Professional Documents
Culture Documents
transoxianac@gmail.com
Agha A
Group Founder
MEMBERS
7,145 members
Invite others
UnlikeComment
You + 839
1w
Unlike
You + 1
1w
Like
1
6d
1941 ..
Like
1
1d
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB We lost 1 one, the other was used for
parts to bring the other 6 back into battle, We had lost (SUNK) 16 US Carriers
however....So how this logic going Peter?
o
Unlike
o
You
1d
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB The Time when USA Was stupid holding
a whole fleet together is not A Battleship, that was Idiocy, Complacency of the
United States, Maybe it was even baited that way...
o
Unlike
o
You
1d
Peter Crittenden WWII was won by the carrier, not the battleship . . . and
every major battleship sunk during WWII - on both sides - was sunk by fleet
air . . .
o
Unlike
o
You
23h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB Ugh...No...The Battleships Supported the
Carrier, How do you think all those Zero's were shot down? and the Normandy,
Pacific Islands Blasted...My Dad was a WW II Battleship Captain, Trust me I know
Better than your misinformed or rewritten history...Just look it up
o
Like
o
3
23h
Show less
o
o
Like
2
23h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB JAPAN During the last weeks of World
War II, Battleship of the United States Navy, bombarded several cities and
industrial facilities in Japan. Battleships and caused heavy damage to several of
the factories targeted. The Japanese military stunned by the heavy shells did not
attempt to attack the Allied fleet during this period, and none of the warships
involved in the bombardments suffered any damage.
The major bombardments began on 14 and 15 July 1945 when United States
warships attacked the cities of Kamaishi and Muroran. The next attack was
made by United States force against the city of Hitachi during the night of 17/18
July, shelled the Nojima Saki and Shionomisaki areas on 18 July and the night of
24/25 July, respectively. On 29 July, American Battleships attacked Hamamatsu,
and on the night of 30/31 Show less
o
Unlike
o
You + 2
22h
Forces landed on the beaches of Normandy. Six American, British and Canadian
Infantry Divisions, three Airborne Divisions and numerous supporting units came
ashore in landing craft or were airdropped into Normandy. Backing them was an
immense Naval Task Force which provided naval gunfire support, screened the
force from German U-Boat or surface naval forces and transported the massive
ground force. It was an amazing armada.
It was an armada that also is forgotten by many who read about Normandy or
whose only exposure to the landings are films such as Saving Private Ryan.
Today I think it is fitting to remember Battleships that served at Normandy, USS
Arkansas, USS Texas, USS Nevada, HMS Warspite, HMS Ramillies and HMS
Rodney.Show less
o
Unlike
o
You + 2
22h
through early 1945, the U.S. Navy, under Admiral Chester Nimitz, adopted a
strategy of "Battleship island-hopping". Rather than attacking Japan's Imperial
Navy in force, the goal was to capture and control strategic islands along a path
toward the Japanese home islands, enabling to bringing Carrier based U.S.
bombers within range and preparing for a possible invasion. Show less
o
Unlike
o
You + 2
22h
22h
obsolete. Prove it. Do not cite the historical record. Thank you if you can do it. I
want to see a threat analysis done. Andrew
o
Like
o
1
21h
Craig Chemaly How is it possible that battleships are obsolete? How can
raining mobile hell down on almost any spot on earth via multiple delivery
systems be obsolete?
o
Like
o
4
21h
Christopher Whalen, CAMS Peter, I disagree with you. Each type of ship
carries out a specific or set of functions with regard to naval warfare. The aircraft
carrier is important for providing air and command and control. The battleship
provides naval gunfire or fire support to ground troops. Destroyers and destroyer
escorts provide security for the larger ships (and so on). Saying that a particular
ship or capability is the sole reason for success is simplistic. Tom is correct that
battleships are still valuable. The point he has been making is that the functions
of the battleship have been ignored due to the type of warfare that has been
underway over the past 15 years. Since we are now "pivoting" and responding
to increased tension with Russia, the navy and congress should relook naval
programs. The next war will need a stronger naval capability. Show less
o
Like
o
3
21h
Battleships up and running with new weapons on board she will be a great help
out in the world....you see a ship that size coming at you ..you get the hell out of
the way fast....
