Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re Aaron Holsey, 23 F.3d 401, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Aaron Holsey filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the reassignment of his cases in the District of Maryland to a different district judge. The court denied the petition because Holsey failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would warrant recusal. As Holsey did not demonstrate evidence of bias, the court denied mandamus relief and oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-04-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 23 F.3d 401 Docket: 93-8081

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Aaron Holsey filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the reassignment of his cases in the District of Maryland to a different district judge. The court denied the petition because Holsey failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would warrant recusal. As Holsey did not demonstrate evidence of bias, the court denied mandamus relief and oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    In Re Aaron Holsey, 23 F.3d 401, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Aaron Holsey filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the reassignment of his cases in the District of Maryland to a different district judge. The court denied the petition because Holsey failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would warrant recusal. As Holsey did not demonstrate evidence of bias, the court denied mandamus relief and oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    23 F.

    3d 401
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    In re Aaron HOLSEY, Petitioner.


    No. 93-8081.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 17, 1994.
    Decided April 4, 1994.

    Aaron Holsey, petitioner pro se.


    PETITION DENIED.
    Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Aaron Holsey petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district
    court to reassign his cases in the District of Maryland to another district judge.
    Holsey has failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would
    warrant recusal. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827-32 (4th Cir.1987).
    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus
    relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would
    not significantly aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED.

    You might also like