EQUIA

Scientific Sheet - Clinical studies

EQUIA
TITLE

Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system:

A retrospective cohort study

REFERENCE

K. FRIEDL, K.A. HILLER & K.H. FRIEDL

Dent Mater (2011) 27(10):1031-7

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with 151 restorations

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

The suitability of a glass ionomer system (EQUIA) as a permanent restoration material in

posterior cavities.

After 2 years and about 150 restorations it was concluded that EQUIA may be used
as a permanent restoration material for any size of Class I and in smaller Class II cavities.

TITLE

48-Months, Multicentre, Clinical Evaluation on 304 Glass Ionomer Permanent

Restorations

REFERENCE

M. BASSO, A. IONESCU & M. GONE BENITES

Abstract 192686, IADR- PER, Dubrovnik 2014

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

To evaluate clinical efficiency and mechanical resistance of restorative system based on

a high-viscosity, coated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA), when used for permanent
restorations.

At 48 months, 304 restorations were evaluated in 202 patients (82 Class I, 150 Class II, 72 Class V).
Overall general success rate reported was of 91,45%, and a general integrity rate (only Criteria =0) of 79,61%.
These results suggest that the restorative system used in this trial can be a reliable choice for
permanent dental restorations, even in load bearing tooth surfaces of molars and premolars.

TITLE

Randomized Clinical Trial in the field: Longevity after 24 months

REFERENCE

T.U. KLINKE, A.A. DABOUL & R.H. BIFFAR (University of Greifswald)

J Dent Res 92 (Spec Iss B): Abstract 3, 2013

DESIGN

Prospective, double blinded randomized control clinical trial

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

The clinical performance of a GIC material (GC Fuji IX GP Fast, GC)

versus a coated GIC system (EQUIA, GC).

The results showed good clinical performance of GIC and EQUIA.

No significant differences in survival rate were found between both materials. Cavity preparation
and material application should adhere to the indications and recommendations set by the manufacturer
in order to have a higher filling longevity. The ongoing follow up will strengthen the current results.

GC Europe N.V.
EQUIA
Issue n1, 2014

173097-GC-Clinical Studies-EQUIA-OK.indd 1

08/07/14 10:34

EQUIA

TITLE

60-Month Clinical Performance Of A Glass-Ionomer Restorative System

REFERENCE

S. GURGAN, Z.B. KUTUK, E. FIRAT, F.Y. CAKIR &.S.S. OKTAS

Abstract 89, IADR Cape Town 2014

DESIGN

Five-year randomised clinical trial on 140 (80 Cl1 and 60 Cl2) lesions in 59 patients

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

The clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system (EQUIA, GC),

versus a micro-filled posterior composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC).

After 60 months 126 (76 Cl1 and 50 Cl2) restorations were evaluated in 52 patients.
None of the restorations showed trends to downgrade in anatomical form, secondary caries,
surface texture, postoperative sensitivity and color match (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The use of both materials for the restoration of posterior teeth exhibited a similar
and clinically successful performance after 60 months.
TITLE

The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance

of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement

REFERENCE

V.T.K. DIEM, M.J. TYAS, H.C. NGO, L.H. PHUONG & N.D. KHANH
Clin Oral Investig 2014 18(3):753-9

DESIGN

Clinical trial with 198 evaluated restorations

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

The respective clinical performances of a conventional GIC (GC Fuji IX GP Extra, GC),
a resin-coated GIC (GC Fuji IX GP Extra + G-Coat Plus, GC) and a resin composite
(Solare, GC) as a comparison material.

This study shows that although both GC Fuji IX GP Extra and GC Fuji IX GP Extra with G-Coat Plus
(EQUIA restorative system) showed acceptable clinical performance in occlusal cavities in children,
the application of G-Coat Plus gave some protection against wear.
Clinical Relevance: The application of G-Coat Plus to GC Fuji IX GP Extra glass-ionomer cement
may be beneficial in reducing wear in occlusal cavities.
TITLE

Clinical evaluation of new encapsulated glass ionomers and surface coating

combinations for 24-months

REFERENCE

O. KANIK & L.S. TURKUN

Clin. Oral Invest (2011) 15:771857

DESIGN

Clinical trial with 248 evaluated restorations in 52 patients

WHAT IS BEING
TESTED?

