officials Elected representatives (MP and MLAs) City stakeholders (industry representatives, resident welfare associations, NGOs, councilors and citizens) Discussion Agenda: Inform stakeholders about the JNNURM concept Discuss the CDP process adopted for Faridabad Discuss the issues and potential of Faridabad Explore strategies and actions required to achieve the vision
Municipal Officials Workshop 11 July, 2006 The MCF officials workshop was organised on July 11, 2006 to get feedback from officials on issues related to services offered by MCF, and their perspective on the preparation of the CDP. The workshop was chaired by the Municipal Commissioner, MCF, where the CDP consultants, CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory, explained the approach to the CDP and invited feedback and suggestions from the officials. In addition to MCF officials, officials from HUDA, PHED, the Electricity Board and District Industries Centre also attended the workshop. Focus Areas: The following areas were identified by the Commissioner and the municipal officials. Planned road network with good riding quality, exiting roads to be widened as per the master plan, encroachments to be removed, all junctions to be improved and beautification to be undertaken Bypass for NH traffic to be explored and developed to reduce traffic congestion Multi-level parking system to be provided at critical junctions Metro rail to be extended to Faridabad as per the NCR Plan The existing defunct sewerage system to be rehabilitated and extended to cover the entire city A Comprehensive Storm Water Drainage Master Plan to be prepared Ongoing efforts on developing parks to be expedited to develop 400 parks E-Governance and computerisation to be undertaken in all departments and all municipal functions Scientific solid waste disposal facility to be developed Shri Avatar Singhji Bhadana, MP, Faridabad 15th July 2006 Focus Areas : Identified issues and suggested actions Faridabad, which is a part of the Mewat region of Haryana is a backward region. Hence, the planning for Faridabad should be in the regional perspective to support and promote regional economy. An alternative source of water to be identified and developed as reliability on ground water in the long run is not feasible; the availability of Agra Canal, which supplies water to Gurgaon, needs to be explored Improved educational and infrastructure facilities to attract investments in the IT sector
128
A SEZ to be developed in the vicinity of Faridabad; a bypass for NH traffic to be explored and developed to reduce traffic congestion; this project may be considered as a part of SEZ to improve its viability Connectivity with New Delhi to be improved (Badarpur flyover and parallel roads to be identified) Smt. Sharda Rathod, MLA Vallabgarh -15th July 2006 Focus Areas: Issues In the near future, Faridabad will face problems mainly in three sectors i.e., water supply, sewerage & drainage, and internal/ regional connectivity, if planned interventions are not given importance. The number of slums in Faridabad has been continuously increasing. Slum-dwellers in Faridabad do not have access to most of the basic services; the concentration of these locations in industrial and other environmentally sensitive areas is also a main problem that should be immediately tackled. Increasing crime rate in Faridabad is a major fallout of the failure of various urban poor/ slum development initiatives and the intended benefits having not reached/ not reaching the actual beneficiaries. Faridabad is not in a position to compete with other cities in attracting new investments in the commerce and industry sectors Suggested Actions Comprehensive master plans need to be prepared immediately for all municipal services and implementation of the same should be monitored in an integrated manner to avoid unnecessary and recurring expenditure. Slum-dwellers need to be provided with basic infrastructure and based on consensus they should be to be rehabilitated or relocated for better living conditions. Provide infrastructure and distribute the benefits equitably to all the residents of Faridabad; build confidence in people to actually contribute to the development process. Shri AC Choudary, MLA NIT, Faridabad-13th July 2006 Focus Areas: Issues Faridabad, once the sixth largest industrial estate in Asia, is now at the ninth position. It is losing its importance due to the lack of infrastructure. Faridabad lacks good educational and medical facilities. Slowdown and the closure of certain units has created an unemployment problem. Suggested Actions Revive industrial growth, improve infrastructure facilities, provide better higher educational facilities and plan the development of commercial and residential areas to recapture lost ground as the preferred satellite destination of Delhi Attract population working in Faridabad but residing outside Faridabad Develop affordable housing plots for EWS and LIG Provide infrastructure facilities in all JJ colonies Widen all main roads and improve all junctions Undertake city beautification on a priority basis Improve connectivity with Delhi, by developing the Badarpur Flyover. Develop more power projects and encourage captive power plants Develop tourism by marketing Badkal and Surajkund
129
Shri Mahendra Pratap Singhji, MLA Faridabad -16th July 2006 Focus Areas: The following issues were identified and actions suggested by him. Faridabad has not developed in accordance with the growing population and infrastructure requirements. Over 50% of the colonies are unauthorised. Faridabad, being an industrial hub, residential plots for EWS and LIG need to be developed as per requirement and affordability, to address the problem of unauthorised colonies and slums. The defunct sewerage system needs to be upgraded and a comprehensive master plan for both sewerage and storm water drainage needs to be prepared and projects implemented. All Juggi-Jopdis (slums) need to be rehabilitated at the same site or resettled at an appropriate location. The future proposal should include plots for EWS and LIG families too. Faridabad lacks modern health facilities, the BK Hospital needs to be modernised and a medical college set up in the city. A mini-stadium needs to be developed to promote sports. Plan for storage of rainwater from the hills surrounding Faridabad. Traffic & Transportation All the city main corridors need to be have four lanes (Gurgaon-Faridabad, Badkal-Pali and Badarpur Border Bypass, NIT-Pali, Balbgarh-Sona, Balbagarh-Tigaon, etc). KPT Bypass and the bypass via Palli-Lakepur-Ferozpur must be developed on a priority basis. The Badkal Bridge needs to be widened. An Under bridge at the Old Faridabad-Ferozpur chandli railway crossing needs to be provided. There are proposals to build an eight-lane flyovers on GT Road, and flyover at the Badkal turn in old Faridabad, Bata Junction, Nelam Junction, Balabgarh and Faridabad Junction Eight-lane roads and an eight-lane flyover on GT Road are needed. Economy Any new large-scale or water-intensive or polluting industries need to be located outside Faridabad (Palwal or Hodal). All small industries located in residential zones are to be relocated by developing plots of appropriate size. The thermal power plant located in the heart of city needs to be relocated and its capacity should be enhanced to address the growing demand. Installation of captive power plants must be promoted and incentives for the use of solar energy provided. City Stakeholder during Workshop: July 16, 2006 Focus Areas: The following issues were identified and actions suggested. General Issues Identified: Lacks storm water drainage system Power supply is inadequate power. Electrical sub-stations need to be installed in each sector. Operation of industrial units in residential areas is an area of concern. Infrastructure of villages within the MCF limits is ignored and needs to be addressed. Arrest further growth of unauthorised colonies and slums. There is a lack of proper infrastructure in sectors developed by HUDA. Faridabad, in general, lacks medical facilities at city level and particularly all developed sectors lack primary medical facilities. Development of community centres to be undertaken in all sectors.
130
Sectors are of the opinion that there should be frequent meetings with RWAs to address local problems. Faridabad, being a manufacturing hub, should aim to develop and attract the service industry to achieve overall development. Involve the industry and institutions in the development process. Traffic & Transportation All internal roads to be made of cement concrete and all roads to have proper footpaths Connectivity with Delhi, Noida and Gurgaon to be improved The road design should be at higher level than the sidewalks, which can be channelised to recharge ground water Transport nagars (truck terminals) to be planned at various locations Existing service lanes to be improved and new service lanes to be provided on all major roads to reduce accidents on highways CNG filling stations to be developed in Faridabad, and all auto and transport vehicles to be converted to CNG in order to allow these vehicles into Delhi A railway under bridge at Munjesar Phatak and a bridge on Gudia Nalla need to be built to improve connectivity with surrounding areas. Connectivity with Delhi to be improved and the Badarpur flyover proposal to be implemented at the earliest Sanitation facilities need to be improved and a proper green cover provided in all all sectors along the railway track and NH. All traffic junctions to be improved and beautified Parking facilities to be improved on all busy locations Slow-moving vehicular traffic to be restricted on roads carrying high speed/volume of traffic All intra-city bus stands to be improved and equipped with proper signboards and bus timings need to be maintained To enhance the life of roads and also to improve the outlook of the city, all roads should have underground service corridors. Land use Planning Decongest the core city by relocating various wholesale markets (rice mandi, steel market, vegetable market) Develop sectors in a planned manner and in conformity with land use in the adjacent areas Locate new industries in the villages within MCF Develop areas earmarked as parks with the participation of RWAs. Though there are about 15,000 industries in Faridabad, only 3000 plots have been planned. There is need for proper planning to overcome non-confirming land use all over the city. Develop industrial plots of all sizes as per the requirements of industry Adopt the industrial cluster development approach while planning for new industrial estates, instead of allocating land to industries in an ad hoc way Shift forging industrial units located in residential areas Modify byelaws to accommodate existing small plots and explore the possibility of vertical growth to service better Water Supply Currently, many bore wells are defunct. New bore wells need to be installed after proper investigation about the availability and quality of water. Regularise unauthorised water connections to improve cost recovery. Rain water harvesting needs to be promoted. Sewerage and Storm Water Drainage There is a need to prepare a comprehensive drainage master plan for the city. All encroachments along the drainage channels and the sides of the roads need to be removed.
131
The low level areas should be connected to near by canal or water channels. There is a need for greater coordination between MCF, HUDA, the irrigation and other concerned departments. The Agra Canal, which passes through the city, must be covered to avoid mosquito menace. The defunct sewer system has to be revived and mixing of sewerage with storm water drainage checked. All industrial units must have their own or common effluent treatment plants. Street Lighting Improve street lighting coverage in sectors and maintain streetlights. Promote the use of solar energy. Solid Waste Management Currently, the collection system is very poor. Hence, solid waste is being dumped in open drains and sewer lines. Improve solid waste management by promoting door-to-door collection and source segregation. Implement scientific disposal methods. Segregate industrial waste from domestic waste. Social Infrastructure and other Suggestions Rain water harvesting should be encouraged. The location of the thermal power plant in the heart of city is causing pollution. It needs to be relocated, this will help in realising high value land in the heart of city If the thermal power plant is to be retained, then the non-working electrostatic plates need to be repaired; this will reduce the pollution. Use of the right technology will reduce pollution resulting from the thermal power plant. All earmarked open spaces should be developed with proper green cover.
132
Annexure 5: Municipal Finance Assessment of Past 5 Years Income & Expenditure Statement
Income and Expenditure Statement S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Rupees Lakh Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General Account Opening Balance Part I - REVENUE I Revenue Income A Own Sources Tax Revenue 1 Octroi Compensation 2 Property Tax 3 Other Taxes Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) Non Tax Revenue 1 Duty on sale of property 2 Building permission and Development charges 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 4 W ater charges 5 Sewerage charges 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 7 Fee from HUDA 8 Other License and Fees 9 Interest on Investments 10 Other Miscellaneous Income Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) Total O wn Sources B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions 1 General Grants 2 SFC Revenue grants 3 Other Revenue grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Revenue Income II Revenue Expenditure A Salaries/ Wages & Allowances 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Pension 3 Water supply 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street Lighting 7 Town planning 8 Fire Fighting 9 Gardens 10 Public Health & Sanitation 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total Salary Expenses B Operation & Maintenance 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Water supply 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 Street Lighting 6 Town planning 7 Fire Fighting 8 Gardens 9 Public Health & Sanitation 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total O&M Expenses C Debt Servicing 1 Principal & Interest repayment 2 Others Total Debt Servicing Expenses Total Revenue Expenditure Operating Status - Revenue Account 258 1,105 1,391 2,039 2,605 2004-05 2005-06
1,891 161 2,053
2,125 603 2,728
1,065 627 1,692
2,601 677 3,278
2,469 945 3,414
1,159 327 271 551 10 1 1,312 34 87 151 3,904 5,957
1,066 354 117 519 9 1 864 122 1 116 3,170 5,898
1,002 377 83 908 11 1 532 320 69 98 3,399 5,092
1,510 432 200 1,006 15 2 799 787 7 79 4,838 8,116
1,710 360 146 1,102 16 2 423 1,730 44 96 5,629 9,043
62 62 6,019
76 76 5,974
80 80 5,172
43 43 8,159
9,043
408 861 394 1,009 28 54 58 326 74 36 3,247
378 973 376 1,054 26 54 53 307 74 31 3,326
424 980 412 1,097 30 65 72 356 89 39 3,564
453 1,129 439 1,222 34 63 75 377 91 47 3,930
511 1,356 536 1,415 47 78 79 431 134 50 4,639
181 9 3 60 2 1 0 0 0 257
437 14 4 65 2 1 2 0 1 525
74 4 5 61 0 2 1 1 1 149
102 9 5 60 2 2 1 1 1 182
145 7 33 90 2 2 2 3 2 287
20 20 3,524 2,495 -
18 18 3,868 2,106
32 32 3,745 1,427
843 843 4,955 3,204
412 412 5,338 3,705
133
Income and Expenditure Statement S. No. Head of Account Part II - CAPITAL I Capital Income A Own Sources 1 Sale of Lands 2 Sale of Municipal Property 3 Lease Income Total Own Sources B Loans 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
517
3,106
1,682
1,872
359
517 30
3,106 -
1,682 -
1,872 -
359 87
C Grants & Contributions 1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants 2 SFC Development Grants 3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Capital Income Capital Expenditure 1 General Administration 2 Roads and drains 3 Water supply 4 Sewerage 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street lighting 7 Gardens & Parks 8 Slum development 9 Fire services 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 11 Town planning 12 Other Grant related works 13 Others Total Capital Expenditure Utilisation Status - Capital Account Summary - General Account Opening Balance Revenue Account Status Capital Account Status Suspense Account Status Closing Balance II
5 1,600 37 3 1,644 2,192
172 50 98 321 3,427
115 50 153 75 394 2,075
61 160 6 227 2,099
244 147 58 1,393 1,841 2,287
24 819 2,730 26 175 28 30 0 28 19 49 3,927 (1,735)
82 1,709 1,920 57 73 416 83 58 1 43 160 89 4,692 (1,265)
32 732 1,284 17 608 37 47 1 11 70 74 2,914 (839)
49 2,010 1,704 48 427 187 59 3 15 81 98 100 4,781 (2,682)
112 2,073 2,351 2 651 225 5 16 5 1,381 6,821 (4,534)
258 2,495 (1,735) 88 1,105
1,105 2,106 (1,265) (555) 1,391
1,391 1,427 (839) 60 2,039
2,039 3,204 (2,682) 44 2,605
2,605 3,705 (4,534) 28 1,804
134
Income & Expenditure Statement-Sectotral Contribution

