Professional Documents
Culture Documents
850
15 NOVEMBER 2013
VOL 342
SCIENCE
Supplementary Materials
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6160/846/suppl/DC1
Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S20
Tables S1 to S3
References (2854)
23 April 2013; accepted 30 September 2013
10.1126/science.1239552
www.sciencemag.org
REPORTS
Fig. 1. (A) Tree cover, (B) forest loss, and (C) forest gain. A color composite of tree cover in green, forest loss in red, forest gain in blue, and
forest loss and gain in magenta is shown in (D), with loss and gain en-
hanced for improved visualization. All map layers have been resampled
for display purposes from the 30-m observation scale to a 0.05 geographic grid.
Fig. 2. Regional subsets of 2000 tree cover and 2000 to 2012 forest loss and gain. (A) Paraguay, centered at 21.9S, 59.8W; (B) Indonesia,
centered at 0.4S, 101.5E; (C) the United States, centered at 33.8N, 93.3W; and (D) Russia, centered at 62.1N, 123.4E.
www.sciencemag.org
SCIENCE
VOL 342
15 NOVEMBER 2013
851
REPORTS
rainforests during the study period; over 31% of
its forest cover was either lost or regrown. Areas
of colocated loss and gain (magenta tones in Fig.
1D), indicating intensive forestry practices, are
found on all continents within the subtropical
climate domain, including South Africa, central
Chile, southeastern Brazil, Uruguay, southern
China, Australia, and New Zealand.
The temperate climatic domain has a forestrydominant change dynamic and a relatively low
ratio of loss to gain (1.6 for >50% of tree cover).
Oceanic ecozones, in particular, are similar to the
subtropics in the intensity of indicated forest land
use. The northwest United States is an area of
intensive forestry, as is the entire range of temperate Canada. The intermountain West of North
America exhibits a loss dynamic, largely due to
fire, logging, and disease [for example, large-scale
tree mortality due to mountain pine bark beetle
infestation, most evident in British Colombia,
Canada (9)]. Temperate Europe has a forestry
dynamic with Estonia and Latvia exhibiting a
high ratio of loss to gain. Portugal, which straddles the temperate and subtropical domains, has a
complicated dynamic of forestry and forest loss
due to fire; the resulting aggregate change dynamic is fourth in intensity globally. Elevated
loss due to storm damage is indicated for a few
areas. For example, a 2005 extratropical cyclone
led to a historic blowdown of southern Sweden
temperate forests, and a 2009 windstorm leveled extensive forest areas in southwestern
France (10).
Fire is the most significant cause of forest loss
in boreal forests (11), and it occurred across a
range of tree canopy densities. Given slower
regrowth dynamics, the ratio of boreal forest loss
to gain is high over the study period (2.1 for >50%
of tree cover). Boreal coniferous and mountain
ecozones are similar in terms of forest loss rates,
with North America having a higher overall rate
Fig. 3. Annual forest loss totals for Brazil and Indonesia from 2000 to 2012. The forest loss annual increment is the slope of the estimated
trend line of change in annual forest loss.
852
15 NOVEMBER 2013
VOL 342
SCIENCE
www.sciencemag.org
REPORTS
cost and the preprocessing of geometric and radiometric corrections of satellite imagery, exemplified by the Landsat program. Given such progressive
data policies and image processing capabilities, it
is now possible to use advanced computing systems, such as the Google cloud, to efficiently
process and characterize global-scale time-series
data sets in quantifying land change. There are
several satellite systems in place or planned for
collecting data with similar capabilities to Landsat. Similar free and open data policies would
enable greater use of these data for public good
and foster greater transparency of the development,
implementation, and reactions to policy initiatives that affect the worlds forests.
The information content of the presented data
sets, which are publicly available, provides a
transparent, sound, and consistent basis on which
to quantify critical environmental issues, including (i) the proximate causes of the mapped forest
disturbances (15); (ii) the carbon stocks and associated emissions of disturbed forest areas (1618);
(iii) the rates of growth and associated carbon
stock gains for both managed and unmanaged
forests (19); (iv) the status of remaining intact
natural forests of the world and threats to biodiversity (20, 21); (v) the effectiveness of existing
protected-area networks (22); (vi) the economic
drivers of natural forest conversion to more intensive land uses (23); (vii) the relationships between forest dynamics and social welfare, health,
rganelles and other intracellular structures must scale with cell size in order to
function properly. Maintenance of these
dimensional relationships is challenged by the
rapid and reductive cell divisions that characterize early embryogenesis in many organisms. The
cellular machine that drives these divisions, the
1
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming,
Laramie, WY 82071, USA. 2Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA. 3Department of Statistics, University of Wyoming,
Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
mitotic spindle, functions to segregate chromosomes in cells that vary greatly in size while also
adapting to rapid changes in cell size. The issue
of scale is epitomized during Xenopus embryogenesis, where a rapid series of divisions reduces
cell size 100-fold: from the 1.2-mm-diameter fertilized egg to ~12-mm-diameter cells in the adult
frog (1). In large blastomeres, spindle length reaches
an upper limit that is uncoupled from changes in
cell size. However, as cell size decreases, a strong
correlation emerges between spindle length and
cell size (2). Although this scaling relationship
has been characterized in vivo for several differ-
www.sciencemag.org
SCIENCE
VOL 342
Supplementary Materials
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6160/850/suppl/DC1
Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S8
Tables S1 to S5
References (2440)
14 August 2013; accepted 15 October 2013
10.1126/science.1244693
15 NOVEMBER 2013
853
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6160/850/suppl/DC1
varying subsets, referred to as nodes (31). For the tree cover and change products, a
bagged decision tree methodology was employed. Forest loss was disaggregated to
annual time scales using a set of heuristics derived from the maximum annual decline in
percent tree cover and the maximum annual decline in minimum growing season
Normalized Vegetation Difference Index (NDVI). Trends in annual forest loss were
derived using an ordinary least squares slope of the regression of y=annual loss versus
x=year. Outputs per pixel include annual percent tree cover, annual forest loss from 2000
to 2012, and forest gain from 2000 to 2012. To facilitate processing, each continent was
characterized individually: North America, South America, Eurasia, Africa, and
Australia.
Earth Engine uses a lazy computation model in which a sequence of operations may
be executed either interactively on-the-fly or in bulk over a complete data set. We used
the former mode during development and debugging, and the latter mode during the
computation of the final data products. In both cases all image processing operations
were performed in parallel across a large number of computers, and the platform
automatically handled data management tasks such as data format conversion,
reprojection and resampling, and associating image metadata with pixel data. Largescale computations were managed using the FlumeJava framework (32). A total of 20
terapixels of data were processed using one million CPU-core hours on 10,000 computers
in order to characterize year 2000 percent tree cover and subsequent tree cover loss and
gain through 2012.
Supplementary Text
Comparison with FAO data
The standard reference for global scale forest resource information is the UNFAOs
Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) (33), produced at decadal intervals. There are several
limitations of the FRA reports that diminish their utility for global change assessments,
including (i) inconsistent methods between countries; (ii) defining forest based on land
use instead of land cover thereby obscuring the biophysical reality of whether tree cover
is present; (iii) forest area changes reported only as net values; and (iv) forest definitions
used in successive reports have changed over time (34).
