Reputable international NGOs working on modern slavery claim that no brand can claim not to be supporting it. 71% of companies believe that there is a likelihood of modern slavery occurring at some stage in their supply chains. Identifying where the urgencies lie, requires good up-to-date data.
Reputable international NGOs working on modern slavery claim that no brand can claim not to be supporting it. 71% of companies believe that there is a likelihood of modern slavery occurring at some stage in their supply chains. Identifying where the urgencies lie, requires good up-to-date data.
Reputable international NGOs working on modern slavery claim that no brand can claim not to be supporting it. 71% of companies believe that there is a likelihood of modern slavery occurring at some stage in their supply chains. Identifying where the urgencies lie, requires good up-to-date data.
Heres how We have now reached the point where we know that no supply chain is clean of exploitative labour practices. In fact, reputable international NGOs working on modern slavery claim that no brand can claim not to be supporting it. A recent report by Ashridge Centre for Business and Sustainability and the Ethical Trading Initiative, reports that 71% of companies believe that there is a likelihood of modern slavery occurring at some stage in their supply chains (Lake et al, 2015:6). So what can brands bent on being sustainable do about this reality? Acknowledging this reality is certainly a precondition to making progress on identifying and resolving unethical labour practices in supply chains. But we need to go further. Sustainable brands need to move fast faster than the journalists to find urgent cases and actively support change. Identifying where the urgencies lie, requires good up-to-date data. Do we already have that? Well, we have auditors reports, which are invaluable. However audits cannot deliver all the data we need to check that a given site has ethical labour practices. Our over-reliance on audits to date has failed us. A series of tragedies - the most well-cited being Rana Plaza underlines this problem. Gathering strong data on the everyday working conditions of an entire workforce is simply impossible in a single audit visit. This data also isnt generated through hotlines and helplines (notoriously under-used and distrusted). The practice of auditors' leaving their business cards to enable workers to get in touch after the audit visit is similarly ineffective in generating a clear and well-evidenced picture of working conditions. We need statistically sound data, rather than anecdotes or complaints. This may seem a daunting challenge for sustainable brands. Where do you start? What follows is a series of steps that we hope you find helpful. 1. Map your supply chains. Go further than your first, second and third tier
suppliers. Go as far as the plantation, the mine and the vessel.
2. Confirm that all the sites are audited, and check how regularly this happens. On-site audit visits remain the sole source of insight into health and safety compliance, to name one example of their importance. 3. Start hearing from workers directly. Roll out a system to enable all workers to report their working conditions to you directly 2 to 4 times annually. This will accommodate seasonality and give you a balanced picture. 4. Protect workers identities. Ensure that you can always guarantee anonymity when engaging with workers about working conditions. Face to face interviews render workers vulnerable to intimidation or worse, and helplines are used by canaries and not by the most disempowered who are distrustful about who is listening. 5. Ensure that the results are easy to read and actionable, so you can quickly identify the urgencies and target your support and interventions where they are needed most. 6. Collaborate with other parties buying from the same site or working in the same geographies, to share the costs of gathering and analysing the data, and to increase support for suppliers to make the necessary improvements. 7. Dont think hearing from workers directly needs to be a drain on the supplier. Generating data on working conditions should not add to audit fatigue. The supplier sees the results first. A simple bar chart showing working conditions in a large workforce empowers the supplier to know where to start and what needs changing. 8. Finally sustainable brands dont need to do it alone. Steps 3 to 7 can be covered by well-established providers, and this wont break the bank. Cost effective sources of data direct from workers are out there. How do we know all this? Because this is what we do at &Wider. Go to www.andwider.com to find out more.
Tensions in the wine industry regarding working conditions helped to
trigger the establishment of the Ethical Trading Initiative which seeks to protect workers worldwide through enabling member companies to understand and practice ethical trade.
The fishing industry warrants special attention when it comes to
working conditions, given the challenge of monitoring working conditions on sea-going vessels.