Sectoral Contribution/ Share S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Avg (200102 to 200506)
Percentage Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General Account Opening Balance Part I - REVENUE I Revenue Income A Own Sources Tax Revenue 1 Octroi Compensation 2 Property Tax 3 Other Taxes Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) Non Tax Revenue 1 Duty on sale of property 2 Building permission and Development charges 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 4 Water charges 5 Sewerage charges 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 7 Fee from HUDA 8 Other License and Fees 9 Interest on Investments 10 Other Miscellaneous Income Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) Total Own Sources B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions 1 General Grants 2 SFC Revenue grants 3 Other Revenue grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Revenue Income II Revenue Expenditure A Salaries/ Wages & Allowances 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Pension 3 Water supply 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street Lighting 7 Town planning 8 Fire Fighting 9 Gardens 10 Public Health & Sanitation 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total Salary Expenses B Operation & Maintenance 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Water supply 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 Street Lighting 6 Town planning 7 Fire Fighting 8 Gardens 9 Public Health & Sanitation 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total O&M Expenses C Debt Servicing 1 Principal & Interest repayment 2 Others Total Debt Servicing Expenses Total Revenue Expenditure
31 3 34
36 10 46
21 12 33
32 8 40
27 10 38
29 9 38
19 5 5 9 0 0 22 1 1 3 65 99
18 6 2 9 0 0 14 2 0 2 53 99
19 7 2 18 0 0 10 6 1 2 66 98
19 5 2 12 0 0 10 10 0 1 59 99
19 4 2 12 0 0 5 19 0 1 62 100
19 6 2 12 0 0 12 8 1 2 61 99
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
1 1 100
12 24 11 29 1 2 2 9 2 1 92 -
10 25 10 27 1 1 1 8 2 1 86
11 26 11 29 1 2 2 10 2 1 95
9 23 9 25 1 1 2 8 2 1 79
10 25 10 27 1 1 1 8 3 1 87 -
10 25 10 27 1 1 2 8 2 1 88
5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 -
11 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 14
2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5
5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7
1 1 100 -
0 0 100
1 1 100
17 17 100
8 8 100 -
5 5 100
135
Sectoral Contribution/ Share S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Avg (200102 to 200506)
Percentage Part II - CAPITAL I Capital Income A Own Sources 1 Sale of Lands 2 Sale of Municipal Property 3 Lease Income Total Own Sources B Loans
24 24 1 -
91 91 -
81
81
89 89 -
16 16 4 -
60
60 1
C Grants & Contributions 1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants 2 SFC Development Grants 3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Capital Income Capital Expenditure 1 General Administration 2 Roads and drains 3 Water supply 4 Sewerage 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street lighting 7 Gardens & Parks 8 Slum development 9 Fire services 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 11 Town planning 12 Other Grant related works 13 Others Total Capital Expenditure II
0 73 2 0 75 100
5 1 3 9 100 -
6 2 7 4 19 100 -
3 -
11 -
5 0 2 16 3 13 39 100
0 11 100
6 3 61 81 100
1 21 70 1 4 1 1 0 1 0 1 100
2 36 41 1 2 9 2 1 0 1 3 2 100
1 25 44 1 21 1 2 0 0 2 3 100
1 42 36 1 9 4 1 0 0 2 2 2 100
2 30 34 0 10 3 0 0 0 20 100
1 31 45 0 1 11 2 1 0 1 2 6 0 100
136
Income & Expenditure Statement-Growth Trends