Several discrepancies exist between FAO and earth observation-derived forest area
change data. For example, the large amount of tree cover change observed in satellite
imagery in Canada and the USA does not conform to the land use definitions applied in
the FRA for these countries. While there is significant forest change from a biophysical
perspective (i.e., forest cover), there is little or no land use change, the main criterion
used in the FRA report. Additionally, China, and to a lesser extent India, report
significant forest gains that are not readily observable in time-series satellite imagery,
including this analysis (Fig. S3). Large country change area discrepancies such as these
preclude a significant correlation between FAO and Landsat-based country data at the
global scale. However, regional differences in strength of agreement exist, and examples
are illustrated in Fig. S3 and Tab. S4. The region with the highest correlation between
FAO and Landsat net change is Latin America. Deforestation is the dominant dynamic,
and a number of countries, including Brazil, employ earth observation data in estimating
forest area change for official reporting. There is much less agreement for African
countries, though the correlation improves when lowering the tree cover threshold to
3
include more change. The lack of agreement in Africa reflects the difficult nature of
mapping change in environments with a range of tree cover as well as the lack of
systematic forest inventories and mapping capabilities for many African countries.
Southeast Asian countries exhibit changes primarily in dense canopy forests. However,
there is little correlation between Landsat-based change estimates and FAO data. The
forestry dynamics and differing governance and development contexts within this region
may lead to inconsistencies between countries. European data have the least correlation
of the regions examined, with comparatively little net area change reported in either our
Landsat analysis or in the FAO FRA.
The importance of forest definition and its impact on change area estimation is seen
for countries located in boreal and dry tropical climates. Our estimate of Canadas net
change from the Landsat-based study doubled when including forest loss across all tree
cover strata, largely due to extensive burning in open boreal woodlands. Countries such
as Australia, Paraguay and Mozambique have similar outcomes related to disturbances
occurring within a range of tropical forest, woodland and parkland environments.
Gross forest area gain and loss for >50% tree cover were also compared to FAO
roundwood production data summed by country from 2000 to 2011 (Fig. S4). FAO data
are available at http://faostat.fao.org/. The national coniferous and non-coniferous
"total roundwood" production data (in cubic meters) were multiplied by 0.225MgC/m^3
and 0.325 MgC/m^2 respectively, and then added together to give national total
roundwood production in Megatons of carbon. Tab. S4 illustrates the strength of the
relationship between FRA roundwood production and Landsat-derived gross forest area
gain and loss for selected regions. While Africa and Southeast Asia have extremely poor
correlations, Landsat-derived forest area gain for Latin America and both forest gain and
loss for Europe exhibit strong correlations. The FRA roundwood production data
correlate well with satellite-based tree cover change area estimation for forestry land usedominated countries.
The FAO comparison reflects the confusion that results when comparing tabular
data that apply differing criteria in defining forest change. Deforestation is the
conversion of natural forests to non-forest land uses; the clearing of the same natural
forests followed by natural recovery or managed forestry is not deforestation and often
goes undocumented, whether in the tropical or boreal domains. Understanding where
such changes occur is impossible given the current state of knowledge, i.e. the FAO FRA.
While countries such as Canada and Indonesia both clear natural forests without
conversion to non-forest land uses, Indonesia reports over 5,000km2 per year of forest
area loss in the FRA while Canada reports no change. Consistent, transparent and spatiotemporally explicit quantification of natural and managed forest change is required to
fully understand forest change from a biophysical and not solely forest land use
perspective.
Recent global forest mapping research
The FAO and others have turned to earth observation data, specifically Landsat
imagery, to provide a more consistent depiction of global forest change. Sample-based
methods have enabled national to global scale estimation of forest extent and change
(35,2,3). Such methods result in tabular aggregated estimates for areas having sufficient
sampling densities, but do not allow for local-scale area estimation or spatially explicit
representation of extent and change. While exhaustive land cover mapping using Landsat
4
data has been prototyped using single best-date image methods (36,37) based on the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-United States Geological
Survey (USGS) Global Land Survey data set (38), data mining of the Landsat archive to
quantify global forest cover change has not been implemented until this study.
Validation
The validation exercise was performed independently of the mapping exercise. Areas
of forest loss and gain were validated using a probability-based stratified random sample
of 120m blocks per biome. Boreal forest, temperate forest, humid tropical forest and dry
tropical forest biomes and other land constituted the five major strata, and were taken
from our previous study on global forest cover loss (2). The map product was used to
create three sub-strata per biome: no change, loss and gain. The sample allocation for
each biome was 150 blocks for no change, 90 for change and 60 for gain (1,500 blocks
total). Each 120m sample block was interpreted into quartiles of reference change as gain
or loss (i.e., the proportion of gain or loss was interpreted as 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, or 1),
where reference change was obtained as follows. Image interpretation of time-series
Landsat, MODIS and very high spatial imagery from GoogleEarth, where available, was
performed in estimating reference change for each sample block. Forest loss estimated
from the validation reference data set totaled 2.2Mkm2 (SE of 0.3Mkm2) compared to the
map total of 2.3Mkm2. Forest gain estimated from the validation sample totaled 0.9Mkm2
(SE of 0.2 Mkm2) compared to the map total of 0.8Mkm2. Fig. S5 shows the results as
mean map and validation change per block for the globe and per FAO climate domain.
Fig. S6 illustrates the mean per block difference of the map and reference loss and gain
estimates. Comparable map and reference loss and gain results were achieved at the
global and climate domain scales.
Estimated error matrices and accuracy summary statistics are shown in Tab. S5. For
loss, users and producers accuracies are balanced and greater than 80% per climate
domain and the globe as a whole. Results for forest gain indicate a possible
underestimate of tropical forest gain with a users accuracy of 82% and a producers
accuracy of 48%. However, the 95% confidence interval for the bias of tropical forest
gain (expressed as a % of land area) is 0.01% to 0.35%, indicating high uncertainty in the
validation estimate. A possible overestimate of boreal forest gain is also indicated.
Overall, the comparison of individually interpreted sample sites with the algorithm output
illustrates a robust product at the 120m pixel scale.
The annual allocation of change was validated using annual growing season NDVI
imagery from the MODIS sensor. All validation sample blocks were interpreted and if a
single, unambiguous drop in NDVI was observed in the MODIS NDVI time series, a year
of disturbance was assigned. Only 56% of the validation sample blocks were thus
assigned. The sample blocks interpreted represented 46% of the total forest loss mapped
with the Landsat imagery, a fraction similar to the 50% ratio of MODIS to Landsatdetected change in a previous global forest cover loss study (39). For the interpreted
blocks, the mean deviation of the loss date was 0.06 years and the mean absolute
deviation was 0.29 years. The year of disturbance matched for 75.2% of the forest loss
events and 96.7% of the loss events occurred within one year before or after the estimated
year of disturbance.
A second evaluation of forest change was made using LiDAR (light detection and
ranging) data from NASAs GLAS (Geoscience Laser Altimetry System) instrument
onboard the IceSat-1 satellite. Global GLAS release 28 (L1A Global Altimetry Data and
5
the L2 Global Land Surface Altimetry Data) data were screened for quality and viable
GLAS shots used to calculate canopy height (40). For forest loss, GLAS shots co-located
with Landsat forest loss by pixel were identified. The Landsat-estimated year of
disturbance was subtracted from the year of the GLAS shots and populations of year
since disturbance created. Significant differences in height before and after Landsatderived forest loss indicate both a reasonable approximation of forest loss and year of
disturbance. Fig. S7 shows the results by ecozone, all of which passed Wilcoxon-MannWhitney significance tests (non-parametric alternative of t-test) for pairs of +1\-1 and
+2\-2 years.
