Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nathaniel Brown v. Giant Foods Inc., 46 F.3d 1122, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Nathaniel Brown appealed a district court's order that granted summary judgment to Giant Foods Inc. in Brown's case against them and denied Brown's motions for sanctions, to suppress evidence, and for his own summary judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Brown's appeal was without merit based on their review of the record and the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 46 F.3d 1122 Docket: 94-2246

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nathaniel Brown appealed a district court's order that granted summary judgment to Giant Foods Inc. in Brown's case against them and denied Brown's motions for sanctions, to suppress evidence, and for his own summary judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Brown's appeal was without merit based on their review of the record and the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Nathaniel Brown v. Giant Foods Inc., 46 F.3d 1122, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nathaniel Brown appealed a district court's order that granted summary judgment to Giant Foods Inc. in Brown's case against them and denied Brown's motions for sanctions, to suppress evidence, and for his own summary judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Brown's appeal was without merit based on their review of the record and the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    46 F.

    3d 1122

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nathaniel BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    GIANT FOODS INC., Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 94-2246.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 20, 1994.
    Decided Jan. 27, 1995.

    Nathaniel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Annis Farson, JORDAN,


    COYNE & SAVITS, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering summary judgment
    for Defendant and denying Appellant's motions for sanctions, to suppress, and
    for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Giant Food, Inc., No. CA-94-418
    (E.D. Va. May 20 & Sept. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like