Scientific Sheet - Clinical studies

Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system:
A retrospective cohort study


Dent Mater (2011) 27(10):1031-7


Retrospective cohort study with 151 restorations


The suitability of a glass ionomer system (EQUIA) as a permanent restoration material in
posterior cavities.

After 2 years and about 150 restorations it was concluded that EQUIA may be used
as a permanent restoration material for any size of Class I and in smaller Class II cavities.


48-Months, Multicentre, Clinical Evaluation on 304 Glass Ionomer Permanent


Abstract 192686, IADR- PER, Dubrovnik 2014


Prospective clinical trial


To evaluate clinical efficiency and mechanical resistance of restorative system based on
a high-viscosity, coated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA), when used for permanent

At 48 months, 304 restorations were evaluated in 202 patients (82 Class I, 150 Class II, 72 Class V).
Overall general success rate reported was of 91,45%, and a general integrity rate (only Criteria =0) of 79,61%.
These results suggest that the restorative system used in this trial can be a reliable choice for
permanent dental restorations, even in load bearing tooth surfaces of molars and premolars.


Randomized Clinical Trial in the field: Longevity after 24 months


T.U. KLINKE, A.A. DABOUL & R.H. BIFFAR (University of Greifswald)
J Dent Res 92 (Spec Iss B): Abstract 3, 2013


Prospective, double blinded randomized control clinical trial


The clinical performance of a GIC material (GC Fuji IX GP Fast, GC)
versus a coated GIC system (EQUIA, GC).

The results showed good clinical performance of GIC and EQUIA.
No significant differences in survival rate were found between both materials. Cavity preparation
and material application should adhere to the indications and recommendations set by the manufacturer
in order to have a higher filling longevity. The ongoing follow up will strengthen the current results.

GC Europe N.V.
Issue n°1, 2014

173097-GC-Clinical Studies-EQUIA-OK.indd 1

08/07/14 10:34

GC). Conclusion: The use of both materials for the restoration of posterior teeth exhibited a similar and clinically successful performance after 60 months. SDI) and two surface coating materials (G-Coat Plus.05).H. Gradia.Y.indd 2 GC Europe N. Oral Invest (2011) 15:771–857 DESIGN Clinical trial with 248 evaluated restorations in 52 patients WHAT IS BEING TESTED? The clinical performance of two encapsulated glass ionomer cements (GC Fuji IX GP Extra. it has been rebranded as a New Restorative System bearing the components EQUIA Fil and EQUIA Coat. postoperative sensitivity and color match (p>0.S. TYAS. FIRAT. After 60 months 126 (76 Cl1 and 50 Cl2) restorations were evaluated in 52 patients. DIEM.B. TURKUN Clin. IADR Cape Town 2014 DESIGN Five-year randomised clinical trial on 140 (80 Cl1 and 60 Cl2) lesions in 59 patients WHAT IS BEING TESTED? The clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system (EQUIA. The colour match of GC Fuji IX GP Extra was better than Riva SC (p≤0. a resin-coated GIC (GC Fuji IX GP Extra + G-Coat Plus. H. GURGAN. Since March 2011.T. M.EQUIA® TITLE 60-Month Clinical Performance Of A Glass-Ionomer Restorative System REFERENCE S. 173097-GC-Clinical Studies-EQUIA-OK.All rights reserved. KANIK & L. GC and Riva SC.S. These clinical papers are a selection of the available evidence on EQUIA. E. NGO.K. PHUONG & N. TITLE Clinical evaluation of new encapsulated glass ionomers and surface coating combinations for 24-months REFERENCE O. secondary caries. This study shows that although both GC Fuji IX GP Extra and GC Fuji IX GP Extra with G-Coat Plus (EQUIA restorative system) showed acceptable clinical performance in occlusal cavities in children. Some large Class II restorations of both groups were broken from their marginal ridges leading to replacement. KUTUK. GC Europe is not affiliated with any of the universities referenced and none of the trademarks of the universities are trademarks of GC. GC Fuji IX GP Fast.05). None of the restorations showed trends to downgrade in anatomical form.S. G-Bond. F. GC and GC Fuji Varnish. GC) and a resin composite (Solare. surface texture.C.V. OKTAS Abstract 89. All the products GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA. GC) combinations for 24-months. More supporting studies are available and can be delivered upon request. Note: EQUIA Restorative Concept was launched in March 2007 bearing the components GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA + G-Coat PLUS. EQUIA. GC). G-Coat PLUS and the EQUIA Restorative System co-exist in the market. TITLE The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement REFERENCE V. GC). Clinical Relevance: The application of G-Coat Plus to GC Fuji IX GP Extra glass-ionomer cement may be beneficial in reducing wear in occlusal cavities. Clinical Relevance: Encapsulated GICs and light-cured nano-filled coating combinations were found to be suitable permanent restorative options for Class I and small to medium Class II restorations. Z. the application of G-Coat Plus gave some protection against wear. GC) as a comparison material. CAKIR &. EQUIA Issue n°1. Riva is not a trademark of GC. Solare & G-Coat Plus are trademarks of GC. . L. versus a micro-filled posterior composite (Gradia Direct Posterior.J. KHANH Clin Oral Investig 2014 18(3):753-9 DESIGN Clinical trial with 198 evaluated restorations WHAT IS BEING TESTED? The respective clinical performances of a conventional GIC (GC Fuji IX GP Extra.D. 2014 08/07/14 10:34 .

