Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tucker v. AT&T Company, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Mary Tucker filed a civil suit against her employer American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T) arising under § 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act. The district court granted AT&T's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Tucker's suit. Tucker appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for AT&T based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1804

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mary Tucker filed a civil suit against her employer American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T) arising under § 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act. The district court granted AT&T's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Tucker's suit. Tucker appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for AT&T based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Tucker v. AT&T Company, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mary Tucker filed a civil suit against her employer American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T) arising under § 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act. The district court granted AT&T's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Tucker's suit. Tucker appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for AT&T based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1804

    MARY TUCKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    AMERICAN TELEPHONE
    INCORPORATED,

    &

    TELEGRAPH

    COMPANY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CA-95-426-3-MU)
    Submitted:

    October 20, 1997

    Decided:

    November 17, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mary Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.
    Charles Evans Johnson, Brian
    Christian Lambert, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P., Charlotte, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's civil
    suit arising under 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act,
    29 U.S.C. 185(a) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. American
    Telephone & Telegraph, Co., No. CA-95-426-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like