'US nuke threat is state terrorism'

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:18:36 GMT

Font size :

, Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee

Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee describes the US threat of using nuclear
weapons against other countries as state terrorism.

"Threats of using nuclear weapons against a nation are a clear sample of the state terrorism," Khazaee
said at the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC).

He called for a frank fight against terrorism, saying, "Certain countries should not use the case as a
political instrument to promote their expansionist goals and dispatch troops to remote parts of the world
and to the Middle East in particular."

The Iranian envoy slammed such practices as adopting double standards and taking political advantage
of the issue as well as making moves, which will actually serve to expand terrorism. He said, "Iran is a
victim of terrorism and has always condemned acts of terror and the instrumental use of this
phenomenon."

He urged all UN member countries to remain committed to legal and international regulations.

Khazaee said that state terrorism and the use of military force against poor nations under the pretext of a
war on terror is a "serious danger" to global security and a clear breach of international rights and the
Geneva Convention.

He noted that recent threats made by US officials about resorting to the use of nuclear arms against the
Islamic Republic were a clear example of state terrorism and a violation of international rights.

The Iranian diplomat called on the international community to denounce the posing of threats against a
country which is a member of the United Nations and a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT).

Threats of any kind are against article two of the U-N charter. Tehran says it plans to submit a formal
complaint to the United Nations.
[ANALYSIS START OF]
“Terrorist acts may occur during armed
conflicts or in time of peace. As international
humanitarian law applies only in situations
of armed conflict, it does not regulate
terrorist acts committed in peacetime.
The requirement to distinguish between
civilians and combatants, and the
prohibition of attacks on civilians or
indiscriminate attacks, lies at the heart of
humanitarian law. In addition to an express
prohibition of all acts aimed at spreading
terror among the civilian population (Art. 51,
para. 2, Protocol I; and Art. 13, para. 2,
Protocol II), IHL also proscribes the following
acts, which could be considered as terrorist
attacks:
• attacks on civilians and civilian objects
(Arts. 51, para. 2, and 52, Protocol I;
and Art. 13, Protocol II);
• indiscriminate attacks (Art. 51, para. 4,
Protocol I);
• attacks on places of worship (Art. 53,
Protocol I; and Art. 16, Protocol II);
• attacks on works and installations
containing dangerous forces (Art. 56,
Protocol I; and Art. 15, Protocol II);
• the taking of hostages (Art. 75, Protocol I;
Art. 3 common to the four Conventions;
and Art. 4, para. 2b, Protocol II);
• murder of persons not or no longer taking
part in hostilities (Art. 75, Protocol I; Art. 3
common to the four Conventions; and Art. 4,
para. 2a, Protocol II).” – www.icrc.org (Iran is member of the Red Cross &
Crescent Organization)
A sovereign state (commonly simply referred to as
a state) is a political association with effective Definition of Terrorism as used
internal and external sovereignty over a geographic by the Iranian State Run PRESS
area and population which is not dependent on, or TV Seems to be incompatible
subject to any other power or state.[1] While in
with the Red Cross Humanitarian
abstract terms a sovereign state can exist without
being recognised by other sovereign states, Law
unrecognised states will often find it hard to
exercise full treaty-making powers and engage in
diplomatic relations with other sovereign states. For
a list of all 203 states, see the List of sovereign
states page.

'US nuke threat [Against the US] is state terrorism [Local

Population]' Return the Argument against the
Enemy: Iran and other Islamist Fundamentalists usually refer to
Hostile Ways of Life Alien to Islam not Sovereign States which can
fall in time with Non Violent Resistance from the Inside (Also known
as Cultural Terraforming).
Terraforming (literally, "Earth-forming") of a planet, moon, or other body is
the hypothetical process of deliberately modifying
its atmosphere, temperature, surface topography or ecology to be similar to
those ofEarth to make it habitable by terran organisms.

The term is sometimes used more generally as a synonym for planetary

engineering, although some consider this more general usage an error. The
concept of terraforming developed from both science fiction and
actualscience. The term was coined by Jack Williamson in a science-fiction
story ("Collision Orbit") published during 1942 in Astounding Science
Fiction,[1] but the concept may pre-date this work.

