Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22.0,
Amos
22.0.
10
Results
The valid response rate was 39.5% (141/357).
80 people (57%) were health professionals and 61 (43%)
were patients and citizens.
Male : female = 34% : 61%
Health professionals (80) included physicians (16),
nurses (10), pharmacists (3), occupational therapists (5),
physiotherapists (2), nutritionists (3), etc.
Among patients and citizens (61), 19 people had disease
experience, and 27 were family or supporters of patients
or clients.
11
Results
Exploratory factor analysis (Promax rotation) for 17 items
relating transformative learning revealed 4 factors. 3
items were omitted because of double loadings.
The four factors were named self reflection,
perspective transformation, disorienting dilemma and
formative learning.
Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with the 4
factors using SEM, and the model fit indices were
satisfactory (GFI= .89, CFI= .93, RMSEA= .084).
12
SEM of all participants (n=141)
13
disorienting
dilemma
understanding
of others
perspective
transformation
self
reflection
health literacy
improvement
formative
learning
narratives
of clients
encountering
diverse
values
GFI= .80
CFI= .93
RMSEA= .058
significant
not siginificant
14
SEM of health professionals (n=80)
disorienting
dilemma
perspective
transformation
self
reflection
understanding
of others
encountering
diverse
values
narratives
of clients
formative
learning
consciousness
change toward
clients/patients
GFI= .67
CFI= .82
RMSEA= .093
significant
not siginificant
15
SEM of citizens/patients (n=61)
disorienting
dilemma
perspective
transformation
self
reflection
understanding
of others
encountering
diverse
values
narratives
of clients
formative
learning
GFI= .66
CFI= .85
RMSEA= .088
significant
not siginificant
health literacy
improvement
Discussion
Caf-style health communication, in which health
professionals learn diverse patients/clients
values and narratives, can change
consciousness towards patients/clients, possibly
leading to attitudinal change, via self reflection
and perspective transformation.
This psychometric analyses has several
limitations, e.g., it studies only self perceptions,
and it is a cross-sectional survey.
16