Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17 District Collector
17 District Collector
Structure
I'
17.0
17.1
17.2
1 7.3
17.4
17.5
17.6
17.7
17.8
17.9
17.10
Objectives
Introductio~i
Evolution of the Office
Functions of the CoI lector
Collector and Panchayati Raj Institutions
Administrative Support
Colleebr 's Work: Some Constraints
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
References and Further Readings
Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
17.0 OBJECTIVES
If
1
17.1 INTRODUCTION
The institution of Collector, created more than 200 years ago, is one of the most
significant institutions transmitted by the colonial rulers to independent India's
public administration system. He is the highest functionary s f the District
Administration in the country. Several epithets are used to describe this institution.
"Annadata", "Maabaap", 'captain of the team', "eyes and ears of Government", are
some of the common descriptions. He is also described as "the kingpin of
administration", "the key-stone of the arch of district administration", "the area
specialist", and more recently in more benevolent terms, as 'friend, philosopher and
guide", "adviser, educator and helper", "the fulcrum of grassroots democracy", "the
mainspring of development" and so on. Even after independence he continues to
occupy a preeminent position at the district level and is the key functionary of the
State Government. Keeping in view the importance of District Collector, this unit
liighlights the evolution of the institution of the Collector; his role in district
administration; and the constraints, which inhibit the performance of his functions.
11
visaya. The Mughal rulers followed the system of administration of Hindu Kings.
Under the Mughal system the 'circar', which is comparable to the modern district
had three officers viz. Amalguzar, Amir Zuazi and Faujdar. The Amalguzar was a
principal revenue functionary of the circar and was responsible for the collection of
revenue and proper utilisation of land. He also exercised certain administrative
functions like punishing the robbers and some quasi-judicial functions like
settlement of disputed claims on land. However, he was basically responsible of the
collection and management of land revenue. Though, during, Mughal period Faujdar
enjoyed a dominant position in the district administration, Amalguzar performed all
revenue functions. Thus, before the advent of the British, there were territorial
divisions and officers of these divisions were responsible for realisation of land
revenue. These revenue officials were generally invested with several power and
functions. It was, no doubt, considered a feudal form of territorial organisation. The
territorial gradation of administrative areas more br less remained the same
notwithstanding the changes that were brought about in the system by the British.
The British built on the oriental system and established the present system of field
administration. The creation of a district as unit of administration and the
appointment of the District Collector as Head of District Administration laid the
foundation for stable administration in India. Granting of 'diwani' (civil
administration) in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa to the East India Company in 1765
marks the beginning of British revenue administration in India. In 1769 the
Company launched a scheme of English supervision over the local revenue
collecting institutions. East India Coppqny appo&ed covenanted servants as
supervisors during 1769-70 in the districts of the diwani provinces. The supervisors
were expected to report on the production and capacity of the lands; amount of
revenues and other taxes levied; and manner of collection etc. They were expected
not only to be concerned with revenue collection but also to have an overall
knowledge of all the factors that affected the district. But the system failed and the
company decided in 1772 to take over the entire executive management of public
revenues. Accordingly, Warren Hastigns issued a proclamation. On May 14'~,1772
the supervisors were appointed as Collectors. Thus, the institution of Collector was
created for the first time in 1772 during the period of Warren Hastings. From then
onwards collection of revenue became the most important duty of the company's
civil servants. The office of the District Collector became an important institution of
the British local administration. They were entrusted with the executive power of
management and collection of revenue and other duties of enquiry and investigation.
From then onwards the Collector's role has gone through several changes that is
period of strength, neglect etc. By the time India gained independence the District
Collector had become ah important hnctionary Heading the District Administration.
Revenue
The Collector started as a revenue functionary and he continues to be the principal
Revenue Officer and Head of the Revenue Administration in the district. After
It
District CoIIector
..................................................................................................
2) Trace evolution of the institution 6fCollector.
.................................................................................................
3) Explain revenue functions of the District Collector.
Secondly, the Collector has been kept out of Zilla Parishad completely because of a
feeling that it would burden the Collector, who is already over burdened. In some
States, the Collector is made Chairman of the standing committees vested with
power and decision-making. Finally, in some States, the Collector is a member of
Zilla Parishad without right to vote.
The relationship between Collector and Panchayati Raj Institutions can be studied
under different heads namely control over staff, power to suspend ~esolutions,power
to remove officers, and power to suspend and dissolve Panchayati Raj Institutions.
In these areas, the role of Collector varies from state and state. Some aspects of this.
would be discussed later in the Unit on Panchayati Raj. The Collector has power to
write confidential report and has authority to inflict various punishments, such power
vary from state to state. Similarly, the Collector can suspend the resolutions of
Panchayats. An association with these bodies will bring the Collector in intimate
relationship with the people's representatives. This provicies him an opportunity to
understand the dynamics of Development Administration at the district level.
I n practice, the role assigned to him varies from state to state as mentioned below:
In Tamil Nadu he is the Chairman of District Development Council.
In the States of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar he is entitled to attend the meetings of
the Panchayat Samiti and its standing committees but without a right to vote.
