Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crepeau, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Theresa Crepeau appealed a district court order denying her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Crepeau's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Crepeau was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7537

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Theresa Crepeau appealed a district court order denying her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Crepeau's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Crepeau was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Crepeau, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Theresa Crepeau appealed a district court order denying her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Crepeau's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Crepeau was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7537

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    THERESA CREPEAU, a/k/a T. Crepeau,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (CR-94-2, CA-01-68-4)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    January 9, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Theresa Crepeau, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Theresa Crepeau appeals the district courts order denying her
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

    ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See United States v. Crepeau, Nos. CR-94-2; CA-01-68-4

    (E.D. Va. July 10, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like