References As of June 20th. 2014 E Q U I A P o s t e r i o r Restorative S y s t e m .

E. A. doi:10. M. L. J. 10. Kumbuloglu. S. T. Sakuma. Francetti. Bonifacio. Y. GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA. M. P. Bossu. M. L.B. San Diego. 4. Hiller. F. K. Corbella. Abstract 3240 – IADR 2011. Abstract 3246 – IADR 2011. Turkun and L. Barcelona. Kato. A. Abstract 403 – IADR 2010. E. Poggio. C. Kleverlaan. Cakir. 32. San Diego.EQUIA Posterior restorative system 1. 78(6) Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? – Properties. Abstract 796 – AADR March 2010.-A. Nakaseko. Corbella. A. 12. Nowakowska. Abstract 2551 – IADR 2011. S. Washington DC.S.K. Dental Cadmos 2010. Spain. 11. USA 12-Month clinical performance of a glass-ionomer restorative system. 76-96.E. Gurgan. Kutuk. Visai. Yalcin Cakir. Turkun. C. Arcialo. Werner and C. M.59-75 Do bleaching materials affect the color of aesthetic restorative materials ? O. San Diego. The International Journal of Artificial Organs. Polimeni. K. USA Clinical performance of a glass ionomer based restorative system. 5. M. Abstract 2025 Influence of coating materials on conventional glass-ionomer cement (poster). Giugno. J. Basso. S. Kutuk. E. C. Spain The effect of coating glass ionomers with a nanofilled resin. Bedran-Russo. O. Nakaseko. Boggian. Kato. C. n°9. Zhang. Ferrari. Z. The Dental Advisor. limitations and future trends. F. Firat.25. Noguchi. USA Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 2/7 . Bicakci. Van Amerongen. Rosti. H. M.R. 3. Nowakowska. A. IADR 2007.3390/ma3010076 6-month clinical performance of a new glass-ionomer restorative system. M. S. Nowakowska. Journal of Dentistry 2008 Effect of resin coating on the ultimate strength of glass ionomers. S. D’Amici.S. M. Ak. Basso. Shinohara. K.Y. 6. USA Long-term Dental Restorations using High-Viscosity Coated Glassionomer Cements. Abstract 402 – IADR 2010. Turkun. GC Corporation.S. 2. S. March 2008. Change in translucency of posterior restorative glass-ionomer cements. Vol. 2009 Ricostruzioni dentarie a lungo termine con cementi vetroionomerici. Abstract 0487 SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing. A. No 2 Nuove prospettive dei cementi vetroionomerici nella pratica clinica. Spain Clinical evaluation of new glass ionomer-coating combinated systems for 18 months. Korkmaz. Lohbauer. F. Del Fabbro. Dental Cadmos 2010 Marzo . Magni. J. J. Hickel. 15. 13.-H. Friedl. Gurgan. Basso. IADR 2008. S. L. Saino. Abstract 2987 – IADR 2010. K. Vol. T. K. Ak.K. Akahane. T. Barcelona. Friedl. Antunes. Tanaka. GC Corporation. H. R. W. 8. Kanik.78(3) p. Abstract 2494 – IADR 2011.B. 14. USA Adhesion of streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials. E. E. San Diego. 7. Z. Firat. Barcelona. 16. L. Scribante. K. U. Cal. Padovano. 9. S. Materials 2010. Khandelwal. 3.