The clinical performance of two encapsulated glass ionomer cements

(GC Fuji IX GP Extra, GC and Riva SC, SDI) and two surface coating materials
(G-Coat Plus, GC and GC Fuji Varnish, GC) combinations for 24-months.

Some large Class II restorations of both groups were broken from their marginal ridges leading to replacement.
The colour match of GC Fuji IX GP Extra was better than Riva SC (p0.05).
Clinical Relevance: Encapsulated GICs and light-cured nano-filled coating combinations were found to be
suitable permanent restorative options for Class I and small to medium Class II restorations.
Note: EQUIA Restorative Concept was launched in March 2007 bearing the components GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA + G-Coat PLUS. Since
March 2011, it has been rebranded as a New Restorative System bearing the components EQUIA Fil and EQUIA Coat. All the products
GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA, G-Coat PLUS and the EQUIA Restorative System co-exist in the market. These clinical papers are a selection of
the available evidence on EQUIA. More supporting studies are available and can be delivered upon request.

GC Fuji IX GP Fast, EQUIA, Gradia, G-Bond,

Solare & G-Coat Plus are trademarks of GC.
Riva is not a trademark of GC.
GC Europe is not affiliated with any of the universities
referenced and none of the trademarks of the
universities are trademarks of GC.

173097-GC-Clinical Studies-EQUIA-OK.indd 2

GC Europe N.V. - All rights reserved.

EQUIA
Issue n1, 2014

08/07/14 10:34

References
As of June 20th, 2014

E Q U I A
P o s t e r i o r
Restorative
S y s t e m

EQUIA
Posterior restorative system
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

Change in translucency of posterior restorative glass-ionomer cements. K.

Tanaka, K. Kato, T. Noguchi, H. Nakaseko, S. Akahane. GC Corporation. IADR
2007, Abstract 2025
Influence of coating materials on conventional glass-ionomer cement
(poster). K. Kato, H. Nakaseko, T. Sakuma. GC Corporation. IADR 2008,
Abstract 0487
SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of
class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material
and of polishing. E. Magni, L. Zhang, R. Hickel, M. Bossu, A. Polimeni, M.
Ferrari. Journal of Dentistry 2008
Effect of resin coating on the ultimate strength of glass ionomers. M.
Shinohara, A. Antunes, J. Padovano, A.K. Bedran-Russo. Abstract 796
AADR March 2010, Washington DC, USA
Adhesion of streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials. C.
Poggio, C.R. Arcialo, F. Rosti, A. Scribante, E. Saino, L. Visai.
The
International Journal of Artificial Organs. Vol. 32, n9, 2009
Ricostruzioni dentarie a lungo termine con cementi vetroionomerici. M.
Basso, J. Nowakowska, C. Boggian, S. Corbella. Dental Cadmos 2010,
Giugno; 78(6)
Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? Properties,
limitations and future trends. U. Lohbauer. Materials 2010, 3, 76-96;
doi:10.3390/ma3010076
6-month clinical performance of a new glass-ionomer restorative system. S.
Gurgan, F.Y. Cakir, E. Firat, Z.B. Kutuk, S. Ak. Abstract 403 IADR 2010,
Barcelona, Spain
Clinical evaluation of new glass ionomer-coating combinated systems for 18
months. L.S. Turkun, O. Kanik. Abstract 402 IADR 2010, Barcelona, Spain
The effect of coating glass ionomers with a nanofilled resin. C. Bonifacio,
W.E. Van Amerongen, A. Werner and C. Kleverlaan. Abstract 2987 IADR
2010, Barcelona, Spain.
GC Fuji IX GP EXTRA. The Dental Advisor, March 2008, Vol.25, No 2
Nuove prospettive dei cementi vetroionomerici nella pratica clinica. M. Basso,
J. Nowakowska, S. Corbella, S. DAmici, L. Francetti. Dental Cadmos 2010
Marzo ;78(3) p.59-75
Do bleaching materials affect the color of aesthetic restorative materials ? O.
Kumbuloglu, T. Bicakci, E. Cal, M. Turkun and L.S. Turkun. Abstract 2551
IADR 2011, San Diego, USA
12-Month clinical performance of a glass-ionomer restorative system. S.
Gurgan, F. Yalcin Cakir, E. Firat, Z.B. Kutuk, S.S. Ak, Y. Korkmaz. Abstract
3246 IADR 2011, San Diego, USA
Clinical performance of a glass ionomer based restorative system.
P.
Khandelwal, K.-A. Hiller, K. Friedl, K.-H. Friedl. Abstract 3240 IADR 2011,
San Diego, USA
Long-term Dental Restorations using High-Viscosity Coated Glassionomer
Cements. M. Basso, J.K. Nowakowska, M. Del Fabbro. Abstract 2494 IADR
2011, San Diego, USA

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 2/7

17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.