Trends in Income & Expenditure S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 to 2002-03 to 2003-04 to 2004-05 to SAGR (2001- CAGR (20012002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 02 to 2005-06) 02 to 2005-06) Percentage per Annum Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General Account Opening Balance Part I - REVENUE I Revenue Income A Own Sources Tax Revenue 1 Octroi Compensation 2 Property Tax 3 Other Taxes Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) Non Tax Revenue 1 Duty on sale of property 2 Building permission and Development charges 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 4 Water charges 5 Sewerage charges 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 7 Fee from HUDA 8 Other License and Fees 9 Interest on Investments 10 Other Miscellaneous Income Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) Total Own Sources B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions 1 General Grants 2 SFC Revenue grants 3 Other Revenue grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Revenue Income II Revenue Expenditure A Salaries/ Wages & Allowances 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Pension 3 Water supply 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street Lighting 7 Town planning 8 Fire Fighting 9 Gardens 10 Public Health & Sanitation 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total Salary Expenses B Operation & Maintenance 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Water supply 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 Street Lighting 6 Town planning 7 Fire Fighting 8 Gardens 9 Public Health & Sanitation 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total O&M Expenses C Debt Servicing 1 Principal & Interest repayment 2 Others Total Debt Servicing Expenses Total Revenue Expenditure
12 274 33
(50) 4 (38)
144 8 94
(5) 40 4
25 81 23
7 56 14
(8) 8 (57) (6) (5) 2 (34) 253 (98) (23) (19) (1)
(6) 6 (29) 75 15 44 (38) 163 4,891 (16) 7 (14)
51 15 140 11 42 40 50 146 (90) (19) 42 59
13 (17) (27) 10 6 18 (47) 120 550 22 16 11
12 3 7 22 14 26 (17) 170 1,313 (9) 12 14
10 2 (14) 19 13 25 (25) 166 (16) (11) 10 11
23 23 (1)
5 5 (13)
(46) (46) 58
(100) (100) 11
(29) (29) 14
(11) (11) 11
(8) 13 (5) 4 (9) 1 (9) (6) 0 (12) 2
12 1 10 4 16 20 37 16 20 23 7
7 15 7 11 13 (3) 4 6 2 21 10
13 20 22 16 40 24 5 14 48 8 18
6 12 8 9 15 10 9 8 18 10 9
6 12 8 9 14 10 8 7 16 9 9
142 57 7 8 27 (47) 364 (42) 243 104
(83) (74) 24 (6) (80) 320 (70) 89 4 (72)
37 157 6 (3) 368 (39) 18 102 35 23
42 (30) 581 52 15 32 227 196 123 57
35 28 155 13 82 67 135 86 101 28
(5) (7) 76 11 8 16 52 60 81 3
(11) (11) 10
77 77 (3)
2,530 2,530 32
(51) (51) 8
636 636 12
112 112 11
137
Trends in Income & Expenditure S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 to 2002-03 to 2003-04 to 2004-05 to SAGR (2001- CAGR (20012002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 02 to 2005-06) 02 to 2005-06) Percentage per Annum Part II - CAPITAL I Capital Income A Own Sources 1 Sale of Lands 2 Sale of Municipal Property 3 Lease Income Total Own Sources B Loans
500 500 (100)
(46) (46) -
11 11 -
(81) (81) -
96 96 (100)
(9) (9) 30
C Grants & Contributions 1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants 2 SFC Development Grants 3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Capital Income II Capital Expenditure 1 General Administration 2 Roads and drains 3 Water supply 4 Sewerage 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street lighting 7 Gardens & Parks 8 Slum development 9 Fire services 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 11 Town planning 12 Other Grant related works 13 Others Total Capital Expenditure
(100) (100) 168 (100) (81) 56
(33) 56 23 (39)
(47) 220 (100) (92) (42) 1
300 (100) 24,382 713 9
73 (100) 40 (100) 41 8,063 153 7
12 (100) (100) (45) 12 356 3 1
246 109 (30) 181 138 199 91 12,100 50 748 84 19
(61) (57) (33) (100) (76) 46 (55) (19) (31) (73) (56) (17) (38)
55 175 33 182 (30) 401 25 280 30 15 32 64
129 3 38 (96) 53 20 (100) 65 6 (93) 1,306 (100) 43
92 57 2 (100) 48 52 141 (0) 3,103 3 153 351 (100) 22
48 26 (4) (100) (47) 39 68 25 379 (14) (27) 131 (100) 15
138
Per Capita -Income & Expenditure Statement

Per-Capita Income & Expenditure S. No. Head of Account CAGR in Avg (2001Per Capita 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 02 to 2005Amounts (% 06) p.a) Rs. per Annum 10.96 11.38 11.82 12.27 12.74 <------- Popl in Lakhs
Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General Account Opening Balance Part I - REVENUE I Revenue Income A Own Sources Tax Revenue 1 Octroi Compensation 2 Property Tax 3 Other Taxes Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) Non Tax Revenue 1 Duty on sale of property 2 Building permission and Development charges 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 4 Water charges 5 Sewerage charges 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 7 Fee from HUDA 8 Other License and Fees 9 Interest on Investments 10 Other Miscellaneous Income Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) Total Own Sources B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions 1 General Grants 2 SFC Revenue grants 3 Other Revenue grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Revenue Income II Revenue Expenditure A Salaries/ Wages & Allowances 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Pension 3 Water supply 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street Lighting 7 Town planning 8 Fire Fighting 9 Gardens 10 Public Health & Sanitation 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total Salary Expenses B Operation & Maintenance 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Water supply 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 Street Lighting 6 Town planning 7 Fire Fighting 8 Gardens 9 Public Health & Sanitation 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p Total O&M Expenses C Debt Servicing 1 Principal & Interest repayment 2 Others Total Debt Servicing Expenses Total Revenue Expenditure
173 15 187
187 53 240
90 53 143
212 55 267
194 74 268
171 50 221
3 50 9
106 30 25 50 1 0 120 3 8 14 356 543
94 31 10 46 1 0 76 11 0 10 278 518
85 32 7 77 1 0 45 27 6 8 288 431
123 35 16 82 1 0 65 64 1 6 394 661
134 28 11 87 1 0 33 136 3 8 442 710
108 31 14 68 1 0 68 48 4 9 352 573
6 (1) (17) 15 9 20 (27) 156 (19) (14) 6 7
6 6 549
7 7 525
7 7 438
4 4 665
710
5 5 577
(14) (14) 7
37 78 36 92 3 5 5 30 7 3 296 -
33 85 33 93 2 5 5 27 7 3 292
36 83 35 93 3 6 6 30 8 3 302
37 92 36 100 3 5 6 31 7 4 320
40 106 42 111 4 6 6 34 11 4 364
37 89 36 98 3 5 6 30 8 3 315
2 8 4 5 9 6 4 3 12 5 5
16 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 23 -
38 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 46
6 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 13
8 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 15
11 1 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 22
16 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 24
(9) (10) 70 7 4 11 47 54 74 (1)
2 2 321 -
2 2 340
3 3 317
69 69 404
32 32 419
21 21 360
104 104 7
139
Per-Capita Income & Expenditure S. No. Head of Account CAGR in Avg (2001Per Capita 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 02 to 2005Amounts (% 06) p.a) Rs. per Annum
Part II - CAPITAL I Capital Income A Own Sources 1 Sale of Lands 2 Sale of Municipal Property 3 Lease Income Total Own Sources B Loans
47 47 3
273 273 -
142 142 -
153 153 -
28 28 7
129 129 2
(12) (12) 25
C Grants & Contributions 1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants 2 SFC Development Grants 3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants Total Grants & Contributions Total Capital Income Capital Expenditure 1 General Administration 2 Roads and drains 3 Water supply 4 Sewerage 5 Conservancy/ SWM 6 Street lighting 7 Gardens & Parks 8 Slum development 9 Fire services 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 11 Town planning 12 Other Grant related works 13 Others Total Capital Expenditure II
0 146 3 0 150 200
15 4 9 28 301 -
10 4 13 6 33 176 -
5 -
19 -
10 0 4 31 6 23 75 205
13
0 18 171
12 5 109 145 179
8 (100) (100) (47) 8 340 (1) (3)
2 75 249 2 16 3 3 0 3 2 4 358
7 150 169 5 6 37 7 5 0 4 14 8 412
3 62 109 1 51 3 4 0 1 6 6 247
4 164 139 4 35 15 5 0 1 7 8 8 390
9 163 185 0 51 18 0 1 0 108 535
5 123 170 1 3 38 9 3 0 2 6 27 2 388
42 21 (7) (100) (49) 34 62 20 361 (17) (30) 122 (100) 11
140
Annexure 6: CIP- Demand Gap Analysis, Costing and Investments

