Professional Documents
Culture Documents
With exceptions, jatis within a caste have generally existed on a horizontal relationship
with each other as opposed to a vertical one.
Although many no longer pursue their traditional crafts, jatis continue to exist with their
own distinctive customs, rules, and internal structural hierarchy. While there has always
been, for various reasons, some degree on intermarriage between jatis in the same
varna, they have tended to remain endogamous, which keeps the relationships of the
members close knit. Jatis are typically controlled by local and regional caste
organizations and boards, or panchayats, and leaders tend to have a great deal of
influence in the internal functioning of the group, and the activities of its members. For
example, when Mahatma Gandhi wished to travel to England to get a law degree, his
local sub-caste leaders forbid him to do so. In his day, there was a religious restriction
against crossing the ocean, since it was believed that one would not be able to adhere
to purity rules on the journey. Gandhi went against the prohibition and was ostracized
from his jati.
Gotra
Each jati is made up of multiple gotras. A gotra (literally, Acowshed@) is a patrilineal clan
group that claims ancestral lineage to famous ancient figures. Brahmin gotras, for
example, trace their ancestry to one of eight sages believed to have been connected to
portions of the Vedas, the ancient Hindu scriptures. Initially, only varna that had gotra
was Brahmin, but eventually all castes, nearly all jatis, and even Jains, adopted the
tradition. Today, gotras number in the thousands, and some jatis have up to a hundred
or more.
Gotras are also important aspects of identity. In some, male members would wear
distinctive garb or hairstyle to distinguish themselves from other gotras. Various
orthodox rituals, especially rites of passage, require both name and gotra identification
of the beneficiary as a part of the preparatory rites. When a jati panchayat meets, a
member or leader of each gotra is supposed to be represented. W hen one has a
dispute with another member of the same jati in a village, it is often the gotra heads who
will be called upon to mediate. In some jatis, decisions by gotra heads carry the weight
of law and are rarely disputed.
Because gotras are viewed as extended families, they are exogamous. Marriage, then,
occurs within one=s jati, but outside one=s gotra. Like last name, a female adopts the
gotra of her husband. Most jatis strictly prohibit marriage within one=s gotra but allow
marriage to a member of any other gotra within the jati. One of the only added
limitations for most jatis is between offspring of a brother and sister, even though the
children are of different gotra.
Caste as Indian, Caste as Hindu
There has been an ongoing debate for several decades on the role of caste in India, as
opposed to caste in Hinduism. This is because caste can be found in non-Hindu
religious traditions in the country as well. Although many will not admit it, caste plays a
role in Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity in India. It is true that it is a holdover from
caste consciousness among Hindus, but it has clearly become a reality in those
traditions. At the same time, Hinduism outside of India is essentially caste free. Thus,
caste as a social hierarchy and ranking has become more endemic to the land than to
the religious tradition. For those who are against caste, this is both positive and
negative. It is positive in that it shows that Hinduism can exist without caste, but it is
negative in that it suggests that India may not be able to exist without it, at least rural
India.
Caste in Modern India
The varna system continues to have its supporters, especially in the rural areas,
especially those at the top of the hierarchy. They see it as necessary for social stability
and for the maintenance of traditional values and institutions. At the same time, those
who defend the system generally acknowledge that the long standing and inherent
prejudice against avarna Hindus should be removed. They envision a system that
returns to one based strictly on a division of labor. The problem here is that
occupational exclusivity of sub-castes has been dying away since the nineteenth
century. Some of the only professions that remain primarily caste or sub-caste
restricted include the work of priests at the top and most avarna occupations at the
bottom. Those at the bottom of the system, on the other hand, see nothing positive in it
at all. While the occupational elements of the system are ending, the inherent social
prejudices connected with it are more resistant to change.
Diaspora Hinduism and Caste
In the early 1800s, the British government began the system of indentured servitude,
whereby it sent more than one million impoverished, primarily rural, Indians to work
British plantations in the Caribbean, Fiji, Mauritius, and South Af rica, creating the Hindu
Diaspora. The vast majority of Hindus who participated were from Shudra or
Untouchable families and did so both for economic as well as social reasons. They
sought to craft a new life for themselves in their new lands and they left caste identity
behind in the process. Consequently, Diaspora Hinduism is essentially caste-free. Not
only has this not hurt the practice of Hinduism in Diaspora lands, but it has benefitted it
in many ways. The inter-caste tension and discrimination that seems natural and
commonplace does not exist, and this allows Hindus in those lands to more freely
interact, intermarry, and work together toward common goals.
Challenges to Caste
Ever since the early days of the development of Buddhism, more than two millennia
ago, there has been criticism or the caste system. Buddha himself is said to have
rejected the system for his followers. Nearly all the founders of new religious
movements since that time, especially devotional movements, have echoed the
Buddha=s call for rejection of caste. Yet, it persists. However, as Indian society is
becoming more urban, adopting western-style education and social values, the caste
system is becoming less and less relevant. In the larger cities, socio-economic class
has become the basis for the hierarchy, and it appears that a similar pattern will
eventually occur in villages as well. Nevertheless, the varna system still has a great
deal of influence in India even though the original purpose of the system has been lost.
For the most part, all that remains is a purposeless hierarchical structure that continues
to keep those on top in power and those at the bottom relatively powerless.