Forest gain was not allocated annually, but over the entire study period. To compare
GLAS-derived change in height with Landsat-derived gain, gain-identified pixels with no
tree cover for year 2000 and co-located with GLAS data were analyzed. Additionally,
only clustered gain was analyzed, specifically sites where six out of nine pixels within a
3x3 kernel were labeled as forest gain. Fig. S8 illustrates the results. All climate domains
except for the boreal passed Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney significance tests for 2004 and
2008, the beginning and end years for GLAS data collection. The growth-limiting
climate of the boreal domain would preclude the observation of regrowth over such a
short period.
Table S1. Climate domain tree cover extent, loss and gain summary statistics (km2), ranked by total loss.
.
Climate
Domain
Total
Loss
Total
Gain
Treecover 2000
<25%
26-50%
51-75%
a)
b)
c)
d)
f)
e)
76-100%
51-75%
76-100%
g)
h)
j)
k)
i)
Total loss
/ total
land area
(excluding
water) (%)
>25% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>25% tree
cover (%)
>50% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>75% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>75% tree
cover (%)
Total gain
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>50% loss
+ total
gain /
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
q)
Previous
column less
double
counting
pixels with
both loss
and gain (%)
r)
Tropical
Boreal
Subtropical
Temperate
1105786
606841
305835
273390
247233
207100
194103
155989
35866276
11066215
19087918
20938580
4175597
2988449
769954
676500
3524230
3782283
829023
1195036
13241470
4360312
1830148
4080868
85479
51285
37924
7856
125921
114990
28761
11588
180106
147631
32363
25881
714278
292935
206787
228064
1.9
2.7
1.4
1.0
4.9
5.0
7.8
4.5
5.3
5.4
9.0
4.8
5.4
6.7
11.3
5.6
1.5
2.5
7.3
3.0
6.8
8.0
16.3
7.8
6.3
7.9
13.8
7.5
Total
2291851
804425
86958989
8610500
9330573
23512797
182544
281261
385982
1442065
1.8
5.1
5.6
6.1
2.4
8.0
7.5
Table S2. Ecozone tree cover extent, loss and gain summary statistics (km2), ranked by total loss.
Total
Loss
Total
Gain
Treecover 2000
<25%
26-50%
51-75%
b)
c)
d)
f)
e)
76-100%
76-100%
g)
h)
k)
i)
j)
253435
229331
228011
33042
124488
104488
678685
1774827
563048
100431
904244
116976
131817
1577094
275092
5607324
1831760
1661696
2125
15280
2666
3847
29602
2856
10919
50285
15050
236544
134164
207438
162095
143573
122915
120804
96848
88784
33615
36555
103420
39978
24575
3032
2456904
2266444
399595
314668
511549
898296
379932
756678
55264
264683
752270
382134
404571
1000381
65639
474734
742393
231661
1003315
1048086
522260
917683
1941290
150647
17675
23000
854
3223
2272
10581
25214
30952
1582
21444
10590
30683
36530
38751
6486
22386
28693
29104
82676
50869
113993
73751
55293
18416
84719
82998
63370
63068
3649
39105
4342
48939
2370104
791649
924788
3126680
1331743
107937
659389
210065
845218
153970
405281
500447
40070
891664
284991
1003265
27852
2385
3266
1118
28032
4274
21744
2023
25474
6475
20580
9041
3361
69864
17779
50886
56749
44693
39485
33259
26139
17066
1332
3298
731687
989723
568948
3076095
80291
193841
180517
412938
131018
339619
189178
125125
1000282
469305
233314
19520
216
1208
1145
11240
549
1962
8887
11866
2045
10323
13879
7820
53939
31200
15573
2332
28166
7837
739252
91874
189904
298608
1829
1938
6724
17674
25169
22777
19089
19037
18861
17149
15624
14459
13952
12236
10987
8174
2641
13471
8892
5631
25269
4700
5388
1755
4813
5120
284373
97950
929909
4100378
370255
971549
1154706
301136
1181479
1098346
734840
55814
23299
40517
101904
56439
38429
64730
34772
74787
176193
62992
73719
36653
84314
174080
45414
40670
90321
93240
75701
80558
48342
247384
253265
216456
568263
117601
132183
559185
350957
67938
107352
87437
737
202
379
995
2137
491
561
304
1575
1040
1515
1413
470
640
1449
2207
648
799
495
1586
2161
1729
3932
1770
2583
2534
2500
1350
1303
2473
3699
3400
2677
19087
20334
15488
14058
12018
14660
12961
11189
7093
5635
5066
Total loss
/ total
land area
(excluding
water) (%)
>25% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>25% tree
cover (%)
>50% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>75% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>75% tree
cover (%)
Total gain
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>50% loss
+ total
gain /
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
q)
Previous
column less
double
counting
pixels with
both loss
and gain (%)
r)
3.9
3.8
8.7
3.8
4.3
5.0
11.0
8.1
4.3
5.4
11.5
8.5
4.2
7.3
12.5
8.2
0.6
3.7
5.4
2.4
4.9
9.1
16.9
10.9
4.7
9.0
14.4
10.2
2.8
11.8
6.1
2.5
5.3
1.8
4.3
19.0
7.1
2.8
10.2
2.6
4.4
20.5
6.9
3.1
12.4
3.3
4.9
21.8
8.0
2.8
12.2
8.4
1.8
17.6
2.9
0.9
0.8
0.4
6.2
38.1
9.8
4.0
13.2
3.7
6.1
31.2
9.5
3.7
13.1
3.5
4.3
2.8
1.3
2.9
7.0
4.5
3.6
4.7
7.3
5.6
4.0
4.9
7.8
6.2
5.1
5.4
3.7
0.6
3.3
2.3
11.0
6.2
7.2
7.3
10.7
6.2
7.1
6.9
2.2
3.4
0.9
2.1
4.3
6.4
3.9
4.5
5.1
7.0
7.0
5.0
6.6
6.7
11.9
5.9
2.1
0.3
2.3
1.6
7.2
7.3
9.3
6.6
6.6
7.3
8.2
6.2
3.8
6.5
7.2
7.7
2.5
9.7
9.4
5.5
1.5
0.4
