Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gilbert Chambers v. Edward Murray R.J. Beck G.P. Dodson D.A. Braxton R.A. Young, 70 F.3d 111, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The court dismissed the appeal of the district court's denial of the appellants' renewed motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the order was not a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. As such, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal and dismissed the case as interlocutory. The court also denied the appellants' motion to stay proceedings in the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-11-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 70 F.3d 111 Docket: 95-7253

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The court dismissed the appeal of the district court's denial of the appellants' renewed motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the order was not a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. As such, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal and dismissed the case as interlocutory. The court also denied the appellants' motion to stay proceedings in the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Gilbert Chambers v. Edward Murray R.J. Beck G.P. Dodson D.A. Braxton R.A. Young, 70 F.3d 111, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The court dismissed the appeal of the district court's denial of the appellants' renewed motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the order was not a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. As such, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal and dismissed the case as interlocutory. The court also denied the appellants' motion to stay proceedings in the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    70 F.

    3d 111

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Gilbert CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Edward MURRAY; R.J. Beck; G.P. Dodson; D.A. Braxton;
    R.A. Young, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 95-7253.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 19, 1995.
    Decided Nov. 17, 1995.

    Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,


    for Appellants. Gilbert Chambers, Appellee Pro Se.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellants appeal from the district court's denial of their renewed motion for
    summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
    order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
    Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither
    a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

    We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny Appellants' motion to


    stay proceedings in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like