CE 696 Oral Presentation

Instruction:

Semester: ______________________

Tilte of Paper: __________________________________________

Every presentation will be rated using the criteria below. Each criterion will receive a maximum score of 4. Please listen to each presentation carefully.
Rating
Criteria

Name

Name:

Name:

Name:

Preparation (Did the presenter bring adequate materials to aid

his/her presentation?)
Professional Appearance (Did the team dress neatly to give a
professional image?)
Organization (Is the presentation presented in a concise and
organized manner?)
Content (Is the objective clearly defined? Did the presenter
clearly explain the activities performed?)
Delivery (Did the audience hear and understand what the
presenter is talking about?)
Voice Projection and Vocal Delivery
Eye Contact and Gestures
Pace
Clarity of Expression
Time management (Did the presenter finish presentation
within the allotted time?)
Audience involvement (Did the presentation stimulate the
audience, e.g. audience reaction, questions, comments?)
Total Score

Comment:

Preparation

Very well prepared

Very good quality of visuals; very
good balance of texts, figures and
tables; Adequate number of slides

Well prepared
Good quality of visuals; good balance
of texts, figures and tables
Many slides

Prepared
Acceptable quality of visuals
Fair balance of texts, figures and
tables
Too much slide transitions

Unprepared
Poor quality of visuals
Too much texts or figures or
tables
Cluttered slides

Professional
Appearance

Very Neatly and appropriately dress

Neatly and appropriately dressed

Casually dressed

Very casually dressed

Organization

Strong logical order and transition

Strong introduction and conclusion

Good logical order and transition;

Weak introduction or conclusion

Weak logical order and transition;

Lacks introduction or conclusion

Disorganized

Content

Mastery of topic
Focused on important issue
Good conclusion

Demonstrates adequate understanding

of topic
Important issue not adequately covered

Demonstrates some understanding

of topic
Too much issues covered
lacks conclusion

Lacks understanding of topic

Poor unconvincing conclusion

Voice
Projection

Very Clear and audible

Clear and audible

Sometimes audible

Inaudible

Vocal
Delivery

Very lively and interesting;

very enthusiastic and energetic

Lively and interesting; enthusiastic

and energetic

Lacks energy and enthusiasm

Monotone

Eye Contact

Consistently makes eye contact;

always faces audience, rarely reads
from screen

Makes consistent eye contact with

limited number of audience

Sometimes makes eye contact;

seldom faces audience, always reads
from screen

No eye contact; does not face

audience; reads a lot

Gestures

Consistently reinforces verbal

message

Often reinforces verbal message

Often shows distracting gestures or

rarely reinforce verbal message

Too many distracting gestures or

does not have any gestures

Pace

Very good speed; consistently

effective

Good speed; effective

Sometimes too fast or too slow

Consistently too fast or too slow

Clarity of
Expression

No verbal filters (oh, ah, hmm); uses

professional language

Minimal verbal filters (oh, ah, hmm);

uses professional language

Many verbal filters (oh, ah, hmm);

sometimes uses casual language

Too much use of verbal filters;

Time management

Outstanding use of time;

Within time limit

Dwells too much on one issue;

Too long or too short

Audience
Involvement

Very good rapport with audience

Answers questions correctly

Good rapport with audience;

adequately answers questions

Little rapport with audience;

answers questions vaguely

No rapport with audience

Unable to answer question

Delivery