3.2
1.4
0.8
1.9
1.0
0.8
1.2
7.2
5.5
2.1
7.6
7.9
2.1
3.0
5.7
3.1
4.8
7.6
6.0
2.2
8.9
9.3
2.2
3.1
7.5
4.8
5.7
8.0
7.2
2.5
10.2
11.1
2.3
3.2
10.4
5.2
5.8
0.9
4.5
1.2
3.5
14.6
0.7
1.2
1.2
2.6
3.8
8.5
10.5
3.4
12.4
23.9
2.9
4.3
8.7
7.4
9.5
8.4
10.0
3.4
11.5
20.5
2.7
3.9
8.5
6.8
8.7
9972
9695
8300
8256
6488
5439
5180
4234
4220
3292
3177
2854
2832
1864
1717
1556
751
707
3374
4213
286
10797
5983
5786
5137
3902
2269
3510
870
2317
522
880
723
1229
317
379
48615
3012481
1081882
57044
130692
108801
390362
81757
94608
107543
142817
14521
123244
308429
67075
58127
7778
414034
20176
116266
150336
5787
22580
6052
9522
17375
14214
8332
31827
1511
30126
10588
3801
14101
3977
31011
30783
177782
86494
6298
30269
13996
6115
10024
21282
23900
25026
1900
31947
7605
3009
8704
7622
7067
687847
285763
15996
30265
90635
82774
5316
12111
60561
90484
22140
20962
72471
8179
12153
3540
101354
8741
65
726
4393
49
82
24
295
417
35
41
283
7
113
224
128
74
4
312
97
1155
1951
84
206
54
536
1037
68
15
616
12
236
341
170
160
9
222
345
2571
1432
269
394
216
1898
886
257
45
1151
35
448
526
238
517
46
82
9465
5243
524
7854
5806
5146
2451
1894
3860
3192
1127
2801
2035
772
1181
805
691
91
375
248
147
94
142
119
10919
52497
226487
7706
1603
2143
10154
3662
1706
25954
17420
7185
4
15
8
7
3
3
46
8
7
317
221
129
1.3
0.3
0.6
8.3
2.4
2.6
1.3
3.5
2.2
1.4
1.4
7.3
1.1
0.6
2.0
1.8
0.6
0.2
0.7
1.3
1.5
1.5
19.4
4.5
5.3
23.3
9.7
4.4
2.6
3.7
11.7
2.0
6.2
8.4
5.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.7
1.9
22.2
5.1
5.5
38.0
12.6
5.0
2.8
4.8
12.4
2.4
8.2
9.4
10.8
0.7
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.8
3.3
26.0
6.4
6.2
46.1
15.6
6.4
3.5
5.1
13.4
2.8
9.4
9.7
22.7
0.7
1.0
1.2
0.5
0.9
0.3
29.5
4.9
6.0
44.9
17.6
2.8
3.1
1.8
10.1
0.5
5.6
4.8
10.0
0.3
2.4
0.3
1.8
2.6
2.2
51.7
10.1
11.5
83.0
30.2
7.8
5.9
6.7
22.5
2.9
13.8
14.1
20.8
1.0
3.5
1.3
1.7
2.5
2.2
42.5
8.5
9.6
58.1
25.4
6.8
4.9
6.6
20.1
2.8
12.9
13.0
15.0
0.9
2.1
1.2
0.3
0.1
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.5
1.3
1.8
0.7
1.3
1.8
2.9
1.7
2.6
Table S3. Country tree cover extent, loss and gain summary statistics (km2), ranked by total loss.
Country
a)
Russia
Brazil
United States
Canada
Indonesia
China
DRCongo
Australia
Malaysia
Argentina
Paraguay
Bolivia
Sweden
Colombia
Mexico
Mozambique
Tanzania
Finland
Angola
Peru
Myanmar
Cote d'Ivoire
Madagascar
Zambia
Venezuela
Cambodia
Vietnam
Laos
Thailand
Chile
Total
gain
Treecover 2000
<25%
26-50%
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
8414687 1846554 2707260
3304608
43907
62789
88346
169972
3118579
509317
464530
4292417
23699
30816
43577
262185
6294153
424662
462709
1982786
9274
17956
30306
206408
4141357 1068282 1074635
2167262
6860
44780
46295
166007
252964
68334
141996
1411892
1558
1611
8887
145795
7565646
387994
694764
618901
2250
3955
17457
37469
175163
469228
453121
1190506
917
4863
12362
40821
7209820
209287
79484
177890
28168
17318
2335
10915
32061
5538
17263
272365
289
309
1818
44862
2352414
170266
125227
105950
5039
14574
14378
12966
146165
110139
64482
75473
1230
12592
11751
12385
424460
75142
96512
478387
464
1340
4295
23768
130774
42494
85855
153996
95
302
1790
23346
302224
41544
61240
721695
315
619
1943
22315
1391412
131003
126317
294988
1919
2013
4042
15887
403453
266480
101514
3414
3078
10181
7818
476
544450
243832
84708
12320
5111
7880
5740
1173
85929
36353
78775
104264
74
263
1684
17496
612241
314210
281472
37883
4423
6556
6579
1762
498646
14200
23555
744591
80
101
245
14863
227580
37863
123465
274434
556
896
3991
9514
139172
116351
58468
5111
2893
3830
6953
1213
402077
64144
63773
58637
1382
2490
4900
5888
419962
224188
91539
429
3460
5562
3918
223
328461
33724
43779
493663
695
993
2389
8881
86064
16785
16401
58431
484
748
2478
8884
152816
22284
40869
106971
660
637
2247
8744
34908
11904
36244
144908
384
422
1861
9417
301598
25899
69216
110454
1402
1050
2985
6612
546019
17728
36107
142031
112
107
331
11329
365015
360277
263944
263943
157850
61130
58963
58736
47278
46958
37958
29867
25533
25193
23862
21552
19903
19516
19320
15288
14958
14889
14659
13163
12958
12595
12289
12084
12049
11879
162292
75866
138082
91071
69701
22387
13926
14142
25798
6430
510
1736
15281
5516
6333
1446
3041
10849
638
1910
3149
2298
4051
181
1910
1096
5643
3379
4992
14611
51-75%
76-100%
Total loss
/ total
land area
(excluding
water) (%)
Total
loss
76-100%
2.2
4.3
2.9
3.1
8.4
0.7
2.6
0.8
14.4
1.7
9.6
2.8
6.2
2.2
1.2
2.8
2.2
6.4
1.6
1.2
2.3
4.7
2.5
1.8
1.4
7.1
3.8
5.3
2.4
1.6
>25% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>25% tree
cover (%)
>50% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>75% tree
cover loss
/ year
2000
>75% tree
cover (%)
Total gain
/ year
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
>50% loss
+ total
gain /
2000
>50% tree
cover (%)
m)
n)
o)
p)
q)
4.1
6.4
8.9
6.0
9.6
3.5
2.7
6.6
15.9
10.4
14.7
4.5
9.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
4.3
8.9
2.4
1.9
3.3
6.7
7.1
3.1
2.1
13.2
6.8
6.1
5.2
6.0
4.3
6.4
9.7
6.5
10.0
4.2
3.2
5.1
16.1
11.8
17.2
4.9
10.5
3.1
4.7
7.9
7.1
10.5
2.6
2.0