In-vitro wear of glass ionomer restorative systems.

Barkmeier. Abstract 1978 IADR 2011, San Diego, USA

M. Latta, W.W.

Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel

nanofilled resin coating. U. Lohbauer, N. Krmer, G. Siedschlag, E. Schubert,
B. Lauerer, F. Mller, A. Petschelt, J. Ebert. American Journal of Dentistry,
Vol.24, N2, April 2011
Fluoride release from uncoated and coated glass-ionomers cements. L. SalehHassan, J. Padovano, A.K.B. Bedran-Russo. Abstract 2480 IADR 2011, San
Diego, USA
Properties of surface coated and uncoated glass-ionomer cement. H.
Watanabe, D. Covey. Abstract 1982 - IADR 2011, San Diego, USA
Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: A
retrospective cohort study. K. Friedl, K.-A. Hiller, K.-H. Friedl.
Dental
Materials, 27(2011) 10311037
The science of simplicity. P. Khandelwal. J Minim Interv Dent 2011; 4 (6)
Evaluacin in vitro de la dureza superficial del ionmero de vidrio como
material restaurador. J. Roldn, M. Mercad, M. Valls, M. Roig, L. Giner.
Dentum 2011;11(1):33-35
Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. C. Calil Bonifcio, A.
Werner & C.J. Kleverlaan. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2011; Early
Online, 17
Resin-coated glass ionomer cement abrasion and wear resistance. A.S.
Aljamhan, J.A. Platt, N.B. Cook, M. Cochran, B. Matis, A. Ferreira Zandona.
Abstract 1045 AADR 2012, Tampa, USA
Influence
of
a
nanofilled
coating
on
physical
properties
of
glassionomercements. U. Lohbauer, A. Petschelt. Abstract 1048 AADR
2012, Tampa, USA
Influence of resin coating time on GI shear strength. J. Blasbalg, S.
Levartovsky, R. Pilo. Abstract 44 IADR 2011, Israeli division
Biocompatibility of different types of adhesive restorative systems on human
pulp. T. Toz, A. Kiremitci, A. Usubtn. Abstract 122 Conseuro 2011,
Istanbul, turkey. Clin Oral Invest (2011) 15:771857
Clinical evaluation of new encapsulated glass ionomers and surface coating
combinations for 24-months. O. Kanik, L.S. Turkun. Abstract 113 Conseuro
2011, Istanbul, turkey. Clin Oral Invest (2011) 15:771857
Flexural and diametral tensile strength of capsulated GICs for ART. I.
Mazzola, L. Brain Lascano, G.F. Molina, M.A. Farah, R.J. Cabral, J. Frencken.
Abstract 193 IADR 2012, Iguau Falls, Brazil
Compressive strength of new capsulated GICs for Atraumatic Restorative
Treatment. R.J. Cabral, G.F. Molina, L. Brain Lascano, L.M. Zaya, I. Mazzola,
J. Frencken. Abstract 192 IADR 2012, Iguau Falls, Brazil
DTS of high-viscosity GICs heated with LED during setting period. G.F.
Molina, R.J. Cabral, I. Mazzola, C.J. Pascualini, M. Farah, J. Frencken.
Abstract 191 - IADR 2012, Iguau Falls, Brazil
24-Month Clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. S.
Gurgan, F. Yalcin Cakir, E. Firat, Z.B. Kutuk, S.S. Ak Oztas, Y. Korkmaz
Ceylan. Abstract 107 - IADR 2012, Iguau Falls, Brazil
Glasionomerzemente fr die Kinderzahnheilkunde. N. Krmer, U. Lohbauer,
C. Uebereck, B. Wstmann, R. Frankenberger. Quintessenz 2012;63(5}:639644

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 3/7

35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.

Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. C. Calil Bonifcio, A.