USA M. I. Vol. C.J. Iguaçu Falls.S.B. Watanabe. J. 25.IADR 2012. I. Iguaçu Falls.S. Early Online.K. San Diego. G.A. Uebereck. San Diego. Kanik. Iguaçu Falls. K. U. Tampa. K. Kleverlaan. 27. C. 30. S. Lauerer. 29. Abstract 44 – IADR 2011.F. Ferreira Zandona. Ebert. S. Clin Oral Invest (2011) 15:771–857 Clinical evaluation of new encapsulated glass ionomers and surface coating combinations for 24-months. N.IADR 2012.-A. Clin Oral Invest (2011) 15:771–857 Flexural and diametral tensile strength of capsulated GICs for ART. USA Influence of a nanofilled coating on physical properties of glassionomercements. 28. Brain Lascano. Molina. 32. F. 27(2011) 1031–1037 The science of simplicity. M. Zaya. Abstract 191 . Abstract 192 – IADR 2012. G. R. P. 21. Matis. Abstract 1978 – IADR 2011. Ak Oztas. E. Iguaçu Falls. Khandelwal. 18. Siedschlag. Frencken. Cook. In-vitro wear of glass ionomer restorative systems. Mazzola. A. Brazil 24-Month Clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System.A. Lohbauer. G. J Minim Interv Dent 2011. Friedl. L. F. Cochran.J. Farah. Petschelt. J. M.W. Pilo. Aljamhan. W. Frencken. Brain Lascano. Z. Covey. Dentum 2011. Bedran-Russo. Dental Materials. O. Hiller. 22.F. N. 1–7 Resin-coated glass ionomer cement abrasion and wear resistance.F. L. J. Cabral.M. Krämer. turkey. R. Abstract 113 – Conseuro 2011. U. M. Abstract 107 . L. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating.11(1):33-35 Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. B. Y. B. Abstract 1048 – AADR 2012. Schubert. A. 19. Toz. Friedl. Levartovsky. Abstract 122 – Conseuro 2011. R. J. 33. I. Roldán.63(5}:639644 Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 3/7 . Abstract 1982 . B. Abstract 2480 – IADR 2011. R.17. N. M. A. USA Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: A retrospective cohort study. Firat. G. R. Farah.S. 4 (6) Evaluación in vitro de la dureza superficial del ionómero de vidrio como material restaurador. Quintessenz 2012. Brazil Compressive strength of new capsulated GICs for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. A. M. L. USA Properties of surface coated and uncoated glass-ionomer cement. Molina. Molina. Krämer. A. April 2011 Fluoride release from uncoated and coated glass-ionomers cements. T.B.J. L. Calil Bonifácio. 2011. Brazil DTS of high-viscosity GICs heated with LED during setting period. Cabral. Pascualini. Abstract 193 – IADR 2012. Frencken. Padovano. Usubütün. Kutuk. A. J. S. A. Platt. Israeli division Biocompatibility of different types of adhesive restorative systems on human pulp.-H. 23. 20.24. Petschelt. Turkun. Kiremitci. E. 31. Werner & C.B. Yalcin Cakir. SalehHassan. San Diego. M. Frankenberger. Giner. Gurgan. J. U. Lohbauer.J. Tampa. L. 34. Blasbalg. Barkmeier. Korkmaz Ceylan. H. N°2. Mazzola.J. Müller. A. Wöstmann. Cabral. J. Roig. Istanbul. D. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. Latta.IADR 2011. Mazzola. K. American Journal of Dentistry. Vallés. Lohbauer. 26. turkey. Mercadé. USA Influence of resin coating time on GI shear strength. J. Istanbul. Abstract 1045 – AADR 2012. 24. C. Brazil Glasionomerzemente für die Kinderzahnheilkunde.

