Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wedington v. US District Court, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Scott Wedington appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Wedington's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had found the original complaint frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7451

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Scott Wedington appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Wedington's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had found the original complaint frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Wedington v. US District Court, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Scott Wedington appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Wedington's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had found the original complaint frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7451

    SCOTT WEDINGTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
    OF MARYLAND,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA03-2431-8-DKC)

    Submitted: January 29, 2004

    Decided:

    February 6, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Scott

    Wedington

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under


    28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Wedington v.

    U.S. District Court, No. CA-03-2431-8-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2003).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like