Werner, C.J. Kleverlaan.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2011; Early
Online, 17
Randomized clinical trial in the fieldrecruitment and practitioners profile. T.
Klinke, C. Schwahn, R. Biffar. Abstract 192 EADR 2012 Helsinki, Finland
Permanent restorations with glass ionomer cements. Clinical evaluation on
319 cases. M. Basso, M. Heiss, P. Khandelwal, M. Del Fabbro. Abstract 594 IADR Seattle 2013
36-months clinical performance of a glass-ionomer restorative system. S.
Gurgan , F. Yalcin Cakir , E. Firat , Z.B. Kutuk , S.S. Oztas. Abstract 2933
IADR Seattle, March 2013
Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation:
effect of coating, aging and storage agents. J.Zoergiebel , N. Ilie. Clin Oral
Invest DOI 10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1
Does Coating Reduce Water Absorption in Glass-Ionomer Restorations? A.D.
Hindsman, R.H. Hatch, B.J. Blen, D. Tantbirojn, A. Versluis. Abstract 1044
IADR March 2012, Tampa, USA
Resin-Coated Glass Ionomer Cement Abrasion and Wear Resistance. A.S.
Aljamhan, J.A. Platt, N.B. Cook, M. Cochran, B. Matis, A. Fereira Zandona.
Abstract 1045 IADR March 2012, Tampa, USA
Compressive Strength of new capsulated GICs for Atraumatic Restorative
Treatment. R.J. Cabral, G.F. Molina, L. Brain Lascano, L.M. Zaya, I. Mazzola,
J. Frencken. Abstract 192 IADR Brazil 2012
Flexural and Diametral Tensile Strength of Capsulated GICs for ART. I.
Mazzola, L. Brain Lascano, G.F. Molina, M.A. Farah, R.J. Cabral, J. Frencken.
Abstract 193 IADR Brazil 2012
DTS of high-viscosity GICs heated with LED during setting period. G.F.
Molina, R.J. Cabral, I. Mazzola, C.J. Pascualini, M. Farah, J. Frencken.
Abstract 191 IADR Brazil 2012
24-Month Clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. S.
Gurgan, F. Yalcin Cakir, E. Firat, Z.B. Kutuk, S.S. Ak Oztas, Y. Korkmaz
Ceylan. Abstract 107 IADR Brazil 2012
Antibacterial Effect of a New Posterior Glass Ionomer Cement. S. Banava,
S.H. Inanloo, M. Ahouran. Abstract 178153 IADR Iran 2012
Thermal Insulation of restorative cements for ART heated with LED. R.J.
Cabal. Abstract 480 IADR Seattle 2013.
Permanent restorations with glasionomer cements, Clinical evaluation on 319
cases. M. Basso. Abstract 594 IADR Seattle 2013.
Fracture Strength of Class II ART Restorations with Proximal Retention.
M.F.D.L. Navarro, M.C.C.D.A. Fretas, M.T. Atta, R.D.I. Navarro; P.V.P.
Oltramari-Navarro, E. Fernandes, L. Wang, J.R.P. Lauris. Abstract 1134
IADR Seattle 2013.
Effect of resin Coating on Fluoride Release from a GIC. L. Al Dehailan, G.
Eckert, J.A. Platt. Abstract 1683 IADR Seattle 2013.
Effectiveness of Resin Coatings On Glass-Ionomer Cements Against Wear.
R.A. Zweifler. Abstract 1684 IADR Seattle 2013.
Mechanical Properties of a New Zinc- Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorative
Material. S.S. Al-Angari, A. Hara, T.G. Chu, J. Platt, N.B. Cook. Abstract 1685
IADR Seattle 2013.

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 4/7

53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.

