Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary Chapter 11
By : Pramadona (29111364)
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG 2013
Firms choose from among three major types of organizational structuressimple, functional, and multidivisionalto implement strategies. 1. Simple, a structure in which the owner-manager makes all major decisions and monitors all activities, staff acts as extension of manager's supervisory authority. Few rules, limited task specialization, unsophisticated technology system characterize this structure. 2. Functional, consists of a chief executive officer and a limited corporate staff, with functional line managers in dominant organizational areas such as production, accounting, marketing, R&D, engineering, and human resources. 3. Multidivisional, consists of a corporate office and operating divisions, each operating division representing a separate business or profit center in which the top corporate officer delegates responsibilities for day-to-day operations and business unit strategy to division managers. Matches between Business-Level Strategies and Functional Structure Firms use different forms of the functional organizational structure to support implementing the cost leadership, differentiation, and integrated cost
leadership/differentiation strategies. The differences in these forms are accounted for primarily by different uses of three important structural characteristics: specialization (concerned with the type and number of jobs required to complete work), centralization (the degree to which decision-making authority is retained at higher managerial levels), and formalization (the degree to which formal rules and procedures govern work). Matches between Corporate-Level Strategies and Multidivisional Structure Chandlers research shows that the firms continuing success leads to product or market diversification or both. The firms level of diversification is a function of decisions about the number and type of businesses in which it will compete as well as how it will manage the businesses. Geared to managing individual organizational functions, increasing diversification eventually creates information processing, coordination, and control problems that the functional structure cannot handle. Thus, using a diversification strategy requires the firm to change from the functional structure to the multidivisional structure to develop an appropriate strategy/structure match. Corporate-level strategies have different degrees of product and market
diversification. The demands created by different levels of diversification highlight the need for a unique organizational structure to effectively implement each strategy.
The three major forms of the multidivisional structure should each be paired with a particular corporate-level strategy. These structures characteristics can see at table above. Differences exist in the degree of centralization, the focus of the performance appraisal, the horizontal structures (integrating mechanisms), and the incentive compensation schemes. The most centralized and most costly structural form is the cooperative structure. The least centralized, with the lowest bureaucratic costs, is the competitive structure. The SBU structure requires partial centralization and involves some of the mechanisms necessary to implement the relatedness between divisions. Also, the divisional incentive compensation awards are allocated according to both SBUs and corporate performance. Matches between International Strategies and Worldwide Structure International strategies are becoming increasingly important for long-term competitive success in what continues to become an increasingly borderless global economy. Among other benefits, international strategies allow the firm to search for new markets, resources, core competencies, and technologies as part of its efforts to outperform competitors. As with business-level and corporate-level strategies, unique organizational structures are necessary to successfully implement the different international strategies. Forming proper matches between international strategies and organizational structures facilitates the firms efforts to effectively coordinate and control its global operations. More importantly, research findings confirm the validity of the international strategy/structure matches.
Matches between cooperative strategies and network structures Network strategy is partners form several alliances in order to improve the performance of the alliance network itself through cooperative endeavors. Strategic network is group of firms that form [around core] to create value to participating in multiple cooperative arrangements. At core, Strategic Center Firm which has 4 primary tasks, they are strategic outsourcing, competencies, technology, and race to learn. Implementing Business-level Cooperative Strategies The two types of business-level complementary alliances are vertical and horizontal. Vertical: partnering firms share their resources and capabilities from different stages of the value chain to create a competitive advantage. Horizontal: partnering firms share resources and capabilities from the same stage of the value chain to create a competitive advantage commonly used for long-term product development and distribution opportunities Implementing Corporate-level Cooperative Strategies Corporate-level cooperative strategies (such as franchising) are used to facilitate product and market diversification. Franchising is contractual relationship to describe and control the sharing of its resources and capabilities with partners. Franchising allows firms to use its competencies to extend or diversity product or market reach, without completing a merger or acquisition. Implementing International Cooperative Strategies Strategic networks formed to implement cooperative strategies resulting in firm competing in several different countries. Distributed strategic networks are organizational structure used to manage international cooperative strategies. Several regional strategic center firms are included in the distributed network to manage partner firms multiple cooperative arrangements.