Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study
A Study
Article information:
To cite this document: S.P. Dubey, G.K. Sharma, K.S. Shishodia, G.S. Sekhon, (2005),"A study of lubrication mechanism of
oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions in steel cold rolling", Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, Vol. 57 Iss: 5 pp. 208 - 212
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00368790510614190
Downloaded on: 18-07-2012
References: This document contains references to 22 other documents
Citations: This document has been cited by 2 other documents
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
This document has been downloaded 1130 times since 2005. *
Introduction
Cold rolling is a direct compression process which reduces
the thickness or changes the cross section of the work piece.
The compressive force required for plastic deformation of
sheet metal is transmitted through a set of rolls. During the
deformation of the work piece, frictional stress between rolls
and work piece is generated. The ratio of work piece
thickness to work roll diameter determines the level of
friction. Friction gets affected by mill speed, type of material
being rolled, surface finish of rolls and the strip (Roberts,
1978). Heat is generated due to plastic deformation of
The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/0036-8792.htm
The present authors wish to thank R&D management of the Indian Oil
Corporation Limited, for giving permission to publish the paper, and
officers and staff of different departments of Indian Oil Corporation
Limited, R&D center who have rendered help in conducting the tests on
different test rigs.
208
friction, forward slip, roll load and torque. It was found that oil
viscosity, roll speed, reduction ratio and surface roughness have
substantial influence on lubrication during cold rolling.
Studies on the lubricating action of commercially available
O/W emulsions of known industrial performance are scarce in
the published literature. Such investigations are highly relevant
for oil formulators, tribologists and industrial users. This paper
describes the results of a study carried out to understand the
lubrication mechanism of three commercially available rolling
oil emulsions of known industrial performance.
Experimental study
Test oils
Rolling oils (Table I) called as A, B and C were selected for
the present study. These are commercial rolling oils and are in
use in the Indian industry. These represent three different
generations and the corresponding progress in the
development of rolling oils. The important chemical
ingredients of the three oils are listed in Table I.
Emulsion stability
O/W emulsion of 5 percent (v/v) concentration was made by
adding emulsifiable rolling oil to water of hardness 200 PPM at
558C temperature. The mixture was sufficiently agitated. This
emulsion was transferred to a separating funnel, maintained at
508C by means of a water bath and allowed to stay for 1 h. From
the bottom 100 ml of emulsion was transferred to a measuring
cylinder, immersed in a water bath maintained at a temperature
of 85-908C. The oil was separated from the emulsion through
sulfuric acid treatment. The percentage of oil obtained is an
indication of the emulsion stability of the emulsion. Emulsion
stability value and other properties of the three emulsions used
in the present study are given in Table II.
Droplet size
Emulsions of oil samples A, B and C were prepared in
200 PPM hard water with 2.5 and 5 percent concentrations.
Table I Important chemical ingredients of the chosen test oils
Ingredients
Oil A
Oil B
Oil C
Mineral oil
Natural fat
Ester
Emulsifier
Anionic
Non anionic
Hybrid
Characteristics
Oil A
Oil B
Oil C
1
2
3
4
28.96
0.901
5.2
60
0.902
65
45.8
0.912
175
5.0
4.0
0.7
30.1
21.4
24.0
17.7
68.5
60.1
209
Film thickness
The film thickness was measured using an ultra thin film
EHD interferometry instrument (Barker et al., 1993).
Emulsions of oil samples A, B and C of 2.5 and 5 percent
concentration were tested. Test load was 20 N and emulsion
temperature was maintained at 608C. The disc speed was
Figure 1 Droplet size distribution of oil sample A
210
0.50
0.040
0.040
286
365
55 ^ 4
_ 0:02
s0 220 1 1510:3 1 _=1Ref
Emulsion stability
As given in Table II, the values of emulsion stability of oils A,
B and C at 5 percent oil concentration are 5.0, 4.0 and 0.7,
respectively. Therefore, oil A is stable, oil B is less stable and
oil C is least stable. Consequently the lubrication properties
of oil A, B and C are expected to be poor, fair and good.
where s0 is the yield stress, 1 is the plastic strain, 1_is the strain
rate, and 1_Ref is the reference strain rate.
The sheet metal was first cleaned with mechanical rubbing
and then with solvent in the strip preparation unit. The strip
was next mounted on a spool of the uncoiler stand.