I
i
1I
!n Andhra Pradesh, he is not only the member of the Zilla Parishad but also the
Chairman of all the standing committees in whom executive authority is vested.
!
I
I
I
The unique feature about the controlling authority assigned to the Collector in Tamil
Nadu is that the District Collector has the overall controlling authority as the
District Collector
problems and constraints, which inhibit his work. Problems like frequent transfers,
increasing workload, political pressures, crisis situations, and individual orientation
of Collectors are a few which need to be examined in this context.
The Civil Servants need to have a tenure, which is long enough to understand the
environment, establish constructive relationships, and to implement the development
programmes. A well-accepted policy is to retain an officer in a particular place for a
period of three to five years. Unfortunately, this policy does not seem to be the
practice in case of the Collectors. A few studies, conducted on this issue indicate
that there are too frequent transfers inhibiting the proper performance of the
Collector's functions. For example, in Rajasthan, the average tenure of Collectors
was 14.2 months, which is not conducive to attain development objectives. This
indicates that they are dislocated before they acquaint themselves with the problems
of the district. Some of the Collectors have tenure of less than four months, and
there are very few Collectors who enjoy three years of tenure. This type of frequent
transfers apart from having a negative influence on the Collector would adversely
affect district development administration.
Political interference and pressure is another area affecting work of the Collectors.
Such pressures are generally brought to restrain the District Administration in cases
of land acquisition by the Government or use of judicial support for their followers
or issue of gun licenses or permits for scarce commodities like sugar etc. If the
District Collectors concede the request, they are accused of partisanship; and if they
resist the pressure, they are accused of being insensitive to the requests of the
people's representatives. Quite often, resistance to pressures leads to politicisation
of issues. This may even lead to transfer of the Collectors. This has an adverse
effect on performance of the Collector as an agent of change. It also adversely
affects their job performance.
The visiting dignitaries like the Minister frequently interrupt the Collector's work.
Protocol requires that the Collector must receive and be available to have discussions
with the visiting dignitaries. Thus, protocol duty is another area, which affects the
Collector's work to some extent.
!
t
I
I
One complaint often made is that the Collector is over-worked. Though studies are
few in this area. These studies revealed the varied nature of the workload of the
District Collectors. An analysis of the work of Collectors in the former Bombay
State indicates that the Collector spends 54 per cent of his time on correspondence,
26 per cent on tours, and the remaining 20 per cent on meeting the visitors, attending
to protocol duties, attending meetings and hearing cases. In another study conducted
by Jack Gillespie, it was shown that the Collectors spend 36 per cent of time on
correspondence, 18 per cent on tours, 11 per cent on receiving visitors and the
remaining time to other functions like attending meetings, protocol duties, job
related social activities etc. It was also revealed that the Collectors spend on an
average 70 hours a week for official functions. This means, about 10 hours everyday
including sundays and holidays. This indicates the amount of pressure on his time
and the increasing workload on the Collectors. These activities leave them with
hardly any time for reflection or concentration on development activities.
In the district, the Collector is responsible for the maintenance of law and order. In
practice Superintendent of Police, who is the Head of the Police force, in the district
looks after this function under the overall supervision of the Collector. Quite often,
the people come to the Collector with the complaints about the partisan attitude of
the police and their failures. The Collector's association is indirect and minimal after
the separation of functions, that is judicial and executive. The relations with the
police have always been very delicate and sensitive to the Collector. In recent years,
police began to resent the control of the Collector in the maintenance of law and
order. There have been cases of strained relations between the two. With increasini
unrest in the rural areas, the role of Collector is becoming increasingly important in
the maintenance of peace and tranquility.
District Collector
Lakhina Experiment
Need for administ~atlteefficiency and also responsiveness to the community led
Mr. Anil Kumar Lakhina, a District Collector, to undertake an exercise to reform
disttlct administration, The exercise was done in the Collectorate of Ahmednagar in
Satara district of Maharashtra. Some of the changes brought about in the District
Administration includes regulation of visitors to the Collectorate; designing the
office as per task sequence, making documents available to those who handle them;
preparation of desk manbals, weeding out documents which had outlived their
usefulne~s,provision of dust proof and fire fighting equipment; motivation and
training etc. This experiment revolved around the assumption that attitudinal
changes in the administrator can result in effective administration. It sought to link
attitudinal changes vbith physical work environment. The experiment was
undertaken in only one district and possibility of its adoption elsewhere is yet to be
proved. But the Lakhina experiment is a pointer that structural changes coupled with
attitudinal changes and the 'will' to adopt reforms can bring efficiency in district
administration, What is true of the Collectorate is equally true of other
administrative organs At the district level.
%beckYour Pragress 2
Note; I) Use the spake given below for your answers.
ii) Check your answers with those given at the end of the Unit.
1) Explain role of the Collector in Panchayati Raj Institutions.
.................................................................................................
District Collector
.................................................................................................
3) Discuss the problems that Collectors face in the performance of their duties.
Maheshwari, S.R, 2003, Indian Administration, Orinet Longmans Pvt. Ltd, New
Delhi.
17.10
l'
3)
In some States, the Collector has power 'to suspend and dissolve the
Panchayati Raj Institutions.
2)
District Collectol
3)