Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Comer, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Gregory Comer appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial. The appellate court found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-8081

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gregory Comer appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial. The appellate court found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Comer, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gregory Comer appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial. The appellate court found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-8081

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GREGORY VONZELL COMER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-95-69)

    Submitted:

    February 21, 2002

    Decided:

    March 7, 2002

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gregory Vonzell Comer, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory Vonzell Comer appeals from the district courts order
    denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A.
    3582(c)(2) (West 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we


    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States v.

    Comer, No. CR-95-69 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2001).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like