Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Timothy Wallace, 859 F.2d 151, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Timothy Wallace appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's judgment without oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-09-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 859 F.2d 151 Docket: 88-7672

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy Wallace appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's judgment without oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    United States v. Timothy Wallace, 859 F.2d 151, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Wallace appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's judgment without oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    859 F.

    2d 151
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Timothy WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 88-7672.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 29, 1988.
    Dismissed Sept. 15, 1988.

    Timothy Wallace, appellant pro se.


    Charles Preston Scheeler, Office of U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Timothy Wallace appeals the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b)
    motion for a reduction of his sentence. Because we find that the district court
    did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, we affirm its judgment. We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would
    not significantly aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like