BFS of GICs for ART heated with LED during setting. G.F. Molina, I. Mazolla,
L. Brain Lascano, R.J. Cabral, J. Frencken. Abstract 2793 IADR Seattle
2013.
36-months clinical Performance of a Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. S.
Gurgan, F. Yalcin Cakir, E. Firat, Z.B. Kutuk, SS. Oztas. Abstract 2933 IADR
Seattle 2013.
Marginal Quality, Wear and Fracture Behaviour of Different GICs in vitro. V.E.
Vosen, M. Krech, N. Schmidt, M. Lison, A. Braun, R. Frankenberger. Abstract
085 Conseuro Paris 2013
Glass Ionomer Restorative System for Permanent Dental Restorations.
Clinical Evaluation on 283 restorations at 36 months. M. Basso, M. Gone
Benitez, L. Francetti. Abstract 083 - Conseuro Paris 2013.
The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of
a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. V.T.K. Diem, M.J. Tyas,
H.C. Ngo, L.H.Phuong, N.D. Khanh. Clin Oral Invest. Published online: 07 July
2013.
Toothbrush abrasion of resin coated glass ionomers over 8 years. L. Sebnem
Turkum, O. Kanik, W. Dash.
Comparative evaluation of surface coated compomer and glass ionomer
cement in vitro. Uzel, Ertugrul. Abstract/poster 461, FDI Istanbul 2831/08/2013.
EQUIA - RCT in the field: Longevity after 24 months. T. Klinke, A. Daboul, R.
Biffar. Abstract 3 IADR Firenze, September 2013
Friction coefficients for glassionomer cements depending on a coating layer.
U. Lohbauer, R. Belli, A. Petschelt. Abstract 473 IADR Firenze, September
2013
Clinical Evaluation of Class I Resin Coated Glass Ionomer Restorations. C.
Pentelescu, A. Delean, L. Colceriu, L. Pascu, J. Sander. Abstract 53 IADR
Firenze, September 2013
Toothbrush Abrasion Of Resin Coated Glass Ionomers Over 8 Years. L.S.
Turkun, O. Kanik, W. Dasch. Abstract 7 IADR Firenze, September 2013
An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements
and their interface to dentin. J. Zoergiebel, N. Ilie. Acta Biomaterialia (2013)
Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements
for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). G.F. Molina, R.J.
Cabral, I. Mazzola, L. Brain Lascano, J.E. Frencken. J Appl Oral Sci.
2013;21(3):243-9
redirected to Fuji IX GP (Fast)
Effects of Storage Media on the Flexural Strength of GIC. K. Gorseta, D.
Glavina, T. Skrinjaric, I. Skrinjaric. Abstract 25 IADR-CED 2013, Firenze,
Italy
Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Cements HeatCured with an LED Lamp during Setting. G.F. Molina, R.J. Cabral, I. Mazzola,
L. Brain Lascano, J.E. Frencken. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, BioMed
Research International, Volume 2013, Article ID 838460, 6 pages
Two-year study on the clinical performance of the glass ionomer based
restorative system EQUIA. S. Gurgan, E. Firat E, ZB. Kutuk. Journal of
Minimum Intervention in Dentistry 2013; 6: 81-86
Evaluation of a glass-ionomer based restoration system-a one year pilot
study. I. Mileti, A. Baraba, I. Bago Juri, I. Ani. Journal of Minimum
Intervention in Dentistry 2013; 6: 87-95

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 5/7

71.
72.

60-Month Clinical Performance Of A Glass-Ionomer Restorative System. S.

GURGAN, Z.B. KUTUK, E. FIRAT, F.Y. AKiR, and S.S. OZTAS. Abstract 89
IADR 2014
Effect of Heat Sources on the Mechanical Properties of GICs. G.F. Molina, I.
Mazzola, L.B. Lascano, R.J. Cabral, J. Frencken. Abstract 298 IADR 2014

Articles in Dental magazines

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

EQUIA, Linformation Dentaire, n26, 27-06-07, p.1510

7.

Restauraciones directas con ionmero de vidrio en sector posterior. F.

Caballero, M. Mercad, M. Valls, M. Roig. Labor Dental, vol.9, n3 - 6/2008

8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.

Best products 2007, CRA Newsletter, Vol 31 - Dec 2007

DPRE, Clinical Usage review, P. Tietze Jan-Feb 2008
Equia, Info Dentaire, 27 June 07
CRA Newsletter. April 2008, Vol 1, Issue 4
Staklenoionomerni cementi u slozenim oralnim rehabilitacijama. M. Basso, S.
DAmici, J. Nowakowska. The Croatian Journal of Dental Medicine, 2/09, p.
46-49

Glass ionomer cements: some scientific analysis. Revista Romn de

Medicin Dentar, Vol. XII nr. 6/2009, p.7-12
Fr einen groen Qualittsgewinn bei geringem Mehraufwand. C. Ghring.
Dentalzeitung, 10. Jarngang Mrz 2009
Glass ionomers: a therapeutic alternative to direct composite restorations.
D.H. Ward. Oral Health April 2010
Cementy glasjonomerowe w wietle analizy naukowej.
STOMATOLOGIA WSPCZESNA vol. 17, nr 2, 2010.
Simplifying posterior restorations using self-adhesive systems.
Dentistry Today.com, May 2010

K.H.

