Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.sciencemag.org
cal examination.
The second, and more difficult, problem solved bv auantum field theorv is that
of the creation and annihilation of matter.
When particles collide (when, for exampie, an electron hits a proton) it may happen that they both vanish while twb new ones
(in this case a neutron
and a neutrino) pop up
out of nowhere. No
model, no metaphor,
no theory can account
for these miraculous
events, except quantum field theory.
Treiman points out
that inasmuch as particle creation and annihilation destroy the ancient picture of a material world composed of
irreducible building
blocks, they represent
the first radical break
with the atomic doctrine of Democritus. A
consistent mathematical description of the
creation and annihilation of matter must
therefore be hailed as one of the supreme
achievements of 20th-century physics.
Treiman shows how quantum fields can
provide this description.
Such luminous insight serves as a fitting capstone for Treiman's book, his life,
and his era.
2
BOOKS: M E T H O D S O F S C I E N C E
17 MARCH 2000
1935
SCIENCE'S
COMPASS
This is the main theme of Models as Me- ments as part of the research routine. But
diators, edited by Mary Morgan and Mar- the complexity of the topics covered in the
garet Morrison. The volume comprises 10 case studies often makes it hard for those
case studies that examine mental, physical, from other disciplines to follow the authors'
and computer models in physics, economics, arguments. Trained as.a physicist, I found it
easy enough to underand chemistry. The
' stand the examples
contributors (h~storians
from physics; however,
and philosophers of
the chapters on ecoscience) report that the
nomic modeling left
use of models to aid
me puzzled on more
thinking underlies not
than one occasion.
only the layperson's unThe case studies are
derstanding of the
problematic in another
world, but also scientifrespect. They often
ic reasoning. They exlack the theoretical
plain that scientists are
background that could
not a select few intelliand should guide the
gent enough to think in
analysis of original sciterms of '%road swea- I
1
entikc papers,which is
ing theoretical laws &d
A
Orrery 'On- the authors' preferred
principles." Instead,
scientists are people structed by Thomas Wright, with Earth, empirical method. In
specifically trained to Moon, Venus, and Mercury positioned an exception, Ursula
around the sun.
Klein fruitfullv uses
build models that incorporate theoretical assumptions and empir- her notion of "paper-tools" to show how
ical evidence. Working with models is essen- quasi-mathematical chemical formulas contial to the performance of their daily work; it tributed to the early development of organic
allows them to construct arguments and to chemistry. But most other chapters are not
as successful at incorporating useful.concollect data.
This conclusion is all the more valuable cepts for the analysis of empirical material
today because scientific knowledge is in- (I). In her study on the use of a pendulum
creasingly produced and displayed through and a miniature water tunnel to explore
computer simulations, which are nothing but boundary layers, Morrison dismantles the
a special type of only theoretical account she discusses--realism--and offers no alternative. And even
Models as Mediators model. Where people
when
the relevant descriptive terminology is
once
visited
science
Perspectives on
museums
that
feaNatural and Social
tured actual balls reScience
volving around one
Edited byMary S. Mogan
another, they are now
and Margaret Momkon
much more likelv to
view science
in which round
shapes representing
planets blaze through
a black void, leaving.
white lines behind
them on the television screen. The computer revolution has also
taken hold of the laboratory. Amplified by the
visual style of knowledge distribution, computer simulationshave become an increasingly popular species of scientific model. For
example, economists and meteorologists
now use computer models to produce displays that summarize past and projected
trends for broad audiences and that further
the researcher's own comprehension. If one
aims to understand this approach to science,
it seems worth taking a closer look at models
in general.
The .insight that scientists use material
models as well as abstract theory in their
reasoning is an important one. It draws attention to the production of scientific argu-
2
I
-
ire-
17 MARCH 2000
VOL 287
fer, Eds. The Uses o f Scientific Instruments (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989).
.a
SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
.A
BROWSINGS
The Great Auk. Errol Fuller.
Abrams, New York, 1999.448
pp. $75,CSll5, f48. ISBN 08109-6391-4.
k2
ka
?i