3.4
12.8
8.8
4.5
2.1
15.2
7.4
6.2
5.3
6.5
5.1
6.1
10.4
7.7
10.3
6.1
3.4
6.1
16.5
12.2
16.4
5.0
15.2
3.1
5.4
13.9
9.5
16.8
4.7
2.0
3.5
23.7
10.0
52.0
1.8
15.2
8.2
6.5
6.0
8.0
2.7
1.6
5.6
2.8
4.5
1.7
0.8
5.5
8.9
2.8
0.4
0.3
6.4
0.7
1.5
1.4
3.1
5.9
0.2
0.2
0.8
3.6
3.3
0.2
0.4
1.5
3.8
1.9
2.8
8.2
7.0
8.0
15.3
9.4
14.4
5.9
4.1
10.6
25.0
14.6
17.6
5.2
16.9
3.8
6.2
9.3
10.3
16.4
2.8
2.2
4.2
16.5
12.1
4.7
2.5
16.6
11.3
8.1
8.1
14.7
Previous
column less
double
counting
pixels with
both loss
and gain (%)
r)
7.0
7.5
13.4
9.1
12.4
5.5
3.8
9.1
20.6
13.9
17.6
5.1
16.6
3.7
6.0
8.8
9.5
16.3
2.8
2.1
3.9
15.5
10.8
4.7
2.4
16.1
10.5
7.2
7.7
12.2
Nigeria
South Africa
India
Guatemala
Nicaragua
France
Spain
New Zealand
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Poland
Ukraine
Ghana
Ecuador
Portugal
Germany
Honduras
Cameroon
Mongolia
Central African Republic
Japan
Belarus
Latvia
Liberia
Guinea
Zimbabwe
Uganda
Norway
Turkey
Benin
Chad
Kenya
Republic of Congo
Ethiopia
United Kingdom
Panama
Romania
Estonia
Uruguay
Austria
Burkina Faso
Sierra Leone
Dominican Republic
10239
9526
8971
8883
8225
7664
6908
6883
6337
6227
5829
5657
5406
5246
4987
4890
4860
4816
4779
4719
4303
4167
4120
3955
3933
3869
3654
3520
3426
3307
3306
3059
2993
2821
2689
2675
2307
2179
2027
2015
1993
1967
1929
603
8313
2549
1094
662
5062
4482
7102
2308
2726
5041
3529
1345
1027
2866
2585
582
651
103
395
2570
3755
1857
1084
296
486
685
1729
1783
69
1
1005
467
625
2111
323
1530
894
4985
658
0
451
393
772371
1145626
2703530
29734
39402
373705
386553
149606
27933
102570
201808
470946
153157
62024
64476
226231
32713
120385
1508028
101812
102902
112240
27713
1221
130230
362829
105539
187652
664081
108992
1257866
530692
52860
968731
203651
16563
154828
16601
157077
39299
274158
11320
21365
82016
39602
112692
8709
8527
19842
36472
5653
11647
15788
11013
19510
36659
12832
8726
10219
11870
90110
26031
209547
9616
8835
2742
3783
91912
21175
67065
21453
24543
5962
9549
20815
46265
100537
8793
3089
7088
2052
3568
2743
11
24844
4064
44023
20818
136677
11952
12384
37021
28533
14375
23295
33051
30655
28312
40464
20737
6753
25175
14297
77877
15552
238922
22119
25820
7086
54435
19736
2132
24230
35282
23040
81
72
9271
25236
33866
14394
4854
10939
5085
5359
7205
0
33463
4619
3125
10826
167827
57571
58289
115684
52468
93838
396660
141108
64857
68474
2074
158764
9147
91960
52664
174702
3080
68765
233863
57913
26126
36117
1821
799
8489
62297
59104
8
0
9636
214202
20399
15185
49687
62836
19569
8522
33933
0
2424
17744
5987
678
810
105
109
209
676
24
29
84
79
150
911
58
459
61
84
548
857
226
71
26
10
7
1251
2284
154
18
535
2835
2914
732
101
375
84
35
20
5
26
11
1987
24
72
2670
1074
855
323
230
330
982
22
35
90
163
234
1099
118
784
79
238
691
1514
910
57
89
32
96
1604
1018
703
37
488
405
382
587
272
947
167
69
25
11
73
22
5
240
120
1435
3365
2117
1097
650
1149
1698
126
197
485
814
900
2863
373
1246
457
560
1595
1485
1869
253
547
253
2305
923
353
1118
214
706
59
10
612
803
828
478
262
103
126
282
130
0
1231
276
147
4411
5189
7357
7236
5977
3552
6711
6076
5569
4773
4372
533
4697
2497
4294
3978
1981
922
1714
3924
3504
3825
1547
155
214
1679
3252
1697
8
0
1129
1819
671
1960
2308
2158
2036
1646
1853
0
472
1462
1.1
0.8
0.3
8.2
6.9
1.4
1.4
2.6
1.4
2.1
1.9
1.0
2.3
2.1
5.6
1.4
4.4
1.0
0.3
0.8
1.2
2.0
6.5
4.1
1.6
1.0
1.8
1.1
0.4
2.9
0.3
0.5
0.9
0.3
1.1
3.6
1.0
5.0
1.2
2.4
0.7
2.7
4.0
3.3
12.4
2.0
11.2
10.2
4.3
5.3
6.0
1.5
3.2
5.4
4.7
5.7
2.7
18.4
3.8
6.1
1.2
8.8
0.9
1.6
4.5
11.4
4.2
2.4
6.6
3.5
2.9
2.7
7.8
4.1
5.9
1.0
1.6
6.8
4.6
2.8
8.1
11.5
4.6
45.5
3.2
7.0
3.4
24.6
2.4
12.2
11.2
4.7
6.5
6.3
1.5
3.5
5.8
5.4
8.0
2.8
23.5
4.1
6.8
1.4
12.9
1.2
1.6
4.8
12.3
4.3
5.0
19.3
8.5
3.6
2.9
75.3
13.9
9.2
1.1
2.8
8.2
4.7
3.1
8.8
13.9
4.8
4.7
7.8
4.7
40.7
3.1
12.8
12.4
5.2
6.8
7.2
1.5
3.9
7.4
6.4
25.7
3.0
27.3
4.7
7.6
1.1
29.9
2.5
1.7
6.1
14.6
4.3
8.5
26.8
19.8
5.2
2.9
100.0
11.7
0.8
3.3
12.9
4.6
3.4
10.4
19.3
5.5
19.5
8.2
1.3
26.3
0.8
1.6
0.9
3.3
5.5
6.6
0.5
1.6
5.3
3.6
3.2
0.6
18.0
2.2
0.9
0.3
0.6
0.1
1.0
4.5
5.6
1.2
1.4
16.6
2.1
1.8
2.2
77.5
1.4
5.3
0.2
1.2
7.1
0.6
2.1
3.6
35.9
1.6
1.3
1.8
4.6
50.8
3.2
13.7
12.1
8.0
12.0
12.9
2.0
5.0
11.1
9.1
11.1
3.4
41.6
6.3
7.6
1.7
13.5
1.3
2.6
9.3
17.9
5.5
6.4
35.9
10.6
5.3
5.1
152.8
15.3
14.5
1.3
3.9
15.4
5.3
5.1
12.4
49.8
6.4
6.0
9.5
4.4
36.2
3.0
13.4
12.0
7.6
11.4
10.7
1.9
4.7
10.7
8.8
10.3
3.3
36.1
6.1
7.6
1.6
13.5
1.3
2.5
9.1
17.6
4.9
6.1
29.2
10.2
5.3
4.7
143.8
15.3
13.8
1.2
3.8
14.9
5.2
5.0
12.3
45.2
6.3
5.6
9.4
Gabon
Lithuania
Cuba
Mali
Costa Rica
Czech Republic
South Sudan
North Korea
Italy
Greece
South Korea
Malawi
Slovakia
Belize
Hungary
Sri Lanka
Guyana
Senegal
Kazakhstan
Bulgaria
Ireland
Togo
Swaziland
Algeria
Suriname
Guinea-Bissau
Solomon Islands
Belgium
El Salvador
Bangladesh
Denmark
Croatia
French Guiana
Equatorial Guinea
Nepal
Jamaica
Morocco
Albania
Macedonia
Haiti
Serbia
Taiwan
Switzerland
1891
1845
1725
1694
1653
1646
1635
1605
1603
1566
1463
1290
1237
1206
1107
985
915
832
828
779
778
768
747
743
724
676
630
601
567
543
533
454
441
439
434
329
315
311
296
286
267
267
