Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cordero v. US District Court, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    John Cordero filed a motion under Rule 60(b) seeking to challenge orders in his criminal case. The district court denied the motion. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7463

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Cordero filed a motion under Rule 60(b) seeking to challenge orders in his criminal case. The district court denied the motion. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Cordero v. US District Court, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Cordero filed a motion under Rule 60(b) seeking to challenge orders in his criminal case. The district court denied the motion. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7463

    JOHN CORDERO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
    OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-2368-3-17-BD)

    Submitted:

    November 9, 2001

    Decided:

    November 26, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Cordero, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Cordero appeals from the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought to
    challenge certain orders in his criminal case.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Cordero

    v.

    United

    States

    (D.S.C. July 3, 2001).

    Dist.

    Court,

    No.

    CA-01-2368-3-17-BD

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like