Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tolbert v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moses Tonkllie Tolbert's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6858

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moses Tonkllie Tolbert's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Tolbert v. Ashcroft, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moses Tonkllie Tolbert's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6858

    MOSES TONKLLIE TOLBERT,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-36-JFM)

    Submitted:

    July 18, 2002

    Decided:

    July 25, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Moses Tonkllie Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio,
    United States Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United
    States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Moses Tonkllie Tolbert appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Tolbert v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-36-JFM (D. Md.

    Apr. 16, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like