Professional Documents
Culture Documents
n0
z
n
n0
z
n
2
n+2
So
f(z) =
1
2
z
1
+
n0
(1
1
2
n+2
)z
n
, z A
0,1
(0)
Is the Laurent expansion for f in A
0,1
(0). Note, in particular that f has a simple pole at
z = 0 and that
Res(f; 0) =
1
2
Next we look at the Laurent expansion for f with z A
1,2
(0). Rewriting things again so
1
that we can apply the geometric series trick again we have
f(z) =
1
2z
+
1
1 z
1
2
2
1
1
z
2
1
2z
1
z
1
1
z
1
2
2
1
1
z
2
=
1
z
(
1
2
n0
z
n
)
n0
z
n
2
n+2
=
1
z
(
1
2
n1
z
n
)
n0
z
n
2
n+2
=
1
2z
n2
z
n
n0
z
n
2
n+2
i.e.
f(z) =
1
2z
n2
z
n
n0
z
n
2
n+2
, z A
1,2
(0)
is the Laurent expansion for f(z) in the annulus A
1,2
(0). I want you to NOTICE that the
coecient of
1
z
appearing above is NOT Res(f; 0).
Think of it this way. Consider the 3 Laurent series
f =
nZ
a
n
z
n
, z A
0,1
(0)
f =
nZ
b
n
z
n
, z A
1,2
(0)
and
f =
nZ
c
n
(z 1)
n
, z A
0,
1
2
(1)
Then a
1
= Res(f; 0) = b
1
and c
1
= Res(f; 1) = b
1
. I encourage you to check that
b
1
= 1. Moving onwards on {|z| > 2} we have
f(z) =
1
2z
+
1
1 z
1
2
2
1
1
z
2
=
1
2z
1
z
1
1
z
+
1
2
1
z
1 (
2
z
)
=
1
2z
n1
z
n
+
1
2z
n0
2
n
z
n
=
1
2z
(
1
z
+
1
z
2
+ ) +
1
2z
(1 +
2
z
+
4
z
2
+
8
z
3
+ )
=
1
z
3
+
3
z
4
+ (1)
2
Notice, the coecient of
1
z
is actually zero in this region.
Method 2. Here we gure out the Laurent expansion by reducing everything to calcu-
lation of residues. We already saw that generically, if a function g(z) is holomorphic in a
punctured disk around a point z
0
then
g =
nZ
a
n
(z z
0
)
n
, a
n
=
1
2i
C(z
0
)
f()d
( z
0
)
n+1
where C
(z
0
) lives in the punctured disk. Then, lets look at f(z) as before. Wed like to nd
the Laurent series around z
0
= 0. Notice that f(z) has a simple pole at z = 0 so necessary
the coecient of
1
z
in the Laurent expansion around 0 can be calculated easily from the
residue formulae, namely
a
1
=
1
2
Next, we want a
n
for other choices of n. Notice
a
n
=
1
2i
C(0)
d
n+2
( 1)( 2)
So, by Cauchys theorem, if n + 2 0 a
n
= 0, in other words the Laurent series will be of
the form
nZ
a
n
z
n
=
n1
a
n
z
n
. For n 0 a
n
will be the residue of
1
z
n+2
(z1)(z2)
at 0.
We use of residue formula to get
a
n
= Res(
1
z
n+2
(z 1)(z 2)
; 0)
= lim
0
1
(n + 1)!
(
d
d
)
n+1
1
( 1)( 2)
= lim
0
1
(n + 1)!
{
(n + 1)!(1)
n
( 2)
n+2
(n + 1)!(1)
n
( 1)
n+2
}
=
1
2
n+2
+ 1
which is in agreement with our earlier calculation. Next we look in A
1,2
(0). Here we have,
for 1 < r < 2
a
n
=
1
2i
|z|=r
f()d
n+1
|z| = r encloses two residues of f so we see that actually we have (with (0, 1))
1
2i
|z|=r0
f()d
n+1
=
1
2i
|z|=
f()d
n+1
+ Res(
f(z)
z
n+1
; 1)
But Res(
f(z)
z
n+1
; 1) = 1 (as I encouraged you to check earlier) and
1
2i
|z|=
f()d
n+1
is what we
calculated earlier. In other words a
n
= {previous a
n
} 1. So we get the Laurent series we
3
want by subtracting z
n
from each term of index n Z which we had previously calculated.
Thus
f =
1
2z
+
n0
(
1
2
n+2
+ 1)z
n
n=
z
n
=
1
2z
n0
(
1
2
n+2
)z
n
n2
z
n
i.e.
f =
1
2z
n0
(
1
2
n+2
)z
n
n2
z
n
, z A
1,2
(0)
Notice this is the exact same answer we got using the previous method only this time it
seems we saved a bit of time. Repeating the style of argument we should get the Laurent
expansion for f in {|z| > 2} by adding in the residues of
f(z)
z
n+2
at z = 2. By our standard
formula
Res(
f(z)
z
n+2
; 2) = 2
n2
So we will take
1
2z
n0
(
1
2
n+2
)z
n
n2
z
n
+
n=
z
n
2
n+2
=
1
2z
n2
z
n
+
n=1
z
n
2
n+2
And we see then
f(z) =
1
2z
(
1
z
2
+
1
z
3
+ ) + (
1
2z
+
1
z
2
+
2
z
3
+ ) =
1
z
3
+
3
z
4
+ , |z| > 2
Notice that, again, this saved some time and got the same Laurent series expansion as we
saw before. Which method of calculation you prefer is, obviously, a matter of taste.
4