Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mohamed v. Frye, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Mohamed's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7487

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Mohamed's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Mohamed v. Frye, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed of a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Mohamed's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7487

    HAKEEM MUSTAFA ALI MOHAMED,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DEPUTY FRYE, #8825,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-02-682-2)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2002

    Decided:

    December 4, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Mohamed v. Frye, No.

    CA-02-682-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2002; entered Sept. 6, 2002).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like