ETEC 2003 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION PROJECT RUBRIC

Criteria

Meets Standard
10 pts.

Approaching
Standard
4 pts.

Below Standard
0 pts.

Project
Identificati
on of
problem

Identificati
on of
solution

Successfully identified
an authentic
technology-based
problem within an
educational
community that aligns
with the outcomes of
the project
Project is aligned with
the NETS-T standards
for course.

An authentic
technology-based
problem was
identified within
their educational
community but was
not aligned with
project outcomes
and/or NETS-T
standards for
course

Failed to identify a
n authentic
technology-based
problem that
meets a need
within the
educational
community.

Solution meets a need

identified by the
educational
community
Solution is aligned
with NETS-T standards
for course
Solution is realistic for

Solution does not

meet a need
identified by the
educational
community and/or
Solution does not
align with NETS-T
standards for

Failed to identify a
solution to a
technology-based
problem within the
educational
community.

Score

project time frame

Critical
Thinking

Project demonstrates
ability to think
critically through
problem identification
and the development
of a solution.

course

Needed instructor
assistance in
identifying a
problem within the
educational
community, and/or
Needed instructor
guidance on a
solution to the
identified problem

Failed to identify a
problem and a
solution within the
educational
community

Cooperates with
group but does not
actively contribute
to
identification/soluti
on of problem
Does not
consistently
provide meaningful
feedback or does
not seek feedback
from group
members

Does not actively

participate in
group activity
Does not solicit or
provide
meaningful
feedback

Collaboration
Individual
Collaborati
on
(Score
determined
by peer
evaluation
of
participation
)

Demonstrates
preparedness,
readiness to work
Actively collaborates
with group members
to identify and solve
problem
Makes use of the
technology tools
agreed upon by the
team to communicate
and manage tasks
Contributes and

solicits meaningful
feedback to group
members to improve
project
SelfDirection

Completes tasks on
time without having
to be reminded

Completes tasks
but must be
reminded by group
members and/or
instructor and may
not always
complete tasks by
target dates

Fails to complete
agreed upon tasks

Group
Collaborati
on

Consistently
communicated with
educational
community
throughout project
Established guidelines
for group
communication and
participation
Demonstrated ability
to resolve issues (if
applicable) without
instructor intervention
Clearly defined tasks
were established for
group members

Communicated
with educational
community was not
consistent
Guidelines for
group
communication and
participation were
present but not
clearly defined.
Demonstrated
ability to resolve
most issues (if
applicable). Rarely
involved instructor.
Tasks were defined

Did not
communicate with
educational
community

based on members
strengths
Problem identification
and solution
development involved
all members of the
group

for each member

but were not
followed closely.
Tasks were not
based

Presentation

Creates visually
appealing
presentation
Presentation is
narrated using
MyBrainShark or
similar technology,
Narrator speaks
clearly and is easy to
understand

Presentation
attempts to add
elements to make
it visually
appealing
Presentation is
narrated using
MyBrainShark or
similar technology.
Narration is not
always clear or
easy to understand

Presentation is not
narrated using
MyBrainShark or
similar technology

Total Points
Comments:

/70