Prior to conducting experiments, emulsion tank,
connecting pipes and rolling mill stand were thoroughly
cleaned first with cold water (twice), then with hot water
(twice), and then with biocide. On each occasion the cold
water, hot water and biocide were circulated for a minimum
of 30 min. Afterwards the tank was charged with
demineralized (DM) water and tap water in proportionate
quantities to get hard water of 200 PPM. After determining
the actual hardness of water, heater was switched on. A
measured quantity of selected rolling oil was poured in the
tank to get desired concentration of rolling oil (2.5 or 5.0
percent). While pouring the oil in the tank an agitator was
used for proper mixing of oil in water. The emulsion was
circulated and a sample was drawn from the mill stand to
ascertain the oil concentration in emulsion. The temperature
of emulsion in tank was maintained at 508C. Emulsion flow
rate of 100 l/min was used. The emulsion flow nozzles were
pointed at contact of rolls and strip. Experiments were
conducted at different rolling speeds (100, 350 and 500 m/
min) under variable load conditions. Steel strip was rolled
under a load of 20-40 tonnes and reduced up to 0.35 mm
from an initial thickness of 1.00 mm in a number of passes.
Each experiment was carried out twice and rolling parameters
such as rolling load, rolling torque, reduction, forward slip,
back and front tension and speed were noted. Values of these
parameters and those of mechanical properties of the rolls
material and steel strip were used as input to a FEM based
mathematical model (Montmitonnet, 1999) for the
calculation of the co-efficient of friction.
Saponification value
SAP value of a rolling oil is a measure of the quantity of
natural fats and ester in the oil. SAP values of oils A, B and C
are 5.2, 65 and 175, respectively (Table II). It means oil C has
higher amount of fat and ester as compared to oil B whereas
oil A has negligible fat and ester content. Based on industrial
experience, oil having higher SAP value gives better
lubrication and performs satisfactorily in an industrial
rolling mill. On this basis the oil A, B and C are expected
to perform inferior, better and still better.
Droplet size
The average droplet size of oils A, B and C has been found as
0.133, 1.9 and 2.3-6.2 mm, respectively (Figure 1-3). Literature
and observations of researchers emphasize that O/W emulsions
having larger droplet size produce higher film thickness and
better lubrication. On this ground, oil C is expected to perform
better than oils B and A, oil B to perform better than oil A but
inferior to C, and oil A to be the most inferior.
Film thickness
It is found from Figure 4 that highest film thickness produced
by oils A, B and C in 2.5 and 5.0 percent concentration are
30.1, 24.0, 68.5 and 21.4, 17.7, 60.1, respectively. The two
critical speeds, as observed by other researchers also, are
clearly indicated in the above figure. But there is a significant
deviation from what is generally expected by practitioners and
available in published literature. The film thickness of oil C as
expected has been found to be the highest at both above
concentrations. However, the film thickness of oil A has been
found to be more than that of oil B at both concentrations
which is contrary to expectations, since it is believed that oil of
higher droplet size and SAP value give higher film thickness.
Other deviation is that all three oils produce higher film
thickness at 2.5 percent concentration than that at 5 percent
concentration. The tests were repeated twice, but the
reproducible results were obtained. The reason for anomaly
could be improper simulation by the test equipment of actual
rolling mill conditions in respect of the speed and type of
contact. In a rolling mill, speed is generally found in the range
of 300-1,800 m/min (except a few cases of mill speed of
100-200 m/min) and contact is line contact. In EHD test
equipment, speed is very low (0-180 m/min) and contact is
point contact instead of line contact.
Tribological performance
The experimental data on cold rolling of steel strip using the
three rolling oils A, B and C at two oil concentration (2.5 and
5 percent) and for three different speeds (100, 350, 500 m/
min) was used as input to a finite element model
(Montmitonnet, 1999) to estimate the co-efficient of friction
in each case. The computed values of coefficient of friction
are given in Table IV. The effect of speed and different
211
Speed
m/min
100
350
500
100
350
500
5.0
0.047-0.060
0.050-0.076
0.032-0.056
0.048-0.051
0.039-0.046
0.036-0.047
0.054-0.061
0.041-0.051
0.039-0.050
0.042-0.051
0.038-0.045
0.032-0.041
Conclusion
.
References
Barker, D.C., Johnston, G. and Spikes, H.T. (1993), EHD
film formation and starvation of oil in water emulsions,
Tribology Trans., Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 565-72.
212