Sector/ Head
A Water Supply 1 Daily Supply/ (gross) 2 Treatment capacity 3 Roads Covered with Distribution Network 4 Elevated Storage capacity w.r.t Supply 5 Refurbishment of Old Distribution Network 6 Metering System
Existing and Desired Level Existing Desired Unit Level Level
Service Gap by Year 2011/ 2021 Existing Demand Gap (2006)
Service Gap by Year 2031 Estimate Demand Gap (2016)
Costing Unit
Unit Cost Investment by 2011- Investment beyond 12 2011-12 Total Investment Need
Rs. Lakhs
188 0 75 5 Litres % % % 315 100 85 33 240.00 0.00 910.00 11.37 672.32 672.32 1468.07 224.11 432.32 672.32 558.07 212.74 182.00 32,883 672.32 672.32 1468.07 224.11 896.33 896.33 1957.43 298.78 224.01 224.01 489.36 74.67 146.81 MLD ML Km. ML Km. No.s 45.00 25.00 4.00 16.00 4.00 0.03
Rs. Lakhs
43,448.68 19,454.43 16,808.02 2,232.30 3,403.87 728.00 822.08 48,289.76
Rs. Lakhs
19,420.34 10,080.60 5,600.33 1,957.43 1,194.74 587.23 21,910.32
Rs. Lakhs
62,869.02 29,535.03 22,408.35 4,189.73 4,598.60 1,315.23 822.08 70,200.08
B Sewerage 1 Under Ground Drainage 1 Population Coverage 50 % 2 UGD Network/ Road Length Covered 52 % 3 Sewerage Treatment (Against generation) 60 % 4 Intermediate pumping stations, Pumping machinery & Transmission mains C Urban Roads, Transport & Traffic 1 Road Length per Capita 0.96 2 % Town Area under Roads/ Circulation 9.91 3 Average Road Width 6.66 4 Distribution of Road by Type i Concrete 4 ii Black Top 74 iii WBM 0 iv Cut Stone/ Earthen/Others 22 Total Municiapl Road Length 5 Upgradation (Roads) i BT to Concrete ii WBM to Black Top iii Earthen to Black Top 6 New Formation (Roads) i Concrete ii Black Top iii WBM 7 Public Transport System (bus shelters and other facilities) 8 Improvements to identified Major Roads Widening/ Strengthening (Roads) ROB/ Fly-overs Minor bridges/ Skywalks Utility Shifting for Road Improvements 9 Land Acquisition for Road Improvements 10 Traffic Management/ Junction Improvements
70 80 100
637024 637.68 115.00
1494046 1381.72 537.86
857022 744.04 422.86 807
1494046 1381.72 537.86
1991853 1842.29 717.07
497808 460.57 179.21 269
Persons km. ML ML
18.00 52.00 16.00
13,392.67 21,988.54 12,908.56 41,192.61
8,290.30 9,318.96 4,301.06 20,165.71
21,682.97 31,307.50 17,209.61 61,358.32
meters % meters % % % %
0.96 9.91 7.00 15 85 0 0 48.00 920.00 0.00 250.00 1218.00 259.07 1468.07 0.00 0.00 1727.15 211.07 548.07 0.00 -250.00 509.15 70.36 0.00 250.00 140.71 298.07 0.00 121.80 85.26 4 10 121.80 21.07 8 259.07 1468.07 0.00 0.00 1727.15 345.43 1957.43 0.00 0.00 2302.86 86.36 489.36 0.00 0.00 575.72 28.79 0.00 0.00 57.57 489.36 0.00 km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. L.S km. km. Nos. Nos. km. Acre Nos. 70.00 10.00 14.00 55.00 13.50 7.50 2,000.00 65.00 1,000.00 500.00 25.00 35.00 85.00 4,925.01 3,500.00 7,739.31 4,024.00 2,000.00 5,541.90 4,000.00 5,000.00 3,045.00 737.38 680.00 2,015.00 3,166.44 6,606.33 6,940.02 3,500.00 10,905.74 10,630.34 2,000.00 8,909.84 6,000.00 7,500.00 3,045.00 737.38 1,190.00
51.81 2 5 0 6
3,367.94 2,000.00 2,500.00 510.00
Contd..
141
Sector/ Head
D Storm Water Drains 1 Road Length Covered with Drains 2 Distribution by Type i Kutcha Open ii Pucca Open iii Pucca Closed 3 Desilting & Strengthening of Primary Drains 4 Upgradation i Kutcha to Pucca Open ii Kutcha to Pucca Closed iii Pucca Open to Pucca Closed 5 New Pucca Open Drains 6 New Pucca Closed Drains E Street Lighting 1 Spacing Between Lamp Posts 2 Distribution by Type i Tube Light ii High Power iii High Mast Lamps 3 Replacements i Tube Light with High power lamps 4 New Installation i Tube Light ii High Power iii High Mast Lamps
Existing and Desired Level Desired Existing Unit Level Level
Costing Unit
Unit Cost Investment by 2011- Investment beyond 2011-12 12 Total Investment Need
Rs. Lakhs
66 0 100 0 % % % % 150 0 30 70 100 800.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 74.00 2590.72 0.00 777.22 1813.50 74.00 1790.72 0.00 -22.78 1813.50 74.00 0.00 0.00 22.78 0.00 1790.72 2590.72 0.00 777.22 1813.50 74.00 3454.29 0.00 1036.29 2418.00 74.00 863.57 0.00 259.07 604.50 74.00 0.00 0.00 604.50 863.57 0.00 km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km. km.
Rs. Lakhs
25,559.74
Rs. Lakhs
15,797.14
Rs. Lakhs
41,356.88
4.00 9.00 10.00 8.50 12.00 14.00
296.00 193.67 25,070.07 2,465.25
296.00 5,138.26 10,362.88 1,152.30
592.00 5,331.93 10,362.88 25,070.07 3,617.56
55 76 24 0
meters % % %
30 30 70 0.1
22036 16681 5354 1
57572 17272 40243 12
35536 591 34889 11 0 591 34889 11
57527 17272 40243 12
76762 23029 53657 15
19235 5757 13414 3 0 5757 13414 3
Nos. Nos. Nos. Nos. Nos. Nos. Nos. Nos. Rupees per Fixture 4,000.00 3,700.00 7,000.00 10,500.00 21.87 2,442.23 1.16 3,909.93 213.01 938.98 0.32 4,353.94 234.88 3,381.21 1.47 8,263.87
F Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation 1 Waste Generated per capita 2 Collection Performance 3 Density Factor 4 No. of Trips per Vehicle/ day 5 Vehivle Carrying Capacity Hand Carts (@ Privatisation of 80% HHs) 6 Disposal Site Land Fill Infrastructure (as per CPHEEO Standards) Composting Plant 7 Secondary Collection (Area Coverage) 1 Container Bins - 2.5 MT (Addl 5 bins for servicing) 2 Dual Loaded Dumper Placers 8 Slum Population per Seat of Public Convenience
377 85.8 3.03 5 0.00
Grams % Ratio Nos. % HHs Acres % % Sq. Km No. of Trips Persons
377 100 0.35 2.50 20 67 33 0.20 3 90
480
654
594.94
775
Tonne
209.00 890 0.00
402.25 1173 58.66
193.25 283 58.66 137.97 67.95 481 25 1561 98
402.25 1173 58.66
477.03 1564 146.66
74.79 391 88.00 275.93 135.91
Tonne Nos. Acres Tonne/ Day Tonne/ Day
2.50 0.03 20.00 7.50 2.00 0.25 5.00 8.50
483.11 8.49 1,173.28 1,034.75 135.91 120.25 125.00 829.13
186.97 11.73 1,759.92 2,069.51 271.82 29.00 25.00 -
670.09 20.22 2,933.20 3,104.26 407.72 149.25 150.00 829.13
0.40
359
180 2 410
661 27 1971
661 27 1971
777 32 0
116 Nos. 5 Nos. 0 Seat 0 Units (P&U)
Contd..
142
Sector/ Head
G Urban Poor/ Slums' Improvement 1 Slum Improvement - Rehabilitation/ Housing 2 Slum Improvement - Infrastructure 3 Slum Improvement - Land Acquition H Land use/ Development Plan 1 Acquisition of Reserved lands 2 Existing Land use Survey (GIS based) 3 Others
Existing and Desired Level Desired Existing Unit Level Level
Costing Unit
Unit Cost Investment by 2011- Investment beyond 2011-12 12 Total Investment Need
Rs. Lakhs
14928 47 0 Units Units L.S 1.45 65.00 -
Rs. Lakhs
24,701.18 21,646.18 3,055.00 14,010.00 13,950.00 60.00 8,294.00
Rs. Lakhs
-
Rs. Lakhs
24,701.18 21,646.18 3,055.00 23,760.00 23,700.00 60.00 9,136.00 750.00 400.00 850.00 200.00 96.00 2,750.00 550.00 240.00 3,300.00 305,262.90
465
325
Acres L.S L.S
30.00 60.00 -
9,750.00 9,750.00 842.00
I Other Projects 1 As Identified by the ULB a River Conservation/ Protection b Tree Plantation & Gardens c Fire Services d Stadium Improvements e Night Shelters/ Travellers Bungalows f Eco. Infra Relocations/ Truck Terminals/ Slaughter house etc g Urban Governance/ E-Governance/ GIS h Others (System Stduies etc) i MCF new office and Regular Capital Works Total Investment Identified
4 8 6
2 3 2
L.S L.S L.S L.S Nos. Nos. L.S Nos. L.S
750.00 400.00 850.00 200.00 16.00 250.00 550.00 30.00 3,300.00
750.00 400.00 850.00 200.00 64.00 2,000.00 550.00 180.00 3,300.00 211,871.15
32.00 750.00 60.00 93,391.75
143
Annexure 7: Investment Phasing

