Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lang v. Nordstrom, Inc, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Steven Lang appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment for Nordstrom in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The district court denied relief for reasons stated in court and because the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Lang did not challenge the statute of limitations finding in his brief, and the action was filed outside the limitations period. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1527

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Lang appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment for Nordstrom in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The district court denied relief for reasons stated in court and because the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Lang did not challenge the statute of limitations finding in his brief, and the action was filed outside the limitations period. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lang v. Nordstrom, Inc, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Lang appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment for Nordstrom in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The district court denied relief for reasons stated in court and because the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, as Lang did not challenge the statute of limitations finding in his brief, and the action was filed outside the limitations period. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1527

    STEVEN E. LANG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORDSTROM, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-99-1175-A)

    Submitted:

    September 18, 2001

    Decided:

    October 22, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Steven E. Lang, Appellant Pro Se.
    Stephen William Robinson,
    MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven E. Lang appeals from the district courts order granting summary judgment for Defendant in Langs action under the Fair
    Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C.A. 201 - 219 (West 1998
    & Supp. 2001). The district court denied relief for reasons stated
    from the bench and because Langs action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

    Because Lang fails to challenge in

    his informal appellate brief the district courts finding that his
    action was time-barred, this issue is not preserved for review.
    See 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b).

    Accordingly, we affirm the district

    courts order granting summary judgment on the ground that Lang


    filed the action outside the limitations period.

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like