(c) P

This
iden
mus

Beg
plot
dist
Ben
wha
the

Wal



















The
four
Eco
ankaj Ghemaw
2. Dif
s note intro
ntify and pr
st address w
gin by cons
ts Walmart
ance betwe
ntonville, Ar
at other type
markets tha
lmart Intern

e CAGE dis
r major c
onomic. Diff

wat / For copyrig
fferences an
oduces the
rioritize the
when develo
sidering the
ts operatin
een each co
rkansas. Th
es of differe
at were prof
nationals O
tance frame
categories:
fferences alo
ght permissions
nd the CAG
Pankaj Gh
CAGE dist
e differences
oping cross-
e example
ng margin
ountrys cap
he impact of
ence or dist
fitable for W
Exhibi
Operating M
ework disag
Cultural,
ong these di
s, please e-mail
GE Distanc
hemawat
tance frame
s between c
-border strat
summarize
by countr
pital and W
f geographic
ance can yo
Walmart from
it 2-1
Margin by Co
ggregates di
Administra
imensions g
globecourse@g
ce Framewo
ework, whi
countries th
tegies.
2

d in exhibi
ry in 2004
Walmarts he
c distance is
ou identify t
m those tha
ountry (200
istance or di
ative, Geog
generally ha
ghemawat.com
ork
1

ich is used
hat compani
it 2-1, whi
4 against t
eadquarters
s obvious, b
that separat
at werent?
4 estimates
ifference int
graphic, a
ave a negati
m
to
ies
ich
the
in
but
ted
)
to
and
ive


effe
diff
enco
type

ect on man
ferences alo
ourage rath
es of differe
Cultura
beliefs,
of the
organiz
religiou
values.
market
effects,
busines
markets
least, tie

Adminis
between
tenor o
exchang
differen
course,
country
levels o
profitab
States i
Free Tr
as clas
unincor

Geogra
involve
other: o
country
access t
1 make
profitab

ny cross-bo
ong a limit
her than disc
ence or dista
al distance:
values, and
gameth
zations. Cu
us beliefs, r
Societies
power and
both form
sses operat
s share ling
es through l
strative dis
n countries
of current
ge between
nces along
do admin
y such as au
of corruption
ble countrie
in a region
rade Agreem
ssified by
rporated terr
aphic distan
es more tha
other attrib
ys physica
to the ocean
es it clear th
ble countr
order inter
ed subset o
courage suc
ance is illus
: Culture c
d social nor
hat shape
ultural dista
race/ethnicit
even diffe
d globaliza
mally via re
e.
4
Interes
guistic, reli
large diaspo
stance: Hi
scolonial
relationsh
n themw
these dime
nistrative a
utarchic pol
n. In the Wa
es, Canada a
nal free trad
ment (NAFT
Walmart,
ritory of the
nce: The g
an just how
butes to be
al size, wit
n, topograph
hat the cap
ries is ge
ractions, al
of CAGE d
ch interactio
strated by th
an be defin
rmsthe un
the behavi
ance encom
ty, languag
er in their
ation in wa
egulation a
stingly, Wa
gious and
ora.
storical an
links, free
hipsprofou
which is th
ensions mat
attributes s
licies or we
almart exam
and Mexico
de agreeme
TA). And a
, Puerto R
e United Sta
geographic
w far two c
e considere
thin-country
hy, and eve
ital city of
eographicall
though in
dimensions
ons.
3
Each o
he Walmart
ned as the
nwritten, un
ior of ind
mpasses d
ge, and soci
social attit
ays that ha
and informa
almarts fo
ethnic simi
nd political
e trade agr
undly affe
he same as
tter a great
specific to
eak instituti
mple, note th
o, partner wi
ent, the Nor
third profit
Rico, is
ates.
dimension
countries ar
ed include
y distances
en time zon
f each of W
ly closer t
some case
can actual
of these bro
example.
collection
nspoken rul
dividuals a
differences
ial norms a
tudes towa
ave importa
ally, on ho
our profitab
ilarities or,
associatio
reements, t
ect econom
s saying th
t deal. So,
a particul
ions and hi
hat two of t
ith the Unit
rth Americ
table count
officially
n of distan
re from ea
contiguity,
s to borde
nes. Exhibit
Walmarts fo
to Walmar
2
es,
lly
oad
of
les
and
in
and
ard
ant
ow
ble
at
ons
the
mic
hat
of
lar
gh
the
ted
can
try
an
nce
ach
a
ers,
2-
our
rts