Sector/ Component Water supply 1 Source/ system capacity augmentation 2 Treatment capacity augmentation 3 Distribution network augmentation 4 Elevated Storage capacity augmentation 5 Refurbishment of old Distribution Network 6 Metering System Sewerage 1 UGD - Network 2 UGD - STPs 3 UGD - Pumping Machinery Roads & Urban Transport 1 Roads Upgrdation 2 Roads New Formation 3 Public Transport/ Improvements/ BRTS 4 Road Infra Dev (Imp. Roads) incl. Widening 5 Land Acquisition for Road Improvements 6 Traffic Management/ Jn. Improvements Drains 1 Drains Upgradation 2 Drains New Formation 3 Desilting & Strengthening of Primary Drains Street Lights 1 Replacement - Tube Lights 2 New Installation - Tube Lights 3 New Installation - High power Lamps 4 New Installation - High Mast Lamps Investment till 2011-12 (Rs. Lakhs) 43,449 19,454 16,808 2,232 3,404 728 822 48,290 13,393 21,989 12,909 41,193 8,425 11,763 2,000 17,587 737 680 25,560 194 25,070 296 2,465 22 2,442 1 2006-07 514 223 291 1,808 700 1,108 244 244 2007-08 10,773 9,727 335 437 274 7,197 2,679 4,518 4,296 2,456 400 1,108 332 5,230 68 5,014 148 616 5 611 0 2008-09 2009-10 (Rs. Lakhs) 11,357 6,784 9,727 5,042 335 446 1,021 1,021 274 274 13,793 2,679 6,597 4,518 9,940 2,806 3,127 400 2,964 406 238 5,220 58 5,014 148 488 488 14,247 2,679 7,696 3,873 6,883 805 600 5,478 3,828 68 3,761 372 5 366 0 2010-11 7,691 5,883 446 1,362 10,375 2,679 7,696 11,680 1,231 3,916 600 5,728 204 5,014 5,014 367 366 0 2011-12 6,329 5,883 446 2,679 2,679 6,585 1,231 3,916 1,200 238 6,268 6,268 377 11 366 -
144
Sector/ Component Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation 1 New Vehicles (Primary Collection) 2 New Vehicles (Secondary and Disposal) 3 Acquiring New Disposal Site 4 Infrastructure at Disposal Site 5 DLDPs & Container Bins 6 Public Convenience Systems Urban Poor/ Slums 1 Slum Improvement - Rehabilitation/ Housing 2 Slum Improvement - Infrastructure 3 Slum Improvement - Land acquisition Land use/ Dev. Planning 1 Acquisition of Reserved lands 2 Existing Land use Survey (GIS based) 2 Others
Investment till 2011-12 (Rs. Lakhs) 3,910 8 483 1,173 1,171 245 829 24,701 21,646 3,055 7,035 6,975 60 8,294 750 400 850 200 64 2,000 550 180 3,300 204,896
2006-07 83 82.91 417 417 3,067
2007-08 1,970 2 121 1,173 446 61 165.83 4,011 3,247 764 60 60 1,049 100 340 19 110 63 417 35,201
2008-09 2009-10 (Rs. Lakhs) 607 365 2 121 259 155 61 165.83 207.28 4,011 3,247 764 1,395 1,395 1,675 188 100 298 100 400 110 63 417 48,486 4,329 4,329 1,395 1,395 2,078 263 100 213 100 22 400 110 54 817 40,282
2010-11 547 2 121 155 61 207.28 6,175 5,412 764 2,093 2,093 1,927 300 100 600 110 817 45,867
2011-12 339 2 121 155 61 6,175 5,412 764 2,093 2,093 1,149 22 600 110 417 31,994
Others 1 River Conservation/ Protection 2 Tree Plantation & Gardens 3 Fire Services 4 Stadium Improvements 5 Night Shelters/ Travellers Bungalows 6 Eco. Infra Relocations/ Truck Terminals/ Slaughter 7 Urban Governance/ E-Governance/ GIS 8 Others (System Stduies etc) 9 MCF new office and Regular Capital Works Total
145
Annexure 8: Financial Projections- Financial Operating Plan

Financial Year ------>
Figures in Rs. Lakhs MCF A SUMMARY i Opening balance ii Revenue Receipts iii Revenue Expenditure iv Municipal receipts v Municipal expenditure New Debt Servicing Exp. New O&M Exp. ULB contribution/ Rev. Surplus Transfer for Asset creation vi Operating Surplus/ Deficit for the year vii Municipal Surplus/ Deficit for the year viii Closing balance ix Performance Indicators DSCR DSR PT Collection Performance Water Charges Collection Performance Cost Recovery (Water Supply) - only Charges Cost Recovery (Sewerage) - only Charges B REVENUE ACCOUNT RECEIPTS I Own Sources 1 Octroi Compensation 2 Property Tax 3 Other Taxes 4 Duty on sale of property 5 Building permission and Development charges 6 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 7 Water charges 8 Sewerage charges 9 Fee from HUDA 10 Other non-Tax revenues & Misc. Income Total II Transfers & Revenue Grants 1 General Grants 2 SFC Revenue grants 3 Other Revenue grants Total Total Revenue Receipts 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Estimate 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Projection 2010-11 2011-12
258 6019 3524 8317 7469
1105 5974 3868 9711 9425
1391 5172 3745 7596 6949
2039 8159 4955 10530 9965
2605 9043 5338 11652 12453
2495 847 1105
2106 286 1391
1427 648 2039
3204 566 2605
3705 -801 1804
1804 8182 5865 11640 7113 0 0 374 2317 4527 6331 5.77 6% 100% 77% 49% 169%
6331 9044 6908 22011 22095 0 42 5010 2136 -84 6247 5.40 5% 100% 79% 58% 206%
6247 13203 11675 31884 33848 58 497 6505 1528 -1964 4283 25.52 0% 100% 80% 136% 296%
4283 14484 13105 31567 32631 108 1234 5698 1379 -1064 3219 13.21 1% 100% 82% 149% 264%
3219 14909 14658 35734 38226 234 1960 6258 251 -2492 727 2.05 2% 100% 83% 135% 245%
727 17174 16576 34179 34002 552 2792 4218 599 177 904 2.08 3% 100% 85% 160% 359%
0 1891 161 1159 327 271 551 10 1312 274 5957 0 0 62 62 6019
0 2125 603 1066 354 117 519 9 864 240 5898 0 0 76 76 5974
0 1065 627 1002 377 83 908 11 532 488 5092 0 0 80 80 5172
0 2601 677 1510 432 200 1006 15 799 875 8116 0 0 43 43 8159
0 2469 945 1710 360 146 1102 16 423 1872 9043 0 0 0 0 9043
0 2383 685 1413 405 179 949 429 861 822 8126 0 0 57 57 8182
0 2266 777 1549 444 196 1283 623 944 900 8983 0 0 61 61 9044
0 3703 883 1697 487 215 2697 1435 1034 987 13137 0 0 66 66 13203
0 3552 1003 1859 533 236 3228 1788 1133 1081 14412 0 0 71 71 14484
0 3454 1139 2037 584 258 3124 1809 1242 1185 14832 0 0 77 77 14909
0 3407 1293 2233 640 283 4069 2507 1361 1298 17091 0 0 83 83 17174
146
Financial Year ------>

Figures in Rs. Lakhs MCF EXPENDITURE III Establishment IV O&M Expenses O&M on Current Assets 1 General Administration & Tax Collection 2 Water supply 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 Street Lighting 6 Town planning 7 Others O&M on New Assets Phasing of Non-Debt Liabilities V Debt Servicing Outstanding Debt Liabilities - Old Outstanding Debt Liabilities - New VI Contribution to Revolving Fund/ SUIF Total Revenue Expenses C CAPITAL ACCOUNT RECEIPTS Own Sources/ Sale of lands Capital grants & Contributions 1 TFC/ SFC/ MP/ MLA Grants 2 Project Specific & Other grants 3 JNNURM Grants from GoI 4 JNNURM Grants from GoH Total III Loans Total Capital Receipts EXPENDITURE IV CAPEX I II
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04 Actuals
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07 Estimate
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10 Projection
2010-11
2011-12
3247 257 181 9 3 60 0 2 2
3326 525 437 14 4 65 0 2 3
3564 149 74 4 5 61 0 0 4
3930 182 102 9 5 60 0 2 4
4639 287 145 7 33 90 0 2 10
5072 307 154 7 36 98 0 2 10 0 0 486 0 5865
6052 329 163 7 39 105 0 3 11 42 0 485 0 6908
6617 353 173 8 43 114 0 3 12 497 0 4 58 4146 11675
7234 378 183 8 48 123 0 3 13 1234 0 4 108 4146 13105
7909 406 194 9 53 133 0 3 14 1960 0 4 234 4146 14658
8647 435 206 9 58 143 0 3 15 2792 0 4 552 4146 16576
20
18
32
843
412
3524
3868
3745
4955
5338
517 5 1640
3106 172 148
1682 115 278
1872 61 166
359 244 1598
1628 129 827 624 250 1830 0 3458 1248
1758 139 893 7269 2907 11209 0 12967 15187
1899 150 965 10675 4270 16060 723 18681 22173
2051 162 1042 9425 3770 14399 633 17083 19526
2215 175 1125 11246 4498 17045 1565 20825 23568
2392 189 1215 8143 3257 12805 1808 17005 17426
1644 30 2192 3927
321 0 3427 4692
394 0 2075 2914
227 0 2099 4781
1841 87 2287 6821
147
Annexure 9: Reform Check List

1- MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING DESIRED OBJECTIVES: Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in Municipal Accounting, with the objective of having a modern accounting system based on double-entry accrual principles, leading to better financial management, transparency and self-reliance. I CURRENT STATUS
a. Please provide a short note on the present method of accounting being followed in your city b. Please provide the status of completion and adoption of accounts, and if they have been audited and published in the last 3 years Year Adopted by Council Audited Published 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 No No No Pre audit -System of Government Pre audit -System of Government Pre audit -System of Government Yes No
No No No
c. Please state whether State/city has drawn up its own accounting manual
d. Please state whether State/city has adopted NMAM i. without modifications

