Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hicks v. Prince Graves Homes, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Joy Hicks appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against Prince Graves Homes as frivolous to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1908

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Joy Hicks appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against Prince Graves Homes as frivolous to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Hicks v. Prince Graves Homes, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joy Hicks appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against Prince Graves Homes as frivolous to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1908

    JOY HICKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PRINCE GRAVES HOMES,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CA-96-321)
    Submitted:

    November 21, 1996

    Decided:

    December 3, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joy Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order summarily dismissing the complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
    magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Prince Graves
    Homes, No. CA-96-321 (M.D.N.C. June 13, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like