Ilie. Al-Angari.I. 51. 1–7 Randomized clinical trial in the field–recruitment and practitioners profile. Khandelwal. M. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. Cabal. Platt. USA Compressive Strength of new capsulated GICs for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. Korkmaz Ceylan. M. S. Fernandes.P. Abstract 1044 – IADR March 2012. L. B. S. Matis. T. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Frencken. N. 48. Zaya. Fracture Strength of Class II ART Restorations with Proximal Retention. Frencken. Blen. E. Molina. Abstract 192 – IADR Brazil 2012 Flexural and Diametral Tensile Strength of Capsulated GICs for ART. Kutuk. Cook. Mazzola.A.A. R.R. Atta. I. Clin Oral Invest DOI 10. 36. 46. Oztas. Eckert. Firat.A.T. R. Navarro. Fretas. R. Al Dehailan. Hara. aging and storage agents. Mazzola. Z. March 2013 Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating. Hatch.D. D.Zoergiebel .H. Early Online.J. 2011. Calil Bonifácio. Biffar. P. E. Klinke. Permanent restorations with glasionomer cements.J.35. J. Clinical evaluation on 319 cases. Hindsman.F. Mazzola. R. J. Gurgan . N. A. E. I. 47. Tampa.J.P. Abstract 594 – IADR Seattle 2013. Ahouran. Ak Oztas. M. M. F.F. G. C. S. 39. C. M. Fereira Zandona.B. I. J. 49. 37.J. Platt. G. N. Cook. J. Molina. G. 45. G. 44. Kleverlaan. Abstract 1684 – IADR Seattle 2013. A.B. M. 42. S. Versluis. Abstract 2933 – IADR Seattle.B. USA Resin-Coated Glass Ionomer Cement Abrasion and Wear Resistance. Tantbirojn. Pascualini. Abstract 193 – IADR Brazil 2012 DTS of high-viscosity GICs heated with LED during setting period. Wang.J. Aljamhan. Abstract 480 – IADR Seattle 2013.Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorative Material. Abstract 1045 – IADR March 2012. Cabral. L. A.H. Tampa. Platt. J. 43. Brain Lascano. Cabral. J.S. Frencken. S.C.D. Heiss. A.L.D. Del Fabbro. Schwahn. Basso. R. Cabral. R. Abstract 191 – IADR Brazil 2012 24-Month Clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. Gurgan. F. Clinical evaluation on 319 cases. Navarro. Basso.F.F. Farah. Molina. Chu. Inanloo. Werner.V. Cochran.D. Abstract 178153 – IADR Iran 2012 Thermal Insulation of restorative cements for ART heated with LED. Abstract 1683 – IADR Seattle 2013.S.M. S. Abstract 107 – IADR Brazil 2012 Antibacterial Effect of a New Posterior Glass Ionomer Cement. R.S. C. B. Firat .S. Effect of resin Coating on Fluoride Release from a GIC. Abstract 192 – EADR 2012 Helsinki. J.G. P. 50. M. M.J. 52. L. Oltramari-Navarro. Finland Permanent restorations with glass ionomer cements. Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 4/7 . S. Abstract 1685 – IADR Seattle 2013. Brain Lascano. L. Farah. Y. A. M. Kutuk . J. Yalcin Cakir. L. Yalcin Cakir . Abstract 1134 – IADR Seattle 2013. 40. R. Zweifler. Banava. M.C.B. Abstract 594 IADR Seattle 2013 36-months clinical performance of a glass-ionomer restorative system. T.J. Lauris. 41. Effectiveness of Resin Coatings On Glass-Ionomer Cements Against Wear.A.1007/s00784-012-0733-1 Does Coating Reduce Water Absorption in Glass-Ionomer Restorations? A. Z. 38.A. M. Mechanical Properties of a New Zinc. C.