No No
ii. with modifications.
If NMAM has been adopted with modifications, please state these: Not Applicable e. Please state whether State has modified its current appropriate laws and regulations to be in compliance with the double-entry accrual principles. If yes, please provide date of such modification. (in form GO if any) Yes No Date
f.
If applicable, please provide current status of implementation of double-entry accrual system: State government has floated tenders to shortlist consultants
148
II a
TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS Resolution by Government expressing commitment to establish modern municipal accounting system. (Note: This resolution should be passed within 6 months of signing of MOA under JNNURM and a copy submitted to MOUD.) :
Year 1 2005-06 b c d e f g h i j GO/Legislation/Modification of rules for migrating to double-entry accounting system Appointment of consultants for development of State manual (either based on NMAM or independently) Completion and adoption of manual Commence training of personnel Appointment of field-level consultant for implementation at the citylevel Notification of cut-off date for migrating to the double-entry accounting system Business Process Re-engineering (if required) Valuation of assets and liabilities Drawing up of opening balance sheet (OBS): i Provisional OBS ii Adoption of provisional OBS iii Finalization of OBS Full migration to double-entry accounting system
Year 2 2006-07
Year 3 2007-08
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
149
Year 1 2005-06 l m n o p q r Production of financial statements (income-expenditure accounts and balance sheet) Audit of financial statements Adoption of accounts Preparation of outcome budget Complete re-vamp of the Public Financial Management (PFM) cycle, which includes internal accounts Credit rating of ULB (if required) Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify) i Capacity building of all ULB staff ii Disclosures and public information
Year 2 2006-07
Year 3 2007-08
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
150
2 E-GOVERNANCE DESIRED OBJECTIVES: Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in E-Governance, with the objective of having a transparent administration, quick service delivery, effective MIS, and general improvement in the service delivery link I CURRENT STATUS Remarks Currently 50% of the work is computerised, it is planned to fully computerised all the activities by year 2007 All complaints are accepted by office of Deputy Commissioner, MCF Manual Manually, Single entry cash based accounting system, MCF have recently introduced computers for accounts department Manual Manually, through notice board, newspapers and PRO Data is entered in computers, but not on PIS package- not available Manually, at collection points Manually Not available Year 1 2005-06 a b Appointment of State-level Technology Consultant as State Technology Advisor. Preparation of Municipal E-Governance Design Document (MEDD) on the basis of National Design Document as per NMMP. Year 2 2006-07 Year 3 2007-08 Year 4 2008-09 Year 5 2009-10 Year 6 2010-11 Year 7 2011-12
a. Please provide a list of services covered by E-Governance applications Types of Service ULBs/ Parastatals involved Registration of Births and Deaths Public Grievance Redressal Property Tax Management, including records Mgmt. Municipal Accounting System Works Management System E-Procurement Personal Management, i.e., Personal Information System. Payment of Property Tax, Utility Bills and Management of Utilities that come under the ULBs Building Plan Approval G.I.S. II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS MCF
MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF MCF
This is State Level Activity Will be prepared as per NMMP guidelines over the period of next five years starting from 2007-08
151
Year 1 2005-06 c d e f g h i j i ii iii iv v vi Assessment of MEDD against National E- Governance Standards. (Scalability, intra-operability & security standards etc.) Agreement on Municipal E-Governance Action Agenda. BPR for migration to E-governance Appointment of software consultant(s) Exploring PPP option for different E-Governance service (Public Private Participation.) Defining monitor able time table for implementation of each EGovernance initiative that is being taken up. Ongoing implementation of E- Governance initiatives, against monitor able time-table Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify) Geographic Information System (GIS) IVRS (Interactive Voice Response System) Municipal Area Networking (MAN) Kiosk Document Management System (Document Scanning & Storage) Web Portal of the Local body (if any)
Year 2 2006-07
Year 3 2007-08
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
152
3 PROPERTY TAX DESIRED OBJECTIVES: Note : JNNURM requires certain reforms taken by states/ cities in Property Taxes, with the broad objective of establishing a simple, transparent, nondiscretionary and equitable property tax is encourages voluntary compliance. States/cities need to ensure that their desirable objectives for reforms include these reforms, but need not restrict to these items. I CURRENT STATUS
a. Please indicate if Property tax levied on the following types of properties: i ii iii Residential Commercial Industrial
b. Please indicate the Property tax being collected for year-ending 2005-2006 i ii iii Domestic Non-Domestic/ Nonresidential Residential Commercial Industrial 1,73,663 Nos. Total current demand collection was 18.47 crores during 2005-06 8,783 Nos. (almost 100%), and average collection performance during the 3,459 Nos. last five years was 78%
c. Please Provide the Method of Property Tax Assessment being followed. i Self-Assessment
ii
Demand-based
In the current system property tax assessment are updated once in five years and demand is raised as per the completion year. However any new property is exempted from paying tax for the first three years on application by the assessing, hence the actual demand raised during a FY is higher than the collectable demand.
153
d. Please provide the below information on Current coverage. (Year 2005-06) Estimated no. of No. of properties in No. of properties Name of properties the records of the paying property No Property (Total) municipality tax 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Residential Commercial Industrial Government Total 2,36,000 1,73,663 8,783 3,459 315 1,86,310 1,86,310
Coverage ratio 5 =(4)/(2)
Demand Raised Rs. Crores 6
Demand Collected Rs. Crores 7
Collection Ratio Rs. Crores 8
78.83
17.85
18.46
100% (refer item c above)
e. Please state the Exemption given to property owners No. Type of Exemption Qualifying institution/ individual Any assessment with ARV below Rs. 1200 are 1 exempted and new property is exempted for the first three years from paying property tax f. Please provide the Basis of determination of property tax. i Capital Value ii Rateable Value iii Unit Area iv Other (Please specify)
Revenue implication of exemption Currently 90 assessments are under exemption list
Currently it is charged based as a percentage (2.5 percent for residential and 5 percent for non-residential) of net Annual Rental Value (ARV). Net ARV is arrived at based on the capital value of the land and/ or building. The calculation method is as described below2
Capital value
Annual rateable Value (ARV) Net ARV House tax Exemptions:
= Cost of land (as per guidelines) + cost of bldg (as per PWD (B&R) rates) 1% depreciation per annum on Bldg (subject to a max. of 50%) = 5% of capital value = ARV 10% of ARV (allowable for maintenance) = 2.5% of net ARV (residential purposes and 5% of net ARV (non-residential purposes) =any property with ARV less than Rs. 1200 is exempted from paying house tax and any new house/ property is exempted from paying house tax for the initial three years
154
g. Please provide the Use of technology in property tax management: Currently all the process is manually done i GIS of Property Tax Records ii Electronic Database of Property Records iii Any software for compliance h. Please describe the Level of discretionary power available with assessing authority: NIL, Commissioner is the final authority i. Please provide the last updation of property records and guidance values. i Last updation of Property Records ii Last revision of guidance values iii Frequency of revision of guidance values 2003-04 2003-04 Once in five years
iv Please indicate whether information from appropriate authorities on new building construction, or additions to existing buildings is being captured; how (e.g. development authority etc.) Yes No
(Completion certificate is the basis, but in current system new assessment is recorded once in five years only) v Please indicate whether information from appropriate authorities on change of ownership and land valuation is being captured; if so, how (e.g. Dept of Stamps and Registration) Yes No II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS Year 1 2005-06 a b c Extension of property tax regime to all properties Elimination of exemption Migration to Self-Assessment System of Property Taxation i Setting up a Committee/Team to draft/amend legislation
155
Please provide timelines for the following action items Year 2 200607 Year 3 200708 Year 4 2008-09 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Current Exemption will continue
Year 1 2005-06 ii iii iv v vi vii viii d i ii iii iv v vi vii viii e Stakeholder consultations Preparation of Draft Legislation Approval of Cabinet/ Government Final Enactment of Legislation by legislature Notification Preparation and notification of appropriate subordinate legislation Implementation by municipality (ies) Setting up a non-discretionary method for determination of Property Tax ( e.g. unit area, etc) Setting up a Committee/Team to draft/amend legislation Stakeholder consultations Preparation of Draft Legislation Approval of Cabinet/ Government Final Enactment of Legislation by legislature Notification Preparation and notification of appropriate subordinate legislation Implementation by municipality (ies)
Year 2 200607
Year 3 200708
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Use of GIS-based property tax system i Selection of appropriate consultant ii Preparation of digital property maps for municipality Verification of digital maps and preparation of complete database of iii properties iv Full migration to GIS system Next revision of guidance value (Unit Area Rateable Value) Fix periodicity for revision of guidance values i Periodicity to be adopted ii Deadline for adoption Current periodicity of five years shall continue NA NA
f g
156
Year 1 2005-06 h Establish Taxpayer education programme Local camps for clarification of doubts and assistance in filling out i forms ii Setting up a website for property tax issues/ FAQs etc Establish Dispute Resolution Mechanism Rewarding and acknowledging honest and prompt taxpayers (Rewards will be decided on lottery basis) Achievement of 85% Coverage Ratio (CR) (see item I d above) Achievement of 90% Collection Ratio (CR) ( see item I d above) Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify
Year 2 200607
Year 3 200708
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
i j k l m
157
4 USER CHARGES DESIRED OBJECTIVES: Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states / cities in the levy of User Charges on different municipal services, with an objective of securing effective linkages between asset creation and asset maintenance and ultimately leading to self-sustaining delivery of urban services. I CURRENT STATUS
a. Please provide a list of services being delivered by municipalities/ parastatals and the status of user charges being levied for each Type of Service Service Provider Tariff Structure Last Revision of Tariff Domestic Stepped tariff ranging from Rs. 1.25 /KL to Rs. 4.00/KL, in Metered absence of meters it is charged at Rs. 300 /month Water Supply MCF Domestic Unmetered Rs. 4.00/KL, in absence of meters it is charged at Rs. 300 /month FY 2002-03
Sewerage Solid Waste Management Public Transport Agencies Others (please specify)
MCF MCF Private NA
Based on No. of closets, the charge per closets is Rs. 15/month. No Charge is levied Fire Service, street lighting are provided but no charge is levied
FY 2002-03
b. Please provide the costs for providing the following services (total cost as well as per unit cost) and the total and per unit charges collected in 2005-06 Total user charge, if collected (Please specify the Total O&M Cost (with debt service charges) unit) Type of Service Per Unit Recovery (1 unit = 1000 Per Unit Cost (1 unit = 1000 ltrs.) Total Cost Total Recovery ltrs.) Water Supply Sewerage Solid Waste Management Public Transport Agencies Others (please specify) Rs. 1.56/KL Rs. 1363 lakhs Rs. 1.26/KL Rs. 2/connection/month Not charged Fire Service, street lighting are provided but no charge is levied
158
Rs. 1102 lakhs Rs. 16 Lakhs
It is not accounted separately, part of water supply department cost Rs. 67/assessment/month Rs. 1505 lakhs Street Lighting Fire Fighting Rs.47 lakhs/annaum Rs. 81 lakhs/annuam
c. Please provide metrics and current services levels For Water Supply LPCD Coverage Hrs. of Supply Quality 188 57% of property tax assessments are connected and 75% of roads by network 2 hours Potable
For Sewerage: 55% of population and 52% of road network by UGD For Solid Waste Management: 100%, but door-to-door collection is only in few wards II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS Year 1 2005-06 The State/ ULB must formulate and adopt a policy on user charges which should include proper targeting of subsidies, if any, for all services, ensuring the full realization of O&M cost by the end of the Mission period. (Note : This resolution should be passed within 6 months of signing of MOA under JNNURM and a copy submitted to MOUD) Establishment of proper accounting system for each service so as to determine the O&M cost separately. Please specify the timeline for each service separately Water Supply and Sewerage Solid Waste Management Public Transport Services Others (Please specify) Start Complete Year 2 2006-07 Year 3 2007-08 Year 4 2008-09 Year 5 2009-10 Year 6 2010-11 Year 7 2011-12
b i ii iii iv.
159
Year 1 2005-06 c i ii iii iv. d e f i ii iii iv The State/ULB should define user charge structure and timelines for achieving these Water Supply and Sewerage Solid Waste Management Public Transport Services Others (Please specify) The State should setup a body for recommending a user charge structure
Year 2 2006-07
Year 3 2007-08
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
State should quantify/study the impact of subsidies for each service on The MCF shall do it on its own a periodic basis Time table to achieve full recovery of O&M costs from user charges (Please indicate proposed recovery level for each year) Water Supply Sewerage Solid Waste Management Other Services Door to collection of solid waste has been initiated with the help of NGOs, households will be charged Rs. 35/month for using this service A help line is proposed where residents can lodge their complaints personally/phone/internet. They will be informed after the readdressal of complaints, the complaints shall be addressed in a time bound period as per the citizens charter PPP is already in place for O&M of tube wells and Public convenience /sanitation
Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify)
160
5 INTERNAL EARMARKING FOR BASIC SERVICES FOR POOR DESIRED OBJECTIVES Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states / cities in the provision of basic services to the Urban Poor with an objective of providing security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and sanitation. In addition, delivery of other existing universal services of the government for education, health and social security is to be ensured. I CURRENT STATUS Yes No
a. Please indicate whether the State has identified all Urban Below Poverty Line (BPL) families/ beneficiaries
b. If the answer to 1 (a) is yes, then please indicate what criteria have been adopted in this identification. (for example Kerala model) List of BPL families is forwarded by Divisional Commissioners office to MCF c. Please indicate the number of individuals/ families that have been identified as BPL BPL Population) - 1,32,424 (Population living in slums, please indicate the
d. Please indicate how many BPL lists of the Urban Poor are being maintained by ULB/ different departments of the State? What is the overlap of BPL families among these lists? There is only one list prepared by Divisional Commissioners office e. Please indicate the percentage of households living in squatter settlements/ temporary structures f. i. Municipal water supply - about 20% About 50 % About 50 % About 50 % NIL NIL NIL
161
Please indicate the percentage of households living in squatter settlements/ temporary structures without access to : ii. Sanitation a Sewer b Drainage c Community Toilets d Solid Waste Management iii. Primary education iv. Primary Health
g. Please indicate if there is any internal earmarking within the municipal budget. Please provide the total amount earmarked and the percentage of the total budget in the last 3 years. Year Amount Budgeted- Rs. Crores Actual Amount Spent- Rs. Crores % of the total budget 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 II a No No No.
By 2008-09, MCF propose to allocate at least 15-20% of budget for urban poor
TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS The State/ULB must formulate and adopt an overarching, comprehensive policy on providing basis services for the Urban Poor which should include security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and sanitation. Delivery of other existing universal services of the government for education, health and social security should be ensured. This policy document must include the minimum budgetary earmarking in municipal budgets for the provision of these budgets (Note: This policy document should involve stakeholder participation and be released within 6-9 months of signing of MOA under JNNURM and a copy submitted to MOUD/EPEA Year 3 20072005-06 2006-07 08 As per State government directive Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 200809 Year 5 200910 Year 6 201011 Year 7 201112
b c d
Defining criteria for identification of urban poor Fresh enumeration based on the above Define threshold service levels for the Urban Poor across various services Strategic document which outlines the requirements both physical and financial, timeframes, sources of funding and implementation strategies Including community participation, monitor able output indicators for each of the services, including outlining convergences, if any Periodic impact evaluation by independent agencies appointed by the State Government Any other reform steps being undertaken (specify)
(Already under progress