o
Like
o
1
21h
Andrew Beckwith Peter, the fact is, that a battleship can have cruise
missiles and other weapons platforms and be MUCH harder to sink than a
Zumault. If you look askance at a battleship , how is it that battle ships survived
the 1945 Okinowa Typhoon, with 40 foot ocean swells on the surface and high
winds, when a Zumault , costing 30 times as much to activate would sink in 8
foot swells ? IMO your supposition does not make any sense. Please attempt
focusing upon survivability and the alternative which is post modern crap which
endangers national security.Show less
o
Like
o
2
20h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB Here's How they Fit Today....real Simple:
A Kayak is a Big Target Today.....So when the Shit Rains Down on you, What Do
you want to be on? A Battleship with Longer Survivability or a Carrier or any ship
in US Fleet with Vaporizability?.....Today with Burnable Wooden Zumwalts, and
Aluminum Littoral Combat Ships, they have ZERO CHANCE....One Light weight
Strike and they are gonners....Show less
o
Unlike
o
You + 2
20h
navy, had to answer the question before the U.S. Senate: With out a
Battleship to protect our Carriers How long would our aircraft carriers survive in
a battle against the Russian Navy? His response caused disillusionment: They
would be disabled almost immediately from Combat , maybe if very lucky Two or
three days before they sink, maybe a week if they stay in the harbor. Show
less
o
o
Unlike
You + 2
20h
Andrew Beckwith Thomas is right. One well placed 5 inch shell from a
o
o
20h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB Obsolete after WW II? Huh? North Korea,
Vietnam, Persian gulf Huh? Forcible Entry. Because of her remarkable ability to
absorb punishment, and to dish it out, the battleship is widely believed to be
ideally suited for supporting amphibious landings. The New Jersey showed what
her nine 16-inch guns could do in 1969 when she nosed up to a small, heavily
fortified island off North Vietnam. The enemy soldiers were allowed to escape
unharmed. Then the dreadnought opened fire. A newspaper headline later told
the result: ''The New Jersey Sinks an Island.'' Show less
o
Like
o
2
20h
the number of available offensive platforms - ships that mount weapons capable
of taking war to the enemy. In 1982, after launching the nuclear-powered aircraft
carrier Vinson, the Navy had 13 such surface platforms - the 13 aircraft carriers.
But the aircraft carrier is a thin bred line Heavy maintenance thoroughbred; for
every carrier in deployment there are two others back home being overhauled
or resupplied or having their pilots and crew brought up to peak performance
levels. Thus, in practical terms, at any one time only four or five aircraft carriers
were spread around the globe ready for action. The four Iowa-class battleships
were transformed into major offensive platforms by being fitted with Tomahawk
cruise missiles. The Tomahawks look like flying torpedoes with stubby wings;
they can hit ships from 300 miles away, or land targets from 1,500 miles. Show
less
o
o
Like
2
20h
Andrew Beckwith Peter, it so happens that a battleship can anchor within
20 miles of a beach for an invasion force and shoot inland. Done all the way up
through the 1980s. I.e. you try that with a carrier and the carrier will be SUNK
o
Like
o
2
20h
19h
Commander on Iowa and then WisKey, I know them inside out, I also know what
kind of damage they can take equivalent to 32 Feet of Reinforced Rebar Bunker
Concrete, I know what Force and...Show more
o
Like
o
2
19h
are far superior to digital of Today, I know the Ship would not get stranded due
to EMP, I know the true run costs and they are a penny on the dollar compared
to a Carrier, I know of the Defense Contractor Scheme to Throw disinformation
mud on them so they can open up a $$ Waste Land for themselves. I know these
ships could sail for 300 years structurally , that's how well built they are, I know
because I spent a Year on Big J as an Classified Intelligence Agent... Show less
o
Like
o
2
19h
Andrew Beckwith So, Thomas, is this due to the battleship not sucking in
mega billion bucks for maintainance ? I think this has something to do with it.
