Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bayerle v. Bucklew, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Martin Bayerle filed a § 1983 complaint against trustees and committee members of West Virginia University. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without requiring additional oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2054

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Martin Bayerle filed a § 1983 complaint against trustees and committee members of West Virginia University. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without requiring additional oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Bayerle v. Bucklew, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Martin Bayerle filed a § 1983 complaint against trustees and committee members of West Virginia University. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed without requiring additional oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2054

    MARTIN G. BAYERLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NEIL S. BUCKLEW; RICHARD ADAMS; CATHY M.
    ARMSTRONG; KAY GOODWIN; DAVID C. HARDESTY,
    JR.; JOHN R. HOBLITZELL; JOHN G. HOPKINS, V;
    LUCIA B. JAMES; CHARLES W. MANNING; HENRY R.
    MAROCKIE; PAUL R. MARTINELLI; JON A. MCBRIDE;
    ROBERT A. MCMILLAN; A. MICHAEL PERRY; JOSEPH
    W. POWELL; C. ALLAN ROBERTS; HENRY G. TAYLOR;
    DAVID G. TODD; CLIFFORD M. TRUMP, Trustees,
    Individually; ROBERT M. BASTRESS; THOMAS CADY;
    LISA EICHHORN; ROBERT G. LATHROP; MAJORIE
    MCDIARMID, Committee Members, Individually,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-144)
    Submitted:

    March 21, 1996

    Decided:

    March 29, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Martin G. Bayerle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Randolph Brooks,


    FURBEE, AMOS, WEBB & CRITCHFIELD, Fairmont, West Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Bayerle v. Bucklew, No. CA-94-144 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 28,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like