Professional Documents
Culture Documents
internet facility
Valid
1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th Rank
14th Rank
16th Rank
Total
Frequency
8
3
7
9
8
4
6
8
13
6
9
7
8
4
100
Percent
8.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
8.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
13.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
8.0
4.0
100.0
Valid Percent
8.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
8.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
13.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
8.0
4.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
8.0
11.0
18.0
27.0
35.0
39.0
45.0
53.0
66.0
72.0
81.0
88.0
96.0
100.0
internet facility
16th Rank
1st Rank
14th Rank
2nd Rank
12th Rank
11th Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
10th Rank
5th Rank
9th Rank
7th Rank
th Rank
8th Rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (8%), 2nd rank (3%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (9%),
5th rank (8%), 6th rank (4%), 7th rank (6%), 8th rank (8%), 9th rank (13%), 10th rank (6%),
11th rank (9%), 12th rank (7%), 14th rank ( 8%), 16th rank (4%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 4th rank to internet facility.
Digital facility
Valid
1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
6th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th rank
13th Rank
14 th rank
15th rank
Total
Frequency
3
7
5
13
15
10
2
9
11
3
2
3
7
2
8
100
Percent
3.0
7.0
5.0
13.0
15.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
7.0
2.0
8.0
100.0
Valid Percent
3.0
7.0
5.0
13.0
15.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
7.0
2.0
8.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
3.0
10.0
15.0
28.0
43.0
53.0
55.0
64.0
75.0
78.0
80.0
83.0
90.0
92.0
100.0
Digital facility
15th rank
14 th rank
13th Rank
1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
12th rank
11th Rank
4th Rank
10th Rank
9th Rank
5th Rank
8th Rank
7th Rank
6th Rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (3%), 2nd rank (7%), 3rd rank (5%), 4th rank (13%),
5th rank (15%), 6th rank (10%), 7th rank (2%), 8th rank (9%), 9th rank (11%), 10th rank
(3%), 11th rank (2%), 12th rank (3%), 13th rank (7%), 14th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (8%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 4th rank to digital facility.
more specialization
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
4
2
7
6
14
11
13
6
10
19
3
2
3
100
Percent
4.0
2.0
7.0
6.0
14.0
11.0
13.0
6.0
10.0
19.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Valid Percent
4.0
2.0
7.0
6.0
14.0
11.0
13.0
6.0
10.0
19.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
4.0
6.0
13.0
19.0
33.0
44.0
57.0
63.0
73.0
92.0
95.0
97.0
100.0
more specialization
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
11th rank
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
10th rank
9th rank
6th rank
7th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (4%), 2nd rank (2%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (6%),
5th rank (14%), 6th rank (11%), 7th rank (13%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank (10%), 11th rank
(19%), 13th rank (3%), 15th rank (2%), 16th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 5th rank to more specialization.
place or city
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
11
5
15
10
8
5
4
14
6
9
3
5
4
1
100
Percent
11.0
5.0
15.0
10.0
8.0
5.0
4.0
14.0
6.0
9.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
100.0
Valid Percent
11.0
5.0
15.0
10.0
8.0
5.0
4.0
14.0
6.0
9.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
11.0
16.0
31.0
41.0
49.0
54.0
58.0
72.0
78.0
87.0
90.0
95.0
99.0
100.0
place or city
16th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
1st rank
2nd rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (11%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (15%), 4th rank
(10%), 5th rank (8%), 6th rank (5%), 7th rank (4%), 8th rank (14%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank
(9%), 12th rank (3%), 13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 4%), 16th rank (1%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 3rd rank to Place or city.
placements
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
12
29
7
2
6
14
6
7
1
3
4
4
2
3
100
Percent
12.0
29.0
7.0
2.0
6.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
1.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Valid Percent
12.0
29.0
7.0
2.0
6.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
1.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
12.0
41.0
48.0
50.0
56.0
70.0
76.0
83.0
84.0
87.0
91.0
95.0
97.0
100.0
placements
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank
1st rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
7th rank
2nd rank
6th rank
5th rank
3rd rank
4th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (12%), 2nd rank (29%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (2%),
5th rank (6%), 6th rank (14%), 7th rank (6%), 9th rank (7%), 10th rank (1%), 11th rank (3%),
12th rank (4%), 13th rank (4%), 15th rank ( 2%), 16th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 2nd rank to Placements.
