LITERATURE REVIEW RUBRIC

Indicator Indicator Not Met

(0-13pts)

Indicator Partially Met

(14-17pts) Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge, or topic of the review. (21-26pts) There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections or paragraphs follow in a natural or logical order. (42-53pts) All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected. Significance to the topic is evident.

Indicator Met
(18-20pts) The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the review. Clear overview of paper, demonstrates importance of topic (27-30pts) The summary goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie sections together, as well as adjacent paragraphs. Each cited study related to the topic and to other studies. (54-60pts) The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. A collection of studies are analyzed for differences and commonalities about the topic. An objective, balanced view from various perspectives is offered. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the topic is unquestionable. (18-20pts) The author was able to make succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. Insights into the problem are appropriate. Conclusions are strongly supported in the body of the report.

Problem Statement

Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the review. (0-20pts) The summary appears to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed.

Coherent Theme & Flow of Body

(0-41pts)

Depth & Breadth of Research

Major sections of pertinent content have been omitted or greatly runon. The topic is of little significance.

(0-13pts)

(14-17pts) The author provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the body of the report. (14-17pts) Citation for the review did follow APA format; however; a few (2) errors in essential information were evident. Information is gathered from multiple sources.

Conclusion

There is no indication the author tried to synthesize the information or make a conclusion based on the literature under review.

(0-13pts)

(18-20pts) Citation for the article did follow APA format. Essential information was accurate and complete. Information is gathered from multiple, research-based sources.

Citations/References

Citation for the review did not follow APA format and was missing essential information. Information is gathered from a limited number of sources.