70. 54. Francetti. Molina. Cabral. September 2013 An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin.53. Lohbauer. Gone Benitez. Molina. A. 65. R. Krech. J. T. Abstract 3 – IADR Firenze. Abstract 2793 – IADR Seattle 2013. Abstract 2933 – IADR Seattle 2013. 59. Abstract 53 – IADR Firenze. R.F. 58. Basso. Abstract 473 – IADR Firenze. Petschelt. M. I. L.RCT in the field: Longevity after 24 months. Skrinjaric. Clin Oral Invest. 69. 61. R. F. G. Delean.J. T. Mazzola. 60.C. The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Tyas. Oztas. Frencken. EQUIA . W. Daboul. I. M. S. L.Conseuro Paris 2013. Kanik. A. BFS of GIC’s for ART heated with LED during setting. Frencken. I.D. 57. V. O.J. R. Dash. Glavina. Acta Biomaterialia (2013) Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). 55.E. 67. Abstract 7 – IADR Firenze. I. L. 36-months clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. 63. Clinical Evaluation on 283 restorations at 36 months. Mazolla.S. Klinke. M.F. Marginal Quality. Turkun. September 2013 Clinical Evaluation of Class I Resin Coated Glass Ionomer Restorations. V. Brain Lascano. J. Ertugrul. A. L. Z. R. I. A. Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry 2013. Biffar. Uzel. Wear and Fracture Behaviour of Different GICs in vitro.J. E. Published online: 07 July 2013. A. 56. Dasch. O. September 2013 Friction coefficients for glassionomer cements depending on a coating layer. 2013. I. Bago Jurič. Ngo. Gurgan. L. S. ZB. SS. Gurgan. Firat. Miletić. Kutuk. L. J. Volume 2013. Brain Lascano. L. Abstract/poster 461. J. N. Skrinjaric. C. Baraba. L. Molina. Italy Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Cements HeatCured with an LED Lamp during Setting.H. Khanh. Colceriu. N.T. Abstract 25 – IADR-CED 2013. D. Kanik. J. Schmidt. Sebnem Turkum. U. Abstract 083 . R. Toothbrush abrasion of resin coated glass ionomers over 8 years. 6: 87-95 Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 5/7 . Cabral. Ilie. J Appl Oral Sci. 64. Braun. Zoergiebel. FDI Istanbul 2831/08/2013.F.K. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. I. G. N. 68. M. H. Sander. Frankenberger. Diem. Lison. Brain Lascano. E. 62.Phuong.B. G. 66. Kutuk. W.E. Gorseta. Frencken.21(3):243-9 – redirected to Fuji IX GP (Fast) Effects of Storage Media on the Flexural Strength of GIC. Anić. Belli. Yalcin Cakir. M. Firenze. Pascu. Comparative evaluation of surface coated compomer and glass ionomer cement in vitro.E. L. K. September 2013 Toothbrush Abrasion Of Resin Coated Glass Ionomers Over 8 Years. Firat E. 6 pages Two-year study on the clinical performance of the glass ionomer based restorative system EQUIA. Abstract 085 – Conseuro Paris 2013 Glass Ionomer Restorative System for Permanent Dental Restorations.J. 6: 81-86 Evaluation of a glass-ionomer based restoration system-a one year pilot study. Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry 2013. Vosen. Pentelescu. Article ID 838460. BioMed Research International. Cabral. Mazzola.

J. n°3 .A. May 2010 K. Caballero. R. Labor Dental. 18. M.aadmd.B. Basso.A.J. 27-06-07.dentallearning.11. Simplifying posterior restorations using self-adhesive systems.1510 7. The Croatian Journal of Dental Medicine.9. F.com. Z. n°26. D. Mercadé. S. Friedl.A.info.F. 10. Pitel. M. Dentistry Today. FIRAT. p. 17. 4. and S. March 2011. Tietze Jan-Feb 2008 Equia.barometer-online. C. Abstract 89 – IADR 2014 Effect of Heat Sources on the Mechanical Properties of GICs. Kaminer. Eiben. 6/2009. 3. www. Ausgabe 27/11 Glasionomerzemente als Amalgamersatz. 2/09.org A rapid and aesthetic alternative to a direct posterior composite. Issue 3 “Einfach währt am längsten! Auch bei der Seitenzahnfüllung?“ Die Zahnarzt Woche 03. Dr. nr 2. Vol 31 . November 2010 Aplicación clínica del ionómero de vidrio como material restaurador. I. KUTUK. 13. M. 27 June 07 CRA Newsletter. Frencken. 2010. P. 20. M. 15. 10. R. L. L’information Dentaire. Ward. Revista Românã de Medicinã Dentarã. Dr.02. p. Info Dentaire. Göhring. Oral Health April 2010 Cementy glasjonomerowe w świetle analizy naukowej. STOMATOLOGIA WSPÓŁCZESNA vol. E. F. OZTAS. vol.com.L.2. R. MIDENTISTRY. Terry. 16. XII – nr. Roig.71. S.CORP. p. J. Vol 4. 14.B. Mateos-Palacios. Carlton Horbelt. J. Vol. Molina.H. CRA Newsletter. n°4. 72. Pulgar. 2011 (Kosten)-Effizientz in der Füllungstherapie mit EQUIA. Dentalzeitung. Fuji IX GP Extra: A Versatile Restorative Option For The Person with Special Needs. R. Labor Dental Clínica.Y. 9. (PRWEB)February 17. Clinical Usage review. Abstract 298 – IADR 2014 Articles in Dental magazines 1. Restauraciones directas con ionómero de vidrio en sector posterior. 5. Dental Learning.6/2008 8. C. DZ. EQUIA. 60-Month Clinical Performance Of A Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. Vol 1. Issue 4 Staklenoionomerni cementi u slozenim oralnim rehabilitacijama. Vallès. M. Berden. 10-12/2010 Glass-Ionomer Cement Technology Advances into 21st Century Dentistry Systematic reviews reveal the continued evolution of dental materials. 6. Well-Proven Fuji IX Extra with Surface Sealer. 2. Lucena.net Conveniently Packaged.Dec 2007 DPRE. Navajas. Gil. GURGAN. Cabral. 46-49 Glass ionomer cements: some scientific analysis. D’Amici. February 2011 / www. Jarngang – März 2009 Glass ionomers: a therapeutic alternative to direct composite restorations.S. 2011 Incorporating glass ionomers into the daily routine of general practice. J.7-12 Für einen groβen Qualitätsgewinn bei geringem Mehraufwand. 19. Clinicians Report. 21. 12. Best products 2007. April 2008. 17.H.M. Nowakowska. www. D. ÇAKiR.2011 Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 6/7 . Mazzola. 11. Vol. G. Lascano. DentistryToday.