university
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
12
13
7
11
12
8
10
3
2
13
2
4
2
1
100
Percent
12.0
13.0
7.0
11.0
12.0
8.0
10.0
3.0
2.0
13.0
2.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
100.0
Valid Percent
12.0
13.0
7.0
11.0
12.0
8.0
10.0
3.0
2.0
13.0
2.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
12.0
25.0
32.0
43.0
55.0
63.0
73.0
76.0
78.0
91.0
93.0
97.0
99.0
100.0
university
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank
1st rank
10th rank
2nd rank
9th rank
8th rank
3rd rank
7th rank
4th rank
6th rank
5th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (12%), 2nd rank (13%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank
(11%), 5th rank (12%), 6th rank (8%), 7th rank (10%), 8th rank (3%), 9th rank (2%), 10th
rank (13%), 12th rank (2%), 13th rank (4%), 15th rank ( 2%), 16th rank (1%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 2nd and 10th rank to university.
fee structure
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total
Frequency
6
9
13
10
6
7
14
2
12
6
9
1
2
3
100
Percent
6.0
9.0
13.0
10.0
6.0
7.0
14.0
2.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Valid Percent
6.0
9.0
13.0
10.0
6.0
7.0
14.0
2.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
6.0
15.0
28.0
38.0
44.0
51.0
65.0
67.0
79.0
85.0
94.0
95.0
97.0
100.0
fee structure
15th rank
14th rank
12th rank
1st rank
11th rank
2nd rank
10th rank
3rd rank
9th rank
8th rank
4th rank
7th rank
5th rank
6th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (6%), 2nd rank (9%), 3rd rank (13%), 4th rank (10%),
5th rank (6%), 6th rank (7%), 7th rank (14%), 8th rank (2%), 9th rank (12%), 10th rank (6%),
11th rank (9%), 12th rank (1%), 14th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 7th rank toffee structure.
infrastructure
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
2
10
9
11
11
14
7
6
7
3
6
2
7
5
100
Percent
2.0
10.0
9.0
11.0
11.0
14.0
7.0
6.0
7.0
3.0
6.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
100.0
Valid Percent
2.0
10.0
9.0
11.0
11.0
14.0
7.0
6.0
7.0
3.0
6.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.0
12.0
21.0
32.0
43.0
57.0
64.0
70.0
77.0
80.0
86.0
88.0
95.0
100.0
infrastructure
16th rank
1st rank
15th rank
2nd rank
13th rank
12th rank
4th rank
11th rank
10th rank
5th rank
9th rank
8th rank
6th rank
7th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (10%), 4th rank (9%), 5th rank
(11%), 6th rank (11%), 7th rank (14%), 8th rank (7%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank (7%), 11th
rank (3%), 12th rank (6%), 13th rank (2%), 15th rank ( 7%), 16th rank (5%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 7th rank to infrastructure.
faculty
Valid
1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
28
5
4
8
4
10
10
2
9
3
1
8
3
3
2
100
Percent
28.0
5.0
4.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
100.0
Valid Percent
28.0
5.0
4.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
28.0
33.0
37.0
45.0
49.0
59.0
69.0
71.0
80.0
83.0
84.0
92.0
95.0
98.0
100.0
faculty
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
1th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
7th rank
5th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (28%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (4%), 4th rank (8%),
5th rank (4%), 7th rank (10%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (2%), 10th rank (9%), 11th rank
(3%), 12th rank (1%), 13th rank (8%), 13th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (3%), 16th rank (2%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 1st rank to faculty.
collegereputation
Valid
1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
6
5
7
4
2
13
3
10
2
8
4
7
5
6
11
7
100
Percent
6.0
5.0
7.0
4.0
2.0
13.0
3.0
10.0
2.0
8.0
4.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
11.0
7.0
100.0
Valid Percent
6.0
5.0
7.0
4.0
2.0
13.0
3.0
10.0
2.0
8.0
4.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
11.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
6.0
11.0
18.0
22.0
24.0
37.0
40.0
50.0
52.0
60.0
64.0
71.0
76.0
82.0
93.0
100.0
collegereputation
16th rank
1th rank
2th rank
15th rank
14th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
13th rank
6th rank
12th rank
11th rank
7th rank
10th rank
8th rank
9th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (6%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (4%),
5th rank (2%), 6th rank (13%), 7th rank (3%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (2%), 10th rank (8%),
11th rank (4%), 12th rank (7%), 13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 6%), 15th rank (11%), 16th rank
(7%)..
