0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views42 pages

Pressure Transient Analysis

Processes and equations involved in well testing

Uploaded by

swaala4real
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views42 pages

Pressure Transient Analysis

Processes and equations involved in well testing

Uploaded by

swaala4real
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PETR 5308

Pressure Transient Analysis

GL_5

Recall: The infinite reservoir solution


Solution in Dimensionless form
rD 2
PD 0.5Ei
4t D

Solution in field units


P(r , t ) Pi 70.6

qB 948ct r
Ei
kh
kt

rD

r
rw

tD

0.0002637 kt
crw 2

PD

0.00708khPi P
qB

If the reservoir is ideal (S=0) and the log approximation is valid:


2
70.6qB 1688ct rw

Pi Pwf
ln

kh
kt

2
70.6qB ln(10) 1688ct rw

Pi Pwf
log

kh
kt

That means:

For

948ct r 2
0.02
kt

Because:

Or also

ln X ln 10* log X

1688ct rw 2
162.6qB

Pi Pwf
log

kh
kt

Formation damage

Infinite reservoir solution

Infinite reservoir solution


Representation of formation
damage in a vertical well

Formation damage
Infinite reservoir solution
Representation of formation damage in a vertical well

Formation damage and skin


Damaged zone representation

Formation damage and skin


Damaged zone representation

Skin factor
Hawkins Model
qB
Ps 70.6
2S
kh

Ps 141.2

Or

k
rs
S 1 ln
k s rw

qB
S
kh

For ks<k

S >0 Damage

For ks>k

S <0

Stimulation

Example
k = 10 md
rw= 0.33 ft

In this case:
and:

or:

and:

ks= 4 md
rs= 10 ft

q = 200 stb/d
B = 1.26

10 10
S 1 ln

4
0.33

Ps 2 * 70.6

200 *1.26 *1.5


* 5.12
10 *100

Ps 136.5

psi

h = 100 ft
= 1.5 cp

or: S 5.12

Infinite reservoir solution


Representation of formation damage in a vertical well

2
70.6qB 948ct rw
Ps
Pi Pwf
Ei

kh
kt

2
rs
70.6qB 948ct rw 70.6qB k

Pi Pwf
Ei

2 1 ln

kh
kt
kh
k s rw s

2
rs
70.6qB 948ct rw k

Pi Pwf
2 1 ln
Ei

kh
kt
k s rw

Or:

Or:

Drawdown equation with Skin


For

948ct rw
kt

<0.02

70.6qB 1688ct rw
2S
Pi Pwf
ln

kh
kt

Recall: the skin S is:


k
rs

S 1 ln
k s rw

And the pressure drop related to this skin S, is:


qB
Ps 70.6
2S
kh

damage and skin


Ps 70.6

qB
2S
kh

k
rs
S 1 ln
k s rw

Bounded Reservoirs

Bounded Cylindrical Reservoir solution with Bessel term:

Or:

qB 2t D
3
2 ln reD
P(rw , t ) Pi 141.2

kh reD
4

with

When t is large

Is negligible and we will have:

qB 2t D
3
2 ln reD
P(rw , t ) Pi 141.2
kh reD
4

Different flow regimes

Drawdown equation for an ideal reservoir S=0


Assuming t very large
re 3
qB 0.000527kt
Pwf Pi 141.2
ln
2

kh ct re
rw 4

rD

r
rw

tD

0.0002637 kt
crw 2

PD

0.00708khPi P
qB

0.0744qB
qB re 3
Pwf Pi
ln E1
Or:
t 141.2
2

kh rw 4
ct re h

0
.
0744
qB
qB re 3

Pwf Pi
t 141.2
ln

kh rw 4
V p
ct

After deriving with respect to t


P(rw , t )
0.0744qB

t
ctV p

Or:

P(rw , t )
0.234qB

t
ctV p

P(rw , t )
0.234qB

t
ctVP
Where VP is the Pore volume.
This expression of the slope shows that the rate of pressure
decline is proportional to q and inversely proportional to the
pore volume Vp
After extending a drawdown test, the slope can be estimated
from the plot Pwf vs t and therefore, Vp can be estimated.
Notice:
This can be used as a reservoir limit test

Drawdown period

Different flow regimes

Also, since we have:


VP
c
~
VP ( Pi P )
~
Where P the is average pressure
~ VP 5.615qB(t / 24)
Pi P

2
ctVP
ctre h

or

~ 0.0744qBt
Pi P
2
ct re h
Recalling the draw down equation derived previously E1

0.0744qB
qB re 3
Pwf Pi
ln
t 141.2
2

kh rw 4
ct re h

E1

0.0744qBt
Replacing :
2
ct re h
We obtain :

In E1 by

qB re 3
~
Pwf Pi Pi P 141.2
ln

kh rw 4

~
Pi P

Or:

qB re 3
~
P Pwf 141.2
ln

kh rw 4

In the case of skin damage, this equation can be written:

qB re 3
~
S
P Pwf 141.2
ln

kh rw 4

~
P

Is the average pressure and


is the skin damage

The equation with the skin damage:

qB re 3
~
P Pwf 141.2
ln S

kh rw 4

Can be also written as:


qB re 3
~
P Pwf 141.2
ln

k j h rw 4

kj is an average permeability of the damaged reservoir


After combining, we obtain:
re 3
ln
r 4
kj
w

k re 3

ln S
r 4

Or:

re 3
ln
r 4
w

kj k
re 3

ln S
r 4

Recall
The Productivity Index PI for a bounded circular reservoir

q
PI ~
P Pwf

stb / d
PI
psi

From previous relation, we have:


PI

k jh
re 3
141.2 B ln
rw 4

or

~
P

Is the average pressure and

Pwf

Is the flowing pressure

PI

kh
re 3

141.2 B ln S
rw 4

Bounded Reservoirs with a given shape


In a bounded Reservoir with other non-circular shape , we have:

141.2 Bq 1 10.06 A 3
~
S
P Pwf
ln
2
4
2

kh
C
r
Aw

The productivity index J can be written as:


q
J ~
P Pwf

or:

A Drainage Area sq ft
CA Shape Factor

q
J ~

P Pwf

0.00708kh
1 10.06 A 3

S
B ln
2
4
2

C
r
A
w

Bounded Reservoirs
Example of Shape Factors:
For a circle with the well centered in the middle:

CA = 31.62

Notice
= (31.62/10.06)
A= re2

Bounded Reservoirs
Example of Shape Factors:
For a square with the well centered in the middle:

CA = 30.8828

For a Triangle:

CA = 27.6

Bounded Reservoirs
Example of Shape Factors:
For a square with a well off center - located in just one quarter of
the square:
CA = 4.5132
For a rectangle 2/1 and similar situation:
CA = 2.0769

Bounded reservoirs

Bounded reservoirs

Maximum time a reservoir is infinite acting


ct At DA
0.000264kt
Or
t
Since: t DA
0.000264k
ct A
Upper limit of time
We can use the infinite system solution with less than 1%
error as long as t is smaller than an upper limit of time.

t<

ct At DA
0.000264k

tDA is given in the tables

Time required for the PSS solution to be accurate within 1%

t>

ct At DA
0.000264k

Meaning of this lower limit of time


The Pseudo Steady State solution (PSS) is accurate within
1% as long as t verifies the inequality above

tDA is given in the tables

Example
Bounded reservoir
h
Pav
Pwf
re
rw
q

ct
B

10 ft
2000 psia
1500 psia
1000 ft
0.25 ft
100 stb/d
0.5 cp
0.000072 1/psia
1.5 Rb/stb

Productivity Index
q
100
PI

Pav Pwf 2000 1500

stb / d
PI 0.2
psi

Bounded reservoirs
qB re 3
k j 141.2
ln
hP rw 4
100 *1.5 * 0.5 1000 3
ln
k j 141.2

10(2000 1500) 0.25 4

k j 16md

If the estimation of k is k=25 md. How do you estimate S:


we have seen that:

re 3
ln

rw 4
k j k

r
3
ln e S
r 4

or

re 3

re 3
k j ln S k ln
rw 4

rw 4
kj

re 3 k j
ln

r
4
w
k

re 3

S ln

r
4

or

Or also

kj

re 3 k j

S ln

r
4

re 3
ln

rw 4

or

kj

re 3 k j

S ln 1

r
4
k

Or also

re 3 k
S ln 1
k

r
4
w
j

1000 3 25
S ln
1
0.25 4 16
Or also

S 4.24

This shows that this well is damaged.

Questions:
What is the difference between kj and ks
What is rs
Can we find rs for instance

Flow equations for generalized reservoir geometry

qB 1 10.06 A 3
~

P Pwf 141.2
ln

kh 2 C A rw 2 4

where:
A
Drainage area sq ft
CA
Shape factor

PI

0.00708kh
1 10.06 A 3

S
B ln
2
4
2

C
r
Aw

Application: Flow equations for generalized geometry


In the previous example:
The PI equation is:

PI

0.00708kh
1 10.06 A 3

S
B ln
2
4
2

C
r
Aw

For instance, for a bounded circular reservoir:


A
CA

*(re)2 Drainage area in sq ft


31.62

Example Bounded reservoir with a square shape

h
Pav
Pwf
re
rw
q

ct
B

10 ft
2000 psia
1500 psia
1000 ft
0.25 ft
100 stb/d
0.5 cp
0.000072 1/psia
1.5 Rb/stb

A *(1000)2
CA 30.8828

In this case, We will have:


A
CA
rw

3,141,500 sq ft
30.88
0.25ft

PI equation case of bounded reservoir with a given shape:

PI

0.00708kh
1 10.06 A 3

S
B ln
2
4
2

C
r
Aw

We will have:

Applying the PI equation with skin:

PI

0.00708 * 25 *10
1 10.06 * 3.14 *106 3

4.24
1.5 * .5 ln
2
2 30.8828 * (.25) 4

We get:

stb / d
PI 0.2
psi

This shows that a reservoir with a square shape behaves almost like a
circular reservoir

Another example:
Bounded reservoir with a square shape and a well in the first quarter of
the square

h
Pav
Pwf
re
rw
q

ct
B

10 ft
2000 psia
1500 psia
1000 ft
0.25 ft
100 stb/d
0.5 cp
0.000072 1/psia
1.5 Rb/stb

A *(1000)2
CA 4.5132

Applying the PI equation with skin:

PI

0.00708 * 25 *10
1 10.06 * 3.14 *106 3

4.24
1.5 * .5 ln
2
2 4.5132 * (.25) 4

We get:

stb / d
PI 0.185
psi

This shows that a reservoir with a square shape and a well in the first
quarter behaves slightly differently from a centered circular reservoir

You might also like