Wha

Inte
grav
inte
betw
econ
rela
attri
diff
of o
and









headqua
addition
the Uni
Econom
labor a
econom
in avail
comple
harder f
number
econom
liability
procurin
distance
its enti
strategi
at the Numb
ernational e
vitation to
eractions. T
ween two co
nomic size
ated to the p
ibute). Aug
ferences as w
one such an
economic e

arters than
n, Canada a
ited States.
mic distance
are the m
mic distance
lability (or
ments, and
for Walmar
r of data p
mic distance
y for Walm
ng merch
e, particular
ire internati
es in section
bers Tell Us
economists
o describe
Thus, the s
ountries pre
s (a unilate
physical dist
gmented gra
well as unil
nalysis that
effects on tr
the capitals
and Mexico
e: Consume
most obviou
e between c
lack) of re
d organizat
rt to do wel
points is v
e has not b
mart. The
andise fro
rly in terms
ional store
n 5, which d
s
have ada
trade an
implest gra
edicts that t
eral attribu
tance betwe
avity mode
lateral attrib
evaluated c
rade.
s of any of
o share a co
er wealth an
us (and re
ountries. O
esources, in
tional capa
ll in poorer
very limite
been entire
company
om China
s of labor co
network. W
discusses ar
apted Newt
nd other
avity mode
trade will be
ute of each
een them (a
els add mea
butes. Exhib
cultural, adm
the unprofi
ommon land
nd income a
elated) det
thers includ
nputs, infra
abilities. It
countries
d. Note, h
ely or even
saves mor
exploitin
oststhan i
We will re
rbitrage.
tons law
internationa
el of intern
e directly re
country) a
a bilateral or
asures of o
bit 2-2 show
ministrative
table ones;
d border wi
and the cost
erminants
de differenc
astructure a
seems a b
although t
however, th
n primarily
re money b
ng econom
it makes fro
eturn to su
of univers
al econom
national tra
elated to the
and inverse
r country-pa
other types
ws the resu
e, geograph
3
in
ith
of
of
ces
and
bit
the
hat
y a
by
mic
om
uch
sal
mic
ade
eir
ely
air
of
ults
hic,
D
D
C

A




G




E


Exh
Dimensions o
Distance/Prox
Cultural
Administrative
Geographic
Economic

Sour
Inter
Busi

The
signi
many

The
you
glob
mag
colo
with
ties
effe
orig
that
such

Sim
help
Thu
coun
hibit 2-2 Effe
of
ximity
e
rce: Pankaj
rnational Trad
iness School B
estimates cor
ificant at the 1
y other studie
e signs on m
ur intuition
balized fla
gnitudes of
onial ties ar
hout them,
in generat
ects decades
ginal coloni
t complete
h considerat
milarities ver
p explain fo
us, for U.S.
ntry is Cana

