Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hancock v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Preston Hancock appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint without prejudice for failing to return a consent form for the collection of fees. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6662

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Preston Hancock appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint without prejudice for failing to return a consent form for the collection of fees. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    Hancock v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Preston Hancock appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint without prejudice for failing to return a consent form for the collection of fees. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6662

    PRESTON HANCOCK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:08-cv-00014-HEH)

    Submitted:

    June 19, 2008

    Decided:

    June 25, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Preston

    Hancock

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a


    consent to the collection of fees form.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Hancock v. Brown, No.

    3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like