Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rhodes v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Button Jack Rhodes, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Rhodes appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Rhodes' detention was lawful. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7100

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Button Jack Rhodes, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Rhodes appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Rhodes' detention was lawful. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Rhodes v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Button Jack Rhodes, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Rhodes appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Rhodes' detention was lawful. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7100

    BUTTON JACK RHODES,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH BROOKS,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-03-735)

    Submitted:

    November 22, 2004

    Decided:

    December 10, 2004

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Button Jack Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Button Jack Rhodes, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under


    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Rhodes v. Brooks, No. CA-03-735 (E.D. Va. June
    25, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like