cts of Simila

Determina
Common la

Common re
Colony/colo
Common cu
Differences

Physical dis
Physical siz
Landlocked
Common la

Economic s
Income leve
Ghemawat a
de Networks:
Boston, Februa
rrect for unob
1% level but a
es, apparently
most of the
s (although
at world).
f some of t
re apt to tr
or even mo
ting cultura
s and, in s
ial relations
globalizatio
tionsis ex
rsus differe
oreign direc
companies
ada 60 perc
arities Versus
ant
anguage
egional trading
onizer links
urrency
s in corruption
stance: 1% inc
ze: 1% increas
dness
and border
size: GDP (1%
el: GDP per ca
and Rajiv Ma
A Gravity-B
ary 2003.
bserved thresh
are, in a numb
due to the cor
e estimates
h they ca
What are
the effects
rade almost
ore if one al
al similariti
ome instan
ships were
onas in t
xtremely un
ences along
ct investme
s that opera
cent of the t
s Difference
g bloc
n
crease
se
% increase)
apita (1% incr
Mallick, The
ased Approac
holds for part
ber of cases, s
rrection
in the tab
nnot be re
probably m
for exam
t three time
lso account
ies! The pe
nces, more
dissolved r
the disappe
nlikely anyti
many of th
ent or comp
ate in just o
time (and 10
s on Bilatera
rease)
Industry-Lev
ch, working
icipation in tr
smaller than t
le probably
econciled w
more surpr
mple, that c
es as much
ts for the ro
ersistence o
than a cent
reinforce th
earance of t
ime soon.
he same dim
panies fore
one foreign
0 percent of
al Trade

Chan
+42%

+47%
+188
+114
11%

1.1%
0.2%
48%
+125

+0.8%
+0.7%
vel Structure
paper, Harva
rade and are
those reported
y accord wi
with a ful
rising are t
ountries wi
h as countri
ole of colon
of such lar
tury after t
he conclusi
the effects
mensions al
eign presenc
country, th
f the time it
4
nge in Trade
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
of
ard
all
d in
ith
lly
the
ith
ies
nial
rge
the
on
of
lso
ce.
hat
t is


the
cros
tran
and
is th
mat

Iden

Hav
dist
fram
acco
rega
of th

Exh

Cou
(bila
Cou
(uni
United Kin
ss-border i
nsactions, p
even the in
hat differen
tter in signif
ntifying and
ving highlig
ances, the r
mework to
ounted for
ard by ident
he CAGE c
hibit 2-3 The
untry pairs
ateral)
untries
ilateral)

ngdom).
5
Gr
nteractions
atent citatio
ncidence of
nces betwee
ficant, predi
d Prioritizin
ghted the pe
rest of this
identify a
in developi
tifying bilat
categories.
CAGE Fram
Cultural
Distance
Different
languages
Different
ethnicities;
lack of
connective
ethnic or
social
networks
Different
religions
Lack of tru
Different
values, nor
and
disposition
Insularity
Traditional
ravity mode
as divers
ons, immig
wars! The b
en countries
ictable way
ng Differenc
ersistent imp
section foc
and prioriti
ing global s
teral and un
mework at the
Admin
Distan

ust
rms,
ns
Lack o
ties
Lack o
region
bloc
Lack o
curren
Politic
lism
Nonma
econom
bias vs
bias)
Lack o
membe
interna
organiz
Weak
corrup
els have also
e as equit
grant flows,
basic conclu
sand diff
ys.
ces
pact of cros
cuses on us
ize the dif
strategies. E
nilateral fac
e Country Le
nistrative
nce
of colonial
of shared
al trading
of common
cy
al hostility

arket/closed
my (home
s. foreign
of
ership in
ational
zations
institutions,
tion

o been adap
ty trading,
air traffic,
usion from
ferences in
ss-country d
sing the CA
fferences t
Exhibit 2-3
ctors to cons
evel
Geographic
Distance
Physical dista
Lack of land b
Differences in
zones
Differences in
climates / dise
environments
Landlockedne
Lack of intern
navigability
Geographic si
Geographic
remoteness
Weak transpo
or communic
links
pted to expla
e-commer
, phone cal
this literatu
differences
differences
AGE distan
that must
helps in th
sider for ea
c Eco
Dis
ance
border
n time
n
ease
s
Ric
diff
Oth
diff
cos
of n
reso
fina
reso
hum
reso
infr
and
info
kno
ess
nal
ize
ortation
ation
Eco
Low
inc
5
ain
rce
lls,
ure

or
nce
be
his
ach
onomic
stance
ch/poor
fferences
her
fferences in
st or quality
natural
ources,
ancial
ources,
man
ources,
frastructure,
d
formation or
owledge
onomic size
w per capita
ome