Different divisions of the world have existed in Muslim history. The idea of
divisions was first suggested by the earlySunni Muslim jurist Imam Abu
Hanifa, founder of the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence. Some are
geo-political divisions that are derived from non-scriptural sources. These
conventions delineate several divisions of the worldcalled "Houses" or
"Dar" - literally "place" in Arabic. Other geographic divisions of the world are
described in the Qur'an.

The house of divisions in Islam such as "Dar al-Islam" and "Dar al-Harb"
does not appear in the Qur'an or the Hadith. This geo-political house of
divisions was more acutely framed by another early Islamic scholar, Ibn
Taymiyyah, who issued a treatise and a religious edict on the subject in
response to the Mongol invasions of Muslim lands during the 13th and 14th
[1]
centuries.
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:18:36 GMT
Font size :

Preaching the Law in the UN.

Since the Humanitarian Law

as described by the Red
Crescent is incompatible
what kind of Law Mr.
Khazaee “Preaches”?

, Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee

The Vision of the Person
Used in the Image is
Targeting the Iranian
Enemy which in the given
Article as Written by
PRESS TV is the United
States of America

“Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee describes the US threat of using nuclear
weapons against other countries as state terrorism [Term Terrorism as used by PRESS TV Rejected for
reasons mentioned above].”

"Threats of using nuclear weapons against a nation are a clear sample of the state terrorism, terrorism
[Term Terrorism as used by PRESS TV Rejected for reasons mentioned above]." Khazaee said at the
United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) [No Response given by the CTC Committee, It also
implies further coordination with other Anti US Interests to present the US as a Global Terrorist].

He called for a frank [French] fight against [US] terrorism, saying, "Certain countries should not use the
case as a political instrument to promote their expansionist goals and dispatch troops to remote parts of
the world and to the Middle East in particular. [The United States has Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan after
the 2001 Attacks against US Citizens by Jihadist Warriors disguised as Civilians. This Attack as applied
by Al Qaida cost most than 3000 Civilian Lives. ]"
The Iranian envoy slammed such practices as adopting double standards [In interpretation of Law as this
is interpretation is presented by Iran nowadays (Some would say distorted or manipulated to fit Iranian
Needs)] and taking political advantage of the issue as well as making moves, which will actually serve to
expand terrorism [One more clue that Iran and other US antagonists give not the same Definition of what
is Terrorism.What is Terrorism for one side can be a noble act for another. Iran seems to be seeking
Moral and Legal Ground for Future [Para] Military operations through the UN]. He said, "Iran is a victim of
terrorism and has always condemned acts of terror and the instrumental use of this phenomenon. [What
Phenomenon in this Moment?]"

He urged all UN member countries to remain committed to legal and international regulations [Generic
Declaration as presented by PRESS TV to present an Iran going along with the UN Guidelines at least for
now].

Khazaee said that state terrorism and the use of military force against poor nations [matter does not have
the same meaning in Fundamental Islam] under the pretext of a war on terror is a "serious danger" to
global security [in the Way of Islamic Thought and Action] and a clear breach of international rights and
the Geneva Convention.

The Geneva Convention has no direct reference of the word Terror or

Terrorism but it is used when Acts of War Occur.

From that aspect Iran through PRESS TV warns all Anti Iranian States
and Parties to prepare for a full Scale War.

That brings more doubts about the efficiency of the Iranian Military
and about whether the Iranian Army can respond to any kind of
Attack in a Precise and Professional Manner while protecting what is
supposed to be the Duty of the Iranian Military which is the Iranian
Soil Alone!

With the Extensive use of Para Military Forces that Iran has for
Military Use someone could define this as one more Misuse of
Fundamental Islamists nowadays to distort anything non Islamic while
Promoting the Islamic Law!

Islam as a Religious Way of Life, in general, is well known for its

Tolerance and Focus on Human Rights Unlike what Tehran seems to
present to the innocent nowadays!

From that point of View Iran seeks to have all necessary well
understood Arguments to further implement an Aggressive Policy in
the Middle East.

He noted that recent threats made by US officials about resorting to the use of nuclear arms against the
Islamic Republic were a clear example of state terrorism and a violation of international rights.
 The Iranian diplomat called on the international community to denounce the posing [Indirect Reference to
the US NPR] of threats against a country which is a member of the United Nations and a signatory to the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) [There are clues that Iran has managed to Legally Bypass the
NPT Treaty to acquire Nuclear Weapons in the Future].

Threats of any kind are against article two of the U-N charter. Tehran says it plans to submit a formal
complaint to the United Nations.

The United States have recently published the

Nuclear Posture Review which excludes Nations
with Nuclear Ambitions from a Potential Strike as
last resort.

The Current President of the United States

Barack Hussein Obama has a Vision of Banning
all Nuclear Weapons.

Iran has built Ballistic Missiles with Nuclear

Warhead Capability.

“Article 2

The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the
following Principles.

1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in
good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace
and security, and justice, are not endangered.
4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the
United Nations.
5. All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present
Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking
preventive or enforcement action.
6. The Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with
these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.
7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are
essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to
settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement
measures under Chapter Vll.” – UN Charter
Iran’s Motto is “Death to America” or “Down with the USA”.
Psychological Manipulation of the Enemy while accusing the Enemy for Violations first committed by the
Accuser is a Standard Pattern of Iran especially when it comes to the United States of America

The Following are some exhibits of what Iran is on a Daily Basis :

The Images above is a direct invasion in the mind of the Iranian Residents, An Invasion of the Feeling
known as Hate promoted by the Iranian Establishment itself against a Nation which is known as a Nation
of Immigrants.

On the Original Statue of Liberty it is written:

The New Colossus

By Emma Lazarus, 1883

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,

With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
 "Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

It is Publicly well known that the Vision Fundamental Islam has for the United States of America is to fall
as a Giant whose Base is Corrupted.

The Statue of Liberty Stands Firm the last 130 Years, while a Similar Statue exists in France,
The Place where the Actual Statue of Liberty was created and later Donated to the United States
as a Gift of Friendship between the Two Nations!

“ARTICLE
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient
whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or
explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any
non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other
nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices [Unless it is for Purposes of Self
Defense something which Iran continuously claims when it comes to the United States to legalize the Existence of
Nuclear Weapons in Iran while the Global Opinion and Public will believe the Iranian Arguments, thus Iran will
“Legally” violate the NPT Treaty. The United States and the Soviet Union developed Nuclear Weapons for purposes
of Self Defense long before the NPT Treaty took Place.]. – Non Proliferation Treaty

[ANALYSIS END OF]

'Iran wants peace in Kyrgyzstan'

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:24:12 GMT
Font size :

Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki (L) and the interim leader of Kyrgyzstan, Roza Otunbayeva
Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki has stated that the Islamic Republic wants peace and
stability in the Central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan.

He made the remarks in a phone conversation on Monday with the interim leader of Kyrgyzstan, Roza
Otunbayeva.

"We believe that the maintenance of peace and stability will benefit the Kyrgyz nation as well as the
people and countries of the region," Mottaki told Otunbayeva.

The Kyrgyz opposition, led by former Foreign Minister Roza Otunbayeva, took power last week and
dissolved the parliament.

During the uprising, clashes in Bishkek and other towns claimed the lives of 81 people and over 1,500
people were injured.

Mottaki went on to say that recent events in the country are internal matters and Iran will support any
decision made by the Kyrgyz people.

He also expressed his condolences to the families of the people killed during the recent violence in the
country and said that Iran is prepared to send humanitarian assistance to the country.

Otunbayeva said that the situation in Kyrgyzstan has retuned to calm and the government is in full
control.

She added that her government wants to maintain good relations with Iran and thanked the Iranian
government for its support of the Kyrgyz nation.
[Analysis 'Iran wants peace in Kyrgyzstan' START OF]

'Iran wants peace in Kyrgyzstan'

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:24:12 GMT
Font size :

Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki (L) and the interim leader of Kyrgyzstan, Roza Otunbayeva

Face Confronting Face with a Vertical Line in the Middle.

The Image of the Iranian Minister Seems to be occupying a larger space

when it comes to the Leader of Kyrgystan Mrs. Otunbayeva.

The Vertical Line in the Picture is emphasized on the left side.

From a Symbolic perspective Iran says that there is no Line between the
two Sides (Iranian and Kyrgyzian).

Mrs. Otunbayeva looks stunned to this Attack of Friendship as described

in this Picture.

Using psychological attacks is a standard pattern in the Iranian (and

Others) Propaganda.

It also implies a potential attack by Pro Iranian Interests located in

Kyrgyzstan in case the Otunbayeva Government will not submit in the Pro
Iranian Interests.

Mrs. Otunbayeva is considered to have close ties with Russia while the
Government she leads maintained the Agreements between the United
States and Kyrgyzstan to remain intact in their entirety.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki has stated [The Man is the State?] that the Islamic
Republic wants peace and stability in the Central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan [Term State as it is
internationally defined does not seem to be accepted by Iran].

He made the remarks in a phone conversation on Monday with the interim leader of Kyrgyzstan [Nation],
Roza Otunbayeva.

"We believe [Implies Islamic Faith. Mrs. Otunbayeva studied in Moscow during the 1970’s. Can Allah as
defined by Iran Nowadays reject Atheism?] that the maintenance of peace and stability will benefit the
Kyrgyz nation as well as the people and countries of the region," Mottaki told Otunbayeva [Who did not
answer].

The Kyrgyz opposition, led by former Foreign Minister Roza Otunbayeva, took [Implies that Power was
stolen] power last week and dissolved the parliament [Implies Dictatorship is applied by Mrs. Otunbayeva.
Mrs. Otunbayeva’s has Close Relations with Russia which is a Multinational Republic. The Russian
Federation now applies a Democratic System in the Interior of what was known as the Heart of the Soviet
Union while spreading reforms that can improve dramatically the Political Landscape in the Central Asian
Region.].

During the uprising, clashes in Bishkek and other towns claimed the lives of 81 people and over 1,500
people were injured [PRESS TV Text does not say why. From that Aspect the PRESS TV Text is Biased
against Mrs. Otunbayeva. There are clues that if Mr. Bakiyev is assassinated Kyrgystan will fall to the
status of a Civil War. Russia, The United States and China have interest in the Stability of Kyrgyzstan a
country close to Afghanistan which is also vital for Stability and Prosperity in the Entire Eurasian
Territory].

Mottaki went on [An Iranian Walking on the Map of Central Asia] to say [Verbal Attack] that recent events
in the country are internal matters and Iran will support [Interference Implied] any decision made by the
Kyrgyz people [Text Does not day who is finally leading Kyrgyzstan. It can be also important to
mention that the word State is not used in this PRESS TV Text]

State of Iran

State of Kyrgyzstan

He [Who?] also expressed his condolences to the families of the people killed [Tensions Implied] during
the recent violence in the country and said that Iran is prepared to send humanitarian assistance to the
country [What is the Exchange in Equal Return?].

Otunbayeva said that the situation in Kyrgyzstan has retu[r]ned (Retune Kyrgysian Leadership to Iranian
Needs) to calm [Claims as she is presented by PRESS TV] and the government is in full control.

She added that her [her?] government wants to maintain good relations with Iran and thanked the Iranian
government for its support of the Kyrgyz nation [Not exact Dialogue given between Mr. Mottaki and Mrs.
Otanbayeva].

In Fundamental Islam a Woman cannot Lead Men and especially Nations or States. Indirectly and to
avoid Insults the Iranian PRESS TV gives focus on the Term Nation (Acoustic Distortion is close to
NATO) while the Iranian PRESS TV also emphasizes on the Female Identity of the President of
Kyrgyzstan Mrs. Otunbayeva. The Word “She” is carefully combined with the Word “Family” by PRESS
TV to imply that this is the correct role of a Woman something that comes in direct contradiction with the
Studies about Sexual Equality Mrs. Otunbayeva received during the years of the Soviet Union.

Iranian Women’s Role in the Iranian Society is widely considered to be underestimated despite the claims
of the Iranian Government about the Opposite.
Women are recognized in Shiite Islam as a Gift of God…

In Secular Societies Women are Equal Human Beings in the Society they are members which happens to
be a common Property with the Soviet Union of the 1970’ and 80’s.

Kyrgyzstan has declared alignment with Russia when it comes to how to best promote its interests as an
Independent State in the rather Conflicting and Destabilizing never seen before attempts Far Eastern Ex
Soviet Central Asia Faces.

Kyrgyzstan is also known for its rich Gas Reserves and also for Cultural Iranian Influence over the
Centuries as part of the Mongol Empire.

There are numerous signs that Iran applies all means available to extend its influence in the region while
using Methods publicly known as “Non Violent Resistance” to claim the Moral Ground from the Opponent
no matter who he / she is.

[Analysis 'Iran wants peace in Kyrgyzstan' END OF]