L. Ionómero de vidrio: evaluando la satisfacción del paciente. J Cont Dent Educ 2/2011 Zahnfarben und Kosteneffizient: GIZ-Konzept ist eine echte Amalgamalternative. Sonderausgabe. ZWP 10/2011 Überzeugende Ästhetik. mayo 2014. Kischko. Gaceta Dental 248. DZ. Actualităţi stomatologice. 39. J. I. 32. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag Dental Magazin. Neodent Brief News.info. 42. Ausgabe 15/12 Glasionomer-basierte Systeme auf dem Vormarsch. Marion Güntzel. Remus. Bago. M. Fecht. l. 4/2011 Der Schutzlack sorgt für eine natürliche Ästhetik. p. 23. 2012. 34. junio 2013 – P186-192 The Ratings.22.94-96 Zahnarzt und Patient können indikationsbezogen profitieren. 36. DZ. ZMK. www. Gaceta Dental 258. K.34-37 EQUIA: a true amalgam alternative.June 2012. 30. Jg27. ZWP 4/2012 – 96-99 Ohne Versiegelung stabil. M. Burghardt – interview Prof. July/August 2011 Den Praktiker einbeziehen. R. 35. Alternativ gefüllt. Trevor Burke. Restorative Dentistry. Juan Manuel Goñe Benites. Anic. 24. M. DZW. 27. 6/2011 Schrittweiser Versicht auf Amalgam. A. Ausgabe 23/11 Neue Alternative für permanente Seitenzahnrestaurationen. D. Miletic. 30(1). U.Miscellaneous.26 Glasjonomer Cementi. 61. 40. #6-12 Restauraciones dentales con ionómero de vidrio recubierto. A. Gert Fecht. DZ. 31. nr. Hague. Dental Town . 05. 29. Die ZahnarztWoche 11. Kielbassa. 33. T. Sonderausgabe. 25. DZW Ausgabe 42/13.barometer-online. 37. ZMK. p. Dr. Pitel. G. Boraba. 208-214 Literature EQUIA Status 26/06/2014 Page 7/7 . July/August 2011 Einstufung der EQUIA-Füllung als zuzahlungsfreie GKV-abrechenbare Leistung. F. p. Schnell. aber auch nachhaltiger Problemlöser bewährt. 41. Teamwork. Teamwork. 28. January 2014 Reconsiderarea cimenturilor ionomer de sticlă pentru restaurări directe. Jg27. 26. F. martie 2014 Dental Materials. December 2013 Restauraciones de composite vs. 38. Dr. L.What Goes Where? The Current Status of Glass Ionomer as a Material for Loadbearing Restorations in Posterior Teeth. J Cont Dent Educ 4/2011 Ästhetische und zuverlässige Füllungen für jeden Geldbeutel. Rosenbaum.2011 In meiner Praxis als schneller. REALITY. Basso. October 2013 – Number 246 – p4-6 Nano-gefülltes Coating verbessert physikalische Eigenschaften von GIZ. Frankenberger.