227
391
1226
2271
0
382
1331
38
137
898
356
271
103
523
128
1350
264
114
2
239
678
1238
24
603
325
70
65
203
373
86
70
322
265
42
56
134
68
196
74
104
48
356
61
104
11898
40296
68008
1247103
11327
46934
460581
67695
201331
91341
43787
71949
24608
4073
71070
24684
18733
192538
2628744
68662
60220
48707
11310
2294657
4791
18081
528
21609
9961
108675
35730
31487
928
199
94352
3185
405884
21128
16148
17810
49076
12174
24221
8112
1889
4982
1007
2752
2445
128358
12808
13199
10219
9776
19030
1245
437
2658
4952
1096
1723
13973
3910
2358
6809
3962
4212
420
11875
122
1139
2231
5560
1281
2890
110
251
9930
479
2870
1719
1234
2494
3338
1158
1255
10885
5303
7388
3
5663
6429
39278
31773
19020
8443
28496
2967
2814
675
3705
9285
1319
20
13954
6653
3492
1270
1386
3989
567
3106
441
2011
3309
8449
2506
3396
216
1864
21761
753
2251
1711
1600
2238
5852
2368
3120
230775
16472
28775
0
31183
22264
1773
9164
64805
21132
16694
163
20170
16434
14263
26177
187681
1
17598
32070
2899
5
597
4967
138564
35
26825
5756
4710
6965
3105
18892
81317
24513
21318
6545
2110
3642
5359
4334
19132
20098
11363
27
9
90
1650
28
14
567
96
113
188
230
399
6
5
12
64
4
806
329
18
26
383
48
67
2
164
3
7
25
15
8
53
1
2
67
7
58
20
11
19
5
6
3
110
20
126
40
68
25
629
262
105
181
215
540
11
10
19
77
6
23
196
20
38
333
84
136
4
315
1
11
56
23
13
35
1
12
65
9
65
25
11
42
4
7
3
285
160
295
3
200
197
356
837
244
311
560
309
67
35
84
294
14
3
125
71
122
50
204
211
9
186
5
59
206
116
68
40
4
76
106
28
85
55
31
76
13
27
19
1469
1655
1214
0
1356
1410
83
411
1142
886
458
43
1153
1155
992
551
890
0
178
670
592
2
412
329
708
11
621
524
280
389
444
326
435
349
195
285
107
212
244
148
245
227
201
0.7
2.9
1.6
0.1
3.2
2.1
0.3
1.3
0.5
1.2
1.5
1.4
2.5
5.6
1.2
1.5
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.7
1.1
1.4
4.3
0.0
0.5
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.8
0.4
1.3
0.8
0.5
1.6
0.3
3.0
0.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.7
7.8
4.0
4.3
4.1
5.2
0.6
2.8
1.5
3.5
2.2
4.0
5.1
6.8
5.3
2.3
0.5
1.5
1.1
1.8
8.6
4.8
11.8
5.1
0.5
3.4
2.3
6.7
5.3
2.5
7.6
1.6
0.5
1.6
0.7
4.1
3.6
4.1
3.5
2.9
0.9
1.1
1.4
0.7
8.3
4.2
100.0
4.2
5.6
1.1
3.0
1.7
4.0
2.3
11.2
5.3
7.0
6.0
2.4
0.5
14.3
1.0
1.9
11.2
4.1
31.1
6.0
0.5
6.3
2.3
7.5
6.1
3.3
9.1
1.6
0.5
1.6
0.7
4.3
4.4
5.0
4.0
3.4
1.0
1.1
1.5
0.6
10.0
4.2
4.3
6.3
4.7
4.5
1.8
4.2
2.7
26.4
5.7
7.0
7.0
2.1
0.5
0.0
1.0
2.1
20.4
40.0
69.0
6.6
0.5
31.4
2.3
9.1
5.9
5.6
14.3
1.7
0.5
1.4
0.9
4.4
5.1
5.8
4.6
3.4
1.3
1.1
1.8
0.2
5.6
6.3
0.0
1.0
4.6
0.1
0.3
1.1
1.2
0.6
3.3
2.3
0.7
7.5
0.7
0.1
9.5
0.8
1.8
19.4
1.9
30.4
3.6
0.1
2.1
0.7
4.8
1.1
0.5
5.7
1.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.9
4.5
1.4
1.5
0.7
1.4
0.3
0.7
0.9
14.0
10.5
100.0
5.3
10.2
1.2
3.4
2.7
5.3
2.9
14.5
7.6
7.7
13.5
3.1
0.5
23.8
1.7
3.7
30.5
6.0
61.5
9.7
0.6
8.3
3.0
12.3
7.1
3.7
14.9
2.8
0.6
1.8
1.0
5.2
8.9
6.4
5.4
4.1
2.5
1.4
2.2
0.8
13.7
10.4
100.0
5.1
10.0
1.1
3.4
2.5
5.1
2.8
13.8
7.4
7.5
13.0
3.0
0.5
23.8
1.7
3.4
29.0
5.8
41.9
9.5
0.5
7.9
2.8
11.9
7.1
3.7
14.5
2.8
0.6
1.7
1.0
5.2
8.8
6.3
5.0
4.1
2.4
1.4
2.2
Burundi
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Fiji
East Timor
Rwanda
Brunei
Netherlands
Slovenia
Trinidad and Tobago
Puerto Rico
Bhutan
Namibia
New Caledonia
Gambia
Tunisia
Pakistan
Bahamas
Syria
Georgia
Kosovo
Montenegro
Azerbaijan
Somalia
Sudan
Botswana
Iran
Luxembourg
Vanuatu
Moldova
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Reunion
Israel
Mauritius
Egypt
Cyprus
Martinique
Armenia
Afghanistan
Guadeloupe
Uzbekistan
Comoros
Tajikistan
204
198
194
185
178
171
166
162
154
141
129
128
125
111
103
100
95
91
90
90
77
76
76
69
56
44
44
41
41
35
32
31
29
25
24
24
22
21
20
20
15
7
7
36
265
119
61
71
88
71
35
16
64
22
0
57
0
115
8
8
16
48
56
70
9
3
0
1
11
27
14
63
5
18
31
19
30
50
2
5
13
3
12
5
4
1
16600
23549
2205
7265
16805
434
28258
6851
1188
3591
13772
822966
3883
10221
152233
861788
8628
184360
37436
7064
6683
71829
631245
1868187
577110
1600192
1543
227
29783
185261
9695
673
21626
1020
974071
8057
351
24882
641182
673
433865
236
140238
6956
2532
1834
1467
4966
68
1503
612
111
397
2471
122
4303
213
568
4077
571
319
2601
494
899
2175
1191
2471
529
2553
59
211
625
2969
268
489
149
326
3726
572
45
519
1064
59
712
350
507
1189
4225
1857
1871
1171
157
1896
1304
168
539
7040
5
3261
0
712
3320
575
366
4558
959
1309
2938
146
12
13
5459
149
630
1033
2220
249
573
104
216
140
385
81
698
729
84
309
369
131
222
20546
12339
4296
889
5066
2866
11166
3664
4381
16652
1
7254
0
1074
3349
1995
455
25006
2388
4194
8193
11
0
0
9996
808
10997
2099
2085
191
742
77
292
6
231
629
2252
755
818
205
690
63
43
26
1
4
22
2
6
3
2
10
9
104
7
99
13
9
3
10
5
3
5
9
44
55
47
10
1
0
4
12
8
1
9
2
9
8
1
2
2
2
5
0
4
86
15
2
5
65
1
8
3
2
7
13
21
24
11
12
11
6
10
3
3
6
8
22
13
9
5
1
0
4
4
5
3
4
5
8
5
1
1
4
1
3
1
1
65
38
17
20
63
7
32
16
9
19
35
3
37
0
20
35
10
17
11
7
16
17
9
1
0
13
4
2
7
6
8
15
7
8
6
5
2
3
8
3
4
3
1
11
120
174
156
27
161
121
140
140
105
73
0
57
0
58
46
75
54
71
76
51
43
1
0
0
15
39
38
26
12
11
12
9
11
1
7
19
15
6
14
4
4
1
0.8
0.4
1.1
1.2
0.7
3.0
0.5
0.8