No
f g
162
6 CITY PLANNING FUNCTIONS DESIRED OBJECTIVES: Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in the area of city planning, with an objective to assign or associate elected ULBs with city planning functions. Over a period of seven years, the Mission aims to ensure that all special agencies that deliver civil services in urban areas to ULBs are transferred and accountability platforms are created for all urban service providers in transition. I CURRENT STATUS
a. Please indicate whether the ULB has been associated with city planning functions. (Town Planning Department is also involved to an extent) Yes No b. If a parastatal has been involved with city planning, please indicate whether it has been involved with the formulation of the City Development Plan. (CDP), - The views of HUDA /PHED and other agencies have been taken Yes No c. Please indicate whether the master plan / CDP have been approved by the municipality / ULB. Yes No
d. Please indicate whether the city planning has been in accordance with the Metropolitan Planning Committee (MPC)/ District Planning Committee. (Not applicable for MCF) Yes No
e. Please state which agency is responsible for the provision of water supply and sewerage services f. Please state which agency is responsible for the provision of public transport services g. Please state which agency is responsible for the provision of Solid Waste Management (SWM) services II TIMELINE FOR REFORMS a
MCF Haryana Roadways & Private contractors MCF
Resolution by Government expressing commitment to transferring responsibility of the delivery of municipal services to the ULBs. (Note: This can be done by way of unbundling of services. e.g. parastatals or others may operate, maintain, even own and collect user charges for the production and distribution facilities for these municipal services, so long as they are accountable to ULBs. Services levels should be fixed by ULBs. The ULBs shall ensure the delivery of services at the defined level by the service provider/s through the mechanism of contractual arrangement. This is consistent with the reform being required in the 74th Amendment)
163
Year 1 2005-06 b c Note : Master Plan / CDP can be prepared by professional body but in consultation and requires final approval of ULB. If the answer to (1-d) is no, please indicate a timeline of when the city planning will be in accordance with MPC/ DPC.
Year 2 2006-07
Year 3 2007-08
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
Not Applicable to MCF
Please fill in the timeline for the following functions in months / years : Cabinet Amendment of State / Function Gov. Resolution Approval Municipalities Act City planning Water Supply & Sewerage Public Transport Solid Waste Management Others It is already an MCF function It is already an MCF function Not under MCF It is already an MCF function It is already an MCF function (Fire, Street lighting Year 1 2005-06 d Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify). Year 2 2006-07 Year 3 2007-08
Implementation
Year 4 2008-09
Year 5 2009-10
Year 6 2010-11
Year 7 2011-12
164
7-CHECK LIST OF REFORMS FOR THE URBAN POOR Provision of basic services to the poor, including security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply, sanitation and ensuring delivery of other existing universal services of the Government for education, health and social security. HOUSING I At the beginning of the Mission period, has the City Development Plan made a total inventory of housing stock available for urban poor? II Is there any formal housing available for urban poor such as EWS/LIG/resettlement housing NOT classified as a slum? III If yes, what percentage of the total housing stock does it comprise? IV What percentage of the total housing stock is classified as slum by the urban local body? V What percentage of the total housing stock is classified as squatter, i.e., not recognizable as slums or legal tenements/settlements? VI What has been the growth rate of housing stock classified as slum and squatter (in percentage) in the overall growth of total housing stock (a) annually over the last decade, and (b) decennially (4 decades average) VII Of this, has the City Development Plan identified all unacceptable housing stock, i.e., that which requires replacement? The total number of slum tenements which needs to be relocated are about 15,,000 as they are on critical locations a Does the unacceptable stock include all structures in squatter settlements? If yes, indicate percentage in total unacceptable stock? b Does the unacceptable stock include dilapidated/unsafe structures inside slums? If yes, indicate percentage in total unacceptable stock? c Does the unacceptable stock include temporary (kutccha) structures inside slums? If yes, indicate percentage in total unacceptable stock? VIII At the beginning of the Mission period, has the City Development Plan made a total estimate of required housing stock for the urban poor within the CDP perspective period, including new stock as well as replacement stock? IX What is the housing stock production capacity required to meet the housing need for urban poor? Indicate in units/annum 3,000 units per annum are the housing stock under JNNURM(over a period of 5 years). X a b c d e
No Yes 5% 40% 5% (a) 10% (b) NA Yes Yes 5% Yes 95% Yes 60% No 3000/annum (Total 15000), HHB is also involved
Assuming that a multitude of agencies are capable of providing housing stock for urban poor, list the required capacities of each: Own capacity (if ULB is engaged in creation/replacement of housing stock) 15,000 under JNNURM Development Authority Housing Board Slum Clearance Board Other public agency (including institutional/industrial housing) 165
f g h Year Under MCF
Cooperative model (plotted/flatted) Private sector (plotted/flatted) Other 2005-06 JNNURM by 2006-07 2007-08 3800 2008-09 2600 2009-10 4000 2010-11 3800
2011-12
How has the provision of housing stock for the urban poor been phased over Mission period keeping the need rate constant
Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure. LAND AND BUILDING TENURE Does the ULB employ any method of assembling land for housing the urban poor, which can be used to subsidize capital costs of tenements for the urban poor (such as land bank, pooling, TDR or plot reconstitution)? If so, please state below:
125 acres is available with MCF, no additional land acquisition is required