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 15th rank to college reputation.
extracurricularactivities
Valid
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total
Frequency
2
3
2
4
4
2
10
9
6
7
15
12
12
12
100
Percent
2.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
10.0
9.0
6.0
7.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
100.0
Valid Percent
2.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
10.0
9.0
6.0
7.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.0
5.0
7.0
11.0
15.0
17.0
27.0
36.0
42.0
49.0
64.0
76.0
88.0
100.0
extracurricularactivities
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
15th rank
5th rank
6th rank
14th rank
7th rank
8th rank
13th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
11th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2nd rank (2%), 3rd rank (3%), 4th rank (2%), 5th rank (4%),
6th rank (4%), 7th rank (2%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (9%), 10th rank (6%), 11th rank (7%),
12th rank (15%), 13th rank (12%), 14th rank ( 12%), 15th rank (12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 14th and 15th rank to extracurricular activities.
playground
Valid
4th rank
6th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
5
2
6
3
7
8
8
19
12
15
15
100
Percent
5.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
19.0
12.0
15.0
15.0
100.0
Valid Percent
5.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
19.0
12.0
15.0
15.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
5.0
7.0
13.0
16.0
23.0
31.0
39.0
58.0
70.0
85.0
100.0
playground
4th rank
6th rank
16th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
15th rank
11th rank
14th rank
12th rank
13th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 4th rank (5%), 6th rank (2%), 8th rank (6%), 9th rank (3%),
10th rank (7%), 11th rank (8%), 12th rank (8%), 13th rank (19%), 14th rank (12%), 15th rank
(15%), 16th rank (15%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 13th rank to playground.
canteen
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
2
1
4
2
5
5
7
6
10
8
26
6
18
100
Percent
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
10.0
8.0
26.0
6.0
18.0
100.0
Valid Percent
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
10.0
8.0
26.0
6.0
18.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
26.0
32.0
42.0
50.0
76.0
82.0
100.0
canteen
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
6th rank
16th rank
7th rank
9th rank
15th rank
10th rank
11th rank
14th rank
12th rank
13th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (1%), 3rd rank (4%), 6th rank (2%),
7th rank (5%), 8th rank (5%), 9th rank (7%), 10th rank (7%), 11th rank (6%), 12th rank
(10%), 13th rank (8%), 14th rank ( 26%), 15th rank (6%), 16th rank (18%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 14th rank to canteen.
hostel facility
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
8th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
7
3
1
4
2
8
9
4
9
11
4
21
17
100
Percent
7.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
8.0
9.0
4.0
9.0
11.0
4.0
21.0
17.0
100.0
Valid Percent
7.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
8.0
9.0
4.0
9.0
11.0
4.0
21.0
17.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.0
10.0
11.0
15.0
17.0
25.0
34.0
38.0
47.0
58.0
62.0
83.0
100.0
hostel facility
1st rank
2nd rank
16th rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
8th rank
15th rank
10th rank
11th rank
14th rank
12th rank
13th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (7%), 2nd rank (3%), 3rd rank (1%), 4th rank (4%),
5th rank (2%), 8th rank (8%), 9th rank (9%), 10th rank (9%), 11th rank (4%), 12th rank (9%),
13th rank (11%), 14th rank ( 4%), 15th rank (21%), 16th rank (17%)..
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 15th rank to hostel facility.
Valid
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10thn rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
6
12
8
2
4
8
3
13
1
18
5
3
5
12
100
Percent
6.0
12.0
8.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
13.0
1.0
18.0
5.0
3.0
5.0
12.0
100.0
Valid Percent
6.0
12.0
8.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
13.0
1.0
18.0
5.0
3.0
5.0
12.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
6.0
18.0
26.0
28.0
32.0
40.0
43.0
56.0
57.0
75.0
80.0
83.0
88.0
100.0
16th rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
12th rank
7th rank
10thn rank
8th rank
9th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2nd rank (6%), 3rd rank (12%), 4th rank (8%), 5th rank (2%),
6th rank (4%), 7th rank (8%), 8th rank (3%), 9th rank (1%), 10th rank (18%), 12th rank (5%),
13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 3%), 15th rank (5%), 16th rank (.12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 10th rank to brand of the college.
Valid
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Frequency
2
5
6
4
6
3
11
15
6
7
20
3
12
100
Percent
2.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
3.0
11.0
15.0
6.0
7.0
20.0
3.0
12.0
100.0
Valid Percent
2.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
3.0
11.0
15.0
6.0
7.0
20.0
3.0
12.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.0
7.0
13.0
17.0
23.0
26.0
37.0
52.0
58.0
65.0
85.0
88.0
100.0
2nd rank
3rd rank
15th rank
5th rank
6th rank
14th rank
7th rank
8th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (6%), 5th rank (4%),
6th rank (6%), 7th rank (3%), 8th rank (11%), 11th rank (15%), 12th rank (6%), 13th rank
(7%), 14th rank ( 20%), 15th rank (3%), 16th rank (12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 20th rank to foreign tour or local visit by
flight.a.