3.0
1.6
0.3
0.0
0.7
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.1
0.8
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.3
1.3
0.1
1.3
0.0
0.3
2.0
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
1.9
0.6
1.2
2.4
2.2
3.2
2.6
1.2
3.8
2.5
0.5
18.8
0.8
5.2
3.8
0.9
2.9
7.1
0.3
2.2
1.1
0.5
2.4
0.6
1.7
0.2
4.3
0.3
1.0
0.3
3.4
1.7
6.1
2.9
0.4
1.4
2.9
0.5
0.7
1.9
0.9
0.6
0.4
5.4
0.6
1.3
2.9
4.4
3.2
3.2
1.3
3.9
2.5
0.5
50.0
0.9
4.4
1.2
3.3
8.6
0.3
2.5
1.2
0.5
6.4
8.3
0.0
0.2
4.5
0.3
1.1
0.4
4.3
2.1
8.8
3.7
4.8
1.9
3.0
0.6
0.9
1.9
1.6
0.7
1.0
5.0
0.6
1.4
3.6
3.0
3.2
4.2
1.3
3.8
2.4
0.4
0.0
0.8
5.4
1.4
3.8
11.9
0.3
3.2
1.2
0.5
9.1
0.2
4.8
0.3
1.2
0.6
5.8
1.6
11.7
3.8
16.7
3.0
3.0
0.7
0.8
1.7
2.0
0.6
1.6
2.6
1.1
0.8
1.0
3.4
1.7
1.5
0.3
0.4
1.3
0.1
0.0
0.5
6.4
0.1
0.3
1.9
0.2
1.7
1.3
0.1
1.9
0.0
7.7
0.1
2.8
0.1
2.0
0.1
4.1
2.4
10.5
5.9
34.2
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.2
1.3
1.0
0.4
0.5
7.9
1.7
2.2
3.8
7.8
4.9
4.7
1.5
4.3
3.8
0.5
50.0
1.4
10.8
1.3
3.6
10.6
0.4
4.2
2.5
0.6
8.3
8.3
7.7
0.3
7.3
0.5
3.1
0.5
8.4
4.4
19.3
9.6
39.0
2.3
3.7
1.1
1.1
3.2
2.5
1.0
1.5
7.7
1.7
2.1
3.7
7.4
4.3
4.7
1.5
4.2
3.8
0.5
50.0
1.4
10.6
1.3
3.6
10.5
0.4
4.0
2.5
0.6
8.3
8.3
7.7
0.3
7.1
0.5
3.0
0.5
8.2
4.1
19.3
9.1
39.0
2.3
3.5
1.1
1.1
3.1
2.5
1.0
1.5
Turkmenistan
Libya
Cape Verde
Iraq
Hong Kong
Lesotho
Palestina
Oman
Yemen
Niger
Mauritania
Eritrea
Jordan
United Arab Emirates
Djibouti
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Falkland Islands
Kuwait
Iceland
Western Sahara
7
7
4
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
20
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
466423
1615869
3862
442709
436
30302
6019
309101
452043
1183525
1040803
119719
88670
79190
21514
1908357
11214
11977
17384
99299
267282
69
55
41
133
117
110
5
0
2
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
16
13
58
242
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
3
24
8
280
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
3
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.9
1.4
1.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
5.2
0.0
2.7
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
8.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
-
5.2
21.1
54.1
4.5
0.6
40.0
33.3
0.0
-
10.3
21.1
56.8
4.5
1.0
40.0
33.3
0.0
-
10.3
21.1
56.8
4.5
1.0
40.0
33.3
0.0
-
Fig. S1.
National and climate-domain scale intercomparisons using ratio measures of aggregate
forest change ((loss+gain)/2000 forest) versus percent of aggregate forest change that is
forest loss (loss/(loss+gain)). Countries exhibiting a statistically significant trend in
forest loss during the study period are indicated (e.g. *** for p<0.05). Only countries
with >1000km2 of year 2000 >50% tree cover are shown. For this figure, forest is
defined as tree cover >50%. Regional groupings are highlighted, with magenta= USA
and Canada, green=Latin America, blue=Europe, red=Africa, brown=South Asia,
purple=Southeast Asia, orange=East Asia, and cyan=Australia and Oceania. Refer to
Tab. S1 and S3 for values.
Fig. S2
Ecozone and climate-domain scale intercomparisons using ratio measures of aggregate
forest change ((loss+gain)/2000 forest) versus percent of aggregate forest change that is
forest loss (loss/(loss+gain)). Ecozones exhibiting a statistically significant trend in
forest loss during the study period are indicated (e.g. *** for p<0.05). For this figure,
forest is defined as tree cover >50%. Colors refer to climate domains; NAM=North
America; SAM=South America; EAS=Eurasia; AFR=Africa; AUS=Australia and
Oceania. Refer to Tab. S1 and S2 for values.
Fig. S3
FAO FRA net forest area change, 2000 to 2010, versus Landsat-derived net change, 2000
to 2012. Colors denote regional groupings of Fig. S2.
Fig. S4
FAO FRA roundwood production in megatons of carbon totaled per country from 2000
through 2011 versus total Landsat-derived forest area loss and gain from 2000 to 2012.
Colors denote regional groupings of Fig. S2.
10
Fig. S5
Sample-based estimation of forest cover loss and gain, including all tree cover strata in
loss estimation. Map is from the Landsat-derived map product. Reference is from
validation data derived from multi-source image interpretation. Mean and two standard
error range are shown at global and climate domain scales.
11
Fig. S6
Sample-based difference of map minus reference forest loss and gain per block, including
all tree cover strata in loss estimation. Map is from the Landsat-derived map product.
Reference is from validation data derived from multi-source image interpretation. Mean
and two standard error range are shown at global and climate domain scales.
12
Fig. S7
GLAS-derived vegetation heights for Landsat-derived forest loss pixels. GLAS median
and quartiles are displayed by number of years from Landsat-estimated year of
disturbance.
13
Fig. S8
Median and quartile GLAS-derived vegetation heights for areas of Landsat-derived zero
percent tree cover in 2000 that were mapped as forest gain within the 2000 to 2012 study
period.