Friedl.

D.A. Terry.

Fuji IX GP Extra: A Versatile Restorative Option For The Person with Special
Needs. Carlton Horbelt. www.aadmd.org
A rapid and aesthetic alternative to a direct posterior composite. M.L. Pitel.
DentistryToday.com, November 2010
Aplicacin clnica del ionmero de vidrio como material restaurador. R.
Mateos-Palacios, C. Lucena, J.A. Gil, J.M. Navajas, R. Pulgar. Labor Dental
Clnica, Vol.11, n4, 10-12/2010
Glass-Ionomer Cement Technology Advances into 21st Century Dentistry Systematic reviews reveal the continued evolution of dental materials.
MIDENTISTRY.CORP. (PRWEB)February 17, 2011
Incorporating glass ionomers into the daily routine of general practice. R.
Kaminer. Dental Learning, February 2011 / www.dentallearning.net
Conveniently Packaged, Well-Proven Fuji IX Extra with Surface Sealer.
Clinicians Report, March 2011, Vol 4, Issue 3
Einfach whrt am lngsten! Auch bei der Seitenzahnfllung? Die Zahnarzt
Woche 03, Ausgabe 27/11
Glasionomerzemente als Amalgamersatz. Dr. Eiben. DZ,2, 2011
(Kosten)-Effizientz in der Fllungstherapie mit EQUIA. Dr.A. Berden.
www.barometer-online.info,02,2011

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 6/7

22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.

Alternativ gefllt. M. Remus. Teamwork, J Cont Dent Educ 2/2011

Zahnfarben und Kosteneffizient: GIZ-Konzept ist eine echte
Amalgamalternative. T. Schnell. www.barometer-online.info, 05,2011
In meiner Praxis als schneller, aber auch nachhaltiger Problemlser bewhrt.
G. Fecht. DZW, Ausgabe 23/11
Neue Alternative fr permanente Seitenzahnrestaurationen. ZMK, Jg27,
Sonderausgabe, July/August 2011
Einstufung der EQUIA-Fllung als zuzahlungsfreie GKV-abrechenbare
Leistung. ZMK, Jg27, Sonderausgabe, July/August 2011
Den Praktiker einbeziehen. Teamwork, J Cont Dent Educ 4/2011
sthetische und zuverlssige Fllungen fr jeden Geldbeutel. K. Kischko. DZ,
4/2011
Der Schutzlack sorgt fr eine natrliche sthetik. Marion Gntzel. ZWP
10/2011
berzeugende sthetik. Gert Fecht. DZ, 6/2011
Schrittweiser Versicht auf Amalgam. A. Kielbassa. Die ZahnarztWoche 11,
Ausgabe 15/12
Glasionomer-basierte Systeme auf dem Vormarsch. D. Burghardt interview
Prof. R. Frankenberger. ZWP 4/2012 96-99
Ohne Versiegelung stabil. Deutscher rzte-Verlag Dental Magazin, 2012;
30(1);34-37
EQUIA: a true amalgam alternative. U. Hague. Dental Town - June 2012,
p.94-96
Zahnarzt und Patient knnen indikationsbezogen profitieren. F. Rosenbaum.
DZ, #6-12
Restauraciones dentales con ionmero de vidrio recubierto. Dr. M. Basso.
Gaceta Dental 248, junio 2013 P186-192
The Ratings- Miscellaneous, REALITY, October 2013 Number 246 p4-6
Nano-geflltes Coating verbessert physikalische Eigenschaften von GIZ. DZW
Ausgabe 42/13, p.26
Glasjonomer Cementi. L. Miletic, l. Bago, A. Boraba, I. Anic. Neodent Brief
News, January 2014
Reconsiderarea cimenturilor ionomer de sticl pentru restaurri directe. M. L.
Pitel. Actualiti stomatologice, nr. 61, martie 2014
Dental Materials- What Goes Where? The Current Status of Glass Ionomer as
a Material for Loadbearing Restorations in Posterior Teeth. F. J. Trevor Burke.
Restorative Dentistry, December 2013
Restauraciones de composite vs. Ionmero de vidrio: evaluando la
satisfaccin del paciente. Dr. Juan Manuel Goe Benites. Gaceta Dental 258,
mayo 2014, p. 208-214

Literature EQUIA
Status 26/06/2014
Page 7/7