This document summarizes a group assignment explaining Tuckman's five stages of group development using personal experiences. It discusses the forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning stages. The group was initially unfamiliar with each other but communicated well, established roles, and had no conflicts. They worked effectively together, supported each other, and completed their task with a good grade while maintaining their group structure.
This document summarizes a group assignment explaining Tuckman's five stages of group development using personal experiences. It discusses the forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning stages. The group was initially unfamiliar with each other but communicated well, established roles, and had no conflicts. They worked effectively together, supported each other, and completed their task with a good grade while maintaining their group structure.
This document summarizes a group assignment explaining Tuckman's five stages of group development using personal experiences. It discusses the forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning stages. The group was initially unfamiliar with each other but communicated well, established roles, and had no conflicts. They worked effectively together, supported each other, and completed their task with a good grade while maintaining their group structure.
Name Sr No. M. Jazib Niazi 03 Bakhtawar Sattar 15 Ayesha Inam 12 Ebad Aziz 13 Rabia Afzaal 14 Five-Stage Group Development Model:
Our Assignment is to explain Stages of Group Development model with the help of our personal life experience. The first assignment of Accounting was to make an organization financial statement it was a group assignment and at that time none of us knew each other. That was the prestage 1. Stage 1: Forming is characterized by a great deal of uncertainty about the groups purpose, structure, and leadership. We all dont know each other well, so all of us were a little bit shy and watchful. Through conversation we tried to establish our roles and get to know each other better. Stage 2: Storming is the second stage and one of the intragroup conflicts. Members accept the existence of the group but resist the constraints it imposes on individuality. However in our group there was no conflict, the group communicated well, we use to share our ideas and views with each other and everything was going well and in organized manner. At this stage the need of a group leader became higher, so Jazib Niazi takes the command and started coordinating the work. Stage 3: Norming stage is complete when the group structure solidifies and the group has assimilated a common set of expectations of what defines correct member behavior. Members of our group were working together effectively, help each other where needed and ask for each other opinion and share their ideas and views without hesitation. And our group started fulfilling its purpose. Stage 4: Performing is the fourth stage. The structure at this point is fully functional and accepted. Group energy has moved from getting to know and understand each other to performing the task at hand. The group members became supportive, tolerant and open.. We found a way to get the job done effectively, without any clash. Stage 5: Adjourning stage is a preparation for disbanding. Wrapping up activities is the focus rather than high task performance. At this stage we all with our joint effort completed our task and our work was marked with a good grade. We dont think that we met the final stage of Tuckmans five stage model. Because we still work as a group and are together.
Frederick Cooper (Editor), Randall M. Packard (Editor) - International Development and The Social Sciences - Essays On The History and Politics of Knowledge-University of California Press (1998)