14
Table S4.
Regression results for selected regions comparing 2000-2010 FAO FRA net change and
2000-2011 FAO roundwood production versus 2000-2012 global Landsat-derived gross
forest area gain minus gross forest area loss for two tree cover thresholds (>1% and
>50%).
Net area change
Latin America (excluding Brazil)
Africa (excluding DRC)
Southeast Asia (excluding Indonesia)
Europe (excluding Russia)
Roundwood production
Latin America (excluding Brazil)
Africa (excluding DRC)
Southeast Asia (excluding Indonesia)
Europe (excluding Russia)
15
Table S5.
Accuracy assessment of 2000 to 2012 forest loss and gain at global and climate domain
scales.
Global (n=1500)
Loss error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Loss
No Loss
Total
Users (SE)
Map Loss
1.48
0.22
1.70
87.0 (2.8)
No Loss
0.20
98.10
98.30
99.8 (0.1)
Total
1.68
98.32
Producers
87.8 (2.8)
99.8 (0.1%)
Overall accuracy = 99.6% (0.7%)
Gain error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Gain
No Gain
Total
Users (SE)
Map Gain
0.41
0.13
0.54
76.4 (0.6)
No Gain
0.14
99.32
99.46
99.9 (0.0)
Total
0.55
99.45
Producers
73.9 (0.7)
99.9 (0.0)
Overall accuracy = 99.7% (0.6%)
16
Climate domains
Tropical (n=628)
Loss error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Loss
No Loss
Total
Users (SE)
Map Loss
1.50
0.22
1.72
87.0 (4.7)
No Loss
0.30
97.98
98.28
99.7 (0.1)
Total
1.80
98.20
Producers
83.1 (5.3)
99.8 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.5 (0.1)
Gain error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Gain
No Gain
Total
Users (SE)
Map Gain
0.19
0.04
0.23
81.9 (8.8)
No Gain
0.21
99.56
99.77
99.8 (0.1)
Total
0.40
99.60
Producers
48.0 (8.6)
99.9 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.7 (0.1)
17
Subtropical (n=295)
Loss error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Loss
No Loss
Total
Users
Map Loss
0.56
0.15
0.70
79.3 (8.6)
No Loss
0.14
99.16
99.30
99.8 (0.1)
Total
0.70
99.30
Producers
79.4 (7.4)
99.8 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.7 (0.1)
Gain error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Gain
No Gain
Total
Users (SE)
Map Gain
0.71
0.12
0.83
85.5 (8.9)
No Gain
0.15
99.02
99.17
99.8 (0.1)
Total
0.86
99.14
Producers
82.4 (5.1)
99.9 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.7 (0.1)
18
Temperate (n=298)
Loss error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Loss
No Loss
Total
Users (SE)
Map Loss
1.01
0.14
1.15
88.2 (5.4)
No Loss
0.07
98.79
98.85
99.9 (0.1)
Total
1.08
98.92
Producers
93.9 (4.1)
99.9 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.8 (0.1)
Gain error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Gain
No Gain
Total
Users (SE)
Map Gain
0.36
0.22
0.58
62.0 (15.0)
No Gain
0.11
99.31
99.42
99.9 (0.1)
Total
0.47
99.53
Producers
76.5 (14.5)
99.8 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.7 (0.1)
19
Boreal (n=258)
Loss error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Loss
No Loss
Total
Users (SE)
Map Loss
3.47
0.47
3.94
88.0 (4.7)
No Loss
0.23
95.83
96.06
99.8 (0.1)
Total
3.70
96.30
Producers
93.9 (1.7)
99.5 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.3 (0.2)
Gain error matrix expressed as percent of area (selected standard errors are shown in
parentheses)
Reference
Gain
No Gain
Total
Users (SE)
Map Gain
0.87
0.26
1.13
76.7 (11.8)
No Gain
0.01
98.85
98.86
99.9 (0.1)
Total
0.88
99.11
Producers
98.4 (1.1)
99.7 (0.1)
Overall accuracy = 99.7 (0.1)
20
26. C. Tucker, D. Grant, J. Dykstra, NASAs orthorectified Landsat data set. Photogramm. Eng.
Remote Sensing 70, 313322 (2004).
27. P. Potapov, S. A. Turubanova, M. C. Hansen, B. Adusei, M. Broich, A. Altstatt, L. Mane, C.
O. Justice, Quantifying forest cover loss in Democratic Republic of the Congo, 20002010. Remote Sens. Environ. 122, 106116 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.027
28. M. Broich, M. C. Hansen, P. Potapov, B. Adusei, E. Lindquist, S. V. Stehman, Time-series
analysis of multi-resolution optical imagery for quantifying forest cover loss in Sumatra
and Kalimantan, Indonesia. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs 13, 277291 (2011).
doi:10.1016/j.jag.2010.11.004
29. M. Hansen, A. Egorov, D. P. Roy, P. Potapov, J. Ju, S. Turubanova, I. Kommareddy, T. R.
Loveland, Continuous fields of land cover for the conterminous United States using
Landsat data: First results from the Web-Enabled Landsat Data (WELD) project. Remote
Sens. Letters 2, 279288 (2011). doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.519002
30. M. Hansen, R. S. DeFries, J. R. G. Townshend, M. Carroll, C. Dimiceli, R. A. Sohlberg,
Global percent tree cover at a spatial resolution of 500 meters: First results of the MODIS
vegetation continuous fields algorithm. Earth Interact. 7, 115 (2003). doi:10.1175/10873562(2003)007<0001:GPTCAA>2.0.CO;2
31. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olsen, C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees
(Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1984).
32. C. Chambers, A. Raniwala, F. Perry, S. Adams, R. R. Henry, R. Bradshaw, N. Weizenbaum,
FlumeJava: Easy, efficient data-parallel pipelines. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 45, 363375
(2010). doi:10.1145/1809028.1806638
33. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Global Forest Resources
Assessment (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2010).
34. A. Grainger, Difficulties in tracking the long-term global trend in tropical forest area. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 818823 (2008). doi:10.1073/pnas.0703015105 Medline
35. F. Achard, H. D. Eva, H. J. Stibig, P. Mayaux, J. Gallego, T. Richards, J. P. Malingreau,
Determination of deforestation rates of the worlds humid tropical forests. Science 297,
9991002 (2002). doi:10.1126/science.1070656 Medline
36. P. Gong, J. Wang, L. Yu, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhao, L. Liang, Z. Niu, X. Huang, H. Fu, S. Liu, C. Li,
X. Li, W. Fu, C. Liu, Y. Xu, X. Wang, Q. Cheng, L. Hu, W. Yao, H. Zhang, P. Zhu, Z.
Zhao, H. Zhang, Y. Zheng, L. Ji, Y. Zhang, H. Chen, A. Yan, J. Guo, L. Yu, L. Wang, X.
Liu, T. Shi, M. Zhu, Y. Chen, G. Yang, P. Tang, B. Xu, C. Giri, N. Clinton, Z. Zhu, J.
Chen, J. Chen, Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First
mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 26072654
(2013). doi:10.1080/01431161.2012.748992
37. J. Sexton et al., Global 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based
rescaling of MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields with lidar-based estimates of error.
Int. J. Digit. Earth 6, 427448 (2013).