The
enco
unil
fram
acro
they
set
card
Com
Perc
Port
com
indu
with
Mor
diff
even
netw

Hav
it is
stru
capt
a c
trea
vari
coun
adm
inco
else
con
whi
The
dist
sinc
part
e most dis
ompasses t
lateral attr
meworks th
oss countrie
y assume th
of yardstic
dinal indic
mpetitivene
ceptions Ind
ters diamo
mpetitivenes
ustries. But
h ideas such
re general
ferences of t
n occupyin
work instead
ving drawn
s useful to a
ucture. Spec
turing coun
ountrys in
ated as a c
ious dimens
ntries (ch
ministrative
omes) can b
e. That said
ceptions to
ich countrie

e other poin
ance matter
ce geograph
ticular impo

stinctive fe
the bilatera
ributes of
at have bee
es (or locati
hat countries
cks. Note t
ces such
ss Index
dex but als
ond frame
ss of diffe
t indexicalit
h as The U
lly, indexic
the sort nec
ng) space in
d of as an a
that distinc
add that the
cifically, un
ntry-specific
nvolvement
common co
sions from a
haracterized
policies, ph
be thought
d, one need
o capture th
es are close
nt worthy of
r to differen
hic distance
ortance to c
eature of t
al attributes
individual
en proposed
ions) focus
s can be ass
that this ch
as the W
or Transp
o to ordina
work for di
erent count
ty of this s
U.S. is close
cality is
cessary to en
n relation to
rray along a
ction betwee
ey can be f
nilateral me
c attributes t
in cross-b
omponent
all other cou
d by uni
hysical rem
of as being
s to add bi
he idea tha
and which o
f even more
nt extents i
e affects th
companies d
the CAGE
s of countr
l countries
d for thinki
on just uni
sessed one b
haracterizati
World Econ
arency Int
al ranking s
iagnosing th
tries as h
sort is restri
er to Canada
incapable
nvision cou
o each othe
a common y
en unilatera
fitted togeth
easures of i
that general
border econ
of that co
untries. For
ique, ingr
moteness, or
g relatively
ilateral indi
at a compa
ones are far
e emphasis
in different
he costs of
dealing in h
E framewor
ry pairs as
s. Most o
ng about th
ilateral attri
by one again
ion applies
nomic Foru
ternationals
chemes suc
he (relative)
ome bases
ictive since
a than it is t
of captur
untries as ex
er, that is, a
yardstick.
6

al and bilate
her into the
isolation (o
lly decrease
nomic activ
ountrys dis
r example, r
rown cultu
r extremely
distant from
cators to su
anys home
rther away.
is that diffe
industries.
f transporta
heavy or bu
rk is that
s well as t
of the oth
he differenc
butes; that
nst a comm
s not only
ums Glob
s Corrupti
ch as Micha
) internation
s in specif
e it cant de
to Indonesia
ring bilater
xisting in (a
as nodes in
eral influenc
same over
or integratio
e (or increas
vities can
stances alo
really isolat
ures, clos
y high or lo
m everywhe
uch unilater
e base affec
ferent types
For instanc
ation, it is
ulky produc
6
it
the
her
ces
is,
mon
to
bal
on
ael
nal
fic
eal
a.
ral
and
n a
ces,
rall
on)
se)
be
ng
ted
sed
ow
ere
ral
cts
of
ce,
of
cts.


Cult
pref
or m
busi
like
dist

Cult
Dist
Cultur
matter
when:
Pro
ling
(TV
Pro
cult
iden
Pro
vary
size
stan
(ele
equ
Pro
cou
qua
asso
(win


App

The
itsel
the




tural distan
ferences and
media comp
iness. Exhib
ely to make
ance.
Exhibi
tural
tance
ral differences
r the most
:
ducts have high
guistic content
V programs)
ducts matter to
tural or national
ntity (foods)
duct features
y in terms of
e (cars) or
ndards
ectrical
uipment)
ducts carry
untry-specific
ality
ociations
nes)
plications of
e CAGE fra
lf to a very
most impor

nce, on th
d should be
panybut
bit 2-4 prov
e an industr
it 2-4 The C
Adminis
Distance
h
l
Government
involvement
industries th
Producers
goods (ele
Producers
entitleme
Large emp
(farming)
Large sup
governme
transporta
National c
(aerospace
Vital to na
security
(telecomm
Exploiters
resources
Subject to
costs (infr
f the CAGE
amework, on
y broad arra
rtant ones.
he other h
e a crucial c
is much le
vides a sum
ry particular
CAGE Fram
strative
e
t
t is high in
hat are:
s of staple
ectricity)
s of other
ents (drugs)
ployers
ppliers to
ent (mass
ation)
champions
e)
ational
munications)
s of natural
(oil, mining)
o high sunk
rastructure)
E Distance F
nce it is tak
ay of applic
hand, shap
consideratio
ess importan
mmary of th
rly sensitiv
mework at th
Geographi
Distance
Geography pla
more importan
when:
Products hav
value-to-wei
bulk ratio (ce
Products are
or perishable
fruit)
Local superv
and operatio
requirements
high (service
Framework
ken down to
cations. Let
es consum
on for a con
nt for a cem
he character
e to a parti
he Industry L
ic Ec
Di
ays a
nt role
ve a low
ight or
ement)
e fragile
e (glass,
vision
onal
s are
es)
Econ
mak
impa
Na
va
(ca
Ec
sta
sc
(ce
La
fac
dif
sa
Di
bu
are
(in
Co
be
ag
ap
o the industr
ts focus he
mers produ
nsumer goo
ment or ste
ristics that a
icular kind
Level
onomic
stance
nomic differenc
ke the biggest
act when:
ature of demand
aries with incom
ars)
conomics of
andardization o
ale are limited
ement)
abor and other
ctor cost
fferences are
lient (garments
istribution or
usiness systems
e different
nsurance)
ompanies need
e responsive and
gile (home
ppliances)
ry level, len
ere on four
7
uct
ods
eel
are
of
ces
d
me
or
s)
to
d
nds
of


Mak

One
diff
wor
trac
diff
cann
sens
and
forg

Und

A s
diff
com
fore
be a
Wh
look
thes

Ass

Eve
over
be u
of m
can
Lati
com
valu
than
mor




king Differe
e applicatio
ferences vis
rth belabori
ced back to
ference or d
not simply
sitivity to d
2-4 can
getfulness an
derstanding
second app
ferences ac
mpanies rel
eignnesso
a useful exe
en there are
k to acquir
se barriers.
sessing Natu
en if multin
r local com
used at a fin
multinationa
help expla
in Americ
mparatively
uable when
n decisive. T
re than nat

ences Visib
on of the
sible. While
ing, most n
o a failure
distance. Fu
y fall back
ifferences. C
help even
nd cognitiv
the Liabilit
plication of
cross coun
lative to l
or more gen
ercise for b
e substantia
e or set up
ural Owners
nationals ca
mpetitors in
ner level of
als from dif
ain why Spa
ca, but al
easier for
n conducted
Thus, partic
tural owners
le
CAGE dis
e this applic
notable inte
e to apprec
urthermore,
on person
Checklists o
n experien
ve overload
ty of Foreig
f the CAG
ntries that
ocal comp
nerally affe
both multina
al liabilities
p joint vent
s and Comp
an be confid
a particular
resolution t
fferent coun
anish firms
lso why
U.S. firm
d at the ind
cularly good
ship advan
tance fram
cation may
ernational b
ciate a key
in a very d
nal experien
of the sort e
ced people
in a comple
gnness
GE framew
t might
petitorsthe
ct their rela
ationals and
of foreignn
tures with l
paring Forei
dent that th
r market, th
to shed ligh
ntries. For e
s do well in
success in
ms.
7
Again,
dustry level
d or bad glo
ntages.
mework is t
seem too o
business deb
y type of
diverse wor
nce to ens
embedded in
e avoid er
ex environm
work is to
handicap
e so-called
ative positio
d their local
ness, multin
local firms
ign Competi
hey are goi
he CAGE fr
ht on the rel
example, CA
n many indu
n Mexico
such anal
and is ind
obal strategi
to make k
obvious to
bacles can
cross-count
rld, manage
sure adequa
n exhibits 2
rrors due
ment.
pinpoint t
multination
d liability
ons. This c
l competito
nationals oft
to overcom
itors
ing to prev
ramework c
lative positi
AGE analys
ustries acro
has prov
lysis is mo
dicative rath
ies can matt
8
key
be
be
try
ers
ate
2-3
to
the
nal
of
can
rs.
ten
me
vail
can
on
sis
oss
ved
ost
her
ter


Com

The
pers
anal
mar
Wh
som
how
adju
in d
sect


Stra
Dis
Revi
chap
Pres
How
that
rathe
and t
direc
Ega
Harv
Mul
cont
Pres
Com
Man
mparing Ma
e CAGE fra
spective of
lysis of this
rket size or
ile such d
me adjustme
w much d
ustments at
deciding to
tion, on Gro

1
Pankaj
tegy , (Harv
2
For a
stance Still M
iew, Septembe
pter 2 of Pank
s, 2007), and
w to Achieve I
highlight dista
3
For furt
er than discou
the references
4
For an
ct investmen
alitarianism,
vard Business
5
Susan
ltinationals,
6
For a m
ext, see Andr
s, 2001).
7
Subram
mpetition amo
nagement Jour

arkets and D
amework ca
a particular
s type is to
r potential
discounting
ents of mark
distance m
all. Some c
enter or exi
olsch).

j Ghemawat
vard Busines
more extende
Matters: The H
er 2001. This
kaj Ghemawat
d chapter 3 of
It (Harvard Bu
ance effects, s
ther discussion
urage cross-bo
s cited therein
original disc
nt, see J ord
Cultural Dist
School, Bosto
E. Feinberg
unpublishe
more extended
rew Abbott,
manian Ranga
ong Foreign
rnal 25, no. 3:
Discounting
an also be
r company.
discount (sp
with meas
involves n
ket potentia
matters, tha
companies d
it markets (

t And Jordan
s Review Pre
ed treatment
Hard Reality
topic is also
t, Redefining
f Pankaj Ghem
usiness Revie
see www.ghem
n of the ways
order activity,
.
cussion of cu
dan Siegel,
tance, and F
on, October 2
g, The Exp
d working p
d discussion o
Chaos of Dis
an and Aldem
Multinationa
: 285293.
by Distanc
used to com
One metho
pecifically,
sures of dis
numerous a
al for distan
an refraini
do formally
(as describe
n I. Siegel,
ess, 2011):59
of this mate
of Global Ex
addressed at s
Global Strate
mawat, World
ew Press, 201
mawat.com.
in which CAG
see the discu
ltural distanc
Amir Lich
DI: A New
2008.
ansion and
paper, Rutger
of indexicality
sciplines (Chi
mir Drummon
als in a Foc
ce
mpare mark
d to conduc
divide) raw
stance, bro
approximati
nce is a bette
ng from
y use metho
ed in the firs
Cases on Re
9-69
erial, see Pan
xpansion, Ha
substantially g
egy (Harvard B
d 3.0: Global
1). For a col
GE difference
ssion of arbitr
e and how it
ht, and Sha
Approach,
Location Pa
rs University
y in a broade
icago: Univer
nd, Explainin
cal Host Ma
kets from t
ct quantitati
w measures
adly define
ions, maki
er idea, giv
making a
ds of this so
st case in th
edefining Glo
nkaj Ghemaw
Harvard Busin
greater length
Business Scho
l Prosperity a
llection of ma
es can encoura
rage in section
t affects forei
alom Schwar
working pap
atterns of U
y, 2005.
er social scien
rsity of Chica
ng Outcomes
arket, Strateg
9
the
ive
of
ed.
ng
ven
any
ort
his
bal
wat,
ess
h in
ool
and
aps
age
n 5
ign
rtz,
per,
U.S.
nce
ago
in
gic