Does the ULB have any taxable/tax saving bonds or capital market instrument which it can use/has used to provide housing for urban poor, amongst other assets? If so, please state below: NO How is the requirement of land for meeting new/replacement housing stock requirement for urban poor proposed to be met? Year Land (hectares) 2005-06 requirement NA 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
125 acres is available with MCF, no additional land acquisition is required

NA NA NA NA NA NA
Average subsidy in pricing of housing (%) Note: No subsidy is provided.
166
I II
III IV V VI VII
Is the ULB responsible for defining tenure of an occupant over a tenement? The Competent Authority (Slums) under MCF decides the same. What kinds of tenure is ratified by the ULB as regards housing in slums/resettlement areas/housing for urban poor? Ownership through sale Ownership through hereditary title transfer Leasehold agreement from housing vendor Tenancy under Rent Control/Rent Act Transfer under Power of Attorney Is registration of title necessary on: (a) hereditary transfer/natural succession (b) Power of Attorney Does the ULB employ an apartment ownership act for buildings with more than one tenement? Does the State offer any concession on Stamp Duty for property acquired by an urban poor household? Does the ULB provide preference to women to be the primary title holder of a land/tenement awarded under a State/Central housing scheme? Is prior clearance of the ULB required for selling/transferring a tenement acquired under a slum improvement scheme, if the tenure has been awarded directly by the ULB (first allottee)?
Yes No No Yes No NA Yes NA No Yes Yes Yes
WATER I What percentage of the households living within slums receives less than the stipulated supply? II What percentage of the households living within slums is dependent on piped water supply For over 80% of their needs? For between 60% to 80% of their needs? For between 40% to 60% of their needs? For less than 40% of their needs? Are not connected at all? III What percentage of the households living within slums is dependent on private tankers? IV What percentage of the households living within slums is dependent on private bore wells? V Of the total estimated water demand from the entire slum area of the city, what percentage is provisioned through municipal supply? VI What is the estimated T&D loss (in percentage)? VII What is the expected per capita capital cost for providing water supply to the entire projected urban poor population? VIII What is the O&M cost per kiloliter that is proposed to be recovered from the urban poor?
60% 30% 100% NA NA NA NA 10% NIL 30% 35% Rs.800 Rs. 2.50 per kiloliter at the consumers end
167
Keeping in mind the design and supply thresholds, please indicate the targets earmarked for the Mission period: Year Population * Design Threshold Supply (LPCD) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 135 Total
Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure. SANITATION I What percentage of the households living within slums is connected to sewerage? II What percentage of the households living within slums has individual/septic tanks? III What percentage of the households living within slums discharge sewage into open drains? IV What percentage of the households living within slums has individual toilets? V What percentage of the households living within slums has shared toilets? VI What percentage of the households living within slums does not a have toilet at all? VII What is the expected per capita capital cost for providing a sewer link to the entire projected urban poor population? VIII Is any O&M cost proposed to be recovered from the urban poor? IX X Is any EDC (External Development Charge) proposed to be levied for uplink to trunk sewage systems? If so, how much? Indicate in Rupees/WC/month or flat rate/household/month For households without access to an owned toilet, does the ULB propose to sensitize the people about good hygiene practices?
30% 30% 40% 40% 5% 25% Rs.600 Rs. 250 per slum per annum No Yes
What kind of provisioning is proposed in the next seven years in terms of coverage of the entire urban poor population by a sewerage network with standard disposal? Year 2005-06 Only of Uncovered Population Year Population No. of Seats (men) No. of Seats (women) Total 2005-06 2006-07 0% 26% 2007-08 26% 2008-09 18% 2009-10 16% 2010-11 16% 2011-12 Total 100%
What kind of provisioning would be required in the next seven years in terms of seats to accommodate the population without access to individual toilets? 2006-07 2007-08 15% 50% 50% 100% 2008-09 25% 50% 50% 100% 2009-10 25% 50% 50% 100% 2010-11 25% 50% 50% 100% 2011-12 10% 50% 50% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.
168
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT I What is the expected output in MT from the areas of the city housing urban poor? The solid waste generated by slums is 200g to 250g per capita per day. Total generation of city is about 480 tons II What percentage of the total solid waste generated by the city originates from slum areas? III What is the waste profile in terms of (at city level, as no separate study was conducted particular to slums) Organic kitchen waste Sharps Inert matter Inorganic/ plastics Hazardous waste including medical/chemical IV What percentage of waste generated from the areas housing the urban poor requires disposal through landfill? V VI Is this more or less than 50% of the total waste generated from urban poor households? Are there adequate landfill sites to accommodate this waste over a period of 20 years? Are the landfill sites planned and designed accordingly (with liner, leachate removal and LFG extraction)? What is the average projected life of one hectare of landfill site as per: (a) present estimates (b)estimated after implementing management techniques
30 MT to 44 MT per day 30% 60-70% 8-10% 2.5-4.0% 4-7% 0.5-1.0% Same as city level (100%) Less Yes Yes 20 years 30 years Yes, Vermi compost, Seggregation at collection points itself Initiated, 100% by 2009-10 Initiated, propose to involve NGOs Rs.118 per capita/annum 60% 10% 15% 15%
169
waste
VII VIII IX X
Is the ULB considering any alternative to disposal through landfill sites?

Does the ULB employ any method of segregation at source? Does the ULB have any proposed/existing mechanism for involving the community to segregate waste (including rehabilitation of rag pickers)? Does this include occupational security (use of gloves, masks, routine immunization and health check ups) for the workers? What is the per capita cost of managing (collection, transport and disposal) solid waste in the city? Of this, how much is distributed into: (Say, if per capita cost is Rs. 10/- per month, how is this divided into the following sectors): Collection (including manpower) Segregation at source (including manpower) Transport (including manpower) Disposal (including manpower, proportional cost of landfill site or disposal mechanism)
XI
XII
Does the ULB have any predefined/proposed sites for vermi composting? At ward level At colony level At city level Does the ULB have any resources for: Waste incinerators (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB) Rendering units for visceral waste (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB) Medical waste sterilization units (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB)
No Yes No No Yes No
Does the ULB propose to have any legislative measures (existing or proposed) in order to minimize waste generation over the perspective period of the CDP (such as restricting use of plastics, clustering use of waste generating units or imposing volume penalty on waste generation)? Please state as below: Yes Does the ULB commit to adhering to the CPHEEO norm that not more than 50% of solid waste generated will be disposed through landfill sites? Yes If YES, state the measures that the ULB proposes to take to adhere to this norm:
CONVERGENCE Does the ULB commit to converge all the schemes pertaining to provision of housing, water supply, sanitation and solid waste management, undertaken under the sub-Mission Basic Services to the Urban Poor by the end of the Mission period? Yes Does the ULB commit to converge (make concurrent or co-terminus) all the schemes pertaining to provision of primary education, healthcare and social security along with the above mentioned projects pertaining to housing, water supply, sanitation and solid waste management by the end of the Mission period? Yes Assuming 100% coverage of urban poor population in the city by the end of the Mission period, please state relative coverage plan for the sectors defined below: Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total
170
Housing (MCF JNNURM) Water Supply Sanitation
under
100% 100% 100% 100% GoH GoH GoH
100% 100% 100% 100%
Solid Waste Management Primary Education Healthcare Social Security (Insurance) Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.
PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REFORMS UNDER BASIC SERVICES TO THE URBAN POOR 1. Data requested above shall be compiled and presented as part of the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure by March 31, 2008 and the yearly targets to be set for achieving 100% coverage by the end of the Mission period, i.e., 2001-12.
2. The above targets are desired to be adhered to, but ULBs shall have the flexibility to fix annual delivery targets in a phased manner. However, 100%
coverage is desirable by end of the Mission period, i.e., March 31, 2012.
171

Faridabad: Ity Evelopment Lan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Faridabad: Ity Evelopment Lan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY................................................................................................. 6

FORMULATION OF VISION AND MISSION ........................................................................................ 18 3.1 3.2 3.3

CITY ASSESSMENT SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 26

City Development Plan 4.6

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

CITY INVESTMENT PLAN, STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN................................ 75 5.1

INVESTMENT CAPACITY AND SUSTENANCE OF MCF ................................................................ 108 6.1 6.2

City Development Plan 6.3

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

REFORM ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 112 7.1 7.2

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

Application Process to JNNURM funds Application Process to JNNURM funds

Timeline for Implementation Timeline for Implementation of Reforms of Reforms

Detailed Project Reports Detailed Project Reports

OBJECTIVES OF A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

THE CDP PROCESS ADOPTED BY FARIDABAD

Faridabad City Development Plan Approach

Wish list Wish list

Investment Assessment & Analysis Investment Needs Needs

Investment Investment Needs Needs

Preferences Preferences Where Prioritization to go? Sustainability Sustainability do we want

What are priority needs?

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

2 FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY

GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

LINKAGES AND CONNECTIVITY

Haryana State Ghaziabad NCT-Delhi Gurgaon FARIDABAD Uttar Pradesh State

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

NCR proposals for economic development

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

Major issues pertaining to industrial growth of Faridabad

City Development Plan

Municipal Corporation of Faridabad