I.e. the Carrier and the Zumault are pigs as far as $$$ for support whereas the
Battleship is cheap, comparatively to operate
o
Like
o
2
19h
o
o
Unlike
You + 2
19h
less
o
o
Unlike
You + 2
18h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB So a 600 Foot Zumwalt Made From Balsa
Wood And Glue looks just as good as a 887 Foot Super Armored Battleship with
18 Inches of Class Grade Amor Class Forged Steel, the LCS, Nearly 500 Feet, a
Kayak, 5 Feet, all now Capable, so you can be big and you can be small, it's now
all the Same, it's ALL ABOUT SURVIVABILITY, and Aircraft Carrier are the Biggest
Flaming Gas Garages ever made on earth, and are not protected. Iran just
demonstrated they can penetrate the carriers Electronics as it Droned right over
the Carrier in Gulf. Had it been loaded with an Exocet, it would be sunk today, a
Battleship, it would literally Bounce off. I have data to prove these
statementsShow less
o
Like
o
1
18h
Bella SG Well, for those that mention that the Battleship became absolete in
1941, I guess that is why Reagan/ Lehman re- commission them in 1980s . I
guess they had no vision and had no clue of what they were doing. After all,
they are just two of the best of the best the US ever had, but what did they
know, LOL?
For those that do not believe in the Battleships I guess they believe in the "
state of the art F " Zumwalts and LCSs. Oops... I forgot to mention that thanks to
Mr. Snowden, the Zummies can be hacked and after billions wasted the little
"state of the art" pieces of junk are absolete. Oh and the LCSs... I guess they
don't know they deteriorate and need maintenance and fixing every other day.
But who is counting the billions, actually trillions wasted in maintenance! Show
less
o
o
Like
3
18h
Bella SG And then there is the safety factor for our men, and while it takes 3
hours to sink a Zummie / LCS, it takes 3 days for a Battleship to go down. Well, 3
days gives time to survive ... 3 hours gives you time to pray and I got to tell you
gentlemen... money is just that... money, but for those that have their sons and
husbands putting their lives on the line for the country, somehow I 'd rather
have them on a Battleship. You can always make more money and raise taxes,
but you can never replace a dead son or a dead husband. Show less
o
Like
o
3
18h
o
o
Like
2
18h
Like
1
17h
Bella SG And for those that defend the carrier , I guess they need to see the
tragedy that happened in 1987 when an Iraqi jet aircraft, fired missiles at the
American frigate USS Stark (FFG-31) and how fast thirty-seven United States
Navy personnel were killed and twenty-one were wounded.
o
Like
o
2
17h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB Some have said over the years that
post-Soviet Russia was only relevant on account of its nuclear arsenal. This was
merely an excuse to ignore it in favor of other things as we met the supposed
End of History. The fact is, Russia is, well, Russia and as long as people call that
territory home, those people will have certain interests that are not going away.
This weeks discussions have certainly not provided all the answers on Russian
resurgence, though we hope to have offered a meaningful contribution; but to
ignore the discussion and downplay Russia as a relic of the Cold War is folly.
Russia is right where we left it, and will continue to make its impact felt. Show
less
o
o
Unlike
You
14h
Thomas J. Miller, CLM, CSSMBB .......And closing out the week a graphic
depiction of the Soviet fleet of 1990 was compared with the Russian fleet of
2015, researched and designed by Louis Martin-Vezian. The scale of the work
ahead Russia intends to reach the maritime heights of 25 years ago or bigger is
becoming alarmingly clear.
o
Unlike
o
You
14h
Agha A Simple fact that German industry and Japan industry simply could not
compete with allies in second world war in naval production. US and Britain won
because